scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Ballistic Resistance of Sandwich Panels with Aluminum Foam and Auxetic Honeycomb Cores

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 589216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Yang ◽  
Chang Qi ◽  
Dong Wang ◽  
Renjing Gao ◽  
Haitao Hu ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Qi ◽  
Shu Yang ◽  
Dong Wang ◽  
Li-Jun Yang

The dynamic responses of honeycomb sandwich panels (HSPs) subjected to in-plane projectile impact were studied by means of explicit nonlinear finite element simulations using LS-DYNA. The HSPs consisted of two identical aluminum alloy face-sheets and an aluminum honeycomb core featuring three types of unit cell configurations (regular, rectangular-shaped, and reentrant hexagons). The ballistic resistances of HSPs with the three core configurations were first analyzed. It was found that the HSP with the reentrant auxetic honeycomb core has the best ballistic resistance, due to the negative Poisson’s ratio effect of the core. Parametric studies were then carried out to clarify the influences of both macroscopic (face-sheet and core thicknesses, core relative density) and mesoscopic (unit cell angle and size) parameters on the ballistic responses of the auxetic HSPs. Numerical results show that the perforation resistant capabilities of the auxetic HSPs increase as the values of the macroscopic parameters increase. However, the mesoscopic parameters show nonmonotonic effects on the panels' ballistic capacities. The empirical equations for projectile residual velocities were formulated in terms of impact velocity and the structural parameters. It was also found that the blunter projectiles result in higher ballistic limits of the auxetic HSPs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 861-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
QN Zhang ◽  
XW Zhang ◽  
GX Lu ◽  
D Ruan

To study the protection property of aluminum alloy sandwich panels with honeycomb cores under the attack of bullets or debris, quasi-static perforation, and ballistic impact tests were conducted, in which the thicknesses of the face sheet and core were 0.5–2.0 and 12.7 mm, respectively, while projectiles with diameter 7.5 mm and impact velocity 50–220 m/s were employed. Based on the experiments, the influences of impact velocity, face sheet thickness, core density as well as the nose shape of the projectiles were investigated. The results showed that in the impact tests, the sandwich panels dissipated much more energy than those in quasi-static perforation tests, and the energy absorption and ballistic limit of the sandwich panels increased with the increase of impact velocity. The influence of face sheet thickness was more remarkable than the core density, which was due to the relative density of honeycomb is too small. Although the increase of core density could induce the increase of energy absorption, this effect is more effective for thinner face sheet. Moreover, under the same impact velocity about 200 m/s and face sheet thickness 1.0 mm, the ballistic limit for conical-nosed projectile is highest, while it is lowest for flat-nosed projectile.


2015 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Yu ◽  
B. Han ◽  
C. Y. Ni ◽  
Q. C. Zhang ◽  
C. Q. Chen ◽  
...  

Under quasi-static uniaxial compression, inserting aluminum foams into the interstices of a metallic sandwich panel with corrugated core increased significantly both its peak crushing strength and energy absorption per unit mass. This beneficial effect diminished however if the foam relative density was relatively low or the compression velocity became sufficiently high. To provide insight into the varying role of aluminum foam filler with increasing compression velocity, the crushing response and collapse modes of all metallic corrugate-cored sandwich panels filled with close-celled aluminum foams were studied using the method of finite elements (FEs). The constraint that sandwich panels with and without foam filling had the same total weight was enforced. The effects of plastic hardening and strain rate sensitivity of the strut material as well as foam/strut interfacial debonding were quantified. Three collapse modes (quasi-static, transition, and shock modes) were identified, corresponding to different ranges of compression velocity. Strengthening due to foam insertion and inertial stabilization both acted to provide support for the struts against buckling. At relatively low compression velocities, the struts were mainly strengthened by the surrounding foam; at high compression velocities, inertia stabilization played a more dominant role than foam filling.


Author(s):  
F. W. Zok * ◽  
H. Rathbun ◽  
M. He ◽  
E. Ferri ◽  
C. Mercer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document