scholarly journals Preservation of Spectrotemporal Tuning Between the Nucleus Laminaris and the Inferior Colliculus of the Barn Owl

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 3544-3553 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Björn Christianson ◽  
José Luis Peña
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Phase Locking ◽  
Interaural Time Difference ◽  
Barn Owl ◽  
Central Nucleus ◽  
Sound Recognition ◽  
Spectral Structure ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Ongoing Phase

Performing sound recognition is a task that requires an encoding of the time-varying spectral structure of the auditory stimulus. Similarly, computation of the interaural time difference (ITD) requires knowledge of the precise timing of the stimulus. Consistent with this, low-level nuclei of birds and mammals implicated in ITD processing encode the ongoing phase of a stimulus. However, the brain areas that follow the binaural convergence for the computation of ITD show a reduced capacity for phase locking. In addition, we have shown that in the barn owl there is a pooling of ITD-responsive neurons to improve the reliability of ITD coding. Here we demonstrate that despite two stages of convergence and an effective loss of phase information, the auditory system of the anesthetized barn owl displays a graceful transition to an envelope coding that preserves the spectrotemporal information throughout the ITD pathway to the neurons of the core of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus.

Phase-Locked Responses to Pure Tones in the Inferior Colliculus

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 1926-1935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang-Fa Liu ◽  
Alan R. Palmer ◽  
Mark N. Wallace
Keyword(s):  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Phase Locking ◽  
Single Units ◽  
Central Nucleus ◽  
Dorsal Cortex ◽  
Upper Limits ◽  
Ascending Pathways ◽  
Pure Tones ◽  
The Brain

In the auditory system, some ascending pathways preserve the precise timing information present in a temporal code of frequency. This can be measured by studying responses that are phase-locked to the stimulus waveform. At each stage along a pathway, there is a reduction in the upper frequency limit of the phase-locking and an increase in the steady-state latency. In the guinea pig, phase-locked responses to pure tones have been described at various levels from auditory nerve to neocortex but not in the inferior colliculus (IC). Therefore we made recordings from 161 single units in guinea pig IC. Of these single units, 68% (110/161) showed phase-locked responses. Cells that phase-locked were mainly located in the central nucleus but also occurred in the dorsal cortex and external nucleus. The upper limiting frequency of phase-locking varied greatly between units (80−1,034 Hz) and between anatomical divisions. The upper limits in the three divisions were central nucleus, >1,000 Hz; dorsal cortex, 700 Hz; external nucleus, 320 Hz. The mean latencies also varied and were central nucleus, 8.2 ± 2.8 (SD) ms; dorsal cortex, 17.2 ms; external nucleus, 13.3 ms. We conclude that many cells in the central nucleus receive direct inputs from the brain stem, whereas cells in the external and dorsal divisions receive input from other structures that may include the forebrain.

scholarly journals Emergence of Multiplicative Auditory Responses in the Midbrain of the Barn Owl

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 1181-1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Fischer ◽  
José Luis Peña ◽  
Masakazu Konishi
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Interaural Time Difference ◽  
Extracellular Recording ◽  
Auditory Pathway ◽  
Barn Owl ◽  
Central Nucleus ◽  
Interaural Level Difference ◽  
Tyto Alba ◽  
Neural Responses ◽  
Auditory Responses

Space-specific neurons in the barn owl's auditory space map gain spatial selectivity through tuning to combinations of the interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD). The combination of ITD and ILD in the subthreshold responses of space-specific neurons in the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICx) is well described by a multiplication of ITD- and ILD-dependent components. It is unknown, however, how ITD and ILD are combined at the site of ITD and ILD convergence in the lateral shell of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICcl) and therefore whether ICx is the first site in the auditory pathway where multiplicative tuning to ITD- and ILD-dependent signals occurs. We used extracellular recording of single neurons to determine how ITD and ILD are combined in ICcl of the anesthetized barn owl ( Tyto alba). A comparison of additive, multiplicative, and linear-threshold models of neural responses shows that ITD and ILD are combined nonlinearly in ICcl, but the interaction of ITD and ILD is not uniformly multiplicative over the sample. A subset (61%) of the neural responses is well described by the multiplicative model, indicating that ICcl is the first site where multiplicative tuning to ITD- and ILD-dependent signals occurs. ICx, however, is the first site where multiplicative tuning is observed consistently. A network model shows that a linear combination of ICcl responses to ITD–ILD pairs is sufficient to produce the multiplicative subthreshold responses to ITD and ILD seen in ICx.

