scholarly journals Graphs with Constant Sum of Domination and Inverse Domination Numbers

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Tamizh Chelvam ◽  
T. Asir
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Complete Characterization ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Connected Graphs ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Domination Numbers

A subset D of the vertex set of a graph G, is a dominating set if every vertex in V−D is adjacent to at least one vertex in D. The domination number γ(G) is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G. A subset of V−D, which is also a dominating set of G is called an inverse dominating set of G with respect to D. The inverse domination number γ′(G) is the minimum cardinality of the inverse dominating sets. Domke et al. (2004) characterized connected graphs G with γ(G)+γ′(G)=n, where n is the number of vertices in G. It is the purpose of this paper to give a complete characterization of graphs G with minimum degree at least two and γ(G)+γ′(G)=n−1.

scholarly journals Claw-free graphs with equal 2-domination and domination numbers

Filomat ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 2795-2801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Hansberg ◽  
Bert Randerath ◽  
Lutz Volkmann
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Line Graphs ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Domination Numbers

For a graph G a subset D of the vertex set of G is a k-dominating set if every vertex not in D has at least k neighbors in D. The k-domination number k(G) is the minimum cardinality among the k-dominating sets of G. Note that the 1-domination number 1(G) is the usual domination number (G). Fink and Jacobson showed in 1985 that the inequality ?k(G)?(G)+k?2 is valid for every connected graph G. In this paper, we concentrate on the case k = 2, where k can be equal to ?, and we characterize all claw-free graphs and all line graphs G with ?(G) = ?2(G).

scholarly journals New Bounds on the Double Total Domination Number of Graphs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cabrera-Martínez ◽  
F. A. Hernández-Mira
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Total Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Total Dominating Set

AbstractLet G be a graph of minimum degree at least two. A set $$D\subseteq V(G)$$ D ⊆ V ( G ) is said to be a double total dominating set of G if $$|N(v)\cap D|\ge 2$$ | N ( v ) ∩ D | ≥ 2 for every vertex $$v\in V(G)$$ v ∈ V ( G ) . The minimum cardinality among all double total dominating sets of G is the double total domination number of G. In this article, we continue with the study of this parameter. In particular, we provide new bounds on the double total domination number in terms of other domination parameters. Some of our results are tight bounds that improve some well-known results.

Pitchfork domination in graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050025
Author(s):  
Manal N. Al-Harere ◽  
Mohammed A. Abdlhusein
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Undirected Graph ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
New Model ◽  
Domination In Graphs

In this paper, a new model of domination in graphs called the pitchfork domination is introduced. Let [Formula: see text] be a finite, simple and undirected graph without isolated vertices, a subset [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is a pitchfork dominating set if every vertex [Formula: see text] dominates at least [Formula: see text] and at most [Formula: see text] vertices of [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are non-negative integers. The domination number of [Formula: see text], denotes [Formula: see text] is a minimum cardinality over all pitchfork dominating sets in [Formula: see text]. In this work, pitchfork domination when [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is studied. Some bounds on [Formula: see text] related to the order, size, minimum degree, maximum degree of a graph and some properties are given. Pitchfork domination is determined for some known and new modified graphs. Finally, a question has been answered and discussed that; does every finite, simple and undirected graph [Formula: see text] without isolated vertices have a pitchfork domination or not?

scholarly journals Almost well-dominated bipartite graphs with minimum degree at least two

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadi Alizadeh ◽  
Didem Gözüpek
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Bipartite Graphs ◽  
Maximum Cardinality ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Upper Domination Number ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Two Parameters

A dominating set in a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a set $S$ such that every vertex of $G$ is either in $S$ or adjacent to a vertex in $S$. While the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in $G$ is called the domination number of $G$ denoted by $\gamma(G)$, the maximum cardinality of a minimal dominating set in $G$ is called the upper domination number of $G$ denoted by $\Gamma(G)$. We call the difference between these two parameters the \textit{domination gap} of $G$ and denote it by $\mu_d(G) = \Gamma(G) - \gamma(G)$. While a graph $G$ with $\mu_d(G)=0$ is said to be a \textit{well-dominated} graph, we call a graph $G$ with $\mu_d(G)=1$ an \textit{almost well-dominated} graph. In this work, we first establish an upper bound for the cardinality of bipartite graphs with $\mu_d(G)=k$, where $k\geq1$, and minimum degree at least two. We then provide a complete structural characterization of almost well-dominated bipartite graphs with minimum degree at least two. While the results by Finbow et al.~\cite{domination} imply that a 4-cycle is the only well-dominated bipartite graph with minimum degree at least two, we prove in this paper that there exist precisely 31 almost well-dominated bipartite graphs with minimum degree at least two.

scholarly journals ON THE ROOTS OF TOTAL DOMINATION POLYNOMIAL OF GRAPHS, II

2019 ◽  
pp. 659
Author(s):  
Saeid Alikhani ◽  
Nasrin Jafari
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Simple Graph ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Total Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Total Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Polynomial

