scholarly journals Application of Adoptive T-Cell Therapy Using Tumor Antigen-Specific T-Cell Receptor Gene Transfer for the Treatment of Human Leukemia

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiki Ochi ◽  
Hiroshi Fujiwara ◽  
Masaki Yasukawa

The last decade has seen great strides in the field of cancer immunotherapy, especially the treatment of melanoma. Beginning with the identification of cancer antigens, followed by the clinical application of anti-cancer peptide vaccination, it has now been proven that adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT) using cancer antigen-specific T cells is the most effective option. Despite the apparent clinical efficacy of ACT, the timely preparation of a sufficient number of cancer antigen-specific T cells for each patient has been recognized as its biggest limitation. Currently, therefore, attention is being focused on ACT with engineered T cells produced using cancer antigen-specific T-cell receptor (TCR) gene transfer. With regard to human leukemia, ACT using engineered T cells bearing the leukemia antigen-specific TCR gene still remains in its infancy. However, several reports have provided preclinical data on TCR gene transfer using Wilms' tumor gene product 1 (WT1), and also preclinical and clinical data on TCR gene transfer involving minor histocompatibility antigen, both of which have been suggested to provide additional clinical benefit. In this review, we examine the current status of anti-leukemia ACT with engineered T cells carrying the leukemia antigen-specific TCR gene, and discuss the existing barriers to progress in this area.

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca Simon ◽  
Dennis C. Harrer ◽  
Beatrice Schuler-Thurner ◽  
Gerold Schuler ◽  
Ugur Uslu

Tumor cells can develop immune escape mechanisms to bypass T cell recognition, e.g., antigen loss or downregulation of the antigen presenting machinery, which represents a major challenge in adoptive T cell therapy. To counteract these mechanisms, we transferred not only one, but two receptors into the same T cell to generate T cells expressing two additional receptors (TETARs). We generated these TETARs by lentiviral transduction of a gp100-specific T cell receptor (TCR) and subsequent electroporation of mRNA encoding a second-generation CSPG4-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). Following pilot experiments to optimize the combined DNA- and RNA-based receptor transfer, the functionality of TETARs was compared to T cells either transfected with the TCR only or the CAR only. After transfection, TETARs clearly expressed both introduced receptors on their cell surface. When stimulated with tumor cells expressing either one of the antigens or both, TETARs were able to secrete cytokines and showed cytotoxicity. The confirmation that two antigen-specific receptors can be functionally combined using two different methods to introduce each receptor into the same T cell opens new possibilities and opportunities in cancer immunotherapy. For further evaluation, the use of these TETARs in appropriate animal models will be the next step towards a potential clinical use in cancer patients.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. SCI-39-SCI-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley Riddell ◽  
Cameron Turtle ◽  
Michael Hudecek ◽  
Daniel Sommermeyer ◽  
Michael C. Jensen

Abstract Adoptive T-cell therapy with tumor-reactive T cells is emerging as a highly effective strategy for eliminating even the most advanced chemotherapy refractory malignancies. Endogenous T cells specific for tumor-associated antigens can sometimes be isolated and expanded from the patient’s blood or tumor infiltrate, or more expeditiously can be engineered by gene transfer to express a T-cell receptor specific for a tumor associated MHC/peptide complex or a synthetic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) specific for a tumor associated cell surface molecule. The remarkable regression of advanced acute lymphocytic leukemia and lymphoma in patients treated with T cells engineered to express CD19-specific CARs illustrates the potential for this approach to transform clinical care. Therapeutic activity is variable in individual patients, however, and this appears to correlate with the ability of transferred, tumor-reactive T cells to persist and proliferate in vivo, and to retain effector function. These attributes may reflect both the qualities of the T cells that are isolated or engineered for therapy, and the local tumor microenvironment that may contain regulatory T cells; cells that express ligands that engage inhibitor receptors on effector T cells or cytokines that inhibit effector T-cell proliferation. The CD4+ and CD8+ T cell pools in normal individuals contain a variety of naïve, memory, and regulatory T-cell subsets that differ in epigenetic, transcriptional, and functional properties. Because most clinical protocols have used polyclonal peripheral blood mononuclear cells as recipients for CAR gene transfer, the composition of T-cell products that are being administered is highly variable, particularly when the T cells are obtained from cancer patients that have received prior cytotoxic chemotherapy that can skew the phenotypic composition of the peripheral T-cell pool. As a consequence, transferring tumor-targeting receptors into polyclonal unselected cell populations provides poor control over the cellular composition of the final T-cell product, which may in part explain the marked differences in efficacy and toxicity that have been observed in the clinic, and may complicate regulatory approval of these novel therapies. Methods to derive T cells from distinct naïve and memory T-cell subsets have been developed, enabling the rapid production of therapeutic T cells of uniform composition. The results of preclinical studies that illustrate the improved potency of defined T-cell products that are engineered with tumor-specific CARs, and the clinical implementation of this approach in B-cell malignancies will be presented. Disclosures: Riddell: Cell Medica: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; ZetaRx: Consultancy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (571) ◽  
pp. eaaz6667
Author(s):  
Meixi Hao ◽  
Siyuan Hou ◽  
Weishuo Li ◽  
Kaiming Li ◽  
Lingjing Xue ◽  
...  

