scholarly journals Recommendations for the Appropriate Use of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in the Era of the Coxibs: Defining the Role of Gastroprotective Agents

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H Hunt ◽  
Alan N Barkun ◽  
David Baron ◽  
Claire Bombardier ◽  
Ford R Bursey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Dual Therapy ◽  
Protective Agent ◽  
Appropriate Use ◽  
Gastrointestinal Complications ◽  
Conventional Nsaid ◽  
Gastrointestinal Lesions ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs and the analgesic efficacy of conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are compromised by a two- to fourfold increased risk of gastrointestinal complications. This increased risk has resulted in an increasing use of the new selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors or coxibs, which, in clinical trials and outcomes studies, reduced gastrointestinal adverse events by 50% to 65% compared with conventional NSAIDs. However, the coxibs are not available to all patients who need them, and NSAIDs are still widely used. Moreover, treatment with a coxib cannot heal pre-existing gastrointestinal lesions, and cotherapy with an anti-secretory drug or mucosal protective agent may be required.This paper addresses the management of patients with risk factors for gastrointestinal complications who are taking NSAIDs and makes recommendations for the appropriate use of ‘gastroprotective’ agents (GPAs) in patients who need to take an NSAID or a coxib. When economically possible, a coxib alone is preferable to a conventional NSAID plus a GPA to minimize exposure to potential gastrointestinal damage and avoid unnecessary dual therapy. Patients at high risk require a GPA in addition to a coxib.

scholarly journals Orally Administered NSAIDs—General Characteristics and Usage in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis—A Narrative Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 219
Author(s):  
Marcin Derwich ◽  
Maria Mitus-Kenig ◽  
Elzbieta Pawlowska
Keyword(s):  
Temporomandibular Joint ◽  
Diclofenac Sodium ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Gastrointestinal Complications ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Background: Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ OA) is a degenerative joint disease. The aim of this review was to present the general characteristics of orally administered nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and to present the efficacy of NSAIDs in the treatment of TMJ OA. Methods: PubMed database was analyzed with the keywords: “(temporomandibular joint) AND ((disorders) OR (osteoarthritis) AND (treatment)) AND (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug)”. After screening of 180 results, 6 studies have been included in this narrative review. Results and Conclusions: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are one of the most commonly used drugs for alleviation of pain localized in the orofacial area. The majority of articles predominantly examined and described diclofenac sodium in the treatment of pain in the course of TMJ OA. Because of the limited number of randomized studies evaluating the efficacy of NSAIDs in the treatment of TMJ OA, as well as high heterogeneity of published researches, it seems impossible to draw up unequivocal recommendations for the usage of NSAIDs in the treatment of TMJ OA. However, it is highly recommended to use the lowest effective dose of NSAIDs for the shortest possible time. Moreover, in patients with increased risk of gastrointestinal complications, supplementary gastroprotective agents should be prescribed.

scholarly journals Safety of selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: analysis of the last years data

The Clinician ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 91-99
Author(s):  
N. A. Shostak ◽  
A. A. Klimenko ◽  
N. A. Demidova ◽  
D. A. Anichkov
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Gastrointestinal Tract ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Gastrointestinal Complications ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Cox 2 ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Cox 2 Inhibitors

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly used pain relievers. However, their use often threatens with serious undesirable effects, associated mainly with damage to cardiovascular system (CVS), gastrointestinal tract, kidneys and liver. Contraindications to NSAIDs prescription are clearly regulated, algorithms for their personalized appointment are determined taking into account risk factors for cardiovascular and gastrointestinal adverse events. The severity of NSAIDs side effects is mainly due to the selectivity to cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), as well as the physicochemical properties of various drugs. Cardiovascular adverse events differ among various NSAIDs both within commonly used drugs and among COX-2 inhibitors. It is well known that NSAIDs selective for COX-2 are safer in terms of the effect on the gastrointestinal tract than non-selective drugs. A meta-analysis showed that relatively selective COX-2 inhibitors (meloxicam, etodolac) were associated with a comparable risk of developing symptomatic ulcers and ulcers identified by endoscopy, and safety and tolerability profiles of the drugs were similar.All NSAIDs are associated with cardiovascular toxicity, however, different drugs have significant risk differences. The mechanism of NSAIDs cardiovascular adverse effects is associated with an increase of blood pressure, sodium retention, vasoconstriction, platelet activation, and prothrombotic state. It has been shown that the risk of cardiovascular adverse events when taking COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib, etoricoxib) significantly increases. According to a study of more than 8 million people, it was found that the risk of myocardial infarction was increased in patients taking ketorolac. Further, highest to lowest risk authors list indomethacin, etoricoxib, rofecoxib (not currently used), diclofenac, a fixed combination of diclofenac with misoprostol, piroxicam, ibuprofen, naproxen, celecoxib, meloxicam, nimesulide and ketoprofen. When taking NSAIDs, the risk of heart failure decompensation increases, and it turned out to be the greatest for ketorolac, etoricoxib, and indomethacin. Meloxicam, aceclofenac, ketoprofen almost did not increase heart failure risk. It should be noted that when using the drugs (except for indomethacin and meloxicam), there is a tendency to increase the total cardiovascular and renal risks with increasing doses. Thus, it is obvious that a very careful approach is required when choosing NSAIDs. If there is an increased risk of gastrointestinal complications associated with NSAIDs, selective NSAIDs are preferred, with both coxibs and traditional selective NSAIDs showing the best safety profile in the studies. To minimize cardiovascular side effects specialists should consider the risk level of cardiovascular complications, as well as results of large clinical studies where particular NSAIDs are compared.

Abstract 3047: What Are the Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on Post-Cardiothoracic Surgery Outcomes?

