scholarly journals Auditory-Feedback Control of Temporal Call Patterns in Echolocating Horseshoe Bats

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 1295-1303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Smotherman ◽  
Walter Metzner
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Feedback ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Constant Frequency ◽  
Frequency Shifts ◽  
Call Duration ◽  
Calling Patterns ◽  
Neural Feedback ◽  
Auditory Feedback Control ◽  
Horseshoe Bats ◽  
Echo Delay

During flight, auditory feedback causes horseshoe bats to adjust the duration and repetition rate of their vocalizations in a context-dependent manner. As these bats approach a target, they make finely graded adjustments in call duration and interpulse interval (IPI), but their echolocation behavior is also characterized by abrupt transitions in overall temporal calling patterns. We investigated the relative contributions of two prominent acoustic cues, echo frequency and delay, toward the control of both graded and transitional changes in call duration and IPI. Echoes returning at frequencies above the emitted call frequency caused bats to switch from long single calls to pairs of short calls (doublets). Alternatively, increasing echo delay caused progressive increases in IPI but caused no accompanying changes in call duration. When frequency shifts were combined with changing echo delays, echo delay altered the IPIs occurring between doublets but not the IPI within a doublet. When the echo mimic was replaced by presentation of either an artificial constant-frequency (CF) stimulus or a frequency-modulated (FM) stimulus, each designed to mimic major components of the echo acoustic structure, we found that CF stimuli could trigger the switch to doublets, but changing CF delay had no influence on IPI, whereas the timing of an FM-sweep presentation had a strong effect on IPI. Because CF and FM sounds are known to be processed separately in the bat auditory system, the results indicate that at least two distinct neural feedback pathways may be used to control the temporal patterns of vocalization in echolocating horseshoe bats.

Event-related potential correlates of auditory feedback control of vocal production in experienced singers

Neuroreport ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-331
Author(s):  
Xiuqin Wu ◽  
Baofeng Zhang ◽  
Lirao Wei ◽  
Hanjun Liu ◽  
Peng Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Feedback Control ◽  
Auditory Feedback ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Vocal Production ◽  
Auditory Feedback Control

scholarly journals Contributions of Auditory and Somatosensory Feedback to Vocal Motor Control

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 2039-2053
Author(s):  
Dante J. Smith ◽  
Cara Stepp ◽  
Frank H. Guenther ◽  
Elaine Kearney
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Auditory Feedback ◽  
Native Speakers ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Auditory Masking ◽  
Somatosensory Feedback ◽  
Perturbation Experiment ◽  
Native Speakers Of English ◽  
Auditory Acuity ◽  
Auditory Feedback Control

Purpose To better define the contributions of somatosensory and auditory feedback in vocal motor control, a laryngeal perturbation experiment was conducted with and without masking of auditory feedback. Method Eighteen native speakers of English produced a sustained vowel while their larynx was physically and externally displaced on a subset of trials. For the condition with auditory masking, speech-shaped noise was played via earphones at 90 dB SPL. Responses to the laryngeal perturbation were compared to responses by the same participants to an auditory perturbation experiment that involved a 100-cent downward shift in fundamental frequency ( f o ). Responses were also examined in relation to a measure of auditory acuity. Results Compensatory responses to the laryngeal perturbation were observed with and without auditory masking. The level of compensation was greatest in the laryngeal perturbation condition without auditory masking, followed by the condition with auditory masking; the level of compensation was smallest in the auditory perturbation experiment. No relationship was found between the degree of compensation to auditory versus laryngeal perturbations, and the variation in responses in both perturbation experiments was not related to auditory acuity. Conclusions The findings indicate that somatosensory and auditory feedback control mechanisms work together to compensate for laryngeal perturbations, resulting in the greatest degree of compensation when both sources of feedback are available. In contrast, these two control mechanisms work in competition in response to auditory perturbations, resulting in an overall smaller degree of compensation. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12559628

Distribution of combination-sensitive neurons in the ventral fringe area of the auditory cortex of the mustached bat

1989 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Edamatsu ◽  
M. Kawasaki ◽  
N. Suga
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Functional Organization ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Sound Pulse ◽  
Constant Frequency ◽  
Mustached Bat ◽  
Essential Components ◽  
Tritiated Amino Acids ◽  
Pulse Echo ◽  
Echo Delay

