scholarly journals Independent transmission of convergent visceral primary afferents in the solitary tract nucleus

2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 507-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart J. McDougall ◽  
Michael C. Andresen

Cranial primary afferents from the viscera enter the brain at the solitary tract nucleus (NTS), where their information is integrated for homeostatic reflexes. The organization of sensory inputs is poorly understood, despite its critical impact on overall reflex performance characteristics. Single afferents from the solitary tract (ST) branch within NTS and make multiple contacts onto individual neurons. Many neurons receive more than one ST input. To assess the potential interaction between converging afferents and proximal branching near to second-order neurons, we probed near the recorded soma in horizontal slices from rats with focal electrodes and minimal shocks. Remote ST shocks evoked monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs), and nearby focal shocks also activated monosynaptic EPSCs. We tested the timing and order of stimulation to determine whether focal shocks influenced ST responses and vice versa in single neurons. Focal-evoked EPSC response profiles closely resembled ST-EPSC characteristics. Mean synaptic jitters, failure rates, depression, and phenotypic segregation by capsaicin responsiveness were indistinguishable between focal and ST-evoked EPSCs. ST-EPSCs failed to affect focal-EPSCs within neurons, indicating that release sites and synaptic terminals were functionally independent and isolated from cross talk or neurotransmitter overflow. In only one instance, focal shocks intercepted and depleted the ST axon generating evoked EPSCs. Despite large numbers of functional contacts, multiple afferents do not appear to interact, and ST axon branches may be limited to close to the soma. Thus single or multiple primary afferents and their presynaptic active release sites act independently when they contact single second-order NTS neurons.

Neuroscience ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 379 ◽  
pp. 219-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sojin Kim ◽  
Sung-Moon Kim ◽  
Bermseok Oh ◽  
Jihoon Tak ◽  
Eunhee Yang ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 552-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart J. McDougall ◽  
Timothy W. Bailey ◽  
David Mendelowitz ◽  
Michael C. Andresen

2008 ◽  
Vol 295 (5) ◽  
pp. H2032-H2042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Andresen ◽  
James H. Peters

Cranial nerve visceral afferents enter the brain stem to synapse on neurons within the solitary tract nucleus (NTS). The broad heterogeneity of both visceral afferents and NTS neurons makes understanding afferent synaptic transmission particularly challenging. To study a specific subgroup of second-order neurons in medial NTS, we anterogradely labeled arterial baroreceptor afferents of the aortic depressor nerve (ADN) with lipophilic fluorescent tracer (i.e., ADN+) and measured synaptic responses to solitary tract (ST) activation recorded from dye-identified neurons in medial NTS in horizontal brain stem slices. Every ADN+ NTS neuron received constant-latency ST-evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) (jitter <192 μs, SD of latency). Stimulus-recruitment profiles showed single thresholds and no suprathreshold recruitment, findings consistent with EPSCs arising from a single, branched afferent axon. Frequency-dependent depression of ADN+ EPSCs averaged ∼70% for five shocks at 50 Hz, but single-shock failure rates did not exceed 4%. Whether adjacent ADN− or those from unlabeled animals, other second-order NTS neurons (jitters <200 μs) had ST transmission properties indistinguishable from ADN+. Capsaicin (CAP; 100 nM) blocked ST transmission in some neurons. CAP-sensitive ST-EPSCs were smaller and failed over five times more frequently than CAP-resistant responses, whether ADN+ or from unlabeled animals. Variance-mean analysis of ST-EPSCs suggested uniformly high probabilities for quantal glutamate release across second-order neurons. While amplitude differences may reflect different numbers of contacts, higher frequency-dependent failure rates in CAP-sensitive ST-EPSCs may arise from subtype-specific differences in afferent axon properties. Thus afferent transmission within medial NTS differed by axon class (e.g., CAP sensitive) but was indistinguishable by source of axon (e.g., baroreceptor vs. nonbaroreceptor).