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T Ruffin ◽  
Jeffrey Kluger ◽  
Stephanie M Wills ◽  
C M White ◽  
Craig I Coleman
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cardiothoracic Surgery ◽  
Red Blood Cell Transfusion ◽  
Beta Blockade ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Conflicting Evidence ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Surgery Outcomes ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Background: Two previous studies evaluating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use following cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) demonstrated conflicting evidence regarding their ability to reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). Moreover, neither study examined negative cardiovascular outcomes such as stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). Since a recent study evaluating paracoxib/valdecoxib following CTS demonstrated an increased risk of cardiovascular events, we sought to evaluate whether NSAIDs could reduce the incidence of POAF without increasing patients’ risk of stroke or MI. Methods: Patients (n=555) undergoing CTS from the randomized, controlled Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Trials (AFISTs) I, II and III were evaluated in this nested study. Demographic, surgical and medication use characteristics were prospectively collected as part of the AFIST trials. Endpoints included POAF, stroke, MI and the need for red blood cell transfusion. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results: The population was 67.8 ± 8.6 years old, 77.1% male, 14.6% underwent valve surgery, 6.1% had prior AF, 12.6% had heart failure and 84.0% and 44.1% received postoperative beta-blockade and prophylactic amiodarone. In total, 127 (22.9%) patients received a NSAID postoperatively. NSAID use was associated with reductions in the odds of POAF and the need for RBC transfusions. (Table ) No elevation in the odds of developing stroke or MI was observed. Conclusions: NSAIDs decreased the odds of developing POAF and the need for RBC transfusions without significantly increasing MI or stroke. Table. Effect of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on Postoperative Outcomes

scholarly journals Rheumatoid arthritis: influence of inflammation and anti-inflammatory therapy on cardiovascular risk factors

2020 ◽  
pp. 32-44
Author(s):  
D. I. Trukhan ◽  
D. S. Ivanova ◽  
K. D. Belus
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
Chronic Inflammation ◽  
Pharmacological Intervention ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Rheumatoid arthritis is a frequent and one of the most severe immuno-inflammatory diseases in humans, which determines the great medical and socio-economic importance of this pathology. One of the priority problems of modern cardiac rheumatology is an increased risk of cardiovascular complications in rheumatoid arthritis. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, traditional cardiovascular risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (metabolic syndrome, obesity, dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, smoking and hypodynamia) and a genetic predisposition are expressed. Their specific features also have a certain effect: the “lipid paradox” and the “obesity paradox”. However, chronic inflammation as a key factor in the development of progression of atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction plays a leading role in morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular diseases in rheumatoid arthritis. This review discusses the effect of chronic inflammation and its mediators on traditional cardiovascular risk factors and its independent significance in the development of CVD. Drug therapy (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticosteroids, basic anti-inflammatory drugs, genetically engineered biological drugs) of the underlying disease also has a definite effect on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A review of studies on this problem suggests a positive effect of pharmacological intervention in rheumatoid arthritis on cardiovascular risk factors, their reduction to a level comparable to the populations of patients not suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. The interaction of rheumatologists, cardiologists and first-contact doctors (therapist and general practitioner) in studying the mechanisms of the development of atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis will allow in real clinical practice to develop adequate methods for the timely diagnosis and prevention of cardiovascular diseases in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

scholarly journals Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Increased Risk of Acute Urinary Retention

2005 ◽  
Vol 165 (13) ◽  
pp. 1547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katia M. C. Verhamme ◽  
Jeanne P. Dieleman ◽  
Marc A. M. Van Wijk ◽  
Johan van der Lei ◽  
Joseph L. H. R. Bosch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Abstract P372: U.S. National Estimates of Prescription Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Y Hwang ◽  
Steven M Smith
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Boxed Warning ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Cox 2 ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Cv Disease ◽  
Prescription Nsaid

Introduction: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to treat pain, fever, and inflammation, but their ubiquitous use has led to concerns over increased risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events, particularly in patients with established CV disease (CVD). In 2005, the FDA revised labels for all NSAIDs to include a boxed warning highlighting the potential for increased CV risk. However, little is known regarding real-world prescribing of NSAIDs among patients with CVD. Our objective was to characterize the use of prescription NSAIDs among patients with CVD from 1988-2016 in the U.S. Methods: Using cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 1988-1994 and 1999-2016, we included participants aged ≥18 years with hypertension (defined by self-report, mean blood pressure ≥140/90, or use of an antihypertensive medication), or aged ≥20 years with ≥1 of the following self-reported heart disease conditions: congestive heart failure (CHF), coronary heart disease (CHD), angina, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. Survey-weighted data were analyzed to assess prevalence and trends of prescription NSAID use within each CVD population in 6-year examination periods. Results: Overall, prescription NSAID use declined among all U.S. CVD populations over the study period. Prevalence of prescription NSAID use was highest during the 1999-2004 examination years, but thereafter, declined during the 2005-2010 examination years for those with hypertension (13.9% to 8.8%), CHF (14.6% to 8.5%), CHD (16.3% to 7.0%), angina (17.6% to 9.73%), MI (16.1% to 8.2%), and stroke (15.7% to 8.8%). Use of prescription NSAIDs since the 2005-2010 examination years has remained consistent in all CVD populations. These decreases were driven in part by reduced use of COX-2-selective NSAIDs, whereas non-selective NSAID use among all CVD populations was relatively steady from 1999 to 2016. Conclusions: Prescription NSAID use among patients with CVD appears to have declined from 1988 to 2016, primarily because of less COX-2 NSAID use following removal of 2 approved agents. Otherwise, the prevalence of prescription NSAIDs has remained somewhat stable and relatively high among these high-risk CV populations. Our results suggest additional efforts may be needed to limit the use of NSAIDs among patients with CVD, given that these agents are known to be associated with adverse CVD outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document