Heartbeat Control in Leeches. II. Fictive Motor Pattern

2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 397-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Wenning ◽  
Andrew A. V. Hill ◽  
Ronald L. Calabrese
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Sensory Feedback ◽  
Coordination Mode ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Preceding Paper ◽  
Rhythmic Activity ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Inhibitory Input ◽  
Combine Data ◽  
Coordination Modes

The rhythmic beating of the tube-like hearts in the medicinal leech is driven and coordinated by rhythmic activity in segmental heart motor neurons. The motor neurons are controlled by rhythmic inhibitory input from a network of heart interneurons that compose the heartbeat central pattern generator. In the preceding paper, we described the constriction pattern of the hearts in quiescent intact animals and showed that one heart constricts in a rear-to-front wave (peristaltic coordination mode), while the other heart constricts in near unison over its length (synchronous coordination mode) and that they regularly switch coordination modes. Here we analyze intersegmental and side-to-side-coordination of the fictive motor pattern for heartbeat in denervated nerve cords. We show that the intersegmental phase relations among heart motor neurons in both coordination modes are independent of heartbeat period. This finding enables us to combine data from different experiments to form a detailed analysis of the relative phases, duty cycle, and intraburst spike frequency of the bursts of the segmental heart motor neurons. The fictive motor pattern and the constriction pattern seen in intact leeches closely match in their intersegmental and side-to-side coordination, indicating that sensory feedback is not necessary for properly phased intersegmental coordination. Moreover, the regular switches in coordination mode of the fictive motor pattern mimic those seen in intact animals indicating that these switches likely arise by a central mechanism.

A Central Pattern Generator Producing Alternative Outputs: Temporal Pattern of Premotor Activity

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 309-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Norris ◽  
Adam L. Weaver ◽  
Lee G. Morris ◽  
Angela Wenning ◽  
Paul A. García ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Coordination Mode ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Quantitative Description ◽  
Extracellular Recording ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Regular Feature ◽  
Phase Constancy ◽  
Activity State

The central pattern generator for heartbeat in medicinal leeches constitutes seven identified pairs of segmental heart interneurons. Four identified pairs of heart interneurons make a staggered pattern of inhibitory synaptic connections with segmental heart motor neurons. Using extracellular recording from multiple interneurons in the network in 56 isolated nerve cords, we show that this pattern generator produces a side-to-side asymmetric pattern of intersegmental coordination among ipsilateral premotor interneurons. This pattern corresponds to a similarly asymmetric fictive motor pattern in heart motor neurons and asymmetric constriction pattern of the two tubular hearts, synchronous and peristaltic. We provide a quantitative description of the firing pattern of all the premotor interneurons, including phase, duty cycle, and intraburst frequency of this premotor activity pattern. This analysis identifies two stereotypical coordination modes corresponding to synchronous and peristaltic, which show phase constancy over a broad range of periods as do the fictive motor pattern and the heart constriction pattern. Coordination mode is controlled through one segmental pair of heart interneurons (switch interneurons). Side-to-side switches in coordination mode are a regular feature of this pattern generator and occur with changes in activity state of these switch interneurons. Associated with synchronous coordination of premotor interneurons, the ipsilateral switch interneuron is in an active state, during which it produces rhythmic bursts, whereas associated with peristaltic coordination, the ipsilateral switch interneuron is largely silent. We argue that timing and pattern elaboration are separate functions produced by overlapping subnetworks in the heartbeat central pattern generator.

A Central Pattern Generator Producing Alternative Outputs: Pattern, Strength, and Dynamics of Premotor Synaptic Input to Leech Heart Motor Neurons

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 2992-3005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Norris ◽  
Adam L. Weaver ◽  
Angela Wenning ◽  
Paul S. García ◽  
Ronald L. Calabrese
Keyword(s):  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Temporal Pattern ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Synaptic Connectivity ◽  
Neuron Activity ◽  
Coordination Modes ◽  
Asymmetric Pattern ◽  
Medicinal Leeches

The central pattern generator (CPG) for heartbeat in medicinal leeches consists of seven identified pairs of segmental heart interneurons and one unidentified pair. Four of the identified pairs and the unidentified pair of interneurons make inhibitory synaptic connections with segmental heart motor neurons. The CPG produces a side-to-side asymmetric pattern of intersegmental coordination among ipsilateral premotor interneurons corresponding to a similarly asymmetric fictive motor pattern in heart motor neurons, and asymmetric constriction pattern of the two tubular hearts, synchronous and peristaltic. Using extracellular recordings from premotor interneurons and voltage-clamp recordings of ipsilateral segmental motor neurons in 69 isolated nerve cords, we assessed the strength and dynamics of premotor inhibitory synaptic output onto the entire ensemble of heart motor neurons and the associated conduction delays in both coordination modes. We conclude that premotor interneurons establish a stereotypical pattern of intersegmental synaptic connectivity, strengths, and dynamics that is invariant across coordination modes, despite wide variations among preparations. These data coupled with a previous description of the temporal pattern of premotor interneuron activity and relative phasing of motor neuron activity in the two coordination modes enable a direct assessment of how premotor interneurons through their temporal pattern of activity and their spatial pattern of synaptic connectivity, strengths, and dynamics coordinate segmental motor neurons into a functional pattern of activity.