1. The orientation sound (pulse) of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, consists of long constant-frequency components (CF1-4) and short frequency-modulated components (FM1-4). The auditory cortex of this bat contains several combination-sensitive areas: FM-FM, DF, VA, VF, and CF/CF. The FM-FM area consists of neurons tuned to a combination of the pulse FM1 and the echo FMn (n = 2, 3, or 4) and has an echo-delay (target-range) axis. Our preliminary anatomical studies with tritiated amino acids suggest that the FM-FM area projects to the dorsal fringe (DF) area, which in turn projects to the ventral fringe (VF) area. The aim of our study was to characterize the response properties of VF neurons and to explore the functional organization of the VF area. Acoustic stimuli delivered to the bats were CF tones, FM sounds, and their combinations mimicking the pulse emitted by the mustached bat and the echo. 2. Like the FM-FM and DF areas, the VF area is composed of three types of FM-FM combination-sensitive neurons: FM1-FM2, FM1-FM3, and FM1-FM4. These neurons show little or no response to a pulse alone, echo alone, single CF tone or single FM sound. They do, however, show a strong facilitative response to a pulse-echo pair with a particular echo delay. The essential components in the pulse-echo pair for facilitation are the FM1 of the pulse and the FMn of the echo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Vocalization Control of a Mechanical Vocal System under Auditory Feedback

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 453-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshio Higashimoto ◽  
◽  
Hideyuki Sawada ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical System ◽  
Auditory Feedback ◽  
Mechanical Model ◽  
Sound Production ◽  
Vocal Tract ◽  
Vocal Cords ◽  
System A ◽  
Vocal System ◽  
Speech Performance ◽  
Auditory Feedback Control

We are developing a mechanical model of a human vocal system based on mechatronics technology. Although various ways of vocal sound production have been actively studied, mechanical construction is considered to advantageously realize natural vocalization with its fluid dynamics. In voice generation, analysis of the behavior of the vocal cords and the vocal tract are required in a mechanical system. Furthermore, fluid mechanics are less stable, making control more difficult. Several motors are used to manipulate the mechanical vocal system. A neural network works to establish relations between motor positions and produced vocal sounds by auditory feedback in the learning phase. In speech performance, the mechanical system is able to vocalize while vocal pitches and phonemes are adaptively controlled by auditory feedback control. This paper presents the construction of a mechanical vocal system and its adaptive acquisition of vocalization skills.

scholarly journals Natural echolocation sequences evoke echo-delay selectivity in the auditory midbrain of the FM bat, Eptesicus fuscus

2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 1323-1339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio Macías ◽  
Jinhong Luo ◽  
Cynthia F. Moss
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Sweep Rate ◽  
Eptesicus Fuscus ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Temporal Patterning ◽  
Stimulus Context ◽  
Constant Frequency ◽  
New Findings ◽  
Echo Delay ◽  
Delay Tuning

Echolocating bats must process temporal streams of sonar sounds to represent objects along the range axis. Neuronal echo-delay tuning, the putative mechanism of sonar ranging, has been characterized in the inferior colliculus (IC) of the mustached bat, an insectivorous species that produces echolocation calls consisting of constant frequency and frequency modulated (FM) components, but not in species that use FM signals alone. This raises questions about the mechanisms that give rise to echo-delay tuning in insectivorous bats that use different signal designs. To investigate whether stimulus context may account for species differences in echo-delay selectivity, we characterized single-unit responses in the IC of awake passively listening FM bats, Eptesicus fuscus, to broadcasts of natural sonar call-echo sequences, which contained dynamic changes in signal duration, interval, spectrotemporal structure, and echo-delay. In E. fuscus, neural selectivity to call-echo delay emerges in a population of IC neurons when stimulated with call-echo pairs presented at intervals mimicking those in a natural sonar sequence. To determine whether echo-delay selectivity also depends on the spectrotemporal features of individual sounds within natural sonar sequences, we studied responses to computer-generated echolocation signals that controlled for call interval, duration, bandwidth, sweep rate, and echo-delay. A subpopulation of IC neurons responded selectively to the combination of the spectrotemporal structure of natural call-echo pairs and their temporal patterning within a dynamic sonar sequence. These new findings suggest that the FM bat’s fine control over biosonar signal parameters may modulate IC neuronal selectivity to the dimension of echo-delay. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Echolocating bats perform precise auditory temporal computations to estimate their distance to objects. Here, we report that response selectivity of neurons in the inferior colliculus of a frequency modulated bat to call-echo delay, or target range tuning, depends on the temporal patterning and spectrotemporal features of sound elements in a natural echolocation sequence. We suggest that echo responses to objects at different distances are gated by the bat’s active control over the spectrotemporal patterning of its sonar emissions.

scholarly journals Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech

NeuroImage ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 1429-1443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason A. Tourville ◽  
Kevin J. Reilly ◽  
Frank H. Guenther
Keyword(s):  
Feedback Control ◽  
Auditory Feedback ◽  
Neural Mechanisms ◽  
Auditory Feedback Control
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document