scholarly journals New Theories on Boundary Layer Transition and Turbulence Formation

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaoqun Liu ◽  
Ping Lu ◽  
Lin Chen ◽  
Yonghua Yan
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Flow Field ◽  
Shear Layer ◽  
Boundary Layer Transition ◽  
Length Scale ◽  
Multiple Level ◽  
Shear Layer Instability ◽  
Small Length ◽  
Layer Transition ◽  
Turbulence Generation

This paper is a short review of our recent DNS work on physics of late boundary layer transition and turbulence. Based on our DNS observation, we propose a new theory on boundary layer transition, which has five steps, that is, receptivity, linear instability, large vortex structure formation, small length scale generation, loss of symmetry and randomization to turbulence. For turbulence generation and sustenance, the classical theory, described with Richardson's energy cascade and Kolmogorov length scale, is not observed by our DNS. We proposed a new theory on turbulence generation that all small length scales are generated by “shear layer instability” through multiple level ejections and sweeps and consequent multiple level positive and negative spikes, but not by “vortex breakdown.” We believe “shear layer instability” is the “mother of turbulence.” The energy transferring from large vortices to small vortices is carried out by multiple level sweeps, but does not follow Kolmogorov's theory that large vortices pass energy to small ones through vortex stretch and breakdown. The loss of symmetry starts from the second level ring cycle in the middle of the flow field and spreads to the bottom of the boundary layer and then the whole flow field.

A Boundary Layer Transition Model

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark W. Johnson ◽  
Ali H. Ercan
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layer Transition ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
Length Scale ◽  
Transition Model ◽  
Freestream Turbulence ◽  
Layer Transition ◽  
Frequency Spectra ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
Turbulent Length Scale

A new boundary layer transition model is presented which relates the velocity fluctuations near the wall to the formation of turbulent spots. A relationship for the near wall velocity frequency spectra is also established, which indicates an increasing bias towards low frequencies as the skin friction coefficient for the boundary layer decreases. This result suggests that the dependence of transition on the turbulent length scale is greatest at low freestream turbulence levels. This transition model is incorporated in a conventional boundary layer integral technique and is used to predict eight of the ERCOFTAC test cases. Three of these test cases are for nominally zero pressure gradient and the remaining five are for a pressure distribution typical of an aft loaded turbine blade. The model is demonstrated to predict the development of the boundary layer through transition reasonably accurately for all the test cases. The sensitivity of start of transition to the turbulent length scale at low freestream turbulence levels is also demonstrated.

Boundary-layer transition by interaction of discrete and continuous modes

2008 ◽  
Vol 604 ◽  
pp. 199-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
YANG LIU ◽  
TAMER A. ZAKI ◽  
PAUL A. DURBIN
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Finite Amplitude ◽  
Secondary Instability ◽  
Boundary Layer Transition ◽  
Length Scale ◽  
Bypass Transition ◽  
Continuous Mode ◽  
Layer Transition ◽  
Boundary Layer Turbulence ◽  
Tollmien Schlichting

The natural and bypass routes to boundary-layer turbulence have traditionally been studied independently. In certain flow regimes, both transition mechanisms might coexist, and, if so, can interact. A nonlinear interaction of discrete and continuous Orr-Sommerfeld modes, which are at the origin of orderly and bypass transition, respectively, is found. It causes breakdown to turbulence, even though neither mode alone is sufficient. Direct numerical simulations of the interaction shows that breakdown occurs through a pattern of Λ-structures, similar to the secondary instability of Tollmien–Schlichting waves. However, the streaks produced by the Orr-Sommerfeld continuous mode set the spanwise length scale, which is much smaller than that of the secondary instability of Tollmien–Schlichting waves. Floquet analysis explains some of the features seen in the simulations as a competition between destabilizing and stabilizing interactions between finite-amplitude distortions.

High-speed boundary-layer transition induced by a discrete roughness element

2013 ◽  
Vol 729 ◽  
pp. 524-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prahladh S. Iyer ◽  
Krishnan Mahesh
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Layer ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Roughness Element ◽  
Transition Process ◽  
Significant Rise ◽  
Boundary Layer Transition ◽  
Streamwise Vortices ◽  
Layer Transition ◽  
Mach Numbers

AbstractDirect numerical simulation (DNS) is used to study laminar to turbulent transition induced by a discrete hemispherical roughness element in a high-speed laminar boundary layer. The simulations are performed under conditions matching the experiments of Danehy et al. (AIAA Paper 2009–394, 2009) for free-stream Mach numbers of 3.37, 5.26 and 8.23. It is observed that the Mach 8.23 flow remains laminar downstream of the roughness, while the lower Mach numbers undergo transition. The Mach 3.37 flow undergoes transition closer to the bump when compared with Mach 5.26, in agreement with experimental observations. Transition is accompanied by an increase in ${C}_{f} $ and ${C}_{h} $ (Stanton number). Even for the case that did not undergo transition (Mach 8.23), streamwise vortices induced by the roughness cause a significant rise in ${C}_{f} $ until 20$D$ downstream. The mean van Driest transformed velocity and Reynolds stress for Mach 3.37 and 5.26 show good agreement with available data. Temporal spectra of pressure for Mach 3.37 show that frequencies in the range of 10–1000 kHz are dominant. The transition process involves the following key elements: upon interaction with the roughness element, the boundary layer separates to form a series of spanwise vortices upstream of the roughness and a separation shear layer. The system of spanwise vortices wrap around the roughness element in the form of horseshoe/necklace vortices to yield a system of counter-rotating streamwise vortices downstream of the element. These vortices are located beneath the separation shear layer and perturb it, which results in the formation of trains of hairpin-shaped vortices further downstream of the roughness for the cases that undergo transition. These hairpins spread in the span with increasing downstream distance and the flow increasingly resembles a fully developed turbulent boundary layer. A local Reynolds number based on the wall properties is seen to correlate with the onset of transition for the cases considered.

