scholarly journals Chronic recordings reveal tactile stimuli can suppress spontaneous activity of neurons in somatosensory cortex of awake and anesthetized primates

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 2105-2123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Xin Qi ◽  
Jamie L. Reed ◽  
Joao G. Franca ◽  
Neeraj Jain ◽  
Yoshinao Kajikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Inhibitory Response ◽  
Single Site ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Neuron Activity ◽  
New World Monkeys ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Excitatory Response ◽  
Response Properties ◽  
Tactile Stimuli

In somatosensory cortex, tactile stimulation within the neuronal receptive field (RF) typically evokes a transient excitatory response with or without postexcitatory inhibition. Here, we describe neuronal responses in which stimulation on the hand is followed by suppression of the ongoing discharge. With the use of 16-channel microelectrode arrays implanted in the hand representation of primary somatosensory cortex of New World monkeys and prosimian galagos, we recorded neuronal responses from single units and neuron clusters. In 66% of our sample, neuron activity tended to display suppression of firing when regions of skin outside of the excitatory RF were stimulated. In a small proportion of neurons, single-site indentations suppressed firing without initial increases in response to any of the tested sites on the hand. Latencies of suppressive responses to skin indentation (usually 12–34 ms) were similar to excitatory response latencies. The duration of inhibition varied across neurons. Although most observations were from anesthetized animals, we also found similar neuron response properties in one awake galago. Notably, suppression of ongoing neuronal activity did not require conditioning stimuli or multi-site stimulation. The suppressive effects were generally seen following single-site skin indentations outside of the neuron's minimal RF and typically on different digits and palm pads, which have not often been studied in this context. Overall, the characteristics of widespread suppressive or inhibitory response properties with and without initial facilitative or excitatory responses add to the growing evidence that neurons in primary somatosensory cortex provide essential processing for integrating sensory stimulation from across the hand.

scholarly journals Computational Role of Large Receptive Fields in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 268-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guglielmo Foffani ◽  
John K. Chapin ◽  
Karen A. Moxon
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Spike Timing ◽  
Spike Count ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Single Neurons ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Somatosensory Information

Computational studies are challenging the intuitive view that neurons with broad tuning curves are necessarily less discriminative than neurons with sharp tuning curves. In the context of somatosensory processing, broad tuning curves are equivalent to large receptive fields. To clarify the computational role of large receptive fields for cortical processing of somatosensory information, we recorded ensembles of single neurons from the infragranular forelimb/forepaw region of the rat primary somatosensory cortex while tactile stimuli were separately delivered to different locations on the forelimbs/forepaws under light anesthesia. We specifically adopted the perspective of individual columns/segregates receiving inputs from multiple body location. Using single-trial analyses of many single-neuron responses, we obtained two main results. 1) The responses of even small populations of neurons recorded from within the same estimated column/segregate can be used to discriminate between stimuli delivered to different surround locations in the excitatory receptive fields. 2) The temporal precision of surround responses is sufficiently high for spike timing to add information over spike count in the discrimination between surround locations. This surround spike-timing code (i) is particularly informative when spike count is ambiguous, e.g., in the discrimination between close locations or when receptive fields are large, (ii) becomes progressively more informative as the number of neurons increases, (iii) is a first-spike code, and (iv) is not limited by the assumption that the time of stimulus onset is known. These results suggest that even though large receptive fields result in a loss of spatial selectivity of single neurons, they can provide as a counterpart a sophisticated temporal code based on latency differences in large populations of neurons without necessarily sacrificing basic information about stimulus location.

Differential Organization of Touch and Pain in Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 1770-1776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Ploner ◽  
Frank Schmitz ◽  
Hans-Joachim Freund ◽  
Alfons Schnitzler
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Hierarchical Organization ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Nociceptive Response ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Somatosensory Cortices ◽  
Cortical Responses ◽  
Nociceptive Processing ◽  
Nociceptive Afferents

Processing of tactile stimuli within somatosensory cortices has been shown to be complex and hierarchically organized. However, the precise organization of nociceptive processing within these cortices has remained largely unknown. We used whole-head magnetoencephalography to directly compare cortical responses to stimulation of tactile and nociceptive afferents of the dorsum of the hand in humans. Within the primary somatosensory cortex (SI), nociceptive stimuli activated a single source whereas tactile stimuli activated two sequentially peaking sources. Along the postcentral gyrus, the nociceptive SI source was located 10 mm more medially than the early tactile SI response arising from cytoarchitectonical area 3b and corresponded spatially to the later tactile SI response. Considering a mediolateral location difference between the hand representations of cytoarchitectonical areas 3b and 1, the present results suggest generation of the single nociceptive response in area 1, whereas tactile stimuli activate sequentially peaking sources in areas 3b and 1. Thus nociceptive processing apparently does not share the complex and hierarchical organization of tactile processing subserving elaborated sensory capacities. This difference in the organization of both modalities may reflect that pain perception rather requires reactions to and avoidance of harmful stimuli than sophisticated sensory capacities.

