Binocular Deficits Associated With Early Alternating Monocular Defocus. II. Neurophysiological Observations

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 3012-3023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Zhang ◽  
Kazuki Matsuura ◽  
Takafumi Mori ◽  
Janice M. Wensveen ◽  
Ronald S. Harwerth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Visual Experience ◽  
Preceding Paper ◽  
Neural Signals ◽  
V1 Neurons ◽  
Sensitivity Loss ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Frequency Components ◽  
Abnormal Visual

Experiencing binocularly conflicting signals early in life dramatically alters the binocular responses of cortical neurons. Because visual cortex is highly plastic during a critical period of development, cortical deficits resulting from early abnormal visual experience often mirror the nature of interocular decorrelation of neural signals from the two eyes. In the preceding paper, we demonstrated that monkeys that experienced early alternating monocular defocus (–1.5, –3.0, or –6.0 D) show deficits in stereopsis that generally reflected the magnitude of imposed monocular defocus. Because these results indicated that alternating monocular defocus affected the higher spatial frequency components of visual scenes more severely, we employed microelectrode recording methods to investigate whether V1 neurons in these lens-reared monkeys exhibited spatial-frequency-dependent alterations in their binocular response properties. We found that a neuron's sensitivity to interocular spatial phase disparity was reduced in the treated monkeys and that this reduction was generally more severe for units tuned to higher spatial frequencies. In the majority of the affected units, the disparity-sensitivity loss was associated with interocular differences in monocular receptive field properties. The present results suggest that the behavioral deficits in stereopsis produced by abnormal visual experience reflect at least in part the constraints imposed by alterations at the earliest stages of binocular cortical processing and support the hypothesis that the local disparity processing mechanisms in primates are spatially tuned and can be independently compromised by early abnormal visual experience.

Envelope-responsive neurons in areas 17 and 18 of cat

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 2134-2150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. X. Zhou ◽  
C. L. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Narrow Range ◽  
High Spatial Frequency ◽  
Sine Wave ◽  
Relative Strength ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sensitivity Level ◽  
Areas 17 And 18

1. Single cortical neurons are known to respond to visual stimuli containing Fourier components only in a narrow range of spatial frequencies. This investigation demonstrates that some neurons in cat area 17 and 18 can also respond to certain stimuli that have no Fourier components inside the cell's luminance spatial frequency passband. 2. To study such “non-Fourier” responses, we used envelope stimuli that consisted of a high-spatial-frequency sinusoidal luminance grating (carrier) whose contrast was modulated by a low-spatial frequency sine wave (envelope). There was no Fourier component at the apparent periodicity of the envelope spatial frequency. However, some cells responded to such a “phantom” component of the envelope modulation when it fell inside the cell's luminance spatial frequency passband while all the real Fourier components in the stimuli were outside. 3. We conducted extensive control experiments to eliminate the possibility of producing artifactual responses to the envelope stimuli due to any small residual nonlinearity of the z-linearized CRT screen. The control experiments included 1) testing of screen linearity to ensure that the effect from the residual screen nonlinearity was no larger than the sensitivity level of visual responses and 2) comparing the responses to envelope stimuli with the responses to the equivalent contrast of the artifact produced by the screen nonlinearity. All these control experiments indicated that any effect of screen nonlinearity did not contribute significantly to the neural envelope responses. 4. We performed a statistical analysis to obtain an index of relative strength of envelope responses for each cell and to objectively classify cells as “envelope-responsive” or “non-envelope-responsive.”(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cortical processing of second-order motion

1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 527-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
ISABELLE MARESCHAL ◽  
CURTIS L. BAKER
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
High Spatial Frequency ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Spatial Properties ◽  
Processing Stream ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Nonlinear Input ◽  
Nonlinear Processing ◽  
Frequency Components ◽  
Optimal Values

