scholarly journals Using a Model to Assess the Role of the Spatiotemporal Pattern of Inhibitory Input and Intrasegmental Electrical Coupling in the Intersegmental and Side-to-Side Coordination of Motor Neurons by the Leech Heartbeat Central Pattern Generator

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 1354-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul S. García ◽  
Terrence M. Wright ◽  
Ian R. Cunningham ◽  
Ronald L. Calabrese

Previously we presented a quantitative description of the spatiotemporal pattern of inhibitory synaptic input from the heartbeat central pattern generator (CPG) to segmental motor neurons that drive heartbeat in the medicinal leech and the resultant coordination of CPG interneurons and motor neurons. To begin elucidating the mechanisms of coordination, we explore intersegmental and side-to-side coordination in an ensemble model of all heart motor neurons and their known synaptic inputs and electrical coupling. Model motor neuron intrinsic properties were kept simple, enabling us to determine the extent to which input and electrical coupling acting together can account for observed coordination in the living system in the absence of a substantive contribution from the motor neurons themselves. The living system produces an asymmetric motor pattern: motor neurons on one side fire nearly in synchrony (synchronous), whereas on the other they fire in a rear-to-front progression (peristaltic). The model reproduces the general trends of intersegmental and side-to-side phase relations among motor neurons, but the match with the living system is not quantitatively accurate. Thus realistic (experimentally determined) inputs do not produce similarly realistic output in our model, suggesting that motor neuron intrinsic properties may contribute to their coordination. By varying parameters that determine electrical coupling, conduction delays, intraburst synaptic plasticity, and motor neuron excitability, we show that the most important determinant of intersegmental and side-to-side phase relations in the model was the spatiotemporal pattern of synaptic inputs, although phasing was influenced significantly by electrical coupling.

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Wenning ◽  
Brian J Norris ◽  
Cengiz Günay ◽  
Daniel Kueh ◽  
Ronald L Calabrese

Rhythmic behaviors vary across individuals. We investigated the sources of this output variability across a motor system, from the central pattern generator (CPG) to the motor plant. In the bilaterally symmetric leech heartbeat system, the CPG orchestrates two coordinations in the bilateral hearts with different intersegmental phase relations (Δϕ) and periodic side-to-side switches. Population variability is large. We show that the system is precise within a coordination, that differences in repetitions of a coordination contribute little to population output variability, but that differences between bilaterally homologous cells may contribute to some of this variability. Nevertheless, much output variability is likely associated with genetic and life history differences among individuals. Variability of Δϕ were coordination-specific: similar at all levels in one, but significantly lower for the motor pattern than the CPG pattern in the other. Mechanisms that transform CPG output to motor neurons may limit output variability in the motor pattern.


2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyla García-Crescioni ◽  
Timothy J. Fort ◽  
Estee Stern ◽  
Vladimir Brezina ◽  
Mark W. Miller

The neurogenic heart of decapod crustaceans is a very simple, self-contained, model central pattern generator (CPG)-effector system. The CPG, the nine-neuron cardiac ganglion (CG), is embedded in the myocardium itself; it generates bursts of spikes that are transmitted by the CG's five motor neurons to the periphery of the system, the myocardium, to produce its contractions. Considerable evidence suggests that a CPG-peripheral loop is completed by a return feedback pathway through which the contractions modify, in turn, the CG motor pattern. One likely pathway is provided by dendrites, presumably mechanosensitive, that the CG neurons project into the adjacent myocardial muscle. Here we have tested the role of this pathway in the heart of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus . We performed “de-efferentation” experiments in which we cut the motor neuron axons to the myocardium and “de-afferentation” experiments in which we cut or ligated the dendrites. In the isolated CG, these manipulations had no effect on the CG motor pattern. When the CG remained embedded in the myocardium, however, these manipulations, interrupting either the efferent or afferent limb of the CPG-peripheral loop, decreased contraction amplitude, increased the frequency of the CG motor neuron spike bursts, and decreased the number of spikes per burst and burst duration. Finally, passive stretches of the myocardium likewise modulated the spike bursts, an effect that disappeared when the dendrites were cut. We conclude that feedback through the dendrites indeed operates in this system and suggest that it completes a loop through which the system self-regulates its activity.


