scholarly journals Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia Horster ◽  
Hans-Joachim Stemmler ◽  
Nina Strecker ◽  
Florian Brettner ◽  
Andreas Hausmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Cardiac Output Monitoring ◽  
Saps Ii Score ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Output Monitoring ◽  
Clinical Conditions ◽  
Cardiac Output Measurements

USCOM is an ultrasound-based method which has been accepted for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in various clinical conditions (USCOM, Ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring). The present study aimed at comparing the accuracy of the USCOM device with that of the thermodilution technique in patients with septicemia. We conducted a prospective observational study in a medical but noncardiological ICU of a university hospital. Septic adult patients (median age 55 years, median SAPS-II-Score 43 points) on mechanical ventilation and catecholamine support were monitored with USCOM and PiCCO (). Seventy paired left-sided CO measurements (transaortic access = COUS-A) were obtained. The mean COUS-Awere 6.55 l/min (±2.19) versus COPiCCO6.5 l/min (±2.18). The correlation coefficient was . Comparison by Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of −0.36 l/min (±0.99 l/min) leading to a mean percentage error of 29%. USCOM is a feasible and rapid method to evaluate CO in septic patients. USCOM does reliably represent CO values as compared to the reference technique based on thermodilution (PiCCO). It seems to be appropriate in situations where CO measurements are most pertinent to patient management.

scholarly journals Agreement of Bioreactance Cardiac Output Monitoring With Thermodilution in Healthy Standing Horses

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Hopster ◽  
Samuel D. A. Hurcombe
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Cardiac Output Monitoring ◽  
Output Measurement ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Voltage Variation ◽  
Upper Limits ◽  
Output Monitoring ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
Clinical Conditions

Bioreactance is the continuous analysis of transthoracic voltage variation in response to an applied high frequency transthoracic current and was recently introduced for non-invasive cardiac output measurement (NICOM). We evaluated NICOM compared to thermodilution (TD) in adult horses. Six healthy horses were used for this prospective, blinded, experimental study. Cardiac output (CO) measurements were performed simultaneously using TD and the bioreactance method. Different cardiac output scenarios were established using xylazine (0.5 mg/kg IV) and dobutamine (1.5–3 mcg/kg/min). Statistical analysis was performed by calculating the concordance rate, performing a regression analysis, Pearson correlation, and Bland Altman. The TD-based CO and NICOM values were highly correlated for low, normal and high CO values with an overall correlation coefficient. A 4-quadrant plot showed an 89% rate of concordance. The linear regression calculated a relationship between NICOM and TDCO of Y = 0.4874 · X + 0.5936. For the corrected Bland Altman agreement, the mean bias and lower/upper limits of agreement were −0.26 and −3.88 to 3.41 L/min, respectively. Compared to TD, bioreactance- based NICOM showed good accuracy at induced low, normal, and high CO states in normal horses. Future studies performed under more clinical conditions will show if this monitor can help to assess hemodynamic status and guide therapy in horses in ICU settings and under general anesthesia.

Are Noninvasive Continuous Cardiac Output Monitoring Interchangeable with Esophageal Doppler?

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 541-547
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Cardiac Output Monitoring ◽  
Esophageal Doppler ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Pulse Wave Transit Time ◽  
Output Monitoring ◽  
Trending Ability

Objective: To compare the trending ability, accuracy, and precision of non-invasive stroke volume (SV) measurement based on a bioreactance technique and measurement of the pulse wave transit time (PWTT) versus the esophageal Doppler monitoring (EDM). Materials and Methods: Two hundred twenty-seven paired measurements from 10 patients who underwent abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were included for SV measurements. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated, and Bland-Altman analysis was performed to evaluate the agreement between EDM and bioreactance (EDM-bioreactance) and between EDM and PWTT (EDM-PWTT). Results: EDM-bioreactance had a correlation coefficient of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 0.78; p<0.001), bias of 0.28 ml (limits of agreement –30.92 to 31.38 ml), and percentage error of 46.82%. EDM-PWTT had a correlation coefficient of 0.48 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.72; p<0.001), bias of –0.18 ml (limits of agreement –40.28 to 39.92 ml), and percentage error of 60.17%. A subgroup analysis of data from patients who underwent crystalloid loading was performed to detect the trending ability. The four-quadrant plot analysis between EDM-bioreactance and EDM-PWTT demonstrated concordance rates of 70.00% and 73.68%, respectively. Conclusion: SV measurement based on bioreactance technique and measurement of PWTT are not interchangeable with EDM. Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR 20181217003 Keywords: Stroke volume, Cardiac output, Doppler, Perioperative care, Pulse, Time

scholarly journals Feasibility of cardiac output measurements in critically ill patients by medical students

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert Koster ◽  
Thomas Kaufmann ◽  
Bart Hiemstra ◽  
Renske Wiersema ◽  
Madelon E. Vos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Poor Agreement ◽  
Cardiac Output Measurements

Abstract Background Critical care ultrasonography (CCUS) is increasingly applied also in the intensive care unit (ICU) and performed by non-experts, including even medical students. There is limited data on the training efforts necessary for novices to attain images of sufficient quality. There is no data on medical students performing CCUS for the measurement of cardiac output (CO), a hemodynamic variable of importance for daily critical care. Objective The aim of this study was to explore the agreement of cardiac output measurements as well as the quality of images obtained by medical students in critically ill patients compared to the measurements obtained by experts in these images. Methods In a prospective observational cohort study, all acutely admitted adults with an expected ICU stay over 24 h were included. CCUS was performed by students within 24 h of admission. CCUS included the images required to measure the CO, i.e., the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter and the velocity time integral (VTI) in the LVOT. Echocardiography experts were involved in the evaluation of the quality of images obtained and the quality of the CO measurements. Results There was an opportunity for a CCUS attempt in 1155 of the 1212 eligible patients (95%) and in 1075 of the 1212 patients (89%) CCUS examination was performed by medical students. In 871 out of 1075 patients (81%) medical students measured CO. Experts measured CO in 783 patients (73%). In 760 patients (71%) CO was measured by both which allowed for comparison; bias of CO was 0.0 L min−1 with limits of agreement of − 2.6 L min−1 to 2.7 L min−1. The percentage error was 50%, reflecting poor agreement of the CO measurement by students compared with the experts CO measurement. Conclusions Medical students seem capable of obtaining sufficient quality CCUS images for CO measurement in the majority of critically ill patients. Measurements of CO by medical students, however, had poor agreement with expert measurements. Experts remain indispensable for reliable CO measurements. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; registration number NCT02912624

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document