scholarly journals Basal Activation of Type I Interferons (Alpha2 and Beta) and2′5′OAS Genes: Insights into Differential Expression Profiles of Interferon System Components in Systemic Sclerosis

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danilo Bretas de Oliveira ◽  
Gabriel Magno de Freitas Almeida ◽  
Antônio Carlos Martins Guedes ◽  
Flávia Patrícia Sena Teixeira Santos ◽  
Claudio Antônio Bonjardim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Basal Expression ◽  
Interferon System ◽  
Type Iii Ifn ◽  
Complex Autoimmune Disease

Objective. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex autoimmune disease in which interferons (IFNs) may play an essential role. We hypothesized that type I and III IFNs may be found in increased levels in patients and be responsible for SSc autoimmune status.Methods. Type I and III IFN and ISG basal expression profiles were measured by qPCR using RNA from PBMCs of patients and controls .Results. Type I IFNs are increased in SSc patients, while no induction of type III IFNs was detected. This induction cannot be related to IRF7, since no upregulation of this gene was seen on patients. Of the ISGs tested, 2′5′OAS levels were increased in patients, while 6–16 and MxA levels were not.Conclusions. While there is no indication of type III IFN induction, increased levels of type I IFNs may lead to abnormal regulation of ISGs that can be responsible for immune system alterations described for SSc.

Differential expression and activity of the porcine type I interferon family

2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongming Sang ◽  
Raymond R. R. Rowland ◽  
Richard A. Hesse ◽  
Frank Blecha
Keyword(s):  
Antiviral Activity ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Type I ◽  
Antiviral Responses ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Antiviral Activities ◽  
Vesicular Stomatitis

Type I interferons (IFNs) are central to innate and adaptive immunity, and many have unique developmental and physiological functions. However, in most species, only two subtypes, IFN-α and IFN-β, have been well studied. Because of the increasing importance of zoonotic viral diseases and the use of pigs to address human research questions, it is important to know the complete repertoire and activity of porcine type I IFNs. Here we show that porcine type I IFNs comprise at least 39 functional genes distributed along draft genomic sequences of chromosomes 1 and 10. These functional IFN genes are classified into 17 IFN-α subtypes, 11 IFN-δ subtypes, 7 IFN-ω subtypes, and single-subtype subclasses of IFN-αω, IFN-β, IFN-ε, and IFN-κ. We found that porcine type I IFNs have diverse expression profiles and antiviral activities against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), with activity ranging from 0 to >105 U·ng−1·ml−1. Whereas most IFN-α subtypes retained the greatest antiviral activity against both PRRSV and VSV in porcine and MARC-145 cells, some IFN-δ and IFN-ω subtypes, IFN-β, and IFN-αω differed in their antiviral activity based on target cells and viruses. Several IFNs, including IFN-α7/11, IFN-δ2/7, and IFN-ω4, exhibited minimal or no antiviral activity in the tested target cell-virus systems. Thus comparative studies showed that antiviral activity of porcine type I IFNs is virus- and cell-dependent, and IFN-αs are positively correlated with induction of MxA, an IFN-stimulated gene. Collectively, these data provide fundamental genomic information for porcine type I IFNs, information that is necessary for understanding porcine physiological and antiviral responses.

scholarly journals Rotavirus NSP1 Inhibits Type I and Type III Interferon Induction

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 589
Author(s):  
Gennaro Iaconis ◽  
Ben Jackson ◽  
Kay Childs ◽  
Mark Boyce ◽  
Stephen Goodbourn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Viral Gene Expression ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Viral Gene ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifn ◽  
Viral Immunity ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Type Iii Ifn

Type I interferons (IFNs) are produced by most cells in response to virus infection and stimulate a program of anti-viral gene expression in neighboring cells to suppress virus replication. Type III IFNs have similar properties, however their effects are limited to epithelial cells at mucosal surfaces due to restricted expression of the type III IFN receptor. Rotavirus (RV) replicates in intestinal epithelial cells that respond predominantly to type III IFNs, and it has been shown that type III rather than type I IFNs are important for controlling RV infections in vivo. The RV NSP1 protein antagonizes the host type I IFN response by targeting IRF-3, IRF-5, IRF-7, or β-TrCP for proteasome-mediated degradation in a strain-specific manner. Here we provide the first demonstration that NSP1 proteins from several human and animal RV strains antagonize type III as well as type I IFN induction. We also show that NSP1 is a potent inhibitor of IRF-1, a previously undescribed property of NSP1 which is conserved among human and animal RVs. Interestingly, all NSP1 proteins were substantially more effective inhibitors of IRF-1 than either IRF-3 or IRF-7 which has significance for evasion of basal anti-viral immunity and type III IFN induction in the intestinal epithelium.