2017 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús M. López ◽  
Ruth Morona ◽  
Agustín González

The distribution of DARPP-32 (a phosphoprotein related to the dopamine D1 receptor) has been widely used as a means to clarify the brain regions with dopaminoceptive cells, primarily in representative species of tetrapods. The relationship between dopaminergic and dopaminoceptive elements is frequently analyzed using the catecholamine marker tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). In the present study, by means of combined immunohistochemistry, we have analyzed these relationships in lungfishes, the only group of sarcopterygian fishes represented by 6 extant species that are the phylogenetically closest living relatives of tetrapods. We used the Australian lungfish Neoceratodus forsteri and the African lungfish Protopterus dolloi. The DARPP-32 antibody yields a distinct and consistent pattern of neuronal staining in brain areas that, in general, coincide with areas that are densely innervated by TH-immunoreactive fibers. The striatum, thalamus, optic tectum, and torus semicircularis contain intensely DARPP-32-immunoreactive cell bodies and fibers. Cells are also located in the olfactory bulbs, amygdaloid complex, lateral septum, pallidum, preoptic area, suprachiasmatic nucleus, tuberal hypothalamic region, rostral rhombencephalic reticular formation, superior raphe nucleus, octavolateral area, solitary tract nucleus, and spinal cord. Remarkably, DARPP-32-immunoreactive fibers originating in the striatum reach the region of the dopaminergic cells in the mesencephalic tegmentum and represent a well-established striatonigral pathway in lungfishes. Double immunolabeling reveals that DARPP-32 is present in neurons that most likely receive TH input, but it is absent from the catecholaminergic neurons themselves, with the only exception of a few cells in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of Neoceratodus and the solitary tract nucleus of Protopterus. In addition, some species differences exist in the localization of DARPP-32 cells in the pallium, lateral amygdala, thalamus, prethalamus, and octavolateral area. In general, the present study demonstrates that the distribution pattern of DARPP-32, and its relationship with TH, is largely comparable to those reported for tetrapods, highlighting a shared situation among all sarcopterygians.


1995 ◽  
Vol 269 (3) ◽  
pp. R647-R661 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Nakamura ◽  
R. Norgren

The activity of single taste neurons was recorded from the nucleus of the solitary tract before (n = 41) and after (n = 58) awake, behaving rats were switched to a sodium-free diet. During sodium deprivation, the spontaneous activity of the neurons increased (142%), but responses to water and sapid stimuli decreased. For all neurons in the sample, the mean response to water decreased to 72% of its predeprivation level, NaCl dropped to 53%, sucrose to 41%, citric acid to 68%, and quinine HCl to 84%. Despite the drop in magnitude, the response profiles of the taste neurons were not changed by the dietary condition. In the Na-replete state, 61% of the activity elicited by NaCl occurred in NaCl-best cells and 33% in sucrose-best neurons. In the depleted state, these values were 60 and 26%, respectively. Nevertheless, at the highest concentrations tested, deprivation did alter the relative responsiveness of the gustatory neurons to sucrose and NaCl in specific categories of neurons. Compared with acute preparations, dietary sodium deprivation in awake, behaving rats produced a more general reduction in the gustatory responses of neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract. The largest reductions in elicited activity occurred for the "best stimulus" of a particular neuron, thus leading to smaller differences in response magnitude across stimuli, particularly at the highest concentrations tested.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 126-137
Author(s):  
Kieran Greer

One of the most fundamental questions in Biology or Artificial Intelligence is how the human brainperforms mathematical functions. How does a neural architecture that may organise itself mostly throughstatistics, know what to do? One possibility is to extract the problem to something more abstract. This becomesclear when thinking about how the brain handles large numbers, for example to the power of something, whensimply summing to an answer is not feasible. In this paper, the author suggests that the maths question can beanswered more easily if the problem is changed into one of symbol manipulation and not just number counting.If symbols can be compared and manipulated, maybe without understanding completely what they are, then themathematical operations become relative and some of them might even be rote learned. The proposed systemmay also be suggested as an alternative to the traditional computer binary system. Any of the actual maths stillbreaks down into binary operations, while a more symbolic level above that can manipulate the numbers andreduce the problem size, thus making the binary operations simpler. An interesting result of looking at this is thepossibility of a new fractal equation resulting from division, that can be used as a measure of good fit and wouldhelp the brain decide how to solve something through self-replacement and a comparison with this good fit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document