A Central Pattern Generator Producing Alternative Outputs: Phase Relations of Leech Heart Motor Neurons With Respect to Premotor Synaptic Input

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 2983-2991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Norris ◽  
Adam L. Weaver ◽  
Angela Wenning ◽  
Paul S. García ◽  
Ronald L. Calabrese
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neuron ◽  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Coordination Mode ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Neuron Activity ◽  
Intersegmental Coordination ◽  
Asymmetric Pattern ◽  
Neuron Ensemble

The central pattern generator (CPG) for heartbeat in leeches consists of seven identified pairs of segmental heart interneurons and one unidentified pair. Four of the identified pairs and the unidentified pair of interneurons make inhibitory synaptic connections with segmental heart motor neurons. The CPG produces a side-to-side asymmetric pattern of intersegmental coordination among ipsilateral premotor interneurons corresponding to a similarly asymmetric fictive motor pattern in heart motor neurons, and asymmetric constriction pattern of the two tubular hearts: synchronous and peristaltic. Using extracellular techniques, we recorded, in 61 isolated nerve cords, the activity of motor neurons in conjunction with the phase reference premotor heart interneuron, HN(4), and another premotor interneuron that allowed us to assess the coordination mode. These data were then coupled with a previous description of the temporal pattern of premotor interneuron activity in the two coordination modes to synthesize a global phase diagram for the known elements of the CPG and the entire motor neuron ensemble. These average data reveal the stereotypical side-to-side asymmetric patterns of intersegmental coordination among the motor neurons and show how this pattern meshes with the activity pattern of premotor interneurons. Analysis of animal-to-animal variability in this coordination indicates that the intersegmental phase progression of motor neuron activity in the midbody in the peristaltic coordination mode is the most stereotypical feature of the fictive motor pattern. Bilateral recordings from motor neurons corroborate the main features of the asymmetric motor pattern.

Gating of Afferent Input by a Central Pattern Generator

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 950-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph A. DiCaprio
Keyword(s):  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Sensory Input ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Afferent Input ◽  
Inhibitory Input ◽  
Cycle Period ◽  
Intracellular Recordings ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Sufficient Magnitude

Gating of afferent input by a central pattern generator. Intracellular recordings from the sole proprioceptor (the oval organ) in the crab ventilatory system show that the nonspiking afferent fibers from this organ receive a cyclic hyperpolarizing inhibition in phase with the ventilatory motor pattern. Although depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current pulses injected into a single afferent will reset the ventilatory motor pattern, the inhibitory input is of sufficient magnitude to block afferent input to the ventilatory central pattern generator (CPG) for ∼50% of the cycle period. It is proposed that this inhibitory input serves to gate sensory input to the ventilatory CPG to provide an unambiguous input to the ventilatory CPG.

scholarly journals Output variability across animals and levels in a motor system

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Wenning ◽  
Brian J Norris ◽  
Cengiz Günay ◽  
Daniel Kueh ◽  
Ronald L Calabrese
Keyword(s):  
Life History ◽  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Motor System ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Phase Relations ◽  
The Other ◽  
Output Variability ◽  
Rhythmic Behaviors

Rhythmic behaviors vary across individuals. We investigated the sources of this output variability across a motor system, from the central pattern generator (CPG) to the motor plant. In the bilaterally symmetric leech heartbeat system, the CPG orchestrates two coordinations in the bilateral hearts with different intersegmental phase relations (Δϕ) and periodic side-to-side switches. Population variability is large. We show that the system is precise within a coordination, that differences in repetitions of a coordination contribute little to population output variability, but that differences between bilaterally homologous cells may contribute to some of this variability. Nevertheless, much output variability is likely associated with genetic and life history differences among individuals. Variability of Δϕ were coordination-specific: similar at all levels in one, but significantly lower for the motor pattern than the CPG pattern in the other. Mechanisms that transform CPG output to motor neurons may limit output variability in the motor pattern.

scholarly journals Feedback From Peripheral Musculature to Central Pattern Generator in the Neurogenic Heart of the Crab Callinectes sapidus: Role of Mechanosensitive Dendrites

2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyla García-Crescioni ◽  
Timothy J. Fort ◽  
Estee Stern ◽  
Vladimir Brezina ◽  
Mark W. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neuron ◽  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Callinectes Sapidus ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Neuron Spike ◽  
Effector System ◽  
Spike Bursts

