Effects of early versus late rehabilitative training on manual dexterity after corticospinal tract lesion in macaque monkeys

2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (12) ◽  
pp. 2853-2865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoko Sugiyama ◽  
Noriyuki Higo ◽  
Kimika Yoshino-Saito ◽  
Yumi Murata ◽  
Yukio Nishimura ◽  
...  

Dexterous hand movements can be restored with motor rehabilitative training after a lesion of the lateral corticospinal tract (l-CST) in macaque monkeys. To maximize effectiveness, the optimal time to commence such rehabilitative training must be determined. We conducted behavioral analyses and compared the recovery of dexterous hand movements between monkeys in which hand motor training was initiated immediately after the l-CST lesion (early-trained monkeys) and those in which training was initiated 1 mo after the lesion (late-trained monkeys). The performance of dexterous hand movements was evaluated by food retrieval tasks. In early-trained monkeys, performance evaluated by the success rate in a vertical slit task (retrieval of a small piece of food through a narrow vertical slit) recovered to the level of intact monkeys during the first 1–2 mo after the lesion. In late-trained monkeys, the task success rate averaged ∼30% even after 3 mo of rehabilitative training. We also evaluated hand performance with the Klüver board task, in which monkeys retrieved small spherical food pellets from cylindrical wells. Although the success rate of the Klüver board task did not differ between early- and late-trained monkeys, kinematic movement analysis showed that there was a difference between the groups: late-trained monkeys with an improved success rate frequently used alternate movement strategies that were different from those used before the lesion. These results suggest that early rehabilitative training after a spinal cord lesion positively influences subsequent functional recovery.

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 904-914
Author(s):  
Merav R. Senesh ◽  
Karina Barragan ◽  
David J. Reinkensmeyer

Objective When a stroke damages the corticospinal tract (CST), it has been hypothesized that the motor system switches to using the corticoreticulospinal tract (CRST) resulting in abnormal arm synergies. Is use of these tracts mutually exclusive, or can the motor system spontaneously switch between them depending on the type of movement it wants to make? If the motor system can share control at will, then people with a rudimentary ability to make dexterous movements should be able to perform synergistic arm movements as well. Methods We analyzed clinical assessments of 319 persons’ abilities to perform “out-of-synergy” and “in-synergy” arm movements after chronic stroke using the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) scale. Results We identified a moderate range of arm impairment (UEFM = ~30-40) where subjects had a rudimentary ability to make out-of-synergy (~23%-50% on the out-of-synergy score) and dexterous hand movements (~3-10 blocks on Box and Blocks Test). Below this range persons could perform in-synergy but not out-of-synergy or dexterous movements. In the moderate range, however, scoring better on out-of-synergy movements correlated with scoring worse on in-synergy movements ( P = .001, r ≈ −0.6). Conclusion Rudimentary dexterity corresponded with reduced ability to move the arm in-synergy. This finding supports the idea that CST and CRST compete and has implications for rehabilitation therapy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Yoshida ◽  
Tadashi Isa

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 315-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadashi Isa

Hand dexterity has uniquely developed in higher primates and is thought to rely on the direct corticomotoneuronal (CM) pathway. Recent studies have shown that rodents and carnivores lack the direct CM pathway but can control certain levels of dexterous hand movements through various indirect CM pathways. Some homologous pathways also exist in higher primates, and among them, propriospinal (PrS) neurons in the mid-cervical segments (C3-C4) are significantly involved in hand dexterity. When the direct CM pathway was lesioned caudal to the PrS and transmission of cortical commands to hand motoneurons via the PrS neurons remained intact, dexterous hand movements could be significantly recovered. This recovery model was intensively studied, and it was found that, in addition to the compensation by the PrS neurons, a large-scale reorganization in the bilateral cortical motor-related areas and mesolimbic structures contributed to recovery. Future therapeutic strategies should target these multihierarchical areas.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 5400-5409
Author(s):  
John E Downey ◽  
Kristin M Quick ◽  
Nathaniel Schwed ◽  
Jeffrey M Weiss ◽  
George F Wittenberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Motor commands for the arm and hand generally arise from the contralateral motor cortex, where most of the relevant corticospinal tract originates. However, the ipsilateral motor cortex shows activity related to arm movement despite the lack of direct connections. The extent to which the activity related to ipsilateral movement is independent from that related to contralateral movement is unclear based on conflicting conclusions in prior work. Here we investigate bilateral arm and hand movement tasks completed by two human subjects with intracortical microelectrode arrays implanted in the left hand and arm area of the motor cortex. Neural activity was recorded while they attempted to perform arm and hand movements in a virtual environment. This enabled us to quantify the strength and independence of motor cortical activity related to continuous movements of each arm. We also investigated the subjects’ ability to control both arms through a brain–computer interface. Through a number of experiments, we found that ipsilateral arm movement was represented independently of, but more weakly than, contralateral arm movement. However, the representation of grasping was correlated between the two hands. This difference between hand and arm representation was unexpected and poses new questions about the different ways the motor cortex controls the hands and arms.


2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Alstermark ◽  
L. G. Pettersson ◽  
Y. Nishimura ◽  
K. Yoshino-Saito ◽  
F. Tsuboi ◽  
...  

In motor control, the general view is still that spinal interneurons mainly contribute to reflexes and automatic movements. The question raised here is whether spinal interneurons can mediate the cortical command for independent finger movements, like a precision grip between the thumb and index finger in the macaque monkey, or if this function depends exclusively on a direct corticomotoneuronal pathway. This study is a followup of a previous report (Sasaki et al. J Neurophysiol 92: 3142–3147, 2004) in which we trained macaque monkeys to pick a small piece of sweet potato from a cylinder by a precision grip between the index finger and thumb. We have now isolated one spinal interneuronal system, the C3-C4 propriospinal interneurons with projection to hand and arm motoneurons. In the previous study, the lateral corticospinal tract (CST) was interrupted in C4/C5 (input intact to the C3-C4 propriospinal interneurons), and in this study, the CST was interrupted in C2 (input abolished). The precision grip could be performed within the first 15 days after a CST lesion in C4/C5 but not in C2. We conclude that C3–C4 propriospinal interneurons also can carry the command for precision grip.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document