scholarly journals Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Cell Pluripotency, Differentiation, and Reprogramming

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Androniki Kretsovali ◽  
Christiana Hadjimichael ◽  
Nikolaos Charmpilas
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ◽  
Hdac Inhibitors ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Differentiation ◽  
Induced Pluripotent

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are small molecules that have important and pleiotropic effects on cell homeostasis. Under distinct developmental conditions, they can promote either self-renewal or differentiation of embryonic stem cells. In addition, they can promote directed differentiation of embryonic and tissue-specific stem cells along the neuronal, cardiomyocytic, and hepatic lineages. They have been used to facilitate embryo development following somatic cell nuclear transfer and induced pluripotent stem cell derivation by ectopic expression of pluripotency factors. In the latter method, these molecules not only increase effectiveness, but can also render the induction independent of the oncogenes c-Myc and Klf4. Here we review the molecular pathways that are involved in the functions of HDAC inhibitors on stem cell differentiation and reprogramming of somatic cells into pluripotency. Deciphering the mechanisms of HDAC inhibitor actions is very important to enable their exploitation for efficient and simple tissue regeneration therapies.

scholarly journals A Novel Purification Method of Murine Embryonic Stem Cell– and Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell–Derived Cardiomyocytes by Simple Manual Dissociation

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 683-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadahiro Shinozawa ◽  
Hatsue Furukawa ◽  
Eimei Sato ◽  
Kenji Takami
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Embryonic Stem Cell ◽  
Pluripotent Stem Cell ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Thin Glass ◽  
Murine Embryonic Stem Cell ◽  
Induced Pluripotent

Cardiomyocytes derived from embryonic stem cells (ES-CMs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS-CMs) are useful for toxicity and pharmacology screening. In the present study, we found that cardiomyocyte-rich beating cell clusters (CCs) emerged from murine embryonic stem cell (mESC)–derived beating EBs and from human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)–derived beating EBs dissociated by gentle pipetting with a thin glass pipette. The percentage of cardiac troponin T (cTnT)–positive cells in the beating CCs obtained from mESC-derived and hiPSC-derived beating EBs was higher (81.5% and 91.6%, respectively) than in beating-undissociated EBs (13.7% and 67.1%, respectively). For mESCs, the yield of cTnT-positive cells from beating CCs was estimated to be 1.6 times higher than that of beating EBs. The bromodeoxyuridine labeling index of mouse ES-CMs and human iPS-CMs in beating CCs was 1.5- and 3.2-fold, respectively, greater than those in beating EBs. To investigate the utility of the cells in toxicity assessment, we showed that doxorubicin, a cardiotoxic drug, induced myofilament disruption in cardiomyocytes isolated by this method. This simple method enables preparation of mouse ES-CMs and human iPS-CMs with better proliferative activity than beating EBs not dissociated by pipetting, and the cardiomyocytes are useful for drug-induced myocardial toxicity testing.

scholarly journals The mitochondrial protein CHCHD2 primes the differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells to neuroectodermal lineages

2016 ◽  
Vol 215 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Zhu ◽  
Aurora Gomez-Duran ◽  
Gabriele Saretzki ◽  
Shibo Jin ◽  
Katarzyna Tilgner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Pluripotent Stem Cells ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Mitochondrial Protein ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell ◽  
Clonal Variation ◽  
Differentiation Potential ◽  
Induced Pluripotent

Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) utility is limited by variations in the ability of these cells to undergo lineage-specific differentiation. We have undertaken a transcriptional comparison of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines and hiPSC lines and have shown that hiPSCs are inferior in their ability to undergo neuroectodermal differentiation. Among the differentially expressed candidates between hESCs and hiPSCs, we identified a mitochondrial protein, CHCHD2, whose expression seems to correlate with neuroectodermal differentiation potential of pluripotent stem cells. We provide evidence that hiPSC variability with respect to CHCHD2 expression and differentiation potential is caused by clonal variation during the reprogramming process and that CHCHD2 primes neuroectodermal differentiation of hESCs and hiPSCs by binding and sequestering SMAD4 to the mitochondria, resulting in suppression of the activity of the TGFβ signaling pathway. Using CHCHD2 as a marker for assessing and comparing the hiPSC clonal and/or line differentiation potential provides a tool for large scale differentiation and hiPSC banking studies.