Response Properties and Organization of Nociceptive Neurons in Area 1 of Monkey Primary Somatosensory Cortex

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 719-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan R. Kenshalo ◽  
Koichi Iwata ◽  
Maurice Sholas ◽  
David A. Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Isolated Cells ◽  
Nociceptive Neurons ◽  
Response Properties ◽  
Stimulus Response ◽  
Noxious Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Wdr Neurons

The organization and response properties of nociceptive neurons in area 1 of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) of anesthetized monkeys were examined. The receptive fields of nociceptive neurons were classified as either wide-dynamic-range (WDR) neurons that were preferentially responsive to noxious mechanical stimulation, or nociceptive specific (NS) that were responsive to only noxious stimuli. The cortical locations and the responses of the two classes of neurons were compared. An examination of the neuronal stimulus-response functions obtained during noxious thermal stimulation of the glabrous skin of the foot or the hand indicated that WDR neurons exhibited significantly greater sensitivity to noxious thermal stimuli than did NS neurons. The receptive fields of WDR neurons were significantly larger than the receptive fields of NS neurons. Nociceptive SI neurons were somatotopically organized. Nociceptive neurons with receptive fields on the foot were located more medial in area 1 of SI than those with receptive fields on the hand. In the foot representation, the recording sites of nociceptive neurons were near the boundary between areas 3b and 1, whereas in the hand area, there was a tendency for them to be located more caudal in area 1. The majority of nociceptive neurons were located in the middle layers (III and IV) of area 1. The fact that nociceptive neurons were not evenly distributed across the layers of area 1 suggested that columns of nociceptive neurons probably do not exist in the somatosensory cortex. In electrode tracks where nociceptive neurons were found, approximately half of all subsequently isolated neurons were also classified as nociceptive. Low-threshold mechanoreceptive (LTM) neurons were intermingled with nociceptive neurons. Both WDR and NS neurons were found in close proximity to one another. In instances where the receptive field shifted, subsequently isolated cells were also classified as nociceptive. These data suggest that nociceptive neurons in area 1 of SI are organized in vertically orientated aggregations or clusters in layers III and IV.

scholarly journals Effects of spatiotemporal stimulus properties on spike timing correlations in owl monkey primary somatosensory cortex

2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (12) ◽  
pp. 3353-3369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie L. Reed ◽  
Pierre Pouget ◽  
Hui-Xin Qi ◽  
Zhiyi Zhou ◽  
Melanie R. Bernard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
Spike Timing ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Spatial Proximity ◽  
Electrode Arrays ◽  
Paired Stimuli ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Source Of Information

The correlated discharges of cortical neurons in primary somatosensory cortex are a potential source of information about somatosensory stimuli. One aspect of neuronal correlations that has not been well studied is how the spatiotemporal properties of tactile stimuli affect the presence and magnitude of correlations. We presented single- and dual-point stimuli with varying spatiotemporal relationships to the hands of three anesthetized owl monkeys and recorded neuronal activity from 100-electrode arrays implanted in primary somatosensory cortex. Correlation magnitudes derived from joint peristimulus time histogram (JPSTH) analysis of single neuron pairs were used to determine the level of spike timing correlations under selected spatiotemporal stimulus conditions. Correlated activities between neuron pairs were commonly observed, and the proportions of correlated pairs tended to decrease with distance between the recorded neurons. Distance between stimulus sites also affected correlations. When stimuli were presented simultaneously at two sites, ∼37% of the recorded neuron pairs showed significant correlations when adjacent phalanges were stimulated, and ∼21% of the pairs were significantly correlated when nonadjacent digits were stimulated. Spatial proximity of paired stimuli also increased the average correlation magnitude. Stimulus onset asynchronies in the paired stimuli had small effects on the correlation magnitude. These results show that correlated discharges between neurons at the first level of cortical processing provide information about the relative locations of two stimuli on the hand.

scholarly journals Investigating the effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on primary somatosensory cortex

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicoletta Manzo ◽  
Andrea Guerra ◽  
Margherita Giangrosso ◽  
Daniele Belvisi ◽  
Giorgio Leodori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Alternating Current ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Alpha Frequency ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Frequency Peak ◽  
Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation ◽  
Gamma Frequencies ◽  
Alpha Beta ◽  
Near Threshold

Abstract Near-threshold tactile stimuli perception and somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold (STDT) are encoded in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and largely depend on alpha and beta S1 rhythm. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive neurophysiological technique that allows cortical rhythm modulation. We investigated the effects of tACS delivered over S1 at alpha, beta, and gamma frequencies on near-threshold tactile stimuli perception and STDT, as well as phase-dependent tACS effects on near-threshold tactile stimuli perception in healthy subjects. In separate sessions, we tested the effects of different tACS montages, and tACS at the individualised S1 μ-alpha frequency peak, on STDT and near-threshold tactile stimuli perception. We found that tACS applied over S1 at alpha, beta, and gamma frequencies did not modify STDT or near-threshold tactile stimuli perception. Moreover, we did not detect effects of tACS phase or montage. Finally, tACS did not modify near-threshold tactile stimuli perception and STDT even when delivered at the individualised μ-alpha frequency peak. Our study showed that tACS does not alter near-threshold tactile stimuli or STDT, possibly due to the inability of tACS to activate deep S1 layers. Future investigations may clarify tACS effects over S1 in patients with focal dystonia, whose pathophysiology implicates increased STDT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document