scholarly journals Use and Indications of Human Acellular Dermis in Ventral Hernia Repair at a Community Hospital

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
William W. Hope ◽  
Devan Griner ◽  
Ashley Adams ◽  
W. Borden Hooks ◽  
Thomas V. Clancy

Background. To evaluate the use, indications, and short-term outcomes for human acellular dermis. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed patients having human acellular dermis placed for ventral hernia repair from January 2008 through October 2009. Demographic information, operative details, and outcomes of patients with and without recurrences were compared; a P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results. 115 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 60 years (range, 24–89). The technique of repair included primary repair with overlay of mesh in 76%, bridge repair in 13%, and underlay in 11%. Average cost of mesh per operation was $3,709 (range $191–10,630). Open repairs were performed in 90% of patients with addition of component separation in 12%. At an average of 13 months, 58 patients were available for followup (50%), with a 47% recurrence rate. The morbidity rate was 48% and the mortality rate was 2%. Technique of repair was the only significant risk factor for recurrence with bridge repairs associated with a higher rate of recurrence (). Conclusions. The use of biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair is becoming more popular especially in clean cases. Although followup is limited, there remains a high recurrence rate associated with the use of human acellular dermis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianchen Wang ◽  
Jianmin Chen ◽  
Yake Chen ◽  
Yuqian Han ◽  
Hongyue Zhang

The study was performed to determine the complication and recurrence rate using the modified Kugel oval patch for small ventral hernia repair. Another aim of the study was to find risk factors for recurrence in patients with this repair. Seventy-three patients underwent ventral hernia repair with the modified Kugel oval patch between April 2013 and February 2015. Prospective follow-up data (18 months postoperative) were collected and evaluated. A total of 58 primary (18 epigastric/40 umbilical) and 15 incisional ventral hernias were repaired with the modified Kugel oval patch (7.6/10.2 cm/8 x 12 cm). We found three patients suffered superficial wound infection and two participants got hernia recurrence. Placement of mesh was found to be a significant risk factor for hernia recurrence. Small ventral hernia repair using the modified Kugel oval patch is a novel and useful approach and we recommend placing the patch preperitoneally.


2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (11) ◽  
pp. 1213-1218
Author(s):  
Sarah S. Fox ◽  
Li-Ching Huang ◽  
W. Borden Hooks ◽  
John P. Fischer ◽  
William W. Hope

The best method for fascial closure during hernia repair remains unknown. This study evaluates the impact of fascial closure techniques on short-term outcomes. All patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair were queried using the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative database. Analysis was stratified by suture type (absorbable and permanent) and technique (figure-of-eight, running, and interrupted). Outcome measures included SSI, surgical site occurrence (SSO), SSO requiring intervention, recurrence rate, and quality of life. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used. The study included 6544 patients. Two-thirds of surgeons closed fascia during ventral hernia repair with absorbable suture and one-third with permanent suture. In the absorbable group, 17 per cent used figure-of-eight, 46 per cent running, and 4 per cent interrupted suture. In the permanent group, 13 per cent used figure-of-eight, 8 per cent running, and 11 per cent interrupted suture. There was no significant association between SSO and closure technique ( P = 0.2). However, SSO and suture type were significant ( P < 0.001) with the odds of SSO for closure with absorbable suture being 62 per cent higher than the odds of permanent. Fascial closure technique and suture type had no significant association ( P > 0.5) with SSI, SSO requiring intervention, hernia recurrence rate, or HerQLes or NIH PROMIS 3a scores at 30 days or 6 months. Fascial closure technique and suture material do not have a major impact on outcomes in ventral hernia repair. Despite a significantly higher rate of SSO for absorbable sutures than permanent, this did not increase the rate of interventions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 718-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sambit Sahoo ◽  
Andrew R. Baker ◽  
Ivy N. Haskins ◽  
David M. Krpata ◽  
Michael J. Rosen ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 256 (6) ◽  
pp. 955-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederik Helgstrand ◽  
Jacob Rosenberg ◽  
Henrik Kehlet ◽  
Pernille Strandfelt ◽  
Thue Bisgaard

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1264-1268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambar Banerjee ◽  
Catherine Beck ◽  
Vimal K. Narula ◽  
John Linn ◽  
Sabrena Noria ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Imsirovic ◽  
Rahul Bagga ◽  
Mansoor Khan ◽  
Krishna Singh ◽  
Parv Sains ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Robotic incisional/ventral hernia repair (R-IVHR) is gaining popularity due to higher safety as well as feasibility profile. The objective of this study is to present a systematic review exploring the role of robotics compared to laparoscopic approach in the management of incisional/ventral hernia. Methods A systematic review of all types of comparative studies until January 2021 published on Embase, Medline, PubMed, PubMed Central and Cochrane databases reporting the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing either R-IVHR versus Laparoscopic (L-IVHR) was performed. Results A total of 8289 patients in 7 studies were included. There was minimal heterogeneity (Tau2 = 0.29, chi2 = 9.10, df, I2 = 45 %) among included studies for the variables of recurrence rate and post-operative complications, but statistically significant heterogeneity (Tau2 = 1.05, chi2 = 132.81, I2 = 96 %) was observed for the duration of operation. In the random effects model analysis using the statistical software Review Manager, statistically the R-IVHR prolonged the duration of operation (Standardized mean difference, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.37, 3.11; z = 5.06; P = 0.00001) but the post-operative complication rate (OR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.30, 1.34; z = 1.20; P = 0.23) as well as the recurrence rate (OR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.14, 2.74; z = 0.62; P = 0.53) were similar. Conclusion R-IVH repair is feasible and safe, but the duration of operation is significantly longer. Major multi-center randomized controlled trial is mandatory to assess the long terms outcomes and cost effectiveness before the routine use of R-IVHR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document