scholarly journals Finding the Right Index for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 397-400
Author(s):  
E Jan Irvine

Several activity indices have been developed to assess the efficacy of new therapies for inflammatory bowel disease. The ideal index should be simple to administer and quantitative. It should be a composite of subjective symptoms, objective findings and laboratory markers of inflammation. Any newly developed indices should be assessed for validity, reliability and responsiveness before application in clinical trials. Obstacles to standardizing disease activity relate to the heterogeneity of disease manifestations, the characteristics of the study population, the therapy being tested, the investigators' preference for which index to apply and the attributes of the index. Examples of available indices are identified, some of their limitations are discussed, and guidelines for how to select an index for a clinical trial are outlined.

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjorie Argollo ◽  
Gionata Fiorino ◽  
Daniela Gilardi ◽  
Federica Furfaro ◽  
Giulia Roda ◽  
...  

Introduction: Biosimilars present a considerable potential to reduce costs related to clinical management allowing health-care providers to reinvest this money, leading to a wider access to an effective biological treatment with monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Infliximab biosimilars have already been incorporated in daily clinical practice and are currently used in all indications for which the reference product (RP) was approved. Areas covered: In the next few years, also adalimumab biosimilars will become available for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In fact, several of them (ABP501, BI 695501, GP2017, and SB5) have been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) with the same indications of the reference product (Humira ®). Initial preclinical data proved a strong similarity between all biosimilars and the RP. Moreover, phase 3 studies in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis showed no differences in terms of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. Data on IBD patients are urgently needed. Expert opinion: Biosimilars of adalimumab showed equivalent clinical efficacy to the RP in other immunemediated diseases. However, defining the ideal patient’s profile to receive or to be switched to a biosimilar, choosing one biosimilar vs. another, or cross-switching among biosimilars, will become the next challenge in IBD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S53-S53
Author(s):  
Joshua Paulton ◽  
Amanjot Gill ◽  
Joelle Prevost

Abstract Background Gut-directed hypnosis (GDH) is a complimentary therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), that can be learnt by patients to practice self-hypnosis. GDH in IBD has augmented remission and improved inflammation. GDH has a history of successful use for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). In IBD it may also improve IBS-like symptoms in remission and recovery from surgery. GDH is suitable for youth and adult IBD patients. In hypnosis, a relaxed state is inducted then suggestions to subconscious mind processes are made. In IBD, the mechanism of action of GDH is unknown but may influence the disease stress response. Aims Aims are the development of a GDH self-hypnosis protocol for IBD, with appropriate target symptoms. Patients first learn to practice with a clinician, then as complimentary psychotherapy for remission augmentation, IBS-like symptoms, and surgery recovery. Methods GDH is practiced first with a clinician, and then by patients as self-hypnosis (table 1). Patients receive psycho-education on GDH for IBD. Next, appropriate treatment goals are made, based on target symptoms. Relaxation techniques induce patient to a deeply relaxed state. Therapeutic suggestions specific to patient goals are given: verbal suggestions, visualizations, and post-hypnotic suggestions. Suggestions can focus on having a healthy digestive system, inflammation and symptoms reduction, and achievement and sustainment of remission. Patients emerge from hypnosis, are debriefed, and encouraged to practice ongoing self-hypnosis. Results In IBD, GDH self-hypnosis can be learnt from clinicians and practiced by patients as a complimentary therapy. Patients’ achievement and sustainment of remission, with clinical markers of inflammation can be monitored. Patients can monitor subjective improvement of IBS-like symptoms and post surgery, recovery progress can be monitored. Conclusions GDH has a history of use for IBS. In IBD, it has been shown to modulate remission, and may improve IBS-like symptoms, and in surgery recovery. The mechanism of action of GDH in IBD may influence the disease stress response. Clinicians trained in GDH are limited currently. Patients may learn GDH self- hypnosis to as a complimentary psychotherapy.


Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1843
Author(s):  
Marilyn Hagan ◽  
Bu' Hussain Hayee ◽  
Ana Rodriguez-Mateos

(Poly)phenols (PPs) may have a therapeutic benefit in gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this review is to summarise the evidence-base in this regard. Observational evidence does not give a clear indication that PP intake has a preventative role for IBD or IBS, while interventional studies suggest these compounds may confer symptomatic and health-related quality of life improvements in known patients. There are inconsistent results for effects on markers of inflammation, but there are promising reports of endoscopic improvement. Work on the effects of PPs on intestinal permeability and oxidative stress is limited and therefore conclusions cannot be formed. Future work on the use of PPs in IBD and IBS will strengthen the understanding of clinical and mechanistic effects.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1267-1275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Hüppe ◽  
Jana Langbrandtner ◽  
Winfried Häuser ◽  
Heiner Raspe ◽  
Bernd Bokemeyer

Abstract Introduction Assessment of disease activity in Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is usually based on the physician’s evaluation of clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, and biomarker analysis. The German Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity Index for CD (GIBDICD) and UC (GIBDIUC) uses data from patient-reported questionnaires. It is unclear to what extent the GIBDI agrees with the physicians’ documented activity indices. Methods Data from 2 studies were reanalyzed. In both, gastroenterologists had documented disease activity in UC with the partial Mayo Score (pMS) and in CD with the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI). Patient-completed GIBDI questionnaires had also been assessed. The analysis sample consisted of 151 UC and 150 CD patients. Kappa coefficients were determined as agreement measurements. Results Rank correlations were 0.56 (pMS, GIBDIUC) and 0.57 (HBI, GIBDICD), with p < 0.001. The absolute agreement for 2 categories of disease activity (remission yes/no) was 74.2 % (UC) and 76.6 % (CD), and for 4 categories (none/mild/moderate/severe) 60.3 % (UC) and 61.9 % (CD). The kappa values ranged between 0.47 for UC (2 categories) and 0.58 for CD (4 categories). Discussion There is satisfactory agreement of GIBDI with the physician-documented disease activity indices. GIBDI can be used in health care research without access to assessments of medical practitioners. In clinical practice, the index offers a supplementary source of information.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsolt Barta ◽  
Levente Czompa ◽  
Aniko Rentka ◽  
Eva Zold ◽  
Judit Remenyik ◽  
...  

Aim. To evaluate tear film parameters and relationship of objective clinical signs and subjective symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) subgroups. Methods. 39 patients with Crohn’s disease (CD), 26 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 39 control persons with no ocular symptoms or surface disorders were included in this prospective, case-control, and cross-sectional study. The ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire was applied to evaluate dry eye symptoms, and objective tests of DED were performed on both eyes of each subject. Results. The average of OSDI scores was 30.59 (±16.68) in CD patients, 24.67 (±23.48) in UC patients, and 11.19 (±5.8) in controls. Except for tear film breakup time (tBUT) and Schirmer-I values other objective parameters were better in UC patients, than in CD patients. CD patients rather than UC patients tend to develop DED. This was associated with immunosuppressant and TNF-α inhibitor use. Conclusions. Clinicians must be aware of the spectrum of DED involvement in IBD and suggest using artificial tears in order to decrease severity of ocular complications.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (s1) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
Matthew Ostrowski ◽  
Eric C. Martens

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This study seeks to culture and characterize mucus-degrading microbes from the microbiome of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Stool will be collected from IBD patients and healthy first-degree relatives, then enriched for mucin-degrading microbes through growth on porcine rectal mucin. Dilution plating in both liquid and solid culture formats will be employed to isolate strains capable of growth on mucin. Cultures that are positive for mucin degradation will be identified with 16S rRNA sequencing; unique isolates will be genome sequenced and transcriptionally profiled on simple monosaccharides and mucin in order to identify putative mucin-degrading genes. The abundance of novel enzymes, pathways, and microbes will be compared in healthy and IBD patient populations using existing datasets in the literature. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We expect to isolate previously uncultured mucin-degrading microbes, which will likely include new strains and possibly new species of bacteria. Through the transcriptomic characterization of mucin-degrading pathways, we will expand the lexicon of known mucin-degrading enzymes and pathways used by bacteria in the human colon. We expect mucin-degrading microbes to be more abundant and active in IBD patients compared to healthy controls. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: There is no cure for IBD and treatment relies heavily on suppressing a patient’s immune system. This research seeks to understand the contribution of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of IBD, which may lead to future therapeutic targets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document