Neurons in the mammalian visual cortex have been found to respond to second-order features which are not defined by changes in luminance over the retina (Albright, 1992; Zhou & Baker, 1993, 1994, 1996; Mareschal & Baker, 1998a,b). The detection of these stimuli is most often accounted for by a separate nonlinear processing stream, acting in parallel to the linear stream in the visual system. Here we examine the two-dimensional spatial properties of these nonlinear neurons in area 18 using envelope stimuli, which consist of a high spatial-frequency carrier whose contrast is modulated by a low spatial-frequency envelope. These stimuli would fail to elicit a response in a conventional linear neuron because they are designed to contain no spatial-frequency components overlapping the neuron's luminance defined passband. We measured neurons' responses to these stimuli as a function of both the relative spatial frequencies and relative orientations of the carrier and envelope. Neurons' responses to envelope stimuli were narrowband to the carrier spatial frequency, with optimal values ranging from 8- to 30-fold higher than the envelope spatial frequencies. Neurons' responses to the envelope stimuli were strongly dependent on the orientation of the envelope and less so on the orientation of the carrier. Although the selectivity to the carrier orientation was broader, neurons' responses were clearly tuned, suggesting that the source of nonlinear input is cortical. There was no fixed relationship between the optimal carrier and envelope spatial frequencies or orientations, such that nonlinear neurons responding to these stimuli could perhaps respond to a variety of stimuli defined by changes in scale or orientation.

Range and Mechanism of Encoding of Horizontal Disparity in Macaque V1

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J.D. Prince ◽  
B. G. Cumming ◽  
A. J. Parker
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Tuning Curve ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Careful Examination ◽  
Phase Encoding ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
V1 Neurons ◽  
Gabor Functions ◽  
Spatial Frequencies

The responses of single cortical neurons were measured as a function of the binocular disparity of dynamic random dot stereograms for a large sample of neurons ( n = 787) from V1 of the awake macaque. From this sample, we selected 180 neurons whose tuning curves were strongly tuned for disparity, well sampled and well described by one-dimensional Gabor functions. The fitted parameters of the Gabor functions were used to resolve three outstanding issues in binocular stereopsis. First, we considered whether tuning curves can be meaningfully divided into discrete tuning types. Careful examination of the distributions of the Gabor parameters that determine tuning shape revealed no evidence for clustering. We conclude that a continuum of tuning types is present. Second, we investigated the mechanism of disparity encoding for V1 neurons. The shape of the disparity tuning function can be used to distinguish between position-encoding (in which disparity is encoded by an interocular shift in receptive field position) and phase-encoding (in which disparity is encoded by a difference in the receptive field profile in the 2 eyes). Both position and phase encoding were found to be common. This was confirmed by an independent assessment of disparity encoding based on the measurement of disparity sensitivity for sinusoidal luminance gratings of different spatial frequencies. The contributions of phase and position to disparity encoding were compared by estimating a population average of the rate of change in firing rate per degree of disparity. When this was calculated separately for the phase and position contributions, they were found to be closely similar. Third, we investigated the range of disparity tuning in V1 as a function of eccentricity in the parafoveal range. We find few cells which are selective for disparities greater than ±1 ° even at the largest eccentricity of ∼5 °. The preferred disparity was correlated with the spatial scale of the tuning curve, and for most units lay within a ±π radians phase limit. Such a size-disparity correlation is potentially useful for the solution of the correspondence problem.

The response dynamics of primate visual cortical neurons to simulated optical blur

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAEL L. RISNER ◽  
TIMOTHY J. GAWNE
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Form Perception ◽  
Response Dynamics ◽  
V1 Neurons ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Optical Blur ◽  
Visual Cortical

