scholarly journals The Need for Guidelines in Asplenic Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Case Report

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. R. Shaarani ◽  
D. Collins ◽  
J. M. O'Byrne
Keyword(s):  
Total Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Oral Antibiotics ◽  
Intravenous Antibiotic ◽  
Orthopaedic Procedure ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Antimicrobial Management ◽  
History Of ◽  
Total Knee

There are currently no guidelines for splenectomy patient undergoing total joint arthroplasty. We present a case history of a 63-year-old man with a history of splenectomy that underwent a total knee arthroplasty with standard intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis. Two weeks postoperatively, he developed a prosthetic joint infection and followed the standard antimicrobial management with intravenous and oral antibiotics prior to having revision surgery. We propose that there are guidelines to properly manage these patients in the pre- and perioperative setting following an orthopaedic procedure.

Prior hip or knee prosthetic joint infection in another joint increases risk three-fold of prosthetic joint infection after primary total knee arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (7_Supple_C) ◽  
pp. 91-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. P. Chalmers ◽  
J. T. Weston ◽  
D. R. Osmon ◽  
A. D. Hanssen ◽  
D. J. Berry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Primary Tkas ◽  
History Of ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Primary Total Knee

Aims There is little information regarding the risk of a patient developing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) when the patient has previously experienced PJI of a TKA or total hip arthroplasty (THA) in another joint. The goal of this study was to compare the risk of PJI of primary TKA in this patient population against matched controls. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 95 patients (102 primary TKAs) treated between 2000 and 2014 with a history of PJI in another TKA or THA. A total of 50 patients (53%) were female. Mean age was 69 years (45 to 88) with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 36 kg/m2 (22 to 59). In total, 27% of patients were on chronic antibiotic suppression. Mean follow-up was six years (2 to 16). We 1:3 matched these (for age, sex, BMI, and surgical year) to 306 primary TKAs performed in 306 patients with a THA or TKA of another joint without a subsequent PJI. Competing risk with death was used for statistical analysis. Multivariate analysis was followed to evaluate risk factors for PJI in the study cohort. Results The cumulative incidence of PJI in the study cohort (6.1%) was significantly higher than the matched cohort (2.6%) at ten years (hazard ratio (HR) 3.3; 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 8.97; p = 0.02). Host grade in the study group was not a significant risk factor for PJI. Patients on chronic suppression had a higher rate of PJI (HR 15; p = 0.002), with six of the seven patients developing PJI in the study group being on chronic suppression. The new infecting microorganism was the same as the previous in only two of seven patients. Conclusion In this matched cohort study, patients undergoing a clean primary TKA with a history of TKA or THA PJI in another joint had a three-fold higher risk of PJI compared with matched controls with ten-year cumulative incidence of 6.1%. The risk of PJI was 15-fold higher in patients on chronic antibiotic suppression; further investigation into reasons for this and mitigation strategies are recommended. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):91–97

scholarly journals Impact of Prior Intra-articular Injections on the Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Nie ◽  
Wei Li
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Total Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Injection Group ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

Objective: The current review was designed to assess the impact of prior intra-articular injections on the risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) with a focus on the timing of injection before surgery.Methods: The databases of PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched up to 15th June 2021. All studies comparing the incidence of PJI with and without prior intra-articular injections were included. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for PJI.Results: Nineteen studies were included. Both corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid injections were used before TJA in the included studies. Overall, comparing 127,163 patients with prior intra-articular injections and 394,104 patients without any injections, we noted a statistically significant increased risk of PJI in the injection group (RR 1.24 95% CI: 1.11, 1.38 I2 = 48% p = 0.002). On subgroup analysis, there was a statistically significant increased risk of PJI in the injection group in studies where intra-articular injections were administered <12 months before surgery (RR 1.18 95% CI: 1.10, 1.27 I2 = 7% p < 0.00001). Furthermore, on meta-analysis, we noted non-significant but increased risk of PJI when injections were administered 1 month (RR 1.47 95% CI: 0.88, 2.46 I2 = 77% p = 0.14), 0–3 months (RR 1.22 95% CI: 0.96, 1.56 I2 = 84% p = 0.11), and 3–6 months (RR 1.16 95% CI: 0.99, 1.35 I2 = 49% p = 0.06) before surgery.Conclusion: Our results indicate that patients with prior intra-articular injections have a small but statistically significant increased risk of PJI after TJA. Considering that PJI is a catastrophic complication with huge financial burden, morbidity and mortality; the clinical significance of this small risk cannot be dismissed. The question of the timing of injections and the risk of PJI still remains and can have a significant impact on the decision making.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42021258297.

