scholarly journals When to Initiate Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Adults?

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Alkhawajah ◽  
Joel Oger
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Glatiramer Acetate ◽  
Major Question ◽  
Disease Modifying Drugs ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

For patients with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Scierosis Beta Interfaerons and Glatiramer Acetate were the first to be licensed for treatment. This review deals with one major question: when to initiate therapy? Through exploring the unique characteristics of the disease and treatement we suggest an approach that should be helpful in the process of decision-making.

scholarly journals Patients experiences with multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies in daily life – a qualitative interview study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Sippel ◽  
Karin Riemann-Lorenz ◽  
Jutta Scheiderbauer ◽  
Ingo Kleiter ◽  
Rebecca Morrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
Interview Study ◽  
Disease Modifying Therapies ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract Background Besides coping with a disease with many uncertainties, people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis face complex decisions concerning disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). In an interview study, we aimed to assess patients’ experiences with DMTs. Methods Problem-centred interviews were conducted with 50 people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Germany using maximum variation sampling and covering all licensed DMTs. Data were analysed thematically using deductive and inductive categories. Results 47 of 50 patients had treatment with at least one of the approved DMTs. The main themes were: (1) starting a DMT, (2) switching to another DMT, (3) discontinuing a DMT, and (4) multiple sclerosis without starting a DMT. Different intercorrelated factors influenced the decision-making processes for or against a DMT. Individual experiences with DMTs in daily life contained the effort in administration, success, and failure of DMTs, coping strategies and well-being without DMTs. The decision-making process for or against a DMT and the use of those treatments can be understood as a constant, continually shifting process, complicated by different factors, which change over time. Experiences with DMTs were characterized by attempts to handle uncertainty and to (re)gain control and integrate adaptivity into one’s life. Conclusions The study provides a rich and nuanced amount of patients’ experiences with DMTs. The findings demonstrate the importance for practitioners to look at current life circumstances of patients with multiple sclerosis when recommending a DMT and to promote and enable patients to make informed decisions.

scholarly journals Disease-Modifying Drugs Reduce Cortical Lesion Accumulation and Atrophy Progression in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Results from a 48-Month Extension Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Rinaldi ◽  
Paola Perini ◽  
Matteo Atzori ◽  
Alice Favaretto ◽  
Dario Seppi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Glatiramer Acetate ◽  
Reference Population ◽  
Cortical Atrophy ◽  
Cortical Lesion ◽  
Disease Modifying Drugs ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Cortical lesions (CLs) and atrophy are pivotal in multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology. This study determined the effect of disease modifying drugs (DMDs) on CL development and cortical atrophy progression in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) over 48 months. Patients (n=165) were randomized to sc IFNβ-1a 44 μg, im IFNβ-1a 30 μg, or glatiramer acetate 20 mg. The reference population comprised 50 DMD-untreated patients with RRMS. After 24 months, 43 of the untreated patients switched to DMDs. The four groups of patients were followed up for an additional 24 months. At 48 months the mean standard deviation number of new CLs was significantly lower in patients treated with sc IFNβ-1a (1.4 ± 1.0, range 0–5) compared with im IFNβ-1a (2.3 ± 1.3, range 0–6,P=0.004) and glatiramer acetate (2.2 ± 1.5, range 0–7,P=0.03). Significant reductions in CL accumulation and new white matter and gadolinium-enhancing lesions were also observed in the 43 patients who switched to DMDs after 24 months, compared with the 24 months of no treatment. Concluding, this study confirms that DMDs significantly reduce CL development and cortical atrophy progression compared with no treatment.

The Case for Early Diagnosis and Treatment In Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Rudick
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Tissue Injury ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Disease Modifying Drugs ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Neurologic Disability ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract The emergence of partially effective disease-modifying drugs for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) has raised important questions. Which patients with RR-MS should be started on disease-modifying drugs? Can some patients be observed without treatment? Treatment decisions are difficult in part because currently available drugs must be administered by injections, and the drugs are expensive. Emerging research findings support the view that most people diagnosed with RR-MS are at risk for irreversible brain tissue injury and resultant neurologic disability. Importantly, the pathologic process is active during the early stages in many RR-MS patients who appear clinically stable. These findings provide a rationale for proactively treating patients with RR-MS early in their disease course with disease-modifying drugs in order to suppress disease activity, minimize tissue injury, and prevent disability at a later stage. Evidence in support of this approach is reviewed in this report, as are practical issues related to the use of disease-modifying drugs in RR-MS patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document