2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 2996-3005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksey Y. Malyshev ◽  
Tigran P. Norekian

Coordination between different motor centers is essential for the orderly production of all complex behaviors, in both vertebrates and invertebrates. The current study revealed that rhythmic activities of two feeding structures of the pteropod mollusk Clione limacina, radula and hooks, which are used to extract the prey from its shell, are highly coordinated in a phase-dependent manner. Hook protraction always coincided with radula retraction, while hook retraction coincided with radula protraction. Thus hooks and radula were always moving in the opposite phases, taking turns grabbing and pulling the prey tissue out of the shell. Identified buccal ganglia motor neurons controlling radula and hooks protraction and retraction were rhythmically active in the same phase-dependent manner. Hook protractor motor neurons were active in the same phase with radula retractor motor neurons, while hook retractor motor neurons burst in phase with radula protractor motor neurons. One of the main mechanisms underlying the phase-locked coordination was electrical coupling between hook protractor and radula retractor motor neurons. In addition, reciprocal inhibitory synaptic connections were found between hook protractor and radula protractor motor neurons. These electrical and inhibitory synaptic connections ensure that rhythmically active hooks and radula controlling motor neurons are coordinated in the specific phase-dependent manner described above. The possible existence of a single multifunctional central pattern generator for both radula and hook motor centers is discussed.


1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 561-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Quinlan ◽  
A. D. Murphy

1. The mechanism for generating diverse patterns of buccal motor neuron activity was explored in the multifunctional central pattern generator (CPG) of Helisoma. The standard pattern of motor neuron activity, which results in typical feeding behavior, consists of three distinct phases of buccal motor neuron activity. We have previously identified CPG interneurons that control the motor neuron activity during phases 1 and 2 of the standard pattern. Here we identify a pair of interneurons responsible for buccal motor neuron activity during phase 3, and examine the variability in the interactions between this third subunit and other subunits of the CPG. 2. During the production of the standard pattern, phase 3 excitation in many buccal motor neurons follows a prominent phase 2 inhibitory postsynaptic potential. Therefore phase 3 excitation was previously attributed to postinhibitory rebound (PIR) in these motor neurons. Two classes of observations indicated that PIR was insufficient to account for phase 3 activity, necessitating phase 3 interneurons. 1) A subset of identified buccal neurons is inhibited during phase 3 by discrete synaptic input. 2) Other identified buccal neurons display discrete excitation during both phases 2 and 3. 3. A bilaterally symmetrical pair of CPG interneurons, named N3a, was identified and characterized as the source of phase 3 postsynaptic potentials in motor neurons. During phase 3 of the standard motor pattern, interneuron N3a generated bursts of action potentials. Stimulation of N3a, in quiescent preparations, evoked a depolarization in motor neurons that are excited during phase 3 and a hyperpolarization in motor neurons that are inhibited during phase 3. Hyperpolarization of N3a during patterned motor activity eliminated both phase 3 excitation and inhibition. Physiological and morphological characterization of interneuron N3a is provided to invite comparisons with possible homologues in other gastropod feeding CPGs. 4. These data support a model proposed for the organization of the tripartite buccal CPG. According to the model, each of the three phases of buccal motor neuron activity is controlled by discrete subsets of pattern-generating interneurons called subunit 1 (S1), subunit 2 (S2), and subunit 3 (S3). The standard pattern of buccal motor neuron activity underlying feeding is mediated by an S1-S2-S3 sequence of CPG subunit activity. However, a number of "nonstandard" patterns of buccal motor activity were observed. In particular, S2 and S3 activity can occur independently or be linked sequentially in rhythmic patterns other than the standard feeding pattern. Simultaneous recordings of S3 interneuron N3a with effector neurons indicated that N3a can account for phase-3-like postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) in nonstandard patterns. The variety of patterns of buccal motor neuron activity indicates that each CPG subunit can be active in the absence of, or in concert with, activity in any other subunit. 5. To explore how CPG activity may be regulated to generate a particular motor pattern from the CPG's full repertoire, we applied the neuromodulator serotonin. Serotonin initiated and sustained the production of an S2-S3 pattern of activity, in part by enhancing PIR in S3 interneuron N3a after the termination of phase 2 inhibition.