Treatment of solid tumors with T cell therapy has yielded limited therapeutic benefits to date. Although T cell therapy in combination with proinflammatory cytokines or immune checkpoints inhibitors has demonstrated preclinical and clinical successes in a subset of solid tumors, unsatisfactory results and severe toxicities necessitate the development of effective and safe combinatorial strategies. Here, the liposomal avasimibe (a metabolism-modulating drug) was clicked onto the T cell surface by lipid insertion without disturbing the physiological functions of the T cell. Avasimibe could be restrained on the T cell surface during circulation and extravasation and locally released to increase the concentration of cholesterol in the T cell membrane, which induced rapid T cell receptor clustering and sustained T cell activation. Treatment with surface anchor-engineered T cells, including mouse T cell receptor transgenic CD8+ T cells or human chimeric antigen receptor T cells, resulted in superior antitumor efficacy in mouse models of melanoma and glioblastoma. Glioblastoma was completely eradicated in three of the five mice receiving surface anchor-engineered chimeric antigen receptor T cells, whereas mice in other treatment groups survived no more than 64 days. Moreover, the administration of engineered T cells showed no obvious systemic side effects. These cell-surface anchor-engineered T cells hold translational potential because of their simple generation and their safety profile.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 926-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Kagoya ◽  
Tingxi Guo ◽  
Brian Yeung ◽  
Kayoko Saso ◽  
Mark Anczurowski ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15021-e15021
Author(s):  
Zishan Zhou ◽  
Yue Pu ◽  
Shanshan Xiao ◽  
Ping Wang ◽  
Yang Yu ◽  
...  

e15021 Background: T-cell receptor (TCR)-engineered T cells are a novel option for adoptive cell therapy used for the treatment of several advanced forms of cancers. Unlike many shared tumor-specific antigens, such as melanoma-associated antigen (MAGE)-A3, MAGE-A4, and New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NY-ESO)-1, neoantigen has garnered much attention as a potential precision immunotherapy. Personalized neoantigen selection serves a broader and more precision future for cancer patients. Methods: Dendritic cells (DCs) derived from adherent monocytes were pulsed with mixed peptides during the maturation phase. CD8+ cells positively selected from PBMCs were incubated with washed DCs. After 21day culture in X-VIVO medium with IL-7 and IL-15, cells were harvested and stimulated with peptides for 6 h. CD137+ cells were sorted by flow cytometric and immediately processed using the 10x Genomic Chromium Single Cell 5' Library & Gel Bead Kit and Chromium Single Cell V(D)J Enrichment Kit. The T-cell TCR libraries were constructed and sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform. The sequencing reads were aligned to the hg38 human reference genome and analyzed using the 10x Genomics Cell Ranger pipeline. The paired TCR α and β chain sequence of each cell was demonstrated with V(D)J analysis. TCR-T cells were constructed using the information of neoantigen specific TCR, and infused to patients. Results: Two patients were treated with the personalized TCR-T treatment. At the first stage, specialized immune cells were harvested and proceeded to single-cell TCR profiling. Then, the single cell sequencing of the first patient's sample revealed the top five neoantigen specific TCR CDR3 clonotypes with the proportion of 25%, 7.67%, 4.81%, 2.79%, and 2.54%, respectively. Similarly, the other patient had the top five TCR CDR3 sequenced with the proportion of 13.38%, 7.04%, 4.21%, 2.83%, and 1.94%, respectively. The results demonstrated that both patients had one or two dominant CDR3 clonotypes, which might reflect the strength of neoantigen in vivo. At the third stage, TCR-T cells were constructed, and infused to the patients. The clinical outcome will be evaluated in the near future. Conclusions: We have generated a pipeline for a highly personalized cancer therapy using TCR-engineered T cells. Although some questions remain to be answered, this novel approach may result in better clinical responses in future treatment.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 823-823
Author(s):  
Marleen M Van Loenen ◽  
Renate de Boer ◽  
Gerdien L Volbeda ◽  
Avital L Amir ◽  
Renate S. Hagedoorn ◽  
...  

