Effects of the motor cortical quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (QPS) on the contralateral motor cortex and interhemispheric interactions

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryosuke Tsutsumi ◽  
Ritsuko Hanajima ◽  
Yasuo Terao ◽  
Yuichiro Shirota ◽  
Shinya Ohminami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Corpus Callosum ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Long Term Potentiation ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Corpus callosum connects the bilateral primary motor cortices (M1s) and plays an important role in motor control. Using the paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm, we can measure interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) and interhemispheric facilitation (IHF) as indexes of the interhemispheric interactions in humans. We investigated how quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (QPS), one form of repetitive TMS (rTMS), on M1 affects the contralateral M1 and the interhemispheric interactions. QPS is able to induce bidirectional plastic changes in M1 depending on the interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of TMS pulses: long-term potentiation (LTP)-like effect by QPS-5 protocol, and long-term depression-like effect by QPS-50, whose numbers indicate the ISI (ms). Twelve healthy subjects were enrolled. We applied QPS over the left M1 and recorded several parameters before and 30 min after QPS. QPS-5, which increased motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by left M1 activation, also increased MEPs induced by right M1 activation. Meanwhile, QPS-50, which decreased MEPs elicited by left M1 activation, did not induce any significant changes in MEPs elicited by right M1 activation. None of the resting motor threshold, active motor threshold, short-interval intracortical inhibition, long-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, and short-interval intracortical inhibition in right M1 were affected by QPS. IHI and IHF from left to right M1 significantly increased after left M1 QPS-5. The degree of left first dorsal interosseous MEP amplitude change by QPS-5 significantly correlated with the degree of IHF change. We suppose that the LTP-like effect on the contralateral M1 may be produced by some interhemispheric interactions through the corpus callosum.

scholarly journals Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF): A multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0257554
Author(s):  
Sergei Tugin ◽  
Victor H. Souza ◽  
Maria A. Nazarova ◽  
Pavel A. Novikov ◽  
Aino E. Tervo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Stimulus Orientation ◽  
Electronic Control ◽  
Field Orientation ◽  
Neuronal Populations ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Strongly Connected

Besides stimulus intensities and interstimulus intervals (ISI), the electric field (E-field) orientation is known to affect both short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF) in paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, it has yet to be established how distinct orientations of the conditioning (CS) and test stimuli (TS) affect the SICI and SICF generation. With the use of a multi-channel TMS transducer that provides electronic control of the stimulus orientation and intensity, we aimed to investigate how changes in the CS and TS orientation affect the strength of SICI and SICF. We hypothesized that the CS orientation would play a major role for SICF than for SICI, whereas the CS intensity would be more critical for SICI than for SICF. In eight healthy subjects, we tested two ISIs (1.5 and 2.7 ms), two CS and TS orientations (anteromedial (AM) and posteromedial (PM)), and four CS intensities (50, 70, 90, and 110% of the resting motor threshold (RMT)). The TS intensity was fixed at 110% RMT. The intensities were adjusted to the corresponding RMT in the AM and PM orientations. SICI and SICF were observed in all tested CS and TS orientations. SICI depended on the CS intensity in a U-shaped manner in any combination of the CS and TS orientations. With 70% and 90% RMT CS intensities, stronger PM-oriented CS induced stronger inhibition than weaker AM-oriented CS. Similar SICF was observed for any CS orientation. Neither SICI nor SICF depended on the TS orientation. We demonstrated that SICI and SICF could be elicited by the CS perpendicular to the TS, which indicates that these stimuli affected either overlapping or strongly connected neuronal populations. We concluded that SICI is primarily sensitive to the CS intensity and that CS intensity adjustment resulted in similar SICF for different CS orientations.

Facilitatory conditioning of the supplementary motor area in humans enhances the corticophrenic responsiveness to transcranial magnetic stimulation