Let $G = (V, E)$ be a simple graph of order $n$. A  total dominating set of $G$ is a subset $D$ of $V$, such that every vertex of $V$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in  $D$. The total domination number of $G$ is  minimum cardinality of  total dominating set in $G$ and is denoted by $\gamma_t(G)$. The total domination polynomial of $G$ is the polynomial $D_t(G,x)=\sum_{i=\gamma_t(G)}^n d_t(G,i)$, where $d_t(G,i)$ is the number of total dominating sets of $G$ of size $i$. In this paper, we study roots of the total domination polynomial of some graphs.  We show that  all roots of $D_t(G, x)$ lie in the circle with center $(-1, 0)$ and radius $\sqrt[\delta]{2^n-1}$, where $\delta$ is the minimum degree of $G$. As a consequence, we prove that if $\delta\geq \frac{2n}{3}$,  then every integer root of $D_t(G, x)$ lies in the set $\{-3,-2,-1,0\}$.

scholarly journals Cost Effective Domination in the Join, Corona and Composition of Graphs

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 978-998
Author(s):  
Ferdinand P. Jamil ◽  
Hearty Nuenay Maglanque
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Minimal Cost ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Maximum Cardinality ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Domination Numbers

Let $G$ be a connected graph. A cost effective dominating set in a graph $G$ is any set $S$ of vertices in $G$ satisfying the condition that each vertex in $S$ is adjacent to at least as many vertices outside $S$ as inside $S$ and every vertex outside $S$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $S$. The minimum cardinality of a cost effective dominating set is the cost effective domination number of $G$. The maximum cardinality of a cost effective dominating set is the upper cost effective domination number of $G$. A cost effective dominating set is said to be minimal if it does not contain a proper subset which is itself a cost effective dominating in $G$. The maximum cardinality of a minimal cost effective dominating set in a graph $G$ is the minimal cost effective domination number of $G$.In this paper, we characterized the cost effective dominating sets in the join, corona and composition of graphs. As direct consequences, we the bounds or the exact cost effective domination numbers, minimal cost effective domination numbers and upper cost effective domination numbers of these graphs were obtained.

scholarly journals k-Tuple Total Domination in Complementary Prisms

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adel P. Kazemi
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Total Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Multipartite Graph ◽  
Complete Multipartite ◽  
Complementary Prism

Let k be a positive integer, and let G be a graph with minimum degree at least k. In their study (2010), Henning and Kazemi defined the k-tuple total domination number γ×k,tG of G as the minimum cardinality of a k-tuple total dominating set of G, which is a vertex set such that every vertex of G is adjacent to at least k vertices in it. If G̅ is the complement of G, the complementary prism GG̅ of G is the graph formed from the disjoint union of G and G̅ by adding the edges of a perfect matching between the corresponding vertices of G and G̅. In this paper, we extend some of the results of Haynes et al. (2009) for the k-tuple total domination number and also obtain some other new results. Also we find the k-tuple total domination number of the complementary prism of a cycle, a path, or a complete multipartite graph.

Characterization of some classes of graphs with equal domination number and isolate domination number

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (05) ◽  
pp. 2050065
Author(s):  
Davood Bakhshesh
Keyword(s):  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Interval Graph ◽  
Induced Subgraph ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Isolated Vertex ◽  
Proper Interval Graph ◽  
Domination In Graphs

Let [Formula: see text] be a simple and undirected graph with vertex set [Formula: see text]. A set [Formula: see text] is called a dominating set of [Formula: see text], if every vertex in [Formula: see text] is adjacent to at least one vertex in [Formula: see text]. The minimum cardinality of a dominating set of [Formula: see text] is called the domination number of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text]. A dominating set [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is called isolate dominating, if the induced subgraph [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] contains at least one isolated vertex. The minimum cardinality of an isolate dominating set of [Formula: see text] is called the isolate domination number of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we show that for every proper interval graph [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]. Moreover, we provide a constructive characterization for trees with equal domination number and isolate domination number. These solve part of an open problem posed by Hamid and Balamurugan [Isolate domination in graphs, Arab J. Math. Sci. 22(2) (2016) 232–241].

scholarly journals Blast Domination Number of Transformation Graphs of Linear and Circular Graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4S4) ◽  
pp. 93-96
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Connected Dominating Set ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Domination Numbers

A subset S of V of a non-trivial connected graph G is called a Blast dominating set (BD-set), if S is a connected dominating set and the induced sub graph 𝑽 − 𝑺 is triple connected. The minimum cardinality taken over all such Blast Dominating sets is called the Blast Domination Number (BDN) of G and is denoted as, 𝜸𝒄 𝒕𝒄 (𝑮). In this article, let us mull over the generalized transformation graphs 𝑮 𝒂𝒃 and get hold of the analogous lexis of the Blast domination numbers for all the rage, transformation graphs, 𝑮 𝒂𝒃 and their complement graphs, 𝑮 𝒂 𝒃 for linear and circular graphs.

scholarly journals Hop Domination in Graphs-II

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-199
Author(s):  
C. Natarajan ◽  
S.K. Ayyaswamy
Keyword(s):  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Unicyclic Graphs ◽  
The Family ◽  
Independent Domination ◽  
Domination In Graphs ◽  
Domination Numbers

Abstract Let G = (V;E) be a graph. A set S ⊂ V (G) is a hop dominating set of G if for every v ∈ V - S, there exists u ∈ S such that d(u; v) = 2. The minimum cardinality of a hop dominating set of G is called a hop domination number of G and is denoted by γh(G). In this paper we characterize the family of trees and unicyclic graphs for which γh(G) = γt(G) and γh(G) = γc(G) where γt(G) and γc(G) are the total domination and connected domination numbers of G respectively. We then present the strong equality of hop domination and hop independent domination numbers for trees. Hop domination numbers of shadow graph and mycielskian graph of graph are also discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document