The neurogenic heart of decapod crustaceans is a very simple, self-contained, model central pattern generator (CPG)-effector system. The CPG, the nine-neuron cardiac ganglion (CG), is embedded in the myocardium itself; it generates bursts of spikes that are transmitted by the CG's five motor neurons to the periphery of the system, the myocardium, to produce its contractions. Considerable evidence suggests that a CPG-peripheral loop is completed by a return feedback pathway through which the contractions modify, in turn, the CG motor pattern. One likely pathway is provided by dendrites, presumably mechanosensitive, that the CG neurons project into the adjacent myocardial muscle. Here we have tested the role of this pathway in the heart of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus . We performed “de-efferentation” experiments in which we cut the motor neuron axons to the myocardium and “de-afferentation” experiments in which we cut or ligated the dendrites. In the isolated CG, these manipulations had no effect on the CG motor pattern. When the CG remained embedded in the myocardium, however, these manipulations, interrupting either the efferent or afferent limb of the CPG-peripheral loop, decreased contraction amplitude, increased the frequency of the CG motor neuron spike bursts, and decreased the number of spikes per burst and burst duration. Finally, passive stretches of the myocardium likewise modulated the spike bursts, an effect that disappeared when the dendrites were cut. We conclude that feedback through the dendrites indeed operates in this system and suggest that it completes a loop through which the system self-regulates its activity.

The Heartbeat Neural Control System of the Leech

2017 ◽  
pp. 575-580
Author(s):  
Ronald L. Calabrese
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Activity Pattern ◽  
Neural Control ◽  
Circulatory System ◽  
Rhythmic Activity ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
The Other ◽  
The Core ◽  
Medicinal Leeches

In medicinal leeches, heartbeat is a continuous, automatic function. Rhythmic constrictions of two muscular lateral vessels (the hearts) move blood through the closed circulatory system. The hearts are coordinated so that one beats in a rear-to-front progression (peristaltically), whereas the other one beats nearly synchronously along its length. The same coordination modes as in the hearts—peristaltic and synchronous—occur in the heart motor neurons: on one side, they are active in a rear-to-front progression, while on the other, they are active nearly synchronously. The rhythmic activity pattern of the heart motor neurons derives from the cyclic inhibition that they receive from the heartbeat central pattern generator (CPG). The core CPG comprises seven bilateral pairs of identified heart (HN) interneurons that occur in the first seven ganglia, HN(1)–HN(7).

Coupling of Efferent Neuromodulatory Neurons to Rhythmical Leg Motor Activity in the Locust

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 361-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Baudoux ◽  
Carsten Duch ◽  
Oliver T. Morris
Keyword(s):  
Motor Activity ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Spike Activity ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Rhythmic Activity ◽  
Motor Output ◽  
Variable Activity ◽  
Metathoracic Ganglion ◽  
Dum Neurons ◽  
Dorsal Unpaired Median

Baudoux, Sylvie, Carsten Duch, and Oliver T. Morris. Coupling of efferent neuromodulatory neurons to rhythmical leg motor activity in the locust. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 361–370, 1998. The spike activity of neuromodulatory dorsal unpaired median (DUM) neurons was analyzed during a pilocarpine-induced motor pattern in the locust. Paired intracellular recordings were made from these octopaminergic neurons during rhythmic activity in hindleg motor neurons evoked by applying pilocarpine to an isolated metathoracic ganglion. This motor pattern is characterized by two alternating phases: a levator phase, during which levator, flexor, and common inhibitor motor neurons spike, and a depressor phase, during which depressor and extensor motor neurons spike. Three different subpopulations of efferent DUM neurons could be distinguished during this rhythmical motor pattern according to their characteristic spike output. DUM 1 neurons, which in the intact animal do not innervate muscles involved in leg movements, showed no change apart from a general increase in spike frequency. DUM 3 and DUM 3,4 neurons produced the most variable activity but received frequent and sometimes pronounced hyperpolarizations that were often common to both recorded neurons. DUM 5 and DUM 3,4,5 neurons innervate muscles of the hindleg and showed rhythmical excitation leading to bursts of spikes during rhythmic activity of the motor neurons, which innervate these same muscles. Sometimes the motor output was coordinated across both sides of the ganglion so that there was alternating activity between levators of both sides. In these cases, the spikes of DUM 5 and DUM 3,4,5 neurons and the hyperpolarization of DUM 3 and DUM 3,4 neurons occurred at particular phases in the motor pattern. Our data demonstrate a central coupling of specific types of DUM neurons to a rhythmical motor pattern. Changes in the spike output of these particular efferent DUM neurons parallel changes in the motor output. The spike activity of DUM neurons thus may be controlled by the same circuits that determine the action of the motor neurons. Functional implications for real walking are discussed.