Transition in a Separation Bubble

1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 752-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Malkiel ◽  
R. E. Mayle
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Layer ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Boundary Layer Transition ◽  
Turbulent Spot ◽  
Layer Transition ◽  
Lateral Direction ◽  
Intensity Measurements ◽  
Separated Shear Layer ◽  
Laminar Shear

In the interest of being able to predict separating–reattaching flows, it is necessary to have an accurate model of transition in separation bubbles. An experimental investigation of the process of turbulence development in a separation bubble shows that transition occurs within the separated shear layer. A comparison of simultaneous velocity traces from comparison of simultaneous velocity traces from probes separated in the lateral direction suggests that Kelvin–Helmholtz waves, which originate in the laminar shear layer, do not break down to turbulence simultaneously across their span when they proceed to agglomerate. The streamwise development of intermittency in this region can be characterized by turbulent spot theory with a high dimensionless spot production rate. Moreover, the progression of intermittency along the centerline of the shear layer is similar to that in attached boundary layer transition. The transverse development of intermittency is also remarkably similar to that in attached boundary layers. The parameters obtained from these measurements agree with correlations previously deduced from turbulence intensity measurements.

Bypass Transition Modelling: A New Method Which Accounts for Free-Stream Turbulence Intensity and Length Scale

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Roach ◽  
David H. Brierley
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulence Intensity ◽  
Free Stream ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Boundary Layer Transition ◽  
Test Surface ◽  
Length Scale ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Layer Transition ◽  
Free Stream Turbulence

The publication of the present authors’ boundary layer transition data in 1992 (now widely known as the ERCOFTAC test case T3) has led to a spate of new experimental and modelling efforts aimed at improving our understanding of this problem. This paper describes a new method of determining boundary layer transition with zero mean pressure gradient. The approach examines the development of a laminar boundary layer to the start of transition, accounting for the influences of free-stream turbulence and test surface geometry. It is presented as a “proof of concept”, requiring a significant amount of work before it can be considered as a practically applicable model for transition prediction. The method is based upon one first put forward by G.I. Taylor in the 1930’s, and accounts for the action of local, instantaneous pressure gradients on the developing laminar boundary layer. These pressure gradients are related to the intensity and length scale of turbulence in the free-stream using Taylor’s simple isotropic model. The findings demonstrate the need to account for the separate influences of free-stream turbulence intensity and length scale when considering the transition process. Although the length scale has less of an effect than the intensity, its influence is, nevertheless, significant and must not be overlooked. This fact goes a long way towards explaining the large scatter to be found in simple correlations which involve only the turbulence intensity. Intriguingly, it is demonstrated that it is the free-stream turbulence at the leading edge of the test surface which is important, not that found locally outside the boundary layer. The additional influence of leading edge geometry is also shown to play a major role in fixing the point at which transition begins. It is suggested that the leading edge geometry will distort the incident turbulent eddies, modifying the effective “free-stream” turbulence properties. Consequently, it is shown that the scale of the eddies relative to the leading edge thickness is a further important parameter, and helps bring together a large number of test cases.

Large-eddy simulation of boundary-layer separation and transition at a change of surface curvature

2001 ◽  
Vol 439 ◽  
pp. 305-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHIYIN YANG ◽  
PETER R. VOKE
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Layer ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Boundary Layer Transition ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Layer Transition ◽  
Transition Mechanism ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Dimensional Instability

Transition arising from a separated region of flow is quite common and plays an important role in engineering. It is difficult to predict using conventional models and the transition mechanism is still not fully understood. We report the results of a numerical simulation to study the physics of separated boundary-layer transition induced by a change of curvature of the surface. The geometry is a flat plate with a semicircular leading edge. The Reynolds number based on the uniform inlet velocity and the leading-edge diameter is 3450. The simulated mean and turbulence quantities compare well with the available experimental data.The numerical data have been comprehensively analysed to elucidate the entire transition process leading to breakdown to turbulence. It is evident from the simulation that the primary two-dimensional instability originates from the free shear in the bubble as the free shear layer is inviscidly unstable via the Kelvin–Helmholtz mechanism. These initial two-dimensional instability waves grow downstream with a amplification rate usually larger than that of Tollmien–Schlichting waves. Three-dimensional motions start to develop slowly under any small spanwise disturbance via a secondary instability mechanism associated with distortion of two-dimensional spanwise vortices and the formation of a spanwise peak–valley wave structure. Further downstream the distorted spanwise two-dimensional vortices roll up, leading to streamwise vorticity formation. Significant growth of three-dimensional motions occurs at about half the mean bubble length with hairpin vortices appearing at this stage, leading eventually to full breakdown to turbulence around the mean reattachment point. Vortex shedding from the separated shear layer is also observed and the ‘instantaneous reattachment’ position moves over a distance up to 50% of the mean reattachment length. Following reattachment, a turbulent boundary layer is established very quickly, but it is different from an equilibrium boundary layer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document