Are current DRG-based bundled payment models for revision total joint arthroplasty risk-adjusting adequately?

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (7) ◽  
pp. 959-964
Author(s):  
Azeem T. Malik ◽  
Mengnai Li ◽  
Safdar N. Khan ◽  
John H. Alexander ◽  
Daniel Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Total Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Marginal Cost ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Bundled Payment ◽  
Bundled Payments ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Payment Models

Aims Currently, the US Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) has been testing bundled payments for revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA) through the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) programme. Under the BPCI, bundled payments for revision TJAs are defined on the basis of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). However, these DRG-based bundled payment models may not be adequate to account appropriately for the varying case-complexity seen in revision TJAs. Methods The 2008-2014 Medicare 5% Standard Analytical Files (SAF5) were used to identify patients undergoing revision TJA under DRG codes 466, 467, or 468. Generalized linear regression models were built to assess the independent marginal cost-impact of patient, procedural, and geographic characteristics on 90-day costs. Results A total of 9,263 patients (DRG-466 = 838, DRG-467 = 4,573, and DRG-468 = 3,842) undergoing revision TJA from 2008 to 2014 were included in the study. Undergoing revision for a dislocation (+$1,221), periprosthetic fracture (+$4,454), and prosthetic joint infection (+$5,268) were associated with higher 90-day costs. Among comorbidities, malnutrition (+$10,927), chronic liver disease (+$3,894), congestive heart failure (+$3,292), anaemia (+$3,149), and coagulopathy (+$2,997) had the highest marginal cost-increase. The five US states with the highest 90-day costs were Alaska (+$14,751), Maryland (+$13,343), New York (+$7,428), Nevada (+$6,775), and California (+$6,731). Conclusion Under the proposed DRG-based bundled payment methodology, surgeons would be reimbursed the same amount of money for revision TJAs, regardless of the indication (periprosthetic fracture, prosthetic joint infection, mechanical loosening) and/or patient complexity. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):959–964.

scholarly journals Use of Chlorhexidine Preparations in Total Joint Arthroplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaiben George ◽  
Alison K Klika ◽  
Carlos A Higuera
Keyword(s):  
Total Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Biofilm Formation ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Hand Antisepsis ◽  
Irrigation Solution ◽  
And Control ◽  
Skin Cleansing ◽  
Emergence Of Resistance

Abstract. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Chlorhexidine is a widely used antiseptic because of its rapid and persistent action. It is well tolerated and available in different formulations at various concentrations. Chlorhexidine can be used for pre-operative skin cleansing, surgical site preparation, hand antisepsis of the surgical team and intra-articular irrigation of infected joints. The optimal intra-articular concentration of chlorhexidine gluconate in irrigation solution is 2%, to provide a persistent decrease in biofilm formation, though cytotoxicity might be an issue. Although chlorhexidine is relatively cheap, routine use of chlorhexidine without evidence of clear benefits can lead to unnecessary costs, adverse effects and even emergence of resistance. This review focuses on the current applications of various chlorhexidine formulations in TJA. As the treatment of PJI is challenging and expensive, effective preparations of chlorhexidine could help in the prevention and control of PJI.

scholarly journals Prosthetic Joint Infection: Updates on Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3892
Author(s):  
Jiri Gallo
Keyword(s):  
Prosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Total Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Joint Diseases ◽  
Diagnosis And Therapy ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
End Stage

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) delivers highly valuable outcomes to patients with end-stage joint diseases [...]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document