scholarly journals Spatial Sensitivity in Field PAF of Cat Auditory Cortex

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 2889-2903 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Christopher Stecker ◽  
Brian J. Mickey ◽  
Ewan A. Macpherson ◽  
John C. Middlebrooks
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Primary Auditory Cortex ◽  
Median Plane ◽  
Stimulus Location ◽  
Population Coding ◽  
Broadband Noise ◽  
Spatial Sensitivity ◽  
Neural Ensembles ◽  
Artificial Neural Network Ann ◽  
Spike Patterns

We compared the spatial tuning properties of neurons in two fields [primary auditory cortex (A1) and posterior auditory field (PAF)] of cat auditory cortex. Broadband noise bursts of 80-ms duration were presented from loudspeakers throughout 360° in the horizontal plane (azimuth) or 260° in the vertical median plane (elevation). Sound levels varied from 20 to 40 dB above units' thresholds. We recorded neural spike activity simultaneously from 16 sites in field PAF and/or A1 of α-chloralose-anesthetized cats. We assessed spatial sensitivity by examining the dependence of spike count and response latency on stimulus location. In addition, we used an artificial neural network (ANN) to assess the information about stimulus location carried by spike patterns of single units and of ensembles of 2–32 units. The results indicate increased spatial sensitivity, more uniform distributions of preferred locations, and greater tolerance to changes in stimulus intensity among PAF units relative to A1 units. Compared to A1 units, PAF units responded at significantly longer latencies, and latencies varied more strongly with stimulus location. ANN analysis revealed significantly greater information transmission by spike patterns of PAF than A1 units, primarily reflecting the information transmitted by latency variation in PAF. Finally, information rates grew more rapidly with the number of units included in neural ensembles for PAF than A1. The latter finding suggests more accurate population coding of space in PAF, made possible by a more diverse population of neural response types.

scholarly journals Spatial Sensitivity in the Dorsal Zone (Area DZ) of Cat Auditory Cortex

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 1267-1280 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Christopher Stecker ◽  
Ian A. Harrington ◽  
Ewan A. Macpherson ◽  
John C. Middlebrooks
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Information Transmission ◽  
Spatial Information ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Temporal Coding ◽  
Broadband Noise ◽  
Complex Frequency ◽  
Spatial Sensitivity ◽  
Spike Patterns

We compared the spatial sensitivity of neural responses in three areas of cat auditory cortex: primary auditory cortex (A1), the posterior auditory field (PAF), and the dorsal zone (DZ). Stimuli were 80-ms pure tones or broadband noise bursts varying in free-field azimuth (in the horizontal plane) or elevation (in the vertical median plane), presented at levels 20–40 dB above units' thresholds. We recorded extracellular spike activity simultaneously from 16 to 32 sites in one or two areas of α-chloralose-anesthetized cats. We examined the dependence of spike counts and response latencies on stimulus location as well as the information transmission by neural spike patterns. Compared with units in A1, DZ units exhibited more complex frequency tuning, longer-latency responses, increased prevalence and degree of nonmonotonic rate-level functions, and weaker responses to noise than to tonal stimulation. DZ responses also showed sharper tuning for stimulus azimuth, stronger azimuthal modulation of first-spike latency, and enhanced spatial information transmission by spike patterns, compared with A1. Each of these findings was similar to differences observed between PAF and A1. Compared with PAF, DZ responses were of shorter overall latency, and more DZ units preferred stimulation from ipsilateral azimuths, but the majority of analyses suggest strong similarity between PAF and DZ responses. These results suggest that DZ and A1 are physiologically distinct cortical fields and that fields like PAF and DZ might constitute a “belt” region of auditory cortex exhibiting enhanced spatial sensitivity and temporal coding of stimulus features.

scholarly journals Diverse spatial representations in primary auditory cortex during active localization simultaneously code source location and identity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Amaro ◽  
Dardo N. Ferreiro ◽  
Benedikt Grothe ◽  
Michael Pecka
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Primary Auditory Cortex ◽  
Source Location ◽  
Population Coding ◽  
Active Sensing ◽  
Spatial Representations ◽  
Behavioral Outcome ◽  
Brain Functions ◽  
Active Localization ◽  
Self Motion

