scholarly journals An Entropy-Based Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm with an Enhanced Elite Mechanism

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yufang Qin ◽  
Junzhong Ji ◽  
Chunnian Liu
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problem ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multi Objective

Multiobjective optimization problem (MOP) is an important and challenging topic in the fields of industrial design and scientific research. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) has proved to be one of the most efficient algorithms solving the multi-objective optimization. In this paper, we propose an entropy-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with an enhanced elite mechanism (E-MOEA), which improves the convergence and diversity of solution set in MOPs effectively. In this algorithm, an enhanced elite mechanism is applied to guide the direction of the evolution of the population. Specifically, it accelerates the population to approach the true Pareto front at the early stage of the evolution process. A strategy based on entropy is used to maintain the diversity of population when the population is near to the Pareto front. The proposed algorithm is executed on widely used test problems, and the simulated results show that the algorithm has better or comparative performances in convergence and diversity of solutions compared with two state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithms: NSGA-II, SPEA2 and the MOSADE.

An Efficient Framework Using Normalized Dominance Operator for Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muneendra Ojha ◽  
Krishna Pratap Singh ◽  
Pavan Chakraborty ◽  
Shekhar Verma
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Objective Test ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Pareto Dominance ◽  
Multi Objective

Multi-objective optimization algorithms using evolutionary optimization methods have shown strength in solving various problems using several techniques for producing uniformly distributed set of solutions. In this article, a framework is presented to solve the multi-objective optimization problem which implements a novel normalized dominance operator (ND) with the Pareto dominance concept. The proposed method has a lesser computational cost as compared to crowding-distance-based algorithms and better convergence. A parallel external elitist archive is used which enhances spread of solutions across the Pareto front. The proposed algorithm is applied to a number of benchmark multi-objective test problems with up to 10 objectives and compared with widely accepted aggregation-based techniques. Experiments produce a consistently good performance when applied to different recombination operators. Results have further been compared with other established methods to prove effective convergence and scalability.

scholarly journals Improved Lebesgue Indicator-Based Evolutionary Algorithm: Reducing Hypervolume Computations

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Saúl Zapotecas-Martínez ◽  
Abel García-Nájera ◽  
Adriana Menchaca-Méndez
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Lebesgue Measure ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Computational Time ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective

One of the major limitations of evolutionary algorithms based on the Lebesgue measure for multi-objective optimization is the computational cost required to approximate the Pareto front of a problem. Nonetheless, the Pareto compliance property of the Lebesgue measure makes it one of the most investigated indicators in the designing of indicator-based evolutionary algorithms (IBEAs). The main deficiency of IBEAs that use the Lebesgue measure is their computational cost which increases with the number of objectives of the problem. On this matter, the investigation presented in this paper introduces an evolutionary algorithm based on the Lebesgue measure to deal with box-constrained continuous multi-objective optimization problems. The proposed algorithm implicitly uses the regularity property of continuous multi-objective optimization problems that has suggested effectiveness when solving continuous problems with rough Pareto sets. On the other hand, the survival selection mechanism considers the local property of the Lebesgue measure, thus reducing the computational time in our algorithmic approach. The emerging indicator-based evolutionary algorithm is examined and compared versus three state-of-the-art multi-objective evolutionary algorithms based on the Lebesgue measure. In addition, we validate its performance on a set of artificial test problems with various characteristics, including multimodality, separability, and various Pareto front forms, incorporating concavity, convexity, and discontinuity. For a more exhaustive study, the proposed algorithm is evaluated in three real-world applications having four, five, and seven objective functions whose properties are unknown. We show the high competitiveness of our proposed approach, which, in many cases, improved the state-of-the-art indicator-based evolutionary algorithms on the multi-objective problems adopted in our investigation.