Abstract T cell receptor transfer to engineer tumor specific T cells is being explored as a strategy for adoptive immunotherapy. By retroviral introduction of T cell receptors (TCRs), large numbers of T cells with defined antigen specificity can be obtained. The in vivo efficacy of adoptively transferred TCR engineered T cells has been demonstrated in mouse studies and recently the first clinical trial with TCR engineered T cells was performed in melanoma patients. However, a potential drawback of TCR gene transfer is the formation of mixed TCR dimers. Chains of the introduced TCR can pair with the endogenous TCR chains, resulting in unknown specificities, and potentially in harmful reactivity against patient HLA molecules. We investigated whether TCR gene transfer leads to the generation of new detrimental reactivities by creating T cells that expressed mixed TCR dimers. To be able to discriminate between the antigen specificity of the mixed TCR dimers and the introduced as well as the endogenous TCR, we transduced mono-specific T cells with seven different antigen specific TCRs. As mono-specific T cells we used CMV-pp50 specific HLA-A1 restricted T cells. The transduced T cells were analyzed for newly acquired specificities against a large HLA-typed EBV-LCL panel covering almost all HLA class I and II molecules. We transduced several polyclonal virus specific T cell populations with the seven different antigen specific TCRs, and showed that in all T cell populations at least one of the seven TCR-transduced populations acquired new alloreactivities. Furthermore, by randomly combining TCR alpha and beta chains derived from different T cell clones we created 60 mixed TCR dimers of which 17 acquired alloreactivity. These results indicate that recombination of the introduced TCR chains with the endogenous TCR chains frequently gives rise to new allospecificities. To ascertain that the newly acquired alloreactivities were exerted by mixed TCR dimers, we introduced only TCR alpha or beta chains into CMV-pp50 specific monoclonal T cells, and demonstrated for example, that the introduction of a CMV pp65 specific TCR alpha chain led to a newly acquired reactivity that was HLA B58 restricted. The introduction of only the beta chain of a minor histocompatibility antigen (mHag) HA-1 specific TCR led to a newly acquired HLA B52 specific reactivity. Furthermore, we analyzed whether mixed TCR dimers consisting of conserved TCRs with the same specificity could acquire new harmful reactivity. We recombined mHag HA-2 specific TCR alpha and beta chains from 4 different T cell clones. Of the 12 mixed TCR dimers, a combination of the mHag HA-2 specific TCR alpha chain derived from the HA2.6 T cell clone with the mHag HA-2 specific beta chain of clone HA2.19 resulted in alloreactivity that was HLA DQ3 restricted. These results indicate that each recombination of TCR chains after TCR gene transfer can potentially result in a harmful new reactivity. In conclusion, mixed TCR dimers due to pairing of endogenous TCR chains with introduced TCR chains acquire potentially dangerous reactivities, both class I and class II restricted. To limit the chance of generating self- or alloreactive T cells, TCRs may be constructed allowing selective pairing of the TCR alpha chain with the corresponding TCR beta chain. Alternatively, we propose to use virus specific T cells as host cells for TCR gene transfer. Since they consist of a restricted TCR repertoire, the number of different chimeric TCRs formed will be limited. By introducing into these T cells as controls only the alpha or beta chain of the TCR of interest, the reactivity of these T cells and harmful reactivities of the mixed TCR dimers can be tested against different patient derived cell types.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-Bei Ren ◽  
Shang-Jun Sun ◽  
Shuang-Yin Han

T-cell therapy using genetically engineered T cells modified with either T cell receptor or chimeric antigen receptor holds great promise for cancer immunotherapy. The concerns about its toxicities still remain despite recent successes in clinical trials. Temporal and spatial control of the engineered therapeutic T cells may improve the safety profile of these treatment regimens. To achieve these goals, numerous approaches have been tested and utilized including the incorporation of a suicide gene, the switch-mediated activation, the combinatorial antigen recognition, etc. This review will summarize the toxicities caused by engineered T cells and novel strategies to overcome them.