Responses of neurons in the auditory pathway of the barn owl to partially correlated binaural signals

1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 1689-1700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Albeck ◽  
M. Konishi
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Cross Correlation ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Neuronal Response ◽  
Interaural Time Difference ◽  
Central Nucleus ◽  
High Threshold ◽  
Correlation Model ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
The Cross

1. Extracellular single-unit recording in anesthetized barn owls was used to study neuronal response to dichotic stimuli of variable binaural correlation (BC). Recordings were made in the output fibers of nucleus laminaris (NL), the anterior division of the ventral lateral lemniscal nucleus (VLVa), the core of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICcC), the lateral shell of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICcLS), and the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICx). 2. The response of all neurons sensitive to interaural time difference (ITD) varied with BC. The relationship between BC and impulse number fits a linear, a parabolic, or a ramp model. A linear or parabolic model fits most neurons in low-level nuclei. Higher order neurons in ICx did not respond to noise bursts with strong negative binaural correlation, creating a ramp-like response to BC. 3. A neuron's ability to detect ITD varied as a function of BC. Conversely, a neuron's response to BC changed with ITD. Neurons in NL, VLVa, and ICcC show almost periodic ITD response curves. In these neurons peaks and troughs of ITD response curves diminished as BC decreased, creating a flat ITD response when BC = 0. When BC was set to -1, the most favorable ITD became the least favorable one and vice versa. The ITD response curve of ICx neurons usually has a single dominant peak. The response of those neurons to a negatively correlated noise pair (BC = -1) showed two ITD peaks, flanking the position of the primary peak. 4. The parabolic BC response of NL neurons fits the prediction of the cross-correlation model, assuming half-wave rectification of the sound by the cochlea. Linear response is not predicted by the model. However, the parabolic and the linear neurons probably do not belong to two distinct groups as the difference between them is not statistically significant. Thus, the cross-correlation model provides a good description of the binaural response not only in NL but also in VLVa and ICcC. 5. Almost all ramp neurons occurred in either ICx or ICcLS where neurons are more broadly tuned to frequency than those in the lower nuclei. The synthesis of this response type requires, however, not only the convergence of different frequency channels but also inhibition between different ITD channels. We modeled the ramp response as a three-step process. First, different spectral channels converge to create broad frequency tuning. The response to variation in BC will be linear (or parabolic) because it is a sum of linear (parabolic) responses. Second, the activity in some adjacent ITD channels is subtracted by lateral inhibition. Finally, the result is rectified using a high threshold to avoid negative activity.

Central and peripheral contributions to coding of acoustic space by neurons in inferior colliculus of cat

1986 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 587-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. Calford ◽  
D. R. Moore ◽  
M. E. Hutchings
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Single Unit ◽  
Arrival Time ◽  
Interaural Time Difference ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Intensity Function ◽  
Central Nucleus ◽  
Stimulus Position ◽  
Acoustic Space

Recordings of response to free-field stimuli at best frequency were made from single units in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus of anesthetized cats. Stimulus position was varied in azimuth, and the responses of units were compared with variation in the intensity and arrival time of the sound at each ear, derived from cochlear microphonic (CM) recordings. CM recordings were made at each frequency and at every point in space for which single-unit data were collected. Interaural time difference (delay) increased monotonically, but not linearly, as the stimulus was moved away from the midline. However, a given delay did not represent a single azimuth across frequency. Low-frequency interaural intensity differences (IIDs) were monotonic across azimuth and peaked at, or near, the poles. Higher-frequency IIDs were nonmonotonic and peaked relatively close to the midline, decreasing toward the poles. Units that showed little variation in discharge across azimuth formed 28% of the sample and were classified as omnidirectional. For other units, the spike-count intensity function and the variation of the CM with azimuth were combined to form a derived monaural azimuth function. For 29% of those units showing azimuthal sensitivity, the derived monaural azimuth function matched the actual azimuth function. This suggested that these units received input from only one ear. The largest group of azimuthally sensitive units (47%) was formed from those units inferred to be IID sensitive. At higher frequencies these units displayed a peaked azimuth function paralleling the nonmonotonic relation of IID to azimuth. The proportion of inferred IID-sensitive units was close to that found in dichotic studies.

scholarly journals Variability Reduction in Interaural Time Difference Tuning in the Barn Owl