2010 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Raux ◽  
Haiqun Xie ◽  
Thomas Similowski ◽  
Lisa Koski
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Supplementary Motor Area ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Area ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Functional Connection ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Inspiratory loading in awake humans is associated with electroencephalographic signs of supplementary motor area (SMA) activation. To provide evidence for a functional connection between SMA and the diaphragm representation in the primary motor cortex (M1DIA), we tested the hypothesis that modulating SMA activity using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) would alter M1DIA excitability. Amplitude and latency of diaphragm motor evoked potentials (MEPDIA), evoked through single pulse M1DIA stimulation, before and up to 16 min after SMA stimulation, were taken as indicators of M1DIA excitability. MEPs from the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI, MEPFDI) served as a control. Four SMA conditioning sessions were performed in random order at 1-wk intervals. Two aimed at increasing SMA activity (5 and 10 Hz, both at 110% of FDI active motor threshold; referred to as 5Hz and 10Hz, respectively), and two aimed at decreasing it (1 Hz either at 110% of FDI active or resting motor threshold, referred to as aMT or rMT, respectively). The 5Hz protocol increased MEPDIA and MEPFDI amplitudes with a maximum 11–16 min poststimulation ( P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively). The 10Hz protocol increased MEPFDI amplitude with a similar time course ( P = 0.03) but did not increase MEPDIA amplitude ( P = 0.32). Both aMT and rMT failed to decrease MEPDIA or MEPFDI amplitudes ( P = 0.23 and P = 0.90, respectively, for diaphragm and P = 0.48 and P = 0.14 for FDI). MEPDIA and MEPFDI latencies were unaffected by rTMS. These results demonstrate that 5-Hz rTMS over the SMA can increase the excitability of M1DIA. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis of a functional connection between SMA and M1DIA.

scholarly journals Cortical disinhibition in Parkinson’s disease

Brain ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (11) ◽  
pp. 3408-3421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Ammann ◽  
Michele Dileone ◽  
Cristina Pagge ◽  
Valentina Catanzaro ◽  
David Mata-Marín ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Intracortical Facilitation ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Conditioning Stimuli

Abstract In Parkinson’s disease, striatal dopamine depletion produces profound alterations in the neural activity of the cortico-basal ganglia motor loop, leading to dysfunctional motor output and parkinsonism. A key regulator of motor output is the balance between excitation and inhibition in the primary motor cortex, which can be assessed in humans with transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques. Despite decades of research, the functional state of cortical inhibition in Parkinson’s disease remains uncertain. Towards resolving this issue, we applied paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols in 166 patients with Parkinson’s disease (57 levodopa-naïve, 50 non-dyskinetic, 59 dyskinetic) and 40 healthy controls (age-matched with the levodopa-naïve group). All patients were studied OFF medication. All analyses were performed with fully automatic procedures to avoid confirmation bias, and we systematically considered and excluded several potential confounding factors such as age, gender, resting motor threshold, EMG background activity and amplitude of the motor evoked potential elicited by the single-pulse test stimuli. Our results show that short-interval intracortical inhibition is decreased in Parkinson’s disease compared to controls. This reduction of intracortical inhibition was obtained with relatively low-intensity conditioning stimuli (80% of the resting motor threshold) and was not associated with any significant increase in short-interval intracortical facilitation or intracortical facilitation with the same low-intensity conditioning stimuli, supporting the involvement of cortical inhibitory circuits. Short-interval intracortical inhibition was similarly reduced in levodopa-naïve, non-dyskinetic and dyskinetic patients. Importantly, intracortical inhibition was reduced compared to control subjects also on the less affected side (n = 145), even in de novo drug-naïve patients in whom the less affected side was minimally symptomatic (lateralized Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III = 0 or 1, n = 23). These results suggest that cortical disinhibition is a very early, possibly prodromal feature of Parkinson’s disease.

scholarly journals Cortical excitability varies across different muscles

2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 1397-1403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parvathi Menon ◽  
Matthew C. Kiernan ◽  
Steve Vucic
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Functional Organization ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Body Regions ◽  
Threshold Tracking ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Limb Muscles

The aim of the present study was to determine whether significant differences in cortical excitability were evident across different body regions in healthy humans. Threshold tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was undertaken in 28 healthy controls. Short-interval intracortical inhibition [SICI between interstimulus intervals (ISI) 1–7 ms], intracortical facilitation (ICF, between ISI 10–30 ms), resting motor threshold (RMT), cortical silent period (CSP) duration (generated at stimulus intensity 150% RMT), and motor evoked potential amplitude were recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB), tibialis anterior (TA), and trapezius muscles. These muscles were selected as they are frequently affected in neurodegenerative diseases, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. SICI and ICF are measured as a percentage difference between conditioned and an unconditioned test response. SICI was significantly greater when recorded over the APB (9.9 ± 1.5%) and TA (8.6 ± 1.4%) muscles compared with the trapezius (4.5 ± 1.9%, P < 0.05). The CSP duration was significantly shorter (CSPtrapezius, 131.0 ± 6.3 ms; CSPTA, 175.7 ± 9.9 ms; CSPAPB, 188.3 ± 4.0 ms; P < 0.001) and ICF greater ( P < 0.01) in the trapezius muscle. There were no significant correlations between inhibitory and facilitatory processes recorded across the three muscles. The present study established significant differences in cortical excitability across three body regions, with evidence of more prominent inhibition and less facilitation in the limb muscles. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Cortical excitability of muscles with differing motor functions was assessed using threshold tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation. Significantly greater intracortical inhibition and less facilitation were evident over the limb muscles. These findings could relate to differences in the functional organization of the corticomotoneuronal system innervating different muscle regions.

