scholarly journals Surgical Excision of Benign Papillomas Diagnosed with Core Biopsy: A Community Hospital Approach

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eka Rozentsvayg ◽  
Kristen Carver ◽  
Sunita Borkar ◽  
Melvy Mathew ◽  
Sean Enis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Surgical Pathology ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Benign Papilloma

Our goal was to assess the value of surgical excision of benign papillomas of the breast diagnosed on percutaneous core biopsy by determining the frequency of upgrade to malignancies and high risk lesions on a final surgical pathology. We reviewed 67 patients who had biopsies yielding benign papilloma and underwent subsequent surgical excision. Surgical pathology of the excised lesions was compared with initial core biopsy pathology results. 54 patients had concordant benign core and excisional pathology. Cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma) was diagnosed in five (7%) patients. Surgery revealed high-risk lesions in 8 (12%) patients, including atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, and lobular carcinoma in situ. Cancer and high risk lesions accounted for 13 (19%) upstaging events from benign papilloma diagnosis. Our data suggests that surgical excision is warranted with core pathology of benign papilloma.

Advocating Nonsurgical Management of Patients With Small, Incidental Radial Scars at the Time of Needle Core Biopsy: A Study of 77 Cases

2015 ◽  
Vol 139 (9) ◽  
pp. 1137-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathleen Matrai ◽  
Timothy M. D'Alfonso ◽  
Lindsay Pharmer ◽  
Michele B. Drotman ◽  
Rache M. Simmons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Invasive Carcinoma ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Radial Scar ◽  
Needle Core Biopsy ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia

Context Radial scars are benign sclerosing lesions that are routinely excised when diagnosed in a needle core biopsy. Optimal management for patients with incidental and small (≤5 mm) radial scars is uncertain. Objective To assess pathologic upgrade of radial scars diagnosed in needle core biopsy samples and identify a subset of patients who could benefit from conservative management. Design Patients with a diagnosis of radial scar in a needle core biopsy who underwent excision of the biopsied area were identified. Radial scars greater than 5 mm in size and those with coexisting atypia, carcinoma, and papillary lesions were excluded. After histologic-radiographic correlation, rates of pathologic upgrade were assessed. Results Seventy-seven radial scars diagnosed in 66 patients were included. Overall, 9 of 77 (12%) showed upgrade to a high-risk lesion (6 lobular carcinoma in situ, 2 atypical ductal hyperplasia, 1 atypical lobular hyperplasia), while none (0%) showed upgrade to invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. One of 22 incidental radial scars (4.5%) showed upgrade on excision versus 6 of 36 (16.7%) for radial scars considered to be the radiographic target (P = .23). Older age was associated with upgrade (P < .001). Conclusions No incidental or small (≤5 mm) radial scars excised revealed invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ on excision. Provided there is good pathologic-radiologic concordance, it appears reasonable for these patients to be managed conservatively.

scholarly journals UK national survey of management of breast lobular carcinoma in situ

2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
pp. 574-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Chester ◽  
O Bokinni ◽  
I Ahmed ◽  
A Kasem
Keyword(s):  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Breast Surgery ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
National Standard ◽  
Excision Biopsy ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma In Situ

Introduction There is no national standard treatment for patients with breast lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Association of Breast Surgery guidelines for the management of breast cancer suggest that lesions containing LCIS should be excised for definitive diagnosis and recommend close surveillance after excision biopsy. The aim of this study was to form a picture of the current management of LCIS by UK breast surgeons. Methods A questionnaire about the management of LCIS was sent to 490 UK breast surgeons. Results Of 490 questionnaires sent out, 173 (35%) were returned. When LCIS is present in a core biopsy, 61% of breast surgeons perform surgical excision, 22% would not excise but would continue follow-up and the remainder perform neither or set no clear management plan. Over half (54%) follow patients up with five years of annual mammography. If classic LCIS were found at the margins of wide local excision, 92% would not re-excise. Conversely, if pleomorphic LCIS were found, 71% would achieve clear margins. Respondents were split evenly regarding management of classic LCIS with a family history as 54% would not alter management whereas 43% would treat the disease more aggressively. Conclusions Our survey has shown that in cases where LCIS is found at core biopsy, most surgeons follow Association of Breast Surgery guidance, obtaining further histological samples to exclude pleomorphic LCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive cancer, whereas others opt for annual surveillance and some discharge the patient. This study highlighted the huge variability in LCIS management, and the need for randomised controlled trials and input into national audits such as the Sloane Project to establish evidence-based national standard guidelines.

scholarly journals Diagnostic underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ at percutaneous core needle and vacuum-assisted biopsies of the breast in a Brazilian reference institution

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Machado Badan ◽  
Decio Roveda Júnior ◽  
Sebastião Piato ◽  
Eduardo de Faria Castro Fleury ◽  
Mário Sérgio Dantas Campos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Underestimation Rate

Abstract Objective: To determine the rates of diagnostic underestimation at stereotactic percutaneous core needle biopsies (CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsies (VABB) of nonpalpable breast lesions, with histopathological results of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) subsequently submitted to surgical excision. As a secondary objective, the frequency of ADH and DCIS was determined for the cases submitted to biopsy. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of 40 cases with diagnosis of ADH or DCIS on the basis of biopsies performed between February 2011 and July 2013, subsequently submitted to surgery, whose histopathological reports were available in the internal information system. Biopsy results were compared with those observed at surgery and the underestimation rate was calculated by means of specific mathematical equations. Results: The underestimation rate at CNB was 50% for ADH and 28.57% for DCIS, and at VABB it was 25% for ADH and 14.28% for DCIS. ADH represented 10.25% of all cases undergoing biopsy, whereas DCIS accounted for 23.91%. Conclusion: The diagnostic underestimation rate at CNB is two times the rate at VABB. Certainty that the target has been achieved is not the sole determining factor for a reliable diagnosis. Removal of more than 50% of the target lesion should further reduce the risk of underestimation.