scholarly journals Differential Regulation of Type I and Type III Interferon Signaling

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan L. Stanifer ◽  
Kalliopi Pervolaraki ◽  
Steeve Boulant
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Differential Regulation ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Interferon Signaling ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Current State ◽  
Type Iii Ifn ◽  
Type Iii Interferon

Interferons (IFNs) are very powerful cytokines, which play a key role in combatting pathogen infections by controlling inflammation and immune response by directly inducing anti-pathogen molecular countermeasures. There are three classes of IFNs: type I, type II and type III. While type II IFN is specific for immune cells, type I and III IFNs are expressed by both immune and tissue specific cells. Unlike type I IFNs, type III IFNs have a unique tropism where their signaling and functions are mostly restricted to epithelial cells. As such, this class of IFN has recently emerged as a key player in mucosal immunity. Since the discovery of type III IFNs, the last 15 years of research in the IFN field has focused on understanding whether the induction, the signaling and the function of these powerful cytokines are regulated differently compared to type I IFN-mediated immune response. This review will cover the current state of the knowledge of the similarities and differences in the signaling pathways emanating from type I and type III IFN stimulation.

scholarly journals Contribution of type III interferons to antiviral immunity: location, location, location

2017 ◽  
Vol 292 (18) ◽  
pp. 7295-7303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergei V. Kotenko ◽  
Joan E. Durbin
Keyword(s):  
Immune Responses ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
First Line ◽  
Receptor System ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Adaptive Immune ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Antimicrobial Protection ◽  
Multiple Levels

Type I interferons (IFN-α/β) and the more recently identified type III IFNs (IFN-λ) function as the first line of defense against virus infection and regulate the development of both innate and adaptive immune responses. Type III IFNs were originally identified as a novel ligand-receptor system acting in parallel with type I IFNs, but subsequent studies have provided increasing evidence for distinct roles for each IFN family. In addition to their compartmentalized antiviral actions, these two systems appear to have multiple levels of cross-regulation and act coordinately to achieve effective antimicrobial protection with minimal collateral damage to the host.

scholarly journals The TLR3/IRF1/Type III IFN Axis Facilitates Antiviral Responses against Enterovirus Infections in the Intestine

mBio ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Su ◽  
Muhammad Adnan Shereen ◽  
Xiaofeng Zeng ◽  
Yicong Liang ◽  
Wen Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Responses ◽  
Health Risks ◽  
Enterovirus 71 ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Enterovirus Infection ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Antiviral Responses ◽  
Public Health Risks ◽  
Type Iii Ifn

ABSTRACT Enteroviruses infect gastrointestinal epithelium cells, cause multiple human diseases, and present public health risks worldwide. However, the mechanisms underlying host immune responses in intestinal mucosa against the early enterovirus infections remain elusive. Here, we showed that human enteroviruses including enterovirus 71 (EV71), coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3), and poliovirus 1 (PV1) predominantly induce type III interferons (IFN-λ1 and IFN-λ2/3), rather than type I interferons (IFN-α and IFN-β), in cultured human normal and cancerous intestine epithelial cells (IECs), mouse intestine tissues, and human clinical intestine specimens. Mechanistic studies demonstrated that IFN-λ production is induced upon enterovirus infection through the Toll-like receptor 3/interferon regulatory factor 1 (TLR3/IRF1) signaling pathway in IECs. In turn, the supplementation of IFN-λ subsequently induces intrinsically antiviral responses against enterovirus replication. Notably, intraperitoneal injection in neonatal C57BL/6J mice with mouse recombinant IFN-λ2 protein represses EV71 replication and protects mice from viral lethal effects. Altogether, these results revealed a distinct mechanism by which the host elicited immune responses against enterovirus infections in intestine through activating the TLR3/IRF1/type III IFN axis. The new findings would provide an antiviral strategy for the prevention and treatment of enterovirus infections and associated diseases. IMPORTANCE Enterovirus infections are significant sources of human diseases and public health risks worldwide, but little is known about the mechanism of innate immune response in host intestine epithelial surface during the viral replication. We reported the epithelial immune response in cultured human normal and cancerous cells (IECs), mouse tissues, and human clinical intestine specimens following infection with enterovirus 71. The results mechanistically revealed type III interferons (IFN-λ1 and IFN-λ2/3), rather than type I interferons (IFN-α and IFN-β), as the dominant production through TLR3/IRF1 signaling upon multiple human enterovirus infection, including enterovirus 71 (EV71), coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3), and poliovirus 1 (PV1). IFN-λ subsequently induced antiviral activity against enterovirus replication in vitro and in vivo. These studies uncovered the role of the novel process of type III IFN production involved in the TLR3/IRF1 pathway in host intestine upon enterovirus infection, which highlighted a regulatory manner of antiviral defense in intestine during enterovirus infection.