A PRC2-Dependent Repressive Role of PRDM14 in Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Reprogramming

Stem Cells ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 682-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun-Shen Chan ◽  
Jonathan Göke ◽  
Xinyi Lu ◽  
Nandini Venkatesan ◽  
Bo Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Embryonic Stem Cells ◽  
Human Embryonic Stem Cells ◽  
Pluripotent Stem Cell ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Reprogramming ◽  
Induced Pluripotent

scholarly journals Ten years of progress and promise of induced pluripotent stem cells: historical origins, characteristics, mechanisms, limitations, and potential applications

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adekunle Ebenezer Omole ◽  
Adegbenro Omotuyi John Fakoya
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells ◽  
Molecular Mechanism ◽  
Pluripotent Stem Cells ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Induced Pluripotent

The discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by Shinya Yamanaka in 2006 was heralded as a major breakthrough of the decade in stem cell research. The ability to reprogrammed human somatic cells to a pluripotent embryonic stem cell-like state through the ectopic expression of a combination of embryonic transcription factors was greeted with great excitement by scientists and bioethicists. The reprogramming technology offers the opportunity to generate patient-specific stem cells for modeling human diseases, drug development and screening, and individualized regenerative cell therapy. However, fundamental questions have been raised regarding the molecular mechanism of iPSCs generation, a process still poorly understood by scientists. The efficiency of reprogramming of iPSCs remains low due to the effect of various barriers of reprogramming. There is also the risk of chromosomal instability and oncogenic transformation associated with the use of viral vectors, such as retrovirus and lentivirus, which deliver the reprogramming transcription factors by integration in the host cell genome. These challenges can hinder the therapeutic prospects and promise of iPSCs and their clinical applications. Consequently, extensive studies have been done to elucidate the molecular mechanism of reprogramming and novel strategies have been identified which help to improve the efficiency of reprogramming methods and overcome the safety concerns linked with iPSCs generation. Distinct barriers and enhancers of reprogramming have been elucidated and non-integrating reprogramming methods have been reported. Here, we summarize the progress and the recent advances that have been made over the last 10 years in the iPSCs field, with emphasis on the molecular mechanism of reprogramming, strategies to improve the efficiency of reprogramming, characteristics and limitations of iPSCs, and the progress made in the applications of iPSCs in the field of disease modelling, drug discovery and regenerative medicine. Additionally, this study appraised the role of genomic editing technology in the generation of healthy iPSCs.

scholarly journals Ten years of progress and promise of induced pluripotent stem cells: historical origins, characteristics, mechanisms, limitations, and potential applications

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adekunle Ebenezer Omole ◽  
Adegbenro Omotuyi John Fakoya
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells ◽  
Molecular Mechanism ◽  
Pluripotent Stem Cells ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Induced Pluripotent

The discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by Shinya Yamanaka in 2006 was heralded as a major breakthrough of the decade in stem cell research. The ability to reprogrammed human somatic cells to a pluripotent embryonic stem cell-like state through the ectopic expression of a combination of embryonic transcription factors was greeted with great excitement by scientists and bioethicists. The reprogramming technology offers the opportunity to generate patient-specific stem cells for modeling human diseases, drug development and screening, and individualized regenerative cell therapy. However, fundamental questions have been raised regarding the molecular mechanism of iPSCs generation, a process still poorly understood by scientists. The efficiency of reprogramming of iPSCs remains low due to the effect of various barriers of reprogramming. There is also the risk of chromosomal instability and oncogenic transformation associated with the use of viral vectors, such as retrovirus and lentivirus, which deliver the reprogramming transcription factors by integration in the host cell genome. These challenges can hinder the therapeutic prospects and promise of iPSCs and their clinical applications. Consequently, extensive studies have been done to elucidate the molecular mechanism of reprogramming and novel strategies have been identified which help to improve the efficiency of reprogramming methods and overcome the safety concerns linked with iPSCs generation. Distinct barriers and enhancers of reprogramming have been elucidated and non-integrating reprogramming methods have been reported. Here, we summarize the progress and the recent advances that have been made over the last 10 years in the iPSCs field, with emphasis on the molecular mechanism of reprogramming, strategies to improve the efficiency of reprogramming, characteristics and limitations of iPSCs, and the progress made in the applications of iPSCs in the field of disease modelling, drug discovery and regenerative medicine. Additionally, this study appraised the role of genomic editing technology in the generation of healthy iPSCs.