AbstractNeurons in visual cortical area V1 typically respond well to lines or edges of specific orientations. There have been many studies investigating how the responses of these neurons to an oriented edge are affected by changes in luminance contrast. However, in natural images, edges vary not only in contrast but also in the degree of blur, both because of changes in focus and also because shadows are not sharp. The effect of blur on the response dynamics of visual cortical neurons has not been explored. We presented luminance-defined single edges in the receptive fields of parafoveal (1–6 deg eccentric) V1 neurons of two macaque monkeys trained to fixate a spot of light. We varied the width of the blurred region of the edge stimuli up to 0.36 deg of visual angle. Even though the neurons responded robustly to stimuli that only contained high spatial frequencies and 0.36 deg is much larger than the limits of acuity at this eccentricity, changing the degree of blur had minimal effect on the responses of these neurons to the edge. Primates need to measure blur at the fovea to evaluate image quality and control accommodation, but this might only involve a specialist subpopulation of neurons. If visual cortical neurons in general responded differently to sharp and blurred stimuli, then this could provide a cue for form perception, for example, by helping to disambiguate the luminance edges created by real objects from those created by shadows. On the other hand, it might be important to avoid the distraction of changing blur as objects move in and out of the plane of fixation. Our results support the latter hypothesis: the responses of parafoveal V1 neurons are largely unaffected by changes in blur over a wide range.

A Test of the Spatial-Frequency Explanation of the Müller-Lyer Illusion

Perception ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 553-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa Carrasco ◽  
Jesus G Figueroa ◽  
J Douglas Willen
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Visual System ◽  
Human Visual System ◽  
Lyer Illusion ◽  
Lower Spatial Frequency ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Frequency Components ◽  
Fourier Spectra

Previous investigations have shown that the response of spatial-frequency-specific channels in the human visual system is differentially affected by adaptation to gratings of distinct spatial frequencies and/or orientations. A study is reported of the effects of adaptation to vertical or horizontal gratings of a high or a low spatial frequency on the extent of the Brentano form of the Müller-Lyer illusion in human observers. It is shown that the illusion decreases after adaptation to vertical gratings of low spatial frequency, but seems unaffected otherwise. These results are consistent with the notion of visual channels that are spatial-frequency and orientation specific, and support the argument that the Müller-Lyer illusion may be due primarily to lower-spatial-frequency components in the Fourier spectra of the image.

scholarly journals Effects of Spatial Frequency Filtering Choices on the Perception of Filtered Images

Vision ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Sabrina Perfetto ◽  
John Wilder ◽  
Dirk B. Walther
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Behavioral Outcomes ◽  
High Spatial Frequency ◽  
Frequency Content ◽  
Frequency Filtering ◽  
Image Content ◽  
Specific Choice ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Spatial Frequency Filtering ◽  
Frequency Components

The early visual system is composed of spatial frequency-tuned channels that break an image into its individual frequency components. Therefore, researchers commonly filter images for spatial frequencies to arrive at conclusions about the differential importance of high versus and low spatial frequency image content. Here, we show how simple decisions about the filtering of the images, and how they are displayed on the screen, can result in drastically different behavioral outcomes. We show that jointly normalizing the contrast of the stimuli is critical in order to draw accurate conclusions about the influence of the different spatial frequencies, as images of the real world naturally have higher contrast energy at low than high spatial frequencies. Furthermore, the specific choice of filter shape can result in contradictory results about whether high or low spatial frequencies are more useful for understanding image content. Finally, we show that the manner in which the high spatial frequency content is displayed on the screen influences how recognizable an image is. Previous findings that make claims about the visual system’s use of certain spatial frequency bands should be revisited, especially if their methods sections do not make clear what filtering choices were made.

scholarly journals Model-based characterization of the selectivity of neurons in primary visual cortex

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Bartsch ◽  
Bruce G Cumming ◽  
Daniel A Butts
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Primary Visual Cortex ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Nonlinear Models ◽  
Field Size ◽  
V1 Neurons ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Spatial Frequencies