Plasticity in the multifunctional buccal central pattern generator of Helisoma illuminated by the identification of phase 3 interneurons

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 561-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Quinlan ◽  
A. D. Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Motor Activity ◽  
Motor Neuron ◽  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Neuron Activity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Standard Pattern

1. The mechanism for generating diverse patterns of buccal motor neuron activity was explored in the multifunctional central pattern generator (CPG) of Helisoma. The standard pattern of motor neuron activity, which results in typical feeding behavior, consists of three distinct phases of buccal motor neuron activity. We have previously identified CPG interneurons that control the motor neuron activity during phases 1 and 2 of the standard pattern. Here we identify a pair of interneurons responsible for buccal motor neuron activity during phase 3, and examine the variability in the interactions between this third subunit and other subunits of the CPG. 2. During the production of the standard pattern, phase 3 excitation in many buccal motor neurons follows a prominent phase 2 inhibitory postsynaptic potential. Therefore phase 3 excitation was previously attributed to postinhibitory rebound (PIR) in these motor neurons. Two classes of observations indicated that PIR was insufficient to account for phase 3 activity, necessitating phase 3 interneurons. 1) A subset of identified buccal neurons is inhibited during phase 3 by discrete synaptic input. 2) Other identified buccal neurons display discrete excitation during both phases 2 and 3. 3. A bilaterally symmetrical pair of CPG interneurons, named N3a, was identified and characterized as the source of phase 3 postsynaptic potentials in motor neurons. During phase 3 of the standard motor pattern, interneuron N3a generated bursts of action potentials. Stimulation of N3a, in quiescent preparations, evoked a depolarization in motor neurons that are excited during phase 3 and a hyperpolarization in motor neurons that are inhibited during phase 3. Hyperpolarization of N3a during patterned motor activity eliminated both phase 3 excitation and inhibition. Physiological and morphological characterization of interneuron N3a is provided to invite comparisons with possible homologues in other gastropod feeding CPGs. 4. These data support a model proposed for the organization of the tripartite buccal CPG. According to the model, each of the three phases of buccal motor neuron activity is controlled by discrete subsets of pattern-generating interneurons called subunit 1 (S1), subunit 2 (S2), and subunit 3 (S3). The standard pattern of buccal motor neuron activity underlying feeding is mediated by an S1-S2-S3 sequence of CPG subunit activity. However, a number of "nonstandard" patterns of buccal motor activity were observed. In particular, S2 and S3 activity can occur independently or be linked sequentially in rhythmic patterns other than the standard feeding pattern. Simultaneous recordings of S3 interneuron N3a with effector neurons indicated that N3a can account for phase-3-like postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) in nonstandard patterns. The variety of patterns of buccal motor neuron activity indicates that each CPG subunit can be active in the absence of, or in concert with, activity in any other subunit. 5. To explore how CPG activity may be regulated to generate a particular motor pattern from the CPG's full repertoire, we applied the neuromodulator serotonin. Serotonin initiated and sustained the production of an S2-S3 pattern of activity, in part by enhancing PIR in S3 interneuron N3a after the termination of phase 2 inhibition.

Heartbeat Control in Leeches. I. Constriction Pattern and Neural Modulation of Blood Pressure in Intact Animals

2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 382-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Wenning ◽  
Gennady S. Cymbalyuk ◽  
Ronald L. Calabrese
Keyword(s):  
Coordination Mode ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Systolic Pressure ◽  
Circulatory System ◽  
The Body ◽  
The Other ◽  
Coordination Modes ◽  
Neural Modulation ◽  
Pressure Profiles ◽  
Intravascular Pressure

Two tubular hearts propel blood through the closed circulatory system of the medicinal leech. The hearts are myogenic but are driven by a centrally generated motor pattern that controls heart rate and intersegmental coordination. In two consecutive papers, we address the question of how the motor pattern is translated into the pattern of diastole and systole of leech hearts. We imaged the constriction patterns of the hearts in quiescent intact animals. In one heart, systole progresses rear-to-front (peristaltic coordination mode), whereas systole occurs nearly simultaneously in the other heart (synchronous coordination mode) with regular switches between these two coordination modes. Intersegmental phase relations between heart segments do not vary with changes in the heartbeat period. The peristaltic heart drives blood forward through itself and then rearward through the other longitudinal vessels. The synchronous heart does not seem to contribute to rearward flow along the body axis and may support segmental circulation instead. Simultaneous monitoring of heart motor neuron discharge and the constriction of the corresponding heart segment in innervated, reduced preparations enabled us later to meld the constriction pattern with the fictive motor pattern described in the following paper. Current injections into one heart modulatory neuron while monitoring intravascular pressure from the corresponding heart showed that these neurons can acutely change diastolic and systolic pressure. However, they do not determine the different systolic pressure profiles associated with the two coordination modes, which appear to result from the constriction pattern.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document