Increase of sensitivity to mechanical stimulus after transplantation of murine induced pluripotent stem cell–derived astrocytes in a rat spinal cord injury model

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 582-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Hayashi ◽  
Masayuki Hashimoto ◽  
Masao Koda ◽  
Atsuhiko T. Naito ◽  
Atsushi Murata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Pluripotent Stem Cell ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell ◽  
Mechanical Stimulus ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Induced Pluripotent

Object Clinical use of autologous induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) could circumvent immune rejection and bioethical issues associated with embryonic stem cells. Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating trauma with long-lasting disability, and current therapeutic approaches are not satisfactory. In the present study, the authors used the neural stem sphere (NSS) method to differentiate iPSCs into astrocytes, which were evaluated after their transplantation into injured rat spinal cords. Methods Induced pluripotent stem cell–derived astrocytes were differentiated using the NSS method and injected 3 and 7 days after spinal contusion–based SCI. Control rats were injected with DMEM in the same manner. Locomotor recovery was assessed for 8 weeks, and sensory and locomotion tests were evaluated at 8 weeks. Immunohistological parameters were then assessed. Results Transplant recipients lived for 8 weeks without tumor formation. Transplanted cells stretched their processes along the longitudinal axis, but they did not merge with the processes of host GFAP-positive astrocytes. Locomotion was assessed in 3 ways, but none of the tests detected statistically significant improvements compared with DMEM-treated control rats after 8 weeks. Rather, iPSC transplantation caused even greater sensitivity to mechanical stimulus than DMEM treatment. Conclusions Astrocytes can be generated by serum treatment of NSS-generated cells derived from iPSCs. However, transplantation of such cells is poorly suited for repairing SCI.

scholarly journals Ten years of progress and promise of induced pluripotent stem cells: historical origins, characteristics, mechanisms, limitations, and potential applications

PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e4370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adekunle Ebenezer Omole ◽  
Adegbenro Omotuyi John Fakoya
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells ◽  
Molecular Mechanism ◽  
Pluripotent Stem Cells ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Induced Pluripotent

The discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by Shinya Yamanaka in 2006 was heralded as a major breakthrough of the decade in stem cell research. The ability to reprogram human somatic cells to a pluripotent embryonic stem cell-like state through the ectopic expression of a combination of embryonic transcription factors was greeted with great excitement by scientists and bioethicists. The reprogramming technology offers the opportunity to generate patient-specific stem cells for modeling human diseases, drug development and screening, and individualized regenerative cell therapy. However, fundamental questions have been raised regarding the molecular mechanism of iPSCs generation, a process still poorly understood by scientists. The efficiency of reprogramming of iPSCs remains low due to the effect of various barriers to reprogramming. There is also the risk of chromosomal instability and oncogenic transformation associated with the use of viral vectors, such as retrovirus and lentivirus, which deliver the reprogramming transcription factors by integration in the host cell genome. These challenges can hinder the therapeutic prospects and promise of iPSCs and their clinical applications. Consequently, extensive studies have been done to elucidate the molecular mechanism of reprogramming and novel strategies have been identified which help to improve the efficiency of reprogramming methods and overcome the safety concerns linked with iPSC generation. Distinct barriers and enhancers of reprogramming have been elucidated, and non-integrating reprogramming methods have been reported. Here, we summarize the progress and the recent advances that have been made over the last 10 years in the iPSC field, with emphasis on the molecular mechanism of reprogramming, strategies to improve the efficiency of reprogramming, characteristics and limitations of iPSCs, and the progress made in the applications of iPSCs in the field of disease modelling, drug discovery and regenerative medicine. Additionally, this study appraises the role of genomic editing technology in the generation of healthy iPSCs.

The role of microRNAs in embryonic stem cell and induced pluripotent stem cell differentiation in male germ cells

2018 ◽  
Vol 234 (8) ◽  
pp. 12278-12289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javad Amini Mahabadi ◽  
Hamed Sabzalipoor ◽  
Hossein Nikzad ◽  
Elahe Seyedhosseini ◽  
Seyed Ehsan Enderami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Differentiation ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Pluripotent Stem Cell ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Differentiation ◽  
Male Germ Cells ◽  
Induced Pluripotent
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document