scholarly journals Follow up after Primary Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of Current Practice in the United Kingdom

Sarcoma ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. H. Gerrand ◽  
L. J. Billingham ◽  
P. J. Woll ◽  
R. J. Grimer

Despite the clinical and financial implications, there is little evidence about how patients who have been treated for soft tissue sarcoma should be followed up. The purpose of this study was to determine current practice in the United Kingdom. 192 clinicians treating patients with soft tissue sarcoma were surveyed with a postal questionnaire enquiring about frequency and method of follow up and how patients would be followed up in each of 3 clinical scenarios: a patient with a trunk or extremity tumour at low risk of relapse; a patient with a trunk or extremity tumour at high risk of relapse; and a patient with a retroperitoneal or abdominal tumour. 155 (81%) clinicians responded. Clinic visits and X-rays were the most frequently used methods of follow up. Chest CT scans, local site imaging, and blood tests were used infrequently. The intensity and methods of follow up varied with each of the clinical scenarios. There was a seven-to-twenty fold variation in cost between the least and the most expensive regimes. Respondents were generally supportive of the development of the clinical trial in this area.

ORL ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Sunil Dutt Sharma ◽  
Ahmad Hariri ◽  
Ravi Kumar Lingam ◽  
Arvind Singh

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted MRI (DWMRI) has a role in the surgical planning for cholesteatoma. <b><i>Aims/Objectives:</i></b> The aim of the study was to assess the use of DWMRI in the management of cholesteatoma across the UK, and measure clinicians’ confidence in the use of DWMRI. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Telephone survey in 139 Otolaryngology Departments in the United Kingdom between March 2017 and July 2017, and asking radiology delegates at the British Society of Head and Neck Imaging 2017 meeting. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The response rate was 101 out of 139 Trusts (73%). Of those respondents who did have DWMRI available, 68/88 respondents (77%) use it for cholesteatoma. The mean confidence (±standard deviation) of the respondents with DWMRI in identifying cholesteatoma presence was 7.3 ± 2.1, in identifying volume of cholesteatoma was 6.8 ± 1.8, and in identifying subsites of cholesteatoma was 4.6 ± 2.1. <b><i>Conclusions and Significance:</i></b> DWMRI has a well-defined role in the follow-up of patients after cholesteatoma surgery, and those primary cases of cholesteatoma where the diagnosis is in question. The use of DWMRI for cholesteatoma is variable across the UK, but there are certain clinical scenarios where there is not enough awareness regarding the benefits of imaging (such as petrous apex cases of cholesteatoma).


Sarcoma ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saurabh P. Nagar ◽  
Daniel S. Mytelka ◽  
Sean D. Candrilli ◽  
Yulia D’yachkova ◽  
Maria Lorenzo ◽  
...  

Objective. To describe real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy in the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, and France. Methods. Physicians completed a web-based medical record abstraction for adult patients with advanced STS (other than Kaposi’s sarcoma or gastrointestinal stromal tumor) who received ≥1 line of systemic therapy. Clinical characteristics, treatments, tumor responses, and mortality data were recorded. Results. A total of 130 physicians provided data for 807 patients. Patients’ mean age at advanced STS diagnosis was 57.1 (±12.3) years; 59% were male. The most commonly identified histologic categories were leiomyosarcoma (28%), liposarcoma (13%), and rhabdomyosarcoma (11%). Overall, 57% of patients received only 1 line of therapy, 32% received 2 lines of therapy, and 11% received ≥3 lines of therapy. The most common first-line regimens were doxorubicin alone (41%), doxorubicin plus ifosfamide (19%), docetaxel plus gemcitabine (9%), paclitaxel alone (4%), and ifosfamide (4%). Median overall survival from start of treatment was estimated to be 17.6 months (95% confidence interval, 15.6–19.0 months). Conclusions. In real-world clinical practice, advanced STS is most commonly treated with older therapies in the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, and France. New therapies that improve overall survival in advanced STS are needed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Sheng Chou ◽  
Chun-Yu Liu ◽  
Wei-Ming Chen ◽  
Tain-Hsiung Chen ◽  
Paul Chih-Hsueh Chen ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 613-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
H J Lerner ◽  
D A Amato ◽  
E D Savlov ◽  
W D DeWys ◽  
A Mittleman ◽  
...  