Genetic Diversity as an Objective in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Toffolo ◽  
Ernesto Benini
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Diversity ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Selection Pressure ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Search Space ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Diversity Evaluation

A key feature of an efficient and reliable multi-objective evolutionary algorithm is the ability to maintain genetic diversity within a population of solutions. In this paper, we present a new diversity-preserving mechanism, the Genetic Diversity Evaluation Method (GeDEM), which considers a distance-based measure of genetic diversity as a real objective in fitness assignment. This provides a dual selection pressure towards the exploitation of current non-dominated solutions and the exploration of the search space. We also introduce a new multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, the Genetic Diversity Evolutionary Algorithm (GDEA), strictly designed around GeDEM and then we compare it with other state-of-the-art algorithms on a well-established suite of test problems. Experimental results clearly indicate that the performance of GDEA is top-level.

Toward the Use of Pareto Performance Solutions and Pareto Robustness Solutions for Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Problems

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijun Wang ◽  
Stéphane Caro ◽  
Fouad Bennis ◽  
Oscar Brito Augusto
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Robust Solutions ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Robust Optimization Problem ◽  
Design Solutions ◽  
Further Development

For Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Problem (MOROP), it is important to obtain design solutions that are both optimal and robust. To find these solutions, usually, the designer need to set a threshold of the variation of Performance Functions (PFs) before optimization, or add the effects of uncertainties on the original PFs to generate a new Pareto robust front. In this paper, we divide a MOROP into two Multi-Objective Optimization Problems (MOOPs). One is the original MOOP, another one is that we take the Robustness Functions (RFs), robust counterparts of the original PFs, as optimization objectives. After solving these two MOOPs separately, two sets of solutions come out, namely the Pareto Performance Solutions (PP) and the Pareto Robustness Solutions (PR). Make a further development on these two sets, we can get two types of solutions, namely the Pareto Robustness Solutions among the Pareto Performance Solutions (PR(PP)), and the Pareto Performance Solutions among the Pareto Robustness Solutions (PP(PR)). Further more, the intersection of PR(PP) and PP(PR) can represent the intersection of PR and PP well. Then the designer can choose good solutions by comparing the results of PR(PP) and PP(PR). Thanks to this method, we can find out the optimal and robust solutions without setting the threshold of the variation of PFs nor losing the initial Pareto front. Finally, an illustrative example highlights the contributions of the paper.

Synthesis of LC-Oscillators Using Rival Multi-Objective Multi-Constraint Optimization Kernels

2015 ◽  
pp. 1-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Póvoa ◽  
Ricardo Lourenço ◽  
Nuno Lourenço ◽  
António Canelas ◽  
Ricardo Martins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Design Automation ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Voltage Controlled Oscillator ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Lc Oscillator ◽  
Lc Oscillators ◽  
Statistical Results ◽  
Multiple Synthesis

This chapter presents a state-of-the-art multi-objective/multi-constraint design automation approach applied to the design of an LC-Voltage Controlled Oscillator and an LC-Oscillator for a 130 nm technology node and leading to sets of design solutions showing figures-of-merit around -192 dBc/Hz and -186 dBc/Hz, respectively. The proposed approach, implemented in AIDA-C, guarantees accuracy by using commercial circuit simulators (HSPICE® and ELDO®) to evaluate the performance of the tentative circuit solutions, where the number of time-consuming circuit simulations is efficiently pruned by the optimization kernel. Three multi-objective optimization algorithms, the NSGA-II, the MOPSO, and the MOSA, are experimented with in the synthesis of the quoted oscillators and compared in terms of performance using statistical results obtained from multiple synthesis runs for each one of the oscillators. The performance of the optimized oscillators is then compared to other state-of-the-art results, showing the benefits of the presented multi-objective design approach.

scholarly journals Direct Tracking of the Pareto Front of a Multi-Objective Optimization Problem

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 699
Author(s):  
Daniele Peri
Keyword(s):  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Ship Design ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Regular Sampling ◽  
Normal Boundary ◽  
Direct Tracking ◽  
Local Sampling

In this paper, some methodologies aimed at the identification of the Pareto front of a multi-objective optimization problem are presented and applied. Three different approaches are presented: local sampling, Pareto front resampling and Normal Boundary Intersection (NBI). A first approximation of the Pareto front is obtained by a regular sampling of the design space, and then the Pareto front is improved and enriched using the other two above mentioned techniques. A detailed Pareto front is obtained for an optimization problem where algebraic objective functions are applied, also in comparison with standard techniques. Encouraging results are also obtained for two different ship design problems. The use of the algebraic functions allows for a comparison with the real Pareto front, correctly detected. The variety of the ship design problems allows for a generalization of the applicability of the methodology.

