scholarly journals Functional organization of human posterior parietal cortex: grasping- and reaching-related activations relative to topographically organized cortex

2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (12) ◽  
pp. 2897-2908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina S. Konen ◽  
Ryan E. B. Mruczek ◽  
Jessica L. Montoya ◽  
Sabine Kastner
Keyword(s):  
Neural Networks ◽  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Functional Organization ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Superior Parietal Lobule ◽  
Movement Type ◽  
The Neural Networks ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
The Relationship

The act of reaching to grasp an object requires the coordination between transporting the arm and shaping the hand. Neurophysiological, neuroimaging, neuroanatomic, and neuropsychological studies in macaque monkeys and humans suggest that the neural networks underlying grasping and reaching acts are at least partially separable within the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). To better understand how these neural networks have evolved in primates, we characterized the relationship between grasping- and reaching-related responses and topographically organized areas of the human intraparietal sulcus (IPS) using functional MRI. Grasping-specific activation was localized to the left anterior IPS, partially overlapping with the most anterior topographic regions and extending into the postcentral sulcus. Reaching-specific activation was localized to the left precuneus and superior parietal lobule, partially overlapping with the medial aspects of the more posterior topographic regions. Although the majority of activity within the topographic regions of the IPS was nonspecific with respect to movement type, we found evidence for a functional gradient of specificity for reaching and grasping movements spanning posterior-medial to anterior-lateral PPC. In contrast to the macaque monkey, grasp- and reach-specific activations were largely located outside of the human IPS.

scholarly journals Change in Motor Plan, Without a Change in the Spatial Locus of Attention, Modulates Activity in Posterior Parietal Cortex

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 2814-2819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence H. Snyder ◽  
Aaron P. Batista ◽  
Richard A. Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Visually Guided ◽  
Lateral Intraparietal Area ◽  
Central Target ◽  
Motor Plan ◽  
Motor Intention ◽  
Posterior Parietal

Snyder, Lawrence H., Aaron P. Batista, and Richard A. Andersen. Change in motor plan, without a change in the spatial locus of attention, modulates activity in posterior parietal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 2814–2819, 1998. The lateral intraparietal area (LIP) of macaque monkey, and a parietal reach region (PRR) medial and posterior to LIP, code the intention to make visually guided eye and arm movements, respectively. We studied the effect of changing the motor plan, without changing the locus of attention, on single neurons in these two areas. A central target was fixated while one or two sequential flashes occurred in the periphery. The first appeared either within the response field of the neuron being recorded or else on the opposite side of the fixation point. Animals planned a saccade (red flash) or reach (green flash) to the flash location. In some trials, a second flash 750 ms later could change the motor plan but never shifted attention: second flashes always occurred at the same location as the preceding first flash. Responses in LIP were larger when a saccade was instructed ( n = 20 cells), whereas responses in PRR were larger when a reach was instructed ( n = 17). This motor preference was observed for both first flashes and second flashes. In addition, the response to a second flash depended on whether it affirmed or countermanded the first flash; second flash responses were diminished only in the former case. Control experiments indicated that this differential effect was not due to stimulus novelty. These findings support a role for posterior parietal cortex in coding specific motor intention and are consistent with a possible role in the nonspatial shifting of motor intention.

The Posterior Parietal Cortex in Humans and Monkeys

Physiology ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 166-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Galletti ◽  
PP Battaglini ◽  
P Fattori
Keyword(s):  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Superior Parietal Lobule ◽  
Monkey Brain ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
Parietal Lobule

The recently reported existence of neurons able to encode visual space in the superior parietal lobule of the monkey brain suggests that human and monkey superior parietal lobules are homologous structures.

scholarly journals Neurophysiology of Prehension. III. Representation of Object Features in Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque Monkey

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 3708-3730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther P. Gardner ◽  
K. Srinivasa Babu ◽  
Soumya Ghosh ◽  
Adam Sherwood ◽  
Jessie Chen
Keyword(s):  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Video Recordings ◽  
Object Properties ◽  
Area 5 ◽  
Somatosensory Input ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
Object Features

Neurons in posterior parietal cortex (PPC) may serve both proprioceptive and exteroceptive functions during prehension, signaling hand actions and object properties. To assess these roles, we used digital video recordings to analyze responses of 83 hand-manipulation neurons in area 5 as monkeys grasped and lifted objects that differed in shape (round and rectangular), size (large and small spheres), and location (identical rectangular blocks placed lateral and medial to the shoulder). The task contained seven stages—approach, contact, grasp, lift, hold, lower, relax—plus a pretrial interval. The four test objects evoked similar spike trains and mean rate profiles that rose significantly above baseline from approach through lift, with peak activity at contact. Although representation by the spike train of specific hand actions was stronger than distinctions between grasped objects, 34% of these neurons showed statistically significant effects of object properties or hand postures on firing rates. Somatosensory input from the hand played an important role as firing rates diverged most prominently on contact as grasp was secured. The small sphere—grasped with the most flexed hand posture—evoked the highest firing rates in 43% of the population. Twenty-one percent distinguished spheres that differed in size and weight, and 14% discriminated spheres from rectangular blocks. Location in the workspace modulated response amplitude as objects placed across the midline evoked higher firing rates than positions lateral to the shoulder. We conclude that area 5 neurons, like those in area AIP, integrate object features, hand actions, and grasp postures during prehension.

Supragranular pyramidal neurones in the medial posterior parietal cortex of the macaque monkey

Neuroreport ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1925-1929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy N. Elston ◽  
Rowan Tweedale ◽  
Marcello G.P. Rosa
Keyword(s):  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Posterior Parietal

scholarly journals Differences in Intrinsic Functional Organization Between Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortex

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 2334-2349 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Katsuki ◽  
X.-L. Qi ◽  
T. Meyer ◽  
P. M. Kostelic ◽  
E. Salinas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Functional Organization ◽  
Dorsolateral Prefrontal ◽  
Posterior Parietal

scholarly journals State Estimation in Posterior Parietal Cortex: Distinct Poles of Environmental and Bodily States

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Pieter Medendorp ◽  
Tobias Heed
Keyword(s):  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Information Seeking ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Functional Organization ◽  
Novelty Detection ◽  
The Body ◽  
Main Role ◽  
Motor Processing ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
And Function

Posterior parietal cortex (PPC) has been implicated in sensory and motor processing, but its underlying organization is still debated. Sensory-based accounts suggest that PPC is mainly involved in attentional selection and multisensory integration, serving novelty detection and information seeking. Motor-specific accounts suggest a parietal subdivision into lower-dimensional, effector-specific subspaces for planning motor action. More recently, function-based interpretations have been put forward based on coordinated responses across multiple effectors evoked by circumscribed PPC regions. In this review, we posit that an overarching interpretation of PPC’s functional organization must integrate, rather than contrast, these various accounts of PPC. We propose that PPC’s main role is that of a state estimator, which extends into two poles: a rostral, body-related pole, which projects the environment onto the body and a caudal, environment-related pole that projects the body into an environment landscape. The combined topology interweaves perceptual, motor, and function-specific principles, and suggests that actions are specified by top-down guided optimization of body-environment interactions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document