ABSTRACTLocalizing and identifying sensory objects during active navigation are fundamental brain functions. However, how individual objects are neuronally represented during self-motion is mostly unexplored. Here we show that active localization during unrestricted navigation promotes previously unreported spatial representations in primary auditory cortex. Spatial tuning differs between sources with distinct behavioral outcome associations, revealing a simultaneous population coding of egocentric source locations and angle-independent identification of individual sources during active sensing.

scholarly journals Rat primary auditory cortex is tuned exclusively to the contralateral hemifield

2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (9) ◽  
pp. 2140-2151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin D. Yao ◽  
Peter Bremen ◽  
John C. Middlebrooks
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Sound Source ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Primary Auditory Cortex ◽  
Homogeneous Population ◽  
Spatial Sensitivity ◽  
Spatial Tuning ◽  
Sound Levels

The rat is a widely used species for study of the auditory system. Psychophysical results from rats have shown an inability to discriminate sound source locations within a lateral hemifield, despite showing fairly sharp near-midline acuity. We tested the hypothesis that those characteristics of the rat's sound localization psychophysics are evident in the characteristics of spatial sensitivity of its cortical neurons. In addition, we sought quantitative descriptions of in vivo spatial sensitivity of cortical neurons that would support development of an in vitro experimental model to study cortical mechanisms of spatial hearing. We assessed the spatial sensitivity of single- and multiple-neuron responses in the primary auditory cortex (A1) of urethane-anesthetized rats. Free-field noise bursts were varied throughout 360° of azimuth in the horizontal plane at sound levels from 10 to 40 dB above neural thresholds. All neurons encountered in A1 displayed contralateral-hemifield spatial tuning in that they responded strongly to contralateral sound source locations, their responses cut off sharply for locations near the frontal midline, and they showed weak or no responses to ipsilateral sources. Spatial tuning was quite stable across a 30-dB range of sound levels. Consistent with rat psychophysical results, a linear discriminator analysis of spike counts exhibited high spatial acuity for near-midline sounds and poor discrimination for off-midline locations. Hemifield spatial tuning is the most common pattern across all mammals tested previously. The homogeneous population of neurons in rat area A1 will make an excellent system for study of the mechanisms underlying that pattern.

Correlation Between the Activity of Single Auditory Cortical Neurons and Sound-Localization Behavior in the Macaque Monkey

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 2723-2739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregg H. Recanzone ◽  
Darren C. Guard ◽  
Mimi L. Phan ◽  
Tien-I K. Su
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Sound Localization ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Primary Auditory Cortex ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Auditory Space ◽  
Spatial Sensitivity ◽  
Acoustic Space ◽  
Localization Ability ◽  
Primate Cerebral Cortex

Lesion studies have indicated that the auditory cortex is crucial for the perception of acoustic space, yet it remains unclear how these neurons participate in this perception. To investigate this, we studied the responses of single neurons in the primary auditory cortex (AI) and the caudomedial field (CM) of two monkeys while they performed a sound-localization task. Regression analysis indicated that the responses of ∼80% of neurons in both cortical areas were significantly correlated with the azimuth or elevation of the stimulus, or both, which we term “spatially sensitive.” The proportion of spatially sensitive neurons was greater for stimulus azimuth compared with stimulus elevation, and elevation sensitivity was primarily restricted to neurons that were tested using stimuli that the monkeys also could localize in elevation. Most neurons responded best to contralateral speaker locations, but we also encountered neurons that responded best to ipsilateral locations and neurons that had their greatest responses restricted to a circumscribed region within the central 60° of frontal space. Comparing the spatially sensitive neurons with those that were not spatially sensitive indicated that these two populations could not be distinguished based on either the firing rate, the rate/level functions, or on their topographic location within AI. Direct comparisons between the responses of individual neurons and the behaviorally measured sound-localization ability indicated that proportionally more neurons in CM had spatial sensitivity that was consistent with the behavioral performance compared with AI neurons. Pooling the responses across neurons strengthened the relationship between the neuronal and psychophysical data and indicated that the responses pooled across relatively few CM neurons contain enough information to account for sound-localization ability. These data support the hypothesis that auditory space is processed in a serial manner from AI to CM in the primate cerebral cortex.

