scholarly journals Confidence Intervals for the Coefficient of Variation in a Normal Distribution with a Known Population Mean

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wararit Panichkitkosolkul

This paper presents three confidence intervals for the coefficient of variation in a normal distribution with a known population mean. One of the proposed confidence intervals is based on the normal approximation. The other proposed confidence intervals are the shortest-length confidence interval and the equal-tailed confidence interval. A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to compare the performance of the proposed confidence intervals with the existing confidence intervals. Simulation results have shown that all three proposed confidence intervals perform well in terms of coverage probability and expected length.

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wararit Panichkitkosolkul

An approximate confidence interval for the reciprocal of a normal population mean with a known coefficient of variation is proposed. This has applications in the area of nuclear physics, agriculture and economic when the researcher knows the coefficient of variation. The proposed confidence interval is based on the approximate expectation and variance of the estimator by Taylor series expansion. A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to compare the performance of the proposed confidence interval with the existing confidence interval. Simulation results show that the proposed confidence interval performs as well as the existing one in terms of coverage probability. However, the approximate confidence interval is very easy to calculate compared with the exact confidence interval.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 261-278
Author(s):  
Warisa Thangjai ◽  
Sa-Aat Niwitpong ◽  
Suparat Niwitpong

The coefficient of variation is widely used as a measure of data precision. Confidence intervals for a single coefficient of variation when the data follow a normal distribution that is symmetrical and the difference between the coefficients of variation of two normal populations are considered in this paper. First, the confidence intervals for the coefficient of variation of a normal distribution are obtained with adjusted generalized confidence interval (adjusted GCI), computational, Bayesian, and two adjusted Bayesian approaches. These approaches are compared with existing ones comprising two approximately unbiased estimators, the method of variance estimates recovery (MOVER) and generalized confidence interval (GCI). Second, the confidence intervals for the difference between the coefficients of variation of two normal distributions are proposed using the same approaches, the performances of which are then compared with the existing approaches. The highest posterior density interval was used to estimate the Bayesian confidence interval. Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess the performance of the confidence intervals. The results of the simulation studies demonstrate that the Bayesian and two adjusted Bayesian approaches were more accurate and better than the others in terms of coverage probabilities and average lengths in both scenarios. Finally, the performances of all of the approaches for both scenarios are illustrated via an empirical study with two real-data examples.


1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Kabaila

We consider a linear regression model with regression parameters (θ1,...,θp) and error variance parameter σ2. Our aim is to find a confidence interval with minimum coverage probability 1 − α for a parameter of interest θ1 in the presence of nuisance parameters (θ2,...,θp,σ2). We consider two confidence intervals, the first of which is the standard confidence interval for θ1 with coverage probability 1 − α. The second confidence interval for θ1 is obtained after a variable selection procedure has been applied to θp. This interval is chosen to be as short as possible subject to the constraint that it has minimum coverage probability 1 − α. The confidence intervals are compared using a risk function that is defined as a scaled version of the expected length of the confidence interval. We show that, subject to certain conditions including that [(dimension of response vector) − p] is small, the second confidence interval is preferable to the first when we anticipate (without being certain) that |θp|/σ is small. This comparison of confidence intervals is shown to be mathematically equivalent to a corresponding comparison of prediction intervals.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peyton Cook

This article is intended to help students understand the concept of a coverage probability involving confidence intervals. Mathematica is used as a language for describing an algorithm to compute the coverage probability for a simple confidence interval based on the binomial distribution. Then, higher-level functions are used to compute probabilities of expressions in order to obtain coverage probabilities. Several examples are presented: two confidence intervals for a population proportion based on the binomial distribution, an asymptotic confidence interval for the mean of the Poisson distribution, and an asymptotic confidence interval for a population proportion based on the negative binomial distribution.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Traoré Boubakar ◽  
Diabaté Lassina ◽  
Touré Belco ◽  
Fané Abdou

An interesting topic in mathematical statistics is that of the construction of the confidence intervals. Two kinds of intervals which are both based on the method of pivotal quantity are the shortest confidence interval and the equal tail confidence intervals. The aim of this paper is to clarify and comment on the finding of such intervals and to investigation the relation between the two kinds of intervals. In particular, we will give a construction technique of the shortest confidence intervals for the mean of the standard normal distribution. Examples illustrating the use of this technique are given.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-334
Author(s):  
Ahad Malekzadeh ◽  
Seyed Mahdi Mahmoudi

AbstractIn this paper, to construct a confidence interval (general and shortest) for quantiles of normal distribution in one population, we present a pivotal quantity that has non-central t distribution. In the case of two independent normal populations, we propose a confidence interval for the ratio of quantiles based on the generalized pivotal quantity, and we introduce a simple method for extracting its percentiles, based on which a shorter confidence interval can be created. Also, we provide general and shorter confidence intervals using the method of variance estimate recovery. The performance of five proposed methods will be examined by using simulation and examples.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Wararit Panichkitkosolkul

An asymptotic test and an approximate test for the reciprocal of a normal mean with a known coefficient of variation were proposed in this paper. The asymptotic test was based on the expectation and variance of the estimator of the reciprocal of a normal mean. The approximate test used the approximate expectation and variance of the estimator by Taylor series expansion. A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to compare the performance of the two statistical tests. Simulation results showed that the two proposed tests performed well in terms of empirical type I errors and power. Nevertheless, the approximate test was easier to compute than the asymptotic test.


Computation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Yousef ◽  
Hosny Hamdy

This paper sequentially estimates the inverse coefficient of variation of the normal distribution using Hall’s three-stage procedure. We find theorems that facilitate finding a confidence interval for the inverse coefficient of variation that has pre-determined width and coverage probability. We also discuss the sensitivity of the constructed confidence interval to detect a possible shift in the inverse coefficient of variation. Finally, we find the asymptotic regret encountered in point estimation of the inverse coefficient of variation under the squared-error loss function with linear sampling cost. The asymptotic regret provides negative values, which indicate that the three-stage sampling does better than the optimal fixed sample size had the population inverse coefficient of variation been known.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document