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 708-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Fischer ◽  
Masakazu Konishi
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Part ◽  
Interaural Time Difference ◽  
Barn Owl ◽  
Time Difference ◽  
Central Nucleus ◽  
Nucleus Laminaris ◽  
Cochlear Nuclei ◽  
Reduction Property ◽  
Single Burst ◽  
Barn Owls

The interaural time difference (ITD) is the primary auditory cue used by the barn owl for localization in the horizontal direction. ITD is initially computed by circuits consisting of axonal delay lines from one of the cochlear nuclei and coincidence detector neurons in the nucleus laminaris (NL). NL projects directly to the anterior part of the dorsal lateral lemniscal nucleus (LLDa), and this area projects to the core of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICcc) in the midbrain. To show the selectivity of an NL neuron for ITD requires averaging of responses over several stimulus presentations for each ITD. In contrast, ICcc neurons detect their preferred ITD in a single burst of stimulus. We recorded extracellularly the responses of LLDa neurons to ITD in anesthetized barn owls and show that this ability is already present in LLDa, raising the possibility that ICcc inherits its noise reduction property from LLDa.

Response of auditory units in the barn owl's inferior colliculus to continuously varying interaural phase differences

1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1428-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Moiseff ◽  
T. Haresign
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Interaural Time Difference ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
Central Nucleus ◽  
Intensity Difference ◽  
Phase Sensitivity ◽  
Tyto Alba ◽  
Interaural Phase ◽  
Stimulus Generation ◽  
Phase Differences

1. We studied the response of single units in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICc) of the barn owl (Tyto alba) to continuously varying interaural phase differences (IPDs) and static IPDs. Interaural phase was varied in two ways: continuously, by delivering tones to each ear that varied by a few hertz (binaural beat, Fig. 1), and discretely, by delaying in fixed steps the phase of sound delivered to one ear relative to the other (static phase). Static presentations were repeated at several IPDs to characterize interaural phase sensitivity. 2. Units sensitive to IPDs responded to the binaural beat stimulus over a broad range of delta f(Fig. 4). We selected a 3-Hz delta f for most of our comparative measurements on the basis of constraints imposed by our stimulus generation system and because it allowed us to reduce the influence of responses to stimulus onset and offset (Fig. 3A). 3. Characteristic interaural time or phase sensitivity obtained by the use of the binaural beat stimulus were comparable with those obtained by the use of the static technique (Fig. 5; r2 = 0.93, Fig. 6). 4. The binaural beat stimulus facilitated the measurement of characteristic delay (CD) and characteristic phase (CP) of auditory units. We demonstrated that units in the owl's inferior colliculus (IC) include those that are maximally excited by specific IPDs (CP = 0 or 1.0) as well as those that are maximally suppressed by specific IPDs (CP = 0.5; Figs. 7 and 8). 5. The selectivity of units sensitive to IPD or interaural time difference (ITD) were weakly influenced by interaural intensity difference (IID).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Estimated Cochlear Delays in Low Best-Frequency Neurons in the Barn Owl Cannot Explain Coding of Interaural Time Difference

2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 1946-1954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Singheiser ◽  
Brian J. Fischer ◽  
Hermann Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Interaural Time Difference ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Barn Owl ◽  
Time Difference ◽  
Central Nucleus ◽  
Response Functions ◽  
Frequency Range ◽  
Response Peak ◽  
Cochlear Delays

The functional role of the low-frequency range (<3 kHz) in barn owl hearing is not well understood. Here, it was tested whether cochlear delays could explain the representation of interaural time difference (ITD) in this frequency range. Recordings were obtained from neurons in the core of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus. The response of these neurons varied with the ITD of the stimulus. The response peak shared by all neurons in a dorsoventral penetration was called the array-specific ITD and served as criterion for the representation of a given ITD in a neuron. Array-specific ITDs were widely distributed. Isolevel frequency response functions obtained with binaural, contralateral, and ispilateral stimulation exhibited a clear response peak and the accompanying frequency was called the best frequency. The data were tested with respect to predictions of a model, the stereausis model, assuming cochlear delays as source for the best ITD of a neuron. According to this model, different cochlear delays determined by mismatches between the ipsilateral and contralateral best frequencies are the source for the ITD in a binaural neuron. The mismatch should depend on the best frequency and the best ITD. The predictions of the stereausis model were not fulfilled in the low best-frequency neurons analyzed here. It is concluded that cochlear delays are not responsible for the representation of best ITD in the barn owl.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document