Subareolar Sclerosing Ductal Hyperplasia

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Cheng ◽  
Timothy M. D’Alfonso ◽  
Maria Arafah ◽  
Rebecca Marrero Rolon ◽  
Paula S. Ginter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Solitary Lesion ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Initial Description

Subareolar sclerosing duct hyperplasia (SSDH) remains to be fully characterized nearly 20 years after initial description. Thirty-five SSDH cases diagnosed over a 16-year period (January 2000 to December 2015) were reviewed. All patients were female (mean age = 59 years, range = 18-80) who had presented with a unilateral solitary lesion (left 22, right 13) with a mean size of 1.3 cm (range = 0.4-3.0 cm), and showed florid and papillary epithelial hyperplasia with dense sclerosis without involvement of nipple or areolar epidermis. Significant lesions concurrent within SSDH included low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma (n = 1), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; n = 1), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS; n = 1), and atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH; n = 13). No case of SSDH recurred in a mean follow-up of 44 months (range = 6-189). Subsequent significant lesions occurred in 6 patients: DCIS (n = 3; ipsilateral 2, contralateral 1), ipsilateral ADH (n = 2), and ipsilateral atypical lobular hyperplasia (n = 1). Long-term follow-up for patients with SSDH is indicated as DCIS can occur subsequently in either breast.

Papillary Breast Lesions: Association with Malignancy and Upgrade Rates on Surgical Excision

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (11) ◽  
pp. 1294-1297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanh-tam Tran ◽  
Asma Mursleen ◽  
Sahar Mirpour ◽  
Omar Ghanem ◽  
Maen J. Farha
Keyword(s):  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Breast Lesion ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Intraductal Papilloma ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Aggressive Approach ◽  
Papillary Lesions ◽  
Benign Papilloma

Intraductal papilloma falls under the category of benign breast mass. However, recent studies show that it can harbor occult carcinoma. The management of benign intraductal papilloma remains controversial because of its nonspecific radiologic and histological findings, as well as its association with surrounding malignant pathology. The purpose of this study is to investigate upgrade rates of a benign intraductal papilloma on surgical excision and the need for surgical excision of papillary lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy. A retrospective review of a single institution's pathology database between 2011 and 2015 identified 43 core biopsies with benign papilloma. We followed the upgrade rates of these lesions on surgical excision. There were 90 biopsies with the diagnosis of benign intraductal papilloma. The average age was 55.2 (range from 24–87 years old). Forty-three had benign intraductal papilloma; 28 of the 43 core biopsies had surgical excision. Two (7.1%) had an upgrade from benign intraductal papilloma to intraductal papilloma with atypia. One (3.6%) had an upgrade to ductal carcinoma in situ. None had invasive cancer. Surgical findings were in agreement with core biopsies in 25 (89.3%) of 28 cases (κ = 0.80, P < 0.0001). Core biopsies have a statistically significant correlation with pathologies on surgical excision in detecting atypia in breast lesion as demonstrated by κ = 0.80. However, the study shows benign intraductal papillomas on core biopsy have an upgrade rate of 10.7 per cent after undergoing surgical excision. As such, we recommend a more aggressive approach including surgical excision of all benign intraductal papillary lesions.

Lobular neoplasia on core biopsy: Is excision always indicated?

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 75-75
Author(s):  
C. A. Makarewich ◽  
K. M. Rosenkranz
Keyword(s):  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Incidental Finding ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Excisional Biopsy ◽  
Invasive Disease ◽  
Lobular Neoplasia ◽  
Occult Malignancy

75 Background: Lobular neoplasia (LN) is a continuum of rare, noninvasive lesions of the breast including lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia. Current management is controversial and often includes excisional biopsy in women diagnosed with LN on percutaneous core biopsy (PCB) to exclude an occult malignancy. This strategy is based on retrospective data in women undergoing selective excisions. We performed routine excision of all lesions diagnosed as LN in our institution in order to ascertain a more accurate assessment of pathologic upgrade. Methods: Retrospective review of all prospectively collected cases of LN treated in a single institution from 2007-2010. Excisional biopsies were performed in all cases of LN excepting one (patient declined). Histologic findings of excisional biopsies were reviewed to assess the rate of pathologic upgrade. Results: Of the 2,289 PCBs performed during the study period, LN was found in 23 cases (1.0%). Twenty two (0.96%) cases proceeded to excisional biopsy. On final pathology, malignancy was found in 4 patients (18%). Two of 22 (9%) women were upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (both intermediate grade with foci of <1mm and 4mm) and 2/22 (9%) women were diagnosed with invasive lobular carcinoma. Conclusions: While 18% of women in our series had upgraded pathology at the time of excisional biopsy, we support selective rather than routine excisional biopsy. One of the invasive diagnoses was an incidental finding unrelated to the microcalcifications for which biopsy was initially performed. In the second case of invasive disease, the upgraded lesion was a mass identified on MRI performed for surgical planning in a woman already diagnosed with breast cancer. In both cases of DCIS, the area of malignancy was small (<1mm and 4mm) and of uncertain clinical significance. Based on these findings, we do not recommend routine excision of all LN identified on PCB. Cases in which the lesion is associated with a radiographic mass and/or is identified in a breast with a synchronous malignancy do warrant excisional biopsy. Patients without these high risk features can be counseled on the risks of malignancy and given the option of observation with close follow up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document