To understand the complexity of stimulus selectivity in primary visual cortex (V1), models constructed to match observed responses to complex time-varying stimuli, instead of to explain responses to simple parametric stimuli, are increasingly used. While such models often can more accurately reflect the computations performed by V1 neurons in more natural visual environments, they do not by themselves provide insight into established measures of V1 neural selectivity such as receptive field size, spatial frequency tuning and phase invariance. Here, we suggest a series of analyses that can be directly applied to encoding models to link complex encoding models to more interpretable aspects of stimulus selectivity, applied to nonlinear models of V1 neurons recorded in awake macaque in response to random bar stimuli. In linking model properties to more classical measurements, we demonstrate several novel aspects of V1 selectivity not available to simpler experimental measurements. For example, we find that individual spatiotemporal elements of the V1 models often have a smaller spatial scale than the overall neuron sensitivity, and that this results in non-trivial tuning to spatial frequencies. Additionally, our proposed measures of nonlinear integration suggest that more classical classifications of V1 neurons into simple versus complex cells are spatial-frequency dependent. In total, rather than obfuscate classical characterizations of V1 neurons, model-based characterizations offer a means to more fully understand their selectivity, and provide a means to link their classical tuning properties to their roles in more complex, natural, visual processing.

Binocular Deficits Associated With Early Alternating Monocular Defocus. I. Behavioral Observations

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 3001-3011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice M. Wensveen ◽  
Ronald S. Harwerth ◽  
Earl L. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Binocular Vision ◽  
Visual Experience ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Depth Discrimination ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Frequency Selective ◽  
Vision Deficits ◽  
Lens Power ◽  
Processing Mechanisms

To study the binocular vision deficits associated with anisometropia, monkeys were reared with alternating monocular defocus, which allowed monocular mechanisms to develop normally while binocular mechanisms were selectively compromised. A defocusing contact lens of –1.5 D, –3 D, or –6 D was worn on alternate eyes on successive days ( n = 3 per lens power) from 3 wk to 9 mo of age. The control subjects were two normally reared monkeys and two human observers. Functional binocular vision was assessed through behavioral measurements of stereoscopic depth discrimination thresholds as a function of spatial frequency. To characterize the extent of the deficits in disparity processing at a given spatial frequency, the contrast required to support stereopsis was determined for a range of disparities that exceeded the subjects' measured stereoacuity. The lens-reared monkeys showed spatial-frequency-selective deficits in stereopsis that depended on the magnitude of the simulated anisometropia experienced during the rearing period. For a given spatial frequency, the treated monkeys generally required higher than normal contrasts to support stereopsis even for large disparities. Moreover, a given increase in contrast produced smaller than normal improvements in stereo discrimination in our treated subjects, which suggests that in addition to deficits in contrast sensitivity, disparity-sensitive mechanisms exhibited low contrast gains. The spatial-frequency selective nature of the binocular deficits produced by the imposed anisometropia indicate that disparity processing mechanisms are normally spatial-frequency selective and that mechanisms tuned to different spatial frequencies can be differentially affected by abnormal binocular visual experience.

Identification of Two-Tone Images; Some Implications for High- and Low-Spatial-Frequency Processes in Human Vision

Perception ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 429-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Hayes
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Human Vision ◽  
Positive Form ◽  
Line Drawings ◽  
Geometric Figures ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Negative Images ◽  
Frequency Components

Unlike most multitone images, two-tone images such as print, geometric figures, and line drawings are as easy to interpret in photographic negative as in positive form. However, images derived from a multitone original in which intensity values are quantised to two levels are not. Bi-level quantised images, distinct from most other two-tone images, are shown to contain picture related components in their low spatial frequencies. Since it is the low-spatial-frequency components alone of negative images that present difficulties for vision, it is proposed that images which are as easy to interpret in negative as in positive form are those which are readily identified using only their high spatial frequencies.

Recognition of Positive and Negative Bandpass-Filtered Images

Perception ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 595-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Hayes ◽  
M Concetta Morrone ◽  
David C Burr
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Visual System ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Recognition Performance ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
High Spatial Frequency ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Negative Images ◽  
Frequency Components

A study is reported in which the significance for vision of low- and high-spatial-frequency components of photographic positive and negative images was investigated by measuring recognition of bandpass-filtered photographs of faces. The results show that a 1.5 octave bandpass-filtered image contains sufficient visual information for good recognition performance, provided the filter is centred close to 20 cycles facewidth−1. At low spatial frequencies negatives are more difficult to recognize than positives, but at high spatial frequencies there is no difference in recognition, implying that it is the low-frequency components of negatives which present difficulties for the visual system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document