scholarly journals Increased sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 to type III interferon in human intestinal epithelial cells

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmon Kee ◽  
Camila Metz-Zumaran ◽  
Patricio Doldan ◽  
Cuncai Guo ◽  
Megan Stanifer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Intestinal Epithelial Cells ◽  
Type I ◽  
Intestinal Epithelial ◽  
Human Intestine ◽  
Virus Spread ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells ◽  
Type Iii Ifn

The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 caused the COVID-19 global pandemic leading to 3.5 million deaths worldwide as of June 2021. The human intestine was found to be a major viral target which could have a strong impact on virus spread and pathogenesis since it is one of the largest organs. While type I interferons (IFNs) are key cytokines acting against systemic virus spread, in the human intestine type III IFNs play a major role by restricting virus infection and dissemination without disturbing homeostasis. Recent studies showed that both type I and III IFNs can inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection, but it is not clear if one IFN controls SARS-CoV-2 infection of the human intestine better or with a faster kinetics. In this study, we could show that both type I and III IFNs possess antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in human intestinal epithelial cells (hIECs), however type III IFN is more potent. Shorter type III IFN pretreatment times and lower concentrations were required to efficiently reduce virus load when compared to type I IFNs. Moreover, type III IFNs significantly inhibited SARS-CoV-2 even 4 hours post-infection and induced a long-lasting antiviral effect in hIECs. Importantly, the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 to type III IFNs was virus-specific since type III IFN did not control VSV infection as efficiently. Together these results suggest that type III IFNs have a higher potential for IFN-based treatment of SARS-CoV-2 intestinal infection as compared to type I IFNs.

scholarly journals AB0042 CYTOKINE NETWORK ELUCIDATED BY THE QUANTIFICATION OF MULTIPLE CYTOKINES IN THE SERUM SEQUENTIALLY SAMPLED FROM RA PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED WITH BIOLOGIC DMARDS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1323.2-1324
Author(s):  
K. Sato ◽  
S. Mamada ◽  
C. Hayashi ◽  
T. Nagashima ◽  
S. Minota
Keyword(s):  
Bone Erosion ◽  
Feedback System ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Cytokine Network ◽  
Biologic Dmards ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Before And After

