scholarly journals A Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicentre Study of the Efficacy And Safety of 5-Aminosalicylic Acid Tablets in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 463-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
LR Sutherland ◽  
M Robinson ◽  
G Onstad ◽  
M Peppercorn ◽  
N Greenberger ◽  
...  

This double-blind, placebo controlled, multicentre, parallel trial assessed the efficacy of two oral doses of a new formulation of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) targeted to release in the cecum which was given for six weeks to 136 patients with active ulcerative colitis. Seven centres participated (two Canadian, five American). Patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (4 g 5-ASA, 2 g 5-ASA or placebo). Medication was dispensed as 250 mg identically appearing tablets containing either 5-ASA or placebo to be taken four times a day. Subjects were assessed at baseline and after three and six weeks of treatment. Assessments included a disease activity index, physician's global assessment and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Compliance was assessed through pill count. A total of 136 patients participated ( 4 7 on 4 g 5-ASA, 45 on 2 g 5-ASA, and 44 on placebo). The three groups were similar in terms of age, weight, distribution of disease, extent of disease, and previous use of steroids or sulphasalazine. Ninety patients completed the six week study. Of the 46 dropouts, 38 (82.6%) left because of insufficient efficacy ( most on either place ho or 2 g 5-ASA), four (8.7%) had adverse reactions (all on 5-ASA), the remaining four (8.7%) left for reasons not related to their ulcerative colitis. The disease activity index represents a composite score ( maximum of 12) with categories for number of daily stools, presence of bleeding, abdominal pain and physician's assessment of disease activity. Patients who received 4 g 5-ASA daily demonstrated significant declines in disease activity index within three weeks of therapy and maintained improvement until the end of the stuuy. Although disease activity index declined for patients receiving 2 g 5-ASA daily, these changes did not reach statistical significance when compared to placebo-treated patients. On a five point scale (much improved, somewhat improved, unchanged, somewhat worse, much worse) the physician's global assessment mirrored the changes in disease activity index. Patients randomized to receive 4 g 5-ASA tablets were consistently noted as being either much or somewhat improved compared to placebo-treated patients. Side effects were few and minor and 52% (4 g 5-ASA), 42% (2 g 5-ASA) and 37% (placebo) of patients had no complaints. Headache was the most commonly cited adverse reaction for 6.9% (4 g 5-ASA) and 9.4% (2 g 5-ASA) of treated patients but 3.5% of placebo-treated patients also complained of headache. In conclusion in this randomized double-blind, placebo controlled study, patients with active ulcerative colitis randomized to 4 g 5-ASA per day noted improvement in disease activity as measured by disease activity index and physician's global assessment when compared to placebo-treated patients. ln contrast, patients who received 2 g 5-ASA daily did not demonstrate significant differences compared to the placebo group.

1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 472-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
CN Williams

The efficacy and tolerance of 500 mg 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalamine) suppositories in the treatment of ulcerative proctitis were assessed in two double-blind, placebo controlled studies of six weeks' duration, involving a total of 173 patients. In trial 1, patients used one 500 mg suppository tid. In trial 2, patients used one 500 mg suppository bid. Physician's global assessment and a disease activity index based upon patient symptoms and sigmoidoscopic appearance were used to assess efficacy. At the endpoint of trial l (tid), there was an 80.4% mean reduction in the disease activity index seen in patients treated with mesalamine compared to a 36.8% mean reduction in the placebo group (P<0.05). Analysis of the physician's global assessment indicated that 84.2% of patients receiving mesalamine were considered to be 'much improved' compared to 41 % of patients on placebo (P<0.01). At the endpoint of trial 2 (tid), there was a 74.7% mean reduction in disease activity index compared to 34.2% in the placebo group (P<0.001). Analysis of the physician's global assessment indicated that 79.2% of the mesalamine group was considered to be 'much improved' compared to 26.2% on placebo (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in efficacy seen in patients treated with 500 mg mesalamine suppositories bid or tid. Mesalamine suppositories are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of ulcerative proctitis.


1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 468-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
MG Robinson ◽  
DL Decktor

The efficacy of 4 g 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA, mesalamine) enemas was assessed in 666 patients with distal ulcerative colitis. Patients were enrolled in an open-label compassionate use program. One 4 g 5-ASA enema was administered each night for a period of four weeks and the disease activity index was assessed at baseline and on days 14 and 28. On days 14 and 28, 78.0% and 88.1% of patients, respectively, demonstrated an improvement in disease activity index. The mean decline in disease activity index on day 14 was 40.7% (P=0.0001) and on day 28 it was 55.4% (P=0.0001). Efficacy was similar whether the disease was confined to or extended beyond 30 cm from the anus. There was no difference in efficacy in patients suffering their first episode of disease compared to patients suffering subsequent attacks. In conclusion, high dose 5-ASA enemas are a highly effective treatment for distal ulcerative colitis.


2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1109-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Rizzello ◽  
P. Gionchetti ◽  
A. D'Arienzo ◽  
F. Manguso ◽  
G. Di Matteo ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lloyd R Sutherland ◽  
Francois Martin

A randomized clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of two different dosages of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) enemas was carried out in 29 patients who had documented ulcerative colitis involving up to 50cm of distal colon. All patients were in remission or had minimal disease activity (Disease Activity Index [DAI] less than 4) at the time of study entry. The two patient groups were similar in terms of age, sex ratio and disease activity. Further significant reduction in DAI occurred during the first three months of the study. Five patients (two in the 2 g group and three in the 4g group) relapsed over the next six months. There were no significant differences in DAI of the two groups over the six month study period (ANOVA for repeated measures). Six patients dropped out of the study all of whom were in remission when last seen (mean follow-up 3. 3 months). In this preliminary study, 2 g enemas were shown to be as effective as 4 g enemas in maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis confined to the distal colon.


2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-167
Author(s):  
Silvio Danese ◽  
Markus Neurath ◽  
Adam Kopon ◽  
Salam F. Zakko ◽  
Timothy C. Simmons ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2021-219876
Author(s):  
Evgeniy Nasonov ◽  
Saeed Fatenejad ◽  
Eugen Feist ◽  
Mariana Ivanova ◽  
Elena Korneva ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of olokizumab (OKZ) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate (MTX).MethodsIn this 24-week multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, patients were randomised 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneously administered OKZ 64 mg once every 2 weeks, OKZ 64 mg once every 4 weeks, or placebo plus MTX. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 12. The secondary efficacy endpoints included percentage of subjects achieving Disease Activity Score 28-joint count based on C reactive protein <3.2, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index at week 12, ACR50 response and Clinical Disease Activity Index ≤2.8 at week 24. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed throughout the study.ResultsA total of 428 patients were randomised. ACR20 responses were more frequent with OKZ every 2 weeks (63.6%) and OKZ every 4 weeks (70.4%) than placebo (25.9%) (p<0.0001 for both comparisons). There were significant differences in all secondary efficacy endpoints between OKZ-treated arms and placebo. Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were reported by more patients in the OKZ groups compared with placebo. Infections were the most common TESAEs. No subjects developed neutralising antidrug antibodies.ConclusionsTreatment with OKZ was associated with significant improvement in signs, symptoms and physical function of rheumatoid arthritis without discernible differences between the two regimens. Safety was as expected for this class of agents. Low immunogenicity was observed.Trial registration numberNCT02760368.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document