scholarly journals Comparing the Prognostic Value of PTEN and Akt Expression with the Mitotic Activity Index in Adjuvant Chemotherapy-Treated Node-Negative Breast Cancer patients aged <55 years

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-35
Author(s):  
Emiel A. M. Janssen ◽  
Håvard Søiland ◽  
Ivar Skaland ◽  
Einar Gudlaugson ◽  
Kjell H. Kjellevold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Mitotic Activity ◽  
Invasive Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Mitotic Activity Index

Background: The prognostic value of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and PTEN in invasive breast cancer (IBC) is controversial. Cell proliferation, especially the Mitotic Activity Index (MAI), is strongly prognostic in lymph node-negative (LNneg) invasive breast cancer. However, its prognostic value has not been compared with the value of Akt and PTEN expression. Material and Methods: Prognostic comparison of Her2Neu, p110alpha (PIK3CA), Akt, mTOR, PTEN, MAI and cell-cycle regulators in 125 LNneg patients aged <55 years with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF)-based adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Results: Twenty-one (17%) patients developed distant metastases = DMs (median follow-up: 134 months). p110alpha correlated (p = 0.01) with pAkt but only in PTEN-negatives; pAkt correlated (p = 0.02) with mTOR. PTEN-negativity correlated with high MAI, high grade and ER-negativity (p = 0.009). The MAI was the strongest prognosticator (Hazard Ratio = HR = 2.9, p = 0.01). Her2Neu/p110α/Akt/mTOR features have no additional prognostic value to the MAI. PTEN had additional value but only in MAI < 3 (39/125 = 31%; 8% DMs). 19/39 = 49% of the MAI < 3 patients have combined MAI < 3 / PTEN+ with 0% DMs, contrasting 15% DMs in MAI < 3 / PTEN− (p = 0.03). Conclusions: In T1−3N0M0 adjuvant CMF-treated breast cancer patients aged <55 years, MAI was the strongest survival predictor. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and cell-cycle regulator characteristics had no additional prognostic value, but PTEN has. Patients with combined MAI < 3 & PTEN-positivity had 100% survival. The small subgroup of MAI < 3 patients that died were PTEN-negative.

Prospective Multicenter Validation of the Independent Prognostic Value of the Mitotic Activity Index in Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer Patients Younger Than 55 Years

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (25) ◽  
pp. 5993-6001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan P.A. Baak ◽  
Paul J. van Diest ◽  
Feja J. Voorhorst ◽  
Elsken van der Wall ◽  
Louk V.A.M. Beex ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Mitotic Activity ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Mitotic Activity Index ◽  
Er Status

Purpose To validate the independent strong prognostic value of mitotic activity index (MAI) in lymph node (LN) –negative invasive breast cancer patients younger than 55 years in a nationwide multicenter prospective study. Patients and Methods Analysis of routinely assessed MAI and other prognosticators in 516 patients (median follow-up, 118 months; range, 8 to 185 months), without systemic adjuvant therapy or previous malignancies. Results Distant metastases occurred in 127 patients (24.6%); 90 (17.4%) died as a result of metastases. MAI (< 10, ≥ 10) showed strong association with recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 3.12; 95% CI, 2.17 to 4.50; P ≤ .0001) and mortality (HR, 4.42; 95% CI, 2.79 to 7.01; P < .0001). The absolute difference in 10-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to distant recurrence as well as survival was 22% between MAI less than 10 versus ≥ 10. This effect was independent of age, estrogen receptor (ER) status, and tumor diameter (which were significant prognosticators). In multivariate analysis with regard to patient age, tumor diameter, grade, ER status, and the St Gallen criterion, MAI proved to be an independent and the strongest prognosticator. Tubular formation (TF) and nuclear atypia (NA), as constituents of (expert revised) grade, had no (for TF) or limited (for NA, P = .048) additional prognostic value to the MAI. In the group with MAI less than 10, MAI less than 3 versus more than 3 had additional value but the classical threshold of 0 to 5 v 6 to 10 did not. With this additional subdivision of MAI as less than 3, 3 to 9, and more than 9, NA lost its additive prognostic value. Conclusion The MAI is the strongest, most widely available, easily assessable, inexpensive, well-reproducible prognosticator and is well suited to routinely differentiate between high- and low-risk LN-negative breast cancer patients younger than 55 years.

scholarly journals LOH at 1p31 (ARHI) and Proliferation in Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 335-343
Author(s):  
Emiel A. M. Janssen ◽  
Irene T. Øvestad ◽  
Ivar Skaland ◽  
Håvard Søiland ◽  
Einar Gudlaugsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Node Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Phosphohistone H3 ◽  
Mitotic Activity Index

Background: The mitotic activity index (MAI) is a strong prognosticator in node-negative invasive breast cancer patients. Recently, a correlation between the MAI and specific chromosomal aberrations at chromosome 1p was described.Methods: Analysis of MAI, immunohistochemical staining patterns for proliferation-associated phosphohistone H3 (PPH3), phosphorylated ERK1/2, p21, cyclin E, Ki67 and cyclin D1 proteins; and prognosis in 158 adjuvant chemotherapy-treated T1-2N0M0 invasive breast cancer patients, analysis of LOH at 1p31 (including ARHI) using the dinucleotide repeats D1S207, D1S430 and D1S464 in 76 patients. Single and multivariate survival analysis was used to evaluate the importance of the various markers tested.Results: LOH at 1p31 did not correlate with MAI nor provide prognostic information. Phosphohistone H3 was the best prognosticator for patients in all age groups with 20 year distant metastasis free survival of distant metastases 93% vs. 72% respectively (p = 0.004, HR = 4.5). In multivariate analysis, phosphohistone H3 < 13 vs. ≥13 exceeded the prognostic value of the mitotic activity index.Conclusions: LOH at 1p31 is common in breast cancer, and correlates with loss of proliferation-associated proteins, but not with MAI, PPH3 or prognosis. PPH3 is the best prognosticator in this study group of adjuvant chemotherapy-treated lymph node-negative breast cancer patients.

scholarly journals Prognostic significance of uPA/PAI-1 level, HER2 status, and traditional histologic factors for survival in node-negative breast cancer patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Fokter Dovnik ◽  
Iztok Takac
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Multivariate Model ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Node Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Size Grade ◽  
Pai 1

Abstract Background The association of HER2 status with urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) levels raises the question whether uPA/PAI-1 level carries additional clinically relevant prognostic information independently from HER2 status. The aim of our study was to compare the prognostic value of uPA/PAI-1 level, HER2 status, and traditional prognostic factors for survival in node-negative breast cancer patients. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis of 858 node-negative breast cancer patients treated in Maribor University Clinical Center, Slovenia, in the years 2000–2009 was performed. Data were obtained from patient medical records. The median follow-up time was 100 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses of disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed using the Cox regression and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results In univariate analysis, age, tumor size, grade, lymphovascular invasion, HER2 status and UPA/PAI-1 level were associated with DFS, and age, tumor size, grade, and uPA/PAI-1 level were associated with OS. In the multivariate model, the most important determinants of DFS were age, estrogen receptor status and uPA/PAI-1 level, and the most important factors for OS were patient age and tumor grade. The HR for death from any cause in the multivariate model was 1.98 (95% CI 0.83–4.76) for patients with high uPA and/or PAI-1 compared to patients with both values low. Conclusions uPA/PAI-1 level clearly carries an independent prognostic value regardless of HER2 status in node-negative breast cancer and could be used in addition to HER2 and other markers to guide clinical decisions in this setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document