Author(s):  
Sasan Ghaffari ◽  
Nastaran Khalili ◽  
Nima Rezaei

AbstractCancer immunotherapy has gained attention as the supreme therapeutic modality for the treatment of various malignancies. Adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT) is one of the most distinctive modalities of this therapeutic approach, which seeks to harness the potential of combating cancer cells by using autologous or allogenic tumor-specific T-cells. However, a plethora of circumstances must be optimized to produce functional, durable, and efficient T-cells. Recently, the potential of ACT has been further realized by the introduction of novel gene-editing platforms such as the CRISPR/Cas9 system; this technique has been utilized to create T-cells furnished with recombinant T-cell receptor (TCR) or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) that have precise tumor antigen recognition, minimal side effects and treatment-related toxicities, robust proliferation and cytotoxicity, and nominal exhaustion. Here, we aim to review and categorize the recent breakthroughs of genetically modified TCR/CAR T-cells through CRISPR/Cas9 technology and address the pearls and pitfalls of each method. In addition, we investigate the latest ongoing clinical trials that are applying CRISPR-associated TCR/CAR T-cells for the treatment of cancers.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. SCI-13-SCI-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Bonini

Adoptive T cell therapy exploits the ability of T lymphocytes to recognize and destroy specific targets, on microbes or tumors, through their T cell receptors (TCR), leading to efficient killing and long-term protection against diseases. Unfortunately, tumor antigens are often overexpressed, unmodified self-antigens, subject to tolerance mechanisms; so tumor-specific T lymphocytes are rare cells. Conversely, neoantigens derive from oncogenic mutations can elicit productive T cell responses, but for tumors with a low mutational load, such as the majority of hematological malignancies, such tumor-specific T cells are rarely identified. These limitations can be overcome by genetic engineering of T lymphocyte specificity. Recently, unprecedented clinical results were obtained with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) engineered T cells in patients affected by B-cell malignancies, raising high expectations among the scientific community, patient associations, biotech companies and general public. While clearly proving the ability of redirected T cells to recognize and efficiently kill cancer cells, CAR therapy has also shown some limitations: the nature of CAR-mediated recognition imposes to restrict the array of targeted antigens to those expressed on the surface of cancer cells. As a consequence, antigens involved in the oncogenic process, that are often expressed as intracellular molecules, cannot be targeted by current CARs. Furthermore, when the natural counterpart of cancer cells cannot be spared, the identification of a proper CAR target on cancer cell surface might become a real challenge. TCR genetic engineering represents a suitable alternative to CAR T cell therapy for several tumors. The core of this approach is the transfer in patients' T cells of genes encoding for rare tumor-specific TCR. TCRs recognize antigen-derived peptides processed and presented on HLA molecules, thus allowing to largely increasing the array of potential targets. However, the simple transfer of tumor specific TCR genes into T cells is affected by other limitations: genetically modified T cells shall express four different TCR chains, that might mispair, leading to unpredictable toxicity and to an overall dilution of the tumor specific TCR on lymphocyte surface, thus limiting the efficacy of therapeutic cellular product. To overcome these issues, we developed a TCR gene editing procedure, based on the knockout of the endogenous TCR genes by transient exposure to alfa and beta chain specific Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs), followed by the introduction of tumor-specific TCR genes by lentiviral vectors (Provasi et al, Nature Medicine 2012). The TCR gene editing technology, proved safer and more effective than conventional TCR gene transfer in vitro and in animal studies. Early differentiated T cells, such as memory stem T cells and central memory T cells, cells endowed with long term persistence capacity, can be genetically engineered by TCR gene transfer and TCR gene editing, thus allowing to produce long-lasting living drugs, with the aim of eliminating cancer cells and patrol the organism for tumor recurrence To enter the phase of clinical practice adoptive T cell therapy needs today to face several challenges: compliance to the dynamic and heterogeneous regulatory framework, susceptibility to automated processes, reproducibility, and sustainability shall be relevant variables in determining the fate of these innovative cellular products. Disclosures Bonini: TxCell: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Molmed SpA: Consultancy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 2333-2343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Leisegang ◽  
Adriana Turqueti-Neves ◽  
Boris Engels ◽  
Thomas Blankenstein ◽  
Dolores J. Schendel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document