Neural Population Coding of Natural Sounds in Non-flying Mammals

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Israel Nelken
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Auditory System ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Dominant Role ◽  
Primary Auditory Cortex ◽  
Population Coding ◽  
Neural Population ◽  
Good Effect ◽  
Natural Sounds ◽  
Complex Sounds

Understanding the principles by which sensory systems represent natural stimuli is one of the holy grails of neuroscience. In the auditory system, the study of the coding of natural sounds has a particular prominence. Indeed, the relationships between neural responses to simple stimuli (usually pure tone bursts)—often used to characterize auditory neurons—and complex sounds (in particular natural sounds) may be complex. Many different classes of natural sounds have been used to study the auditory system. Sound families that researchers have used to good effect in this endeavor include human speech, species-specific vocalizations, an “acoustic biotope” selected in one way or another, and sets of artificial sounds that mimic important features of natural sounds. Peripheral and brainstem representations of natural sounds are relatively well understood. The properties of the peripheral auditory system play a dominant role, and further processing occurs mostly within the frequency channels determined by these properties. At the level of the inferior colliculus, the highest brainstem station, representational complexity increases substantially due to the convergence of multiple processing streams. Undoubtedly, the most explored part of the auditory system, in term of responses to natural sounds, is the primary auditory cortex. In spite of over 50 years of research, there is still no commonly accepted view of the nature of the population code for natural sounds in the auditory cortex. Neurons in the auditory cortex are believed by some to be primarily linear spectro-temporal filters, by others to respond to conjunctions of important sound features, or even to encode perceptual concepts such as “auditory objects.” Whatever the exact mechanism is, many studies consistently report a substantial increase in the variability of the response patterns of cortical neurons to natural sounds. The generation of such variation may be the main contribution of auditory cortex to the coding of natural sounds.

Sound Localization Deficits During Reversible Deactivation of Primary Auditory Cortex and/or the Dorsal Zone

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 1628-1642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shveta Malhotra ◽  
G. Christopher Stecker ◽  
John C. Middlebrooks ◽  
Stephen G. Lomber
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Sound Localization ◽  
Primary Auditory Cortex ◽  
Noise Burst ◽  
Orienting Response ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Broadband Noise ◽  
Physiological Data ◽  
Anterior Ectosylvian Sulcus ◽  
Auditory Field

We examined the contributions of primary auditory cortex (A1) and the dorsal zone of auditory cortex (DZ) to sound localization behavior during separate and combined unilateral and bilateral deactivation. From a central visual fixation point, cats learned to make an orienting response (head movement and approach) to a 100-ms broadband noise burst emitted from a central speaker or one of 12 peripheral sites (located in front of the animal, from left 90° to right 90°, at 15° intervals) along the horizontal plane. Following training, each cat was implanted with separate cryoloops over A1 and DZ bilaterally. Unilateral deactivation of A1 or DZ or simultaneous unilateral deactivation of A1 and DZ (A1/DZ) resulted in spatial localization deficits confined to the contralateral hemifield, whereas sound localization to positions in the ipsilateral hemifield remained unaffected. Simultaneous bilateral deactivation of both A1 and DZ resulted in sound localization performance dropping from near-perfect to chance (7.7% correct) across the entire field. Errors made during bilateral deactivation of A1/DZ tended to be confined to the same hemifield as the target. However, unlike the profound sound localization deficit that occurs when A1 and DZ are deactivated together, deactivation of either A1 or DZ alone produced partial and field-specific deficits. For A1, bilateral deactivation resulted in higher error rates (performance dropping to ∼45%) but relatively small errors (mostly within 30° of the target). In contrast, bilateral deactivation of DZ produced somewhat fewer errors (performance dropping to only ∼60% correct), but the errors tended to be larger, often into the incorrect hemifield. Therefore individual deactivation of either A1 or DZ produced specific and unique sound localization deficits. The results of the present study reveal that DZ plays a role in sound localization. Along with previous anatomical and physiological data, these behavioral data support the view that A1 and DZ are distinct cortical areas. Finally, the findings that deactivation of either A1 or DZ alone produces partial sound localization deficits, whereas deactivation of either posterior auditory field (PAF) or anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) produces profound sound localization deficits, suggests that PAF and AES make more significant contributions to sound localization than either A1 or DZ.

