scholarly journals Thiopurine Methyltransferase Enzyme Activity Determination before Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Azathioprine: Effect on Cost and Adverse Events

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzana A Sayani ◽  
Connie Prosser ◽  
Robert J Bailey ◽  
Philip Jacobs ◽  
Richard N Fedorak

BACKGROUND: Azathioprine (AZA), used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is metabolized by thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT). The accumulation of individual metabolites varies because humans display genetic polymorphism for TPMT expression. Deficiencies in TPMT result in accumulation of toxic metabolites, followed by neutropenia and hepatic inflammation. Concern over acute toxicity frequently leads to under dosing and frequent monitoring tests and visits.OBJECTIVE: To determine whether assessment of TPMT activity before the administration of AZA would predict acute toxicity and, thus, allow for reductions in health care costs related to biochemical screening for, and management of, AZA-induced adverse events.METHODS: Before AZA treatment, 29 patients with IBD were prospectivelyrandomized to one of two groups: group 1, in which no TPMT assay was performed, was started on AZA at 1 mg/kg/day and then titrated every two weeks to a target dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day; and group 2, in which TPMT assays were performed, was started on AZA at the target dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day. For both groups, complete blood count and liver enzymes were monitored weekly for six weeks and at monthly intervals thereafter. Additional tests and health care interventions were undertaken at the discretion of the attending physicians.RESULTS: Of the 29 patients in the study, 15 were randomly assigned to group 1 and 14 to group 2. Demographics and disease activity were similar for both groups. Mean follow-up time was 7.1 months (range 3.5 to 10.7 months). Eight patients from group 1 and six patients from group 2 withdrew as a result of AZA-induced adverse events. There was no correlation between the TPMT activity and the development of AZA-induced adverse events. The direct health care costs for group 1 ($300.11 per patient) were lower than in group 2 ($348.87 per patient).CONCLUSION: The prospective assessment of TPMT enzyme activity before initiating AZA therapy in IBD patients incurred additional cost and did not predict AZA-induced toxicity.

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-143.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Wilke ◽  
Antje Groth ◽  
Gráinne H. Long ◽  
Amanda R. Tatro ◽  
Diana Sun

2011 ◽  
Vol 176 (6) ◽  
pp. 711-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antwan Atia ◽  
Ravindra Murthy ◽  
Beth A. Bailey ◽  
Todd Manning ◽  
Linda L. Garrett ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-103.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taryn Lores ◽  
Charlotte Goess ◽  
Antonina Mikocka-Walus ◽  
Kathryn L. Collins ◽  
Anne L.J. Burke ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175628481989521
Author(s):  
Lorenz Grob ◽  
Sena Bluemel ◽  
Luc Biedermann ◽  
Nicolas Fournier ◽  
Jean-Benoit Rossel ◽  
...  

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) needs early interventions and an individual specialist–patient relationship. Distance from a tertiary IBD center might affect patient’s disease course and outcome. We investigated whether the patient-to-specialist distance has an impact on the disease course using the well-defined patient collective of the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study (SIBDCS). Methods: Patient’s home address at diagnosis (postal zip code) was extracted from the SIBDCS database. Distance between each zip code and the nearest located IBD specialist center was calculated and classified into the following three sections based on proximity: <10 km (group 1); 10–35 km (group 2); >35 km (group 3). Results: Our study included in total 408 IBD patients [234 Crohn’s disease (CD), 154 ulcerative colitis (UC), 20 IBD unclassified (IBDU)]. Median age was lowest in group 2 at diagnosis (G1: 28 years; G2: 21 years, G3: 26 years, p < 0.01). The diagnostic delay did not differ between groups. CD patients in group 1 were treated more often with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (72% versus 56%, p = 0.04) and 5-aminosalicylates (44% versus 28%, p = 0.04) than in group 3. UC/IBDU patients in group 1 were treated more often with corticosteroids than patients in group 3 (83% versus 58%, p < 0.01). The occurrence of IBD-related surgeries did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Patient-to-specialist distance might affect drug treatment. However, disease course and the need for IBD-related surgery does not seem to be associated with a longer distance to specialist care in Switzerland.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Rebecca Sagar ◽  
Marco V. Lenti ◽  
Tanya Clark ◽  
Helen J. Rafferty ◽  
David J. Gracie ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) trough levels and anti-drug antibodies in conjunction with symptoms, disease history, and investigations can aid decision-making. This study evaluated 1-year outcomes of patients with decisions that were altered on the basis of TDM results, in order to investigate whether outcomes from TDM-based decisions to adjust or stop IFX treatment are durable. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively collected clinical outcomes 12 months post treatment decisions based on proactive TDM. Patients whose initial treatment decisions were altered on the basis of TDM results were compared with those where the decision remained unchanged. Events of interest were inpatient admissions with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), further changes to biologic therapy, and IBD-related health-care costs. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 189 patients, 54 (28%) had initial treatment decisions altered in the light of TDM results. The 135 patients whose initial decision was not altered in light of TDM results served as the comparator. There were no differences in hospitalization rates or subsequent biologic switches between the altered decision groups and the comparator group. IBD-related health-care costs were higher in those whose initial decision was altered (median GBP 7,912 vs. GBP 6,521; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001) due to higher drug costs (median GBP 7,062 vs. GBP 6,012; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our study demonstrates good outcomes from changes to IFX treatment based on TDM. Patients with a decision to stop, switch, or continue with an adjusted IFX dose experienced comparable clinical outcomes but had higher drug-related expenditure than those whose treatment decision was not altered in light of TDM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document