Hybrid QPSO-NNIA2 Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization Problem

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (08) ◽  
pp. 1959025
Author(s):  
Lan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Evolution Algebra ◽  
Neighbor List

To improve the convergence and distribution of a multi-objective optimization algorithm, a hybrid multi-objective optimization algorithm, based on the quantum particle swarm optimization (QPSO) algorithm and adaptive ranks clone and neighbor list-based immune algorithm (NNIA2), is proposed. The contribution of this work is threefold. First, the vicinity distance was used instead of the crowding distance to update the archived optimal solutions in the QPSO algorithm. The archived optimal solutions are updated and maintained by using the dynamic vicinity distance based m-nearest neighbor list in the QPSO algorithm. Secondly, an adaptive dynamic threshold of unfitness function for constraint handling is introduced in the process. It is related to the evolution algebra and the feasible solution. Thirdly, a new metric called the distribution metric is proposed to depict the diversity and distribution of the Pareto optimal. In order to verify the validity and feasibility of the QPSO-NNIA2 algorithm, we compare it with the QPSO, NNIA2, NSGA-II, MOEA/D, and SPEA2 algorithms in solving unconstrained and constrained multi-objective problems. The simulation results show that the QPSO-NNIA2 algorithm achieves superior convergence and superior performance by three metrics compared to other algorithms.

Optimization of Vehicle-Borne Radar Antenna Pedestal Based on Modified NSGA-II

2014 ◽  
Vol 945-949 ◽  
pp. 2241-2247
Author(s):  
De Gao Zhao ◽  
Qiang Li
Keyword(s):  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Population Diversity ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Sorting Process ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Radar Antenna ◽  
Modified Algorithm

This paper deals with application of Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm with elitism (NSGA-II) to solve multi-objective optimization problems of designing a vehicle-borne radar antenna pedestal. Five technical improvements are proposed due to the disadvantages of NSGA-II. They are as follow: (1) presenting a new method to calculate the fitness of individuals in population; (2) renewing the definition of crowding distance; (3) introducing a threshold for choosing elitist; (4) reducing some redundant sorting process; (5) developing a self-adaptive arithmetic cross and mutation probability. The modified algorithm can lead to better population diversity than the original NSGA-II. Simulation results prove rationality and validity of the modified NSGA-II. A uniformly distributed Pareto front can be obtained by using the modified NSGA-II. Finally, a multi-objective problem of designing a vehicle-borne radar antenna pedestal is settled with the modified algorithm.

Improved NSGAII with a New Distribution and its Application in Multi-Objective Reservoir Operation

2011 ◽  
Vol 90-93 ◽  
pp. 2734-2739
Author(s):  
Ruan Yun ◽  
Cui Song Yu
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithms ◽  
Control Strategy ◽  
Reservoir Operation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Shape Parameter ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
New Distribution

Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms II (NSGAII) has been widely used for multi- objective optimizations. To overcome its premature shortcoming, an improved NSGAII with a new distribution was proposed in this paper. Comparative to NSGAII, improved NSGAII uses an elitist control strategy to protect its lateral diversity among current non-dominated fronts. To implement elitist control strategy, a new distribution (called dogmatic distribution) was proposed. For ordinary multi-objective optimization problem (MOP), an ordinary exploration ability of improved NSGAII should be maintained by using a larger shape parameter r; while for larger-scale complex MOP, a larger exploration ability of improved NSGAII should be maintained by using a less shape parameter r. The application of improved NSGAII in multi-objective operation of Wohu reservoir shows that improved NSGAII has advantages over NSGAII to get better Pareto front especially for large-scale complex multi-objective reservoir operation problems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document