Comparison of noise and tone azimuth tuning of neurons in cat primary auditory cortex and medical geniculate body

1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 961-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Clarey ◽  
P. Barone ◽  
W. A. Irons ◽  
F. K. Samson ◽  
T. J. Imig
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Medial Geniculate Body ◽  
Primary Auditory Cortex ◽  
Broadband Noise ◽  
Statistical Analyses ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Degree Elevation ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Medial Geniculate ◽  
Ventral Nucleus

1. A comparison of the azimuth tuning of single neurons to broadband noise and to best frequency (BF) tone bursts was made in primary auditory cortex (AI: n = 173) and the medial geniculate body (MGB: n = 52) of barbiturate-anesthetized cats. Observations were largely restricted to cells located within the tonotopically organized divisions of the MGB (i.e., the ventral nucleus and the lateral division of the posterior nuclear group) and the middle layers of AI. All cells studied had BFs > or = 4 kHz. 2. The responses of each cell to sounds presented from seven frontal azimuthal locations (-90 to +90 degrees in 30 degrees steps; 0 degree elevation) and at five sound pressure levels (SPLs: 0-80 dB or 5-85 dB in 20-dB steps) provided an azimuth-level data set. Responses were averaged over SPL to obtain an azimuth function, and a number of features of this function were used to describe azimuth tuning to noise and to tone stimulation. Azimuth function modulation was used to assess azimuth sensitivity, and cells were categorized as sensitive or insensitive depending on whether modulation was > or = 75% or < 75% of maximum, respectively. The majority (88%) of cells in the sample were azimuth sensitive to noise stimulation, and statistical analyses were restricted to these cells, which are presumably best suited to encode sound source azimuth. Azimuth selectivity was assessed by a preferred azimuth range (PAR) over which azimuth function values exceeded 75% (PAR75) or 50% of maximum response. Cells were categorized according to the location and extent of their noise PARs. Unbounded cells had laterally located PARs that extended to the lateral pole (+/- 90 degrees); bounded cells had PARs that were contained entirely within the frontal hemifield, and a subset of these had PARs centered on the midline (+/- 15 degrees). A final group of cells exhibited multipeaked azimuth functions to noise stimulation. 3. Azimuth functions to noise were generally more selective and/or more sensitive than those to tones. Statistical analyses showed that these differences were significant for cells in each azimuth function category, and for the thalamic and cortical samples. With the exception of multipeaked cells, responsiveness to noise was significantly lower than that to tones in all categories, and for the thalamic and cortical samples.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals State-Dependent Population Coding in Primary Auditory Cortex

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 2058-2073 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pachitariu ◽  
D. R. Lyamzin ◽  
M. Sahani ◽  
N. A. Lesica
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Primary Auditory Cortex ◽  
Population Coding ◽  
State Dependent

scholarly journals Selective effects of arousal on population coding of natural sounds in auditory cortex

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles R. Heller ◽  
Zachary P. Schwartz ◽  
Daniela Saderi ◽  
Stephen V. David
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Primary Auditory Cortex ◽  
Population Coding ◽  
Response Magnitude ◽  
Correlated Noise ◽  
Natural Sounds ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Neural Populations ◽  
Evoked Activity ◽  
Low Dimensional

AbstractThe ability to discriminate between complex natural sounds is critical for survival. Changes in arousal and other aspects of behavioral state can impact the accuracy of sensory coding, affecting both the reliability of single neuron responses and the degree of correlated noise between neurons. However, it is unclear how these effects interact to influence coding of diverse natural stimuli. We recorded the spiking activity of neural populations in primary auditory cortex (A1) evoked by a large library of natural sounds while monitoring changes in pupil size as an index of arousal. Heightened arousal increased response magnitude and reduced noise correlations between neurons, improving coding accuracy on average. Rather than suppressing shared noise along all dimensions of neural activity, the change in noise correlations occurred via coherent, low-dimensional modulation of response variability in A1. The modulation targeted a different group of neurons from those undergoing changes in response magnitude. Thus, changes in response magnitude and correlation are mediated by distinct mechanisms. The degree to which these low-dimensional changes were aligned with the high-dimensional natural sound-evoked activity was variable, resulting in stimulus-dependent improvements in coding accuracy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document