scholarly journals Outcome of Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit for Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahad M Al-hameed ◽  
Sat Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Exacerbation ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
End Point

RATIONALE:The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) admission in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who develop acute respiratory failure of unknown etiology.METHODS:A retrospective study at University of Manitoba hospitals reviewed all patients admitted to the ICU from November 1988 to December 2000 with IPF requiring mechanical ventilation for unknown causes of acute respiratory failure. Survival at hospital discharge was assessed as the primary end point and ICU length of stay as a secondary end point. In the absence of open lung biopsy, major and minor clinical criteria (as per American Thoracic Society statements) were used for the diagnosis of IPF. Infections were ruled out by extensive surveillance cultures and/or bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage.RESULTS:Eighty-eight charts were reviewed and 25 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean (± SD) age was 69±11 years (range 42 to 96 years) and 23 patients were male. With the exception of one survivor who was discharged home, 21 patients died while receiving mechanical ventilation, and three patients died in hospital shortly after ICU discharge (one day, 22 days and 67 days). Intubation and mechanical ventilation were administered to 21 patients, with a mean duration of 11±6 days (range two to 27 days); the other four patients were treated with noninvasive ventilation. The average duration of symptoms before ICU admission was 22±26 days. All patients were treated with systemic corticosteroids, while eight patients received additional chemotherapy.CONCLUSIONS:In the absence of a reversible cause, patients with IPF who develop acute exacerbation of IPF may not benefit from ICU admission and mechanical ventilation. However, it is imperative that a diagnostic workup be performed to rule out an infectious or other reversible cause of respiratory failure before admission to the ICU is denied.

Comparative study between noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with respiratory failure

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed N Al Shafi'i ◽  
Doaa M. Kamal El-din ◽  
Mohammed A. Abdulnaiem Ismaiel ◽  
Hesham M Abotiba
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been increasingly used in the management of respiratory failure in intensive care unit (ICU). Aim of the Work is to compare the efficacy and resource consumption of NIPPMV delivered through face mask against invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) delivered by endotracheal tube in the management of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Patients and Methods This prospective randomized controlled study included 78 adults with acute respiratory failure who were admitted to the intensive care unit. The enrolled patients were randomly allocated to receive either noninvasive ventilation or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Results Severity of illness, measured by the simplified acute physiologic score 3 (SAPS 3), were comparable between the two patient groups with no significant difference between them. Both study groups showed a comparable steady improvement in PaO2:FiO2 values, indicating that NIPPV is as effective as CMV in improving the oxygenation of patients with ARF. The PaCO2 and pH values gradually improved in both groups during the 48 hours of ventilation. 12 hours after ventilation, NIPPMV group showed significantly more improvement in PaCO2 and pH than the CMV group. The respiratory acidosis was corrected in the NIPPV group after 24 hours of ventilation compared with 36 hours in the CMV group. NIPPV in this study was associated with a lower frequency of complications than CMV, including ventilator acquired pneumonia (VAP), sepsis, renal failure, pulmonary embolism, and pancreatitis. However, only VAP showed a statistically significant difference. Patients who underwent NIPPV in this study had lower mortality, and lower ventilation time and length of ICU stay, compared with patients on CMV. Intubation was required for less than a third of patients who initially underwent NIV. Conclusion Based on our study findings, NIPPV appears to be a potentially effective and safe therapeutic modality for managing patients with ARF.

Prognosis of Patients With Advanced Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Requiring Mechanical Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure

CHEST Journal ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Stern ◽  
Hervé Mal ◽  
Odile Groussard ◽  
Olivier Brugière ◽  
Armelle Marceau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure

Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Admitted to the ICU With Acute Respiratory Failure—A Reevaluation of the Risk Factors and Outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. 088506662198924
Author(s):  
Matthew Schrader ◽  
Matheni Sathananthan ◽  
Niranjan Jeganathan
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Apache Score ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Organ Failures

Introduction: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients admitted to the ICU with acute respiratory failure (ARF) are known to have a poor prognosis. However, the majority of the studies published to date are older and had small sample sizes. Given the advances in ICU care since the publication of these studies, we sought to reevaluate the outcomes and risk factors associated with mortality in these patients. Methods: Retrospective study using a large multi-center ICU database. We identified 411 unique patients with IPF admitted with ARF between 2014-2015. Results: Of all IPF patients admitted to the ICU with ARF, 81.3% required mechanical ventilation (MV): 48.9% invasive and 32.4% non-invasive alone. The hospital mortality rate was 34.5% for all patients; 48.8% in patients requiring invasive MV, 21.8% in those requiring non-invasive MV and 19.5% with no MV. In multiple regression analyses, age, APACHE score, invasive MV, and hyponatremia at admission were associated with increased mortality whereas post-op status was associated with lower mortality. In patients requiring invasive MV, baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratio was also predictive of mortality. Non-pulmonary organ failures were present in less than 20% of the patients. Conclusions: Although the overall mortality rate for IPF patients admitted to the ICU with ARF has improved, the mortality rates for patients requiring invasive MV remains high at approximately 50%. Older age, high APACHE score, and low baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratio are factors predictive of increased mortality in this population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document