Background:Biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have demonstrated that proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL-) 6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) play important roles in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Other cytokines, such as type I interferons (IFNs), are also implicated in its pathogenesis (ref 1). However, the complete picture of the cytokine network involved in RA remains to be elucidated.Objectives:By quantifying sets of cytokines in the serum of RA patients before and after treatment with various biologic DMARDs, we sought to determine the effects of drugs on (A) type I IFNs, (B) soluble IL-6 receptors, and (C) other cytokines.Methods:52 patients with RA were treated with various biologic DMARDs (tocilizumab (TOC): 16, abatacept (ABT): 15, and TNF inhibitors (TNFi): 21). Serum samples were obtained (1) before, (2) approximately 4 weeks after (3) and approximately 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment. A suspension bead-array system was used for analysis; Bio-Plex Human Cytokine 17-plex Assay kits and Express Custom Panels (Bio-Rad), including IFN-β, IFN-α2, soluble IL-6 receptor α (sIL6Rα) and gp130 were used.Results:(1) As expected, the disease activity score 28-joiny count (DAS28) using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) significantly decreased in all three groups (TOC, ABT and TNFi) by 12 weeks.(2) IFN-α2 was barely detected in the serum samples. IFN-β seemed to increase slightly in the ABT group, but the increase was not statistically significant.(3) The levels of sIL6Rα did not change substantially. Those of gp130 decreased slightly but significantly in the TOC group by 12 weeks.(4) The levels of IL-6 decreased significantly in the ABT group by 12 weeks. Those in the TNFi group decreased significantly at 4 weeks but not 12 weeks (Fig. 1A).(5) The levels of IL-7 decreased significantly only in the TOC group (Fig. 1B).Conclusion:(1) The biologic DMARDs tested in this study did not significantly affect the serum levels of type I IFNs in this study.(2) The decrease in gp130 in the TOC group may imply that gp130 is induced by IL-6, although whether this level of decrease has physiological significance is open to question.(3) Serum IL-6 was significantly decreased in the TNFi group at 4 weeks but not 12 weeks. TNF has been reported to induce IL-6 (ref 2), but negative feedback loop(s) may be present. Such a feedback system might make the discontinuation of TNFi difficult, even if patients are in remission.(4) IL-7 may be a target of IL-6. A higher level of IL-7 has been reported to be present in the joints of RA patients compared with osteoarthrosis and it is a cytokine implicated in the differentiation of osteoclasts (ref 3). This may partly explain the effect of TOC on preventing bone erosion in RA.References:[1]Ann Rheum Dis. 2007; 66: 1008–14[2]Rheumatology 2007; 46: 920-6[3]Rheumatology 2008; 47: 753-9Acknowledgments:We thank all the members of the Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University. We are also grateful to the patients involved in this study.Disclosure of Interests:Kojiro Sato Grant/research support from: Abbie, Pfizer, Chugai, Astellas, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Ono, Takeda, Sachiko Mamada: None declared, Chiyomi Hayashi: None declared, Takao Nagashima: None declared, Seiji Minota: None declared

scholarly journals Activation of Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) and Sjögren Syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
pp. 893-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Papinska ◽  
H. Bagavant ◽  
G.B. Gmyrek ◽  
M. Sroka ◽  
S. Tummala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Autoimmune Disorder ◽  
Sjögren Syndrome ◽  
Lymphoid Cells ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Sjogren Syndrome ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifns

Sjögren syndrome (SS), a chronic autoimmune disorder causing dry mouth, adversely affects the overall oral health in patients. Activation of innate immune responses and excessive production of type I interferons (IFNs) play a critical role in the pathogenesis of this disorder. Recognition of nucleic acids by cytosolic nucleic acid sensors is a major trigger for the induction of type I IFNs. Upon activation, cytosolic DNA sensors can interact with the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) protein, and activation of STING causes increased expression of type I IFNs. The role of STING activation in SS is not known. In this study, to investigate whether the cytosolic DNA sensing pathway influences SS development, female C57BL/6 mice were injected with a STING agonist, dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA). Salivary glands (SGs) were studied for gene expression and inflammatory cell infiltration. SG function was evaluated by measuring pilocarpine-induced salivation. Sera were analyzed for cytokines and autoantibodies. Primary SG cells were used to study the expression and activation of STING. Our data show that systemic DMXAA treatment rapidly induced the expression of Ifnb1, Il6, and Tnfa in the SGs, and these cytokines were also elevated in circulation. In contrast, increased Ifng gene expression was dominantly detected in the SGs. The type I innate lymphoid cells present within the SGs were the major source of IFN-γ, and their numbers increased significantly within 3 d of treatment. STING expression in SGs was mainly observed in ductal and interstitial cells. In primary SG cells, DMXAA activated STING and induced IFN-β production. The DMXAA-treated mice developed autoantibodies, sialoadenitis, and glandular hypofunction. Our study demonstrates that activation of the STING pathway holds the potential to initiate SS. Thus, apart from viral infections, conditions that cause cellular perturbations and accumulation of host DNA within the cytosol should also be considered as possible triggers for SS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document