2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 2983-2991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Norris ◽  
Adam L. Weaver ◽  
Angela Wenning ◽  
Paul S. García ◽  
Ronald L. Calabrese

The central pattern generator (CPG) for heartbeat in leeches consists of seven identified pairs of segmental heart interneurons and one unidentified pair. Four of the identified pairs and the unidentified pair of interneurons make inhibitory synaptic connections with segmental heart motor neurons. The CPG produces a side-to-side asymmetric pattern of intersegmental coordination among ipsilateral premotor interneurons corresponding to a similarly asymmetric fictive motor pattern in heart motor neurons, and asymmetric constriction pattern of the two tubular hearts: synchronous and peristaltic. Using extracellular techniques, we recorded, in 61 isolated nerve cords, the activity of motor neurons in conjunction with the phase reference premotor heart interneuron, HN(4), and another premotor interneuron that allowed us to assess the coordination mode. These data were then coupled with a previous description of the temporal pattern of premotor interneuron activity in the two coordination modes to synthesize a global phase diagram for the known elements of the CPG and the entire motor neuron ensemble. These average data reveal the stereotypical side-to-side asymmetric patterns of intersegmental coordination among the motor neurons and show how this pattern meshes with the activity pattern of premotor interneurons. Analysis of animal-to-animal variability in this coordination indicates that the intersegmental phase progression of motor neuron activity in the midbody in the peristaltic coordination mode is the most stereotypical feature of the fictive motor pattern. Bilateral recordings from motor neurons corroborate the main features of the asymmetric motor pattern.


2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 958-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sami H. Jezzini ◽  
Andrew A. V. Hill ◽  
Pavlo Kuzyk ◽  
Ronald L. Calabrese

To address the general problem of intersegmental coordination of oscillatory neuronal networks, we have studied the leech heartbeat central pattern generator. The core of this pattern generator is a timing network that consists of two segmental oscillators, each of which comprises two identified, reciprocally inhibitory oscillator interneurons. Intersegmental coordination between the segmental oscillators is mediated by synaptic interactions between the oscillator interneurons and identified coordinating interneurons. The small number of neurons (8) and the distributed structure of the timing network have made the experimental analysis of the segmental oscillators as discrete, independent units possible. On the basis of this experimental work, we have made conductance-based models to explore how intersegmental phase and cycle period are determined. We show that although a previous simple model, which ignored many details of the living system, replicated some essential features of the living system, the incorporation of specific cellular and network properties is necessary to capture the behavior of the system seen under different experimental conditions. For example, spike frequency adaptation in the coordinating interneurons and details of asymmetries in intersegmental connectivity are necessary for replicating driving experiments in which one segmental oscillator was injected with periodic current pulses to entrain the activity of the entire network. Nevertheless, the basic mechanisms of phase and period control demonstrated here appear to be very general and could be used by other networks that produce coordinated segmental motor outflow.


1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Kloppenburg ◽  
Robert M. Levini ◽  
Ronald M. Harris-Warrick

