scholarly journals Radiologic Evaluation of Small Renal Masses (II): Posttreatment Management

2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Santos ◽  
C. Deltoro ◽  
M. I. Martín ◽  
A. Marhuenda

The increase in the detection of small renal masses (SRMs) and their best knowledge leads to a change in the therapeutic management of these lesions. The use of a less aggressive surgical technique or even an expectant attitude is the current tendency, in order to preserve as much renal function as possible. Imaging techniques are essential in the followup of these lesions. It allows us to know the postsurgical changes and possible complications due to treatment and the presence of local recurrence and metastases. Furthermore, a close radiological followup of SRM related to ablative treatments is mandatory. The purpose of this article is to reveal the imaging features of complications due to surgical or ablative treatments, local recurrence and metastasis, as well as their followup.

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seshadri Sriprasad ◽  
Mohammed Aldiwani ◽  
Shiv Pandian ◽  
Tommy K. Nielsen ◽  
Mohamed Ismail ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 119-127
Author(s):  
Selahattin Çalışkan ◽  
Orhan Koca ◽  
Mehmet Akyüz ◽  
Metin İshak Öztürk ◽  
Muhammet Ihsan Karaman

Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) account 80–85% of all primary renal neoplasms and originate from the renal cortex. The patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy for renal tumour in our unit between January 2005 and 2015 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups; group 1 includes patients who were treated between January 2005 and December 2009, group 2 those from January 2010 to 2015. There were 103 patients in group 1. The patients were between 21 and 89 years with mean age of 61.46 year. Renal cell carcinomas account 83.4% of the patients, benign renal tumours were 8.7% and transitional cell carcinomas were 7.7% of the patients in group 1. A total of 32.5% RCCs were classified as pT1a, 24.4% as pT1b, 15.1% as pT2a, 11.6% as pT2b, 15.1% as pT3a and 1.1% as pT4. There were 202 patients in group 2 and the patients were between 27 and 81 years with mean age of 58.5 year. Renal cell carcinomas comprised the main bulk of the tumours with 182 nephrectomy specimens. According to the pathological classification of RCCs, 51 specimens were found as pT1a, 54 were pT1b, 13 were pT2a, 14 were pT2b, 48 were pT3a and 2 were pT4. Although, the incidence of small renal masses has been increasing with widespread use of imaging techniques and recent advancements, the proportion of high grade and advanced stage renal tumours increased during the study period.


2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Dominguez-Escrig ◽  
K. Sahadevan ◽  
P. Johnson

Advances in imaging techniques (CT and MRI) and widespread use of imaging especially ultrasound scanning have resulted in a dramatic increase in the detection of small renal masses. While open partial nephrectomy is still the reference standard for the management of these small renal masses, its associated morbidity has encouraged clinicians to exploit the advancements in minimally invasive ablative techniques. The last decade has seen the rapid development of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and novel ablative techniques such as, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and cryoablation (CA). In particular, CA for small renal masses has gained popularity as it combines nephron-sparing surgery with a minimally invasive approach. Studies with up to 5-year followup have shown an overall and cancer-specific 5-year survival of 82% and 100%, respectively. This manuscript will focus on the principles and clinical applications of cryoablation of small renal masses, with detailed review of relevant literature.


2010 ◽  
Vol 183 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Bigot ◽  
Maxime Crepel ◽  
Gregory Verhoest ◽  
Karim Bensalah ◽  
Alexandre De La Taille ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Marhuenda ◽  
M. I. Martín ◽  
C. Deltoro ◽  
J. Santos ◽  
Jose Rubio Briones

When characterizing a small renal mass (SRM), the main question to be answered is whether the mass represents a surgical or nonsurgical lesion or, in some cases, if followup studies are a reasonable option. Is this a task for a urologist or a radiologist? It is obvious that in the increasing clinical scenario where this decision has to be made, both specialists ought to work together. This paper will focus on the principles, indications, and limitations of ultrasound, CT, and MRI to characterize an SRM in 2008 with a detailed review of relevant literature. Special emphasis has been placed on aspects regarding the bidirectional information between radiologists and urologists needed to achieve the best radiological approach to an SRM.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bex ◽  
B. K. Kroon ◽  
R. de Bruijn

With an increasing number of small renal masses being diagnosed organ-preserving treatment strategies such as nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) or radiofrequency and cryoablation are gaining importance. There is evidence that preserving renal function reduces the risk of death of any cause, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. Some patients have unfavourable tumor locations or large tumors unsuitable for NSS or ablation which is a clinical problem especially in those with imperative indications to preserve renal function. These patients may benefit from downsizing primary tumors by targeted therapy. This paper provides an overview of the current evidence, safety, controversies, and ongoing trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document