Forty-seven patients with stage I, II, or III soft tissue sarcoma were entered into a prospective randomized Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) adjuvant protocol. Eligibility included conservative or radical primary treatment for local cure. Patients were then randomized to control or Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH). Adriamycin was administered at 70 mg/m2 (slow push, every 3 weeks for seven courses for a maximum of 550 mg/m2). To date, 32 patients, 17 males and 15 females, with an age range of 17 to 75 years (median, 44 years) have been followed sufficiently long to be included in this analysis. Nine patients have died. The median follow-up of the remaining 23 patients is 30 months (range, 2 to 50 months). Survival was not significantly different between Adriamycin or control. However, the disease-free interval was slightly different in favor of observation. This preliminary report does not support the hypothesis that Adriamycin is an effective adjuvant therapy for soft tissue sarcoma. Due to the small numbers, these results must be interpreted in relation to our ability to detect a difference, if in fact one existed. These preliminary data suggest that adjuvant Adriamycin not be used outside the confines of a clinical trial such as the current intergroup adjuvant sarcoma study.


Sarcoma ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Mytelka ◽  
Saurabh P. Nagar ◽  
Yulia D’yachkova ◽  
Elizabeth M. La ◽  
James A. Kaye ◽  
...  

Objective. To describe health care resource utilization and costs for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in the United Kingdom (UK), Spain, Germany, and France. Methods. Physicians abstracted data for adult patients with a diagnosis of advanced STS (other than Kaposi’s sarcoma or gastrointestinal stromal tumor) who received ≥1 lines of systemic therapy. Health care resource utilization related to advanced STS treatment was recorded; associated costs were estimated by applying unit costs. Results. A total of 130 physicians provided data for 807 patients (UK: 199; Spain: 203; Germany: 204; and France: 201). The site of care during active treatment varied based on differences in the health care systems of these four countries. Total mean per-patient health care cost in the UK was £19,457; in Spain, €26,814; in Germany, €20,468; and in France, €24,368. Advanced STS-related systemic treatment costs were driven primarily by drug acquisition and administration costs. Treatment-related costs increased during later lines of therapy for all countries except France, where they decreased after first-line therapy. Pain control and antiemetics were the most common supportive care medications. Conclusions. This study provides real-world data on resource utilization and estimated costs in advanced STS and could inform policymakers about treatment burden.


Sarcoma ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 2 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 171-177
Author(s):  
S. Murray Yule ◽  
Roderick Skinner ◽  
Martin W. English ◽  
Mike Cole ◽  
Andrew D. J. Pearson ◽  
...  

Background.Although the survival of children with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has improved considerably, the outcome of patients with metastatic disease, and those with primary tumours of the extremities or parameningeal sites remains disappointing. We describe the clinical outcome of an ifosfamide-based regimen with local therapy directed only to children who failed to achieve a complete response to initial chemotherapy.Patients and Methods.Twenty-one children with STS (16 rhabdomyosarcoma) who presented with unresectable tumours were treated with five courses of ifosfamide (9 g/m2) and etoposide (600 mg/m2). Patients who did not achieve a complete response then received local therapy. Chemotherapy with ifosfamide combined with etoposide, vincristine (1.5 mg/m2and doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) or vincristine and actinomycin D (1.5 mg/m2) was continued for one year.Results and Discussion.Objective responses to five courses of ifosfamide and etoposide were seen in all patients. Disease free survival (DFS) at a median follow up of 59 months was 57% (95% CI 29–75%). The DFS of children who received local therapy was 89% compared with 33% in those who received chemotherapy alone (p=0.027). Locoregional recurrences did not occur in children who received radiotherapy to the site of the primary tumour. Ifosfamide-based chemotherapy does not reduce the incidence of loco-regional recurrence in children who do not receive local therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document