Kloppenburg, Peter, Robert M. Levini, and Ronald M. Harris-Warrick. Dopamine modulates two potassium currents and inhibits the intrinsic firing properties of an identified motor neuron in a central pattern generator network. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 29–38, 1999. The two pyloric dilator (PD) neurons are components [along with the anterior burster (AB) neuron] of the pacemaker group of the pyloric network in the stomatogastric ganglion of the spiny lobster Panulirus interruptus. Dopamine (DA) modifies the motor pattern generated by the pyloric network, in part by exciting or inhibiting different neurons. DA inhibits the PD neuron by hyperpolarizing it and reducing its rate of firing action potentials, which leads to a phase delay of PD relative to the electrically coupled AB and a reduction in the pyloric cycle frequency. In synaptically isolated PD neurons, DA slows the rate of recovery to spike after hyperpolarization. The latency from a hyperpolarizing prestep to the first action potential is increased, and the action potential frequency as well as the total number of action potentials are decreased. When a brief (1 s) puff of DA is applied to a synaptically isolated, voltage-clamped PD neuron, a small voltage-dependent outward current is evoked, accompanied by an increase in membrane conductance. These responses are occluded by the combined presence of the potassium channel blockers 4-aminopyridine and tetraethylammonium. In voltage-clamped PD neurons, DA enhances the maximal conductance of a voltage-sensitive transient potassium current ( I A) and shifts its V act to more negative potentials without affecting its V inact. This enlarges the “window current” between the voltage activation and inactivation curves, increasing the tonically active I A near the resting potential and causing the cell to hyperpolarize. Thus DA's effect is to enhance both the transient and resting K+ currents by modulating the same channels. In addition, DA enhances the amplitude of a calcium-dependent potassium current ( I O(Ca)), but has no effect on a sustained potassium current ( I K( V)). These results suggest that DA hyperpolarizes and phase delays the activity of the PD neurons at least in part by modulating their intrinsic postinhibitory recovery properties. This modulation appears to be mediated in part by an increase of I A and I O(Ca). I A appears to be a common target of DA action in the pyloric network, but it can be enhanced or decreased in different ways by DA in different neurons.


1984 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1375-1393 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Eisen ◽  
E. Marder

During motor activity of the pyloric system of the lobster stomatogastric ganglion, there are rhythmic alternations between activity in the pyloric dilator (PD) and pyloric (PY) motor neurons. We studied the phase relations between PD motor neuron activity and PY motor neuron activity in preparations cycling at a wide range of frequencies and after altering the activity of the PD neurons. The PY neurons fall into two classes, early (PE) and late (PL) (21), distinguished by the different phases in the pyloric cycle at which they fire. The phase at which PE neurons fired and the phase at which PL neurons fired was independent of pyloric cycle frequency over a range of frequencies from 0.5 to 2.25 Hz. The anterior burster (AB) interneuron is electrically coupled to the PD motor neurons. Together the AB and PD neurons form the pacemaker for the pyloric system. Synchronous depolarization of the AB and PD neurons evokes a complex inhibitory post-synaptic potential (IPSP) in PY neurons. This IPSP has two components: an early, AB neuron-derived component and a late, PD neuron-derived component. Deletion of the PD neurons from the pyloric circuit by photoinactivation removed the PD-evoked component of the pacemaker-evoked IPSP. This resulted in a decrease in the duration of the IPSP evoked by pacemaker depolarization and a significant advance in the firing phase of PY neurons. Bath application of dopamine was used to hyperpolarize and inhibit the PD neurons (30), causing them to release less neurotransmitter. As a consequence, the duration of the IPSP evoked by pacemaker depolarization was decreased and the firing phase of the PY neurons was significantly advanced. Stimulation of the inferior ventricular nerve (IVN) produces a slow excitation of the PD neurons (30), causing them to release more neurotransmitter. Consequently, the duration of the IPSP evoked by pacemaker depolarization was increased and the firing phase of the PY neurons was significantly retarded for several cycles of pyloric activity following IVN stimulation. Thus, modulation of the strength of PD-evoked inhibition in PY neurons is responsible for altering the firing phase of the PY neurons with respect to the pyloric pacemaker. We suggest that frequency of the pyloric output and the phase relations of the elements within the pyloric cycle can be regulated independently. The potential implications of these data for modulation of synaptic efficacy in other preparations are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 914-929
Author(s):  
Angela Wenning ◽  
Young Rim Chang ◽  
Brian J. Norris ◽  
Ronald L. Calabrese

Moving blood through the segmented heart tubes of leeches requires sequential constrictions driven by motor neurons controlled by a central pattern generator. In a single heart segment, we varied stimuli to explore the neuromuscular transform. Decreasing the cycle period, e.g., to increase volume pumped over time, without altering motor burst duration and intraburst spike frequency shortens relaxation time and decreases amplitude. The likely strategy to preserve constriction amplitude is to shorten burst duration while increasing spike frequency.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document