Magnifying the View of the Hand Changes Its Cortical Representation. A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1098-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Ambron ◽  
Nicole White ◽  
Olufunsho Faseyitan ◽  
Sudha K. Kessler ◽  
Jared Medina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Hot Spot ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Body Part ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Cortical Representation ◽  
Motor Cortex Excitability

Changes in the perceived size of a body part using magnifying lenses influence tactile perception and pain. We investigated whether the visual magnification of one's hand also influences the motor system, as indexed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs). In Experiment 1, MEPs were measured while participants gazed at their hand with and without magnification of the hand. MEPs were significantly larger when participants gazed at a magnified image of their hand. In Experiment 2, we demonstrated that this effect is specific to the hand that is visually magnified. TMS of the left motor cortex did not induce an increase of MEPs when participants looked at their magnified left hand. Experiment 3 was performed to determine if magnification altered the topography of the cortical representation of the hand. To that end, a 3 × 5 grid centered on the cortical hot spot (cortical location at which a motor threshold is obtained with the lowest level of stimulation) was overlaid on the participant's MRI image, and all 15 sites in the grid were stimulated with and without magnification of the hand. We confirmed the increase in the MEPs at the hot spot with magnification and demonstrated that MEPs significantly increased with magnification at sites up to 16.5 mm from the cortical hot spot. In Experiment 4, we used paired-pulse TMS to measure short-interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation. Magnification was associated with an increase in short-interval intracortical inhibition. These experiments demonstrate that the visual magnification of one's hand induces changes in motor cortex excitability and generates a rapid remapping of the cortical representation of the hand that may, at least in part, be mediated by changes in short-interval intracortical inhibition.

scholarly journals Intracortical and Intercortical Motor Disinhibition to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Newly Diagnosed Celiac Disease Patients

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1530
Author(s):  
Francesco Fisicaro ◽  
Giuseppe Lanza ◽  
Carmela Cinzia D’Agate ◽  
Raffaele Ferri ◽  
Mariagiovanna Cantone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Celiac Disease ◽  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Silent Period ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Transcallosal Inhibition ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Background: Celiac disease (CD) may present or be complicated by neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) probes brain excitability non-invasively, also preclinically. We previously demonstrated an intracortical motor disinhibition and hyperfacilitation in de novo CD patients, which revert back after a long-term gluten-free diet (GFD). In this cross-sectional study, we explored the interhemispheric excitability by transcallosal inhibition, which has never been investigated in CD. Methods: A total of 15 right-handed de novo, neurologically asymptomatic, CD patients and 15 age-matched healthy controls were screened for cognitive and depressive symptoms to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), respectively. TMS consisted of resting motor threshold, amplitude, latency, and duration of the motor evoked potentials, duration and latency of the contralateral silent period (cSP). Transcallosal inhibition was evaluated as duration and latency of the ipsilateral silent period (iSP). Results: MoCA and HDRS scored significantly worse in patients. The iSP and cSP were significantly shorter in duration in patients, with a positive correlation between the MoCA and iSP. Conclusions: An intracortical and interhemispheric motor disinhibition was observed in CD, suggesting the involvement of GABA-mediated cortical and callosal circuitries. Further studies correlating clinical, TMS, and neuroimaging data are needed.

scholarly journals Antidepressant effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is not impaired by intake of lithium or antiepileptic drugs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hebel ◽  
M. A. Abdelnaim ◽  
M. Deppe ◽  
P. M. Kreuzer ◽  
A. Mohonko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Valproic Acid ◽  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Antiepileptic Drugs ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Factor Group ◽  
Mood Stabilizers ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Abstract Introduction The effect of concomitant medication on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) outcomes in depression remains understudied. Recent analyses show attenuation of rTMS effects by antipsychotic medication and benzodiazepines, but data on the effects of antiepileptic drugs and lithium used as mood stabilizers or augmenting agents are sparse despite clinical relevance. Preclinical electrophysiological studies suggest relevant impact of the medication on treatment, but this might not translate into clinical practice. We aimed to investigate the role of lithium (Li), lamotrigine (LTG) and valproic acid (VPA) by analyzing rTMS treatment outcomes in depressed patients. Methods 299 patients with uni- and bipolar depression treated with rTMS were selected for analysis in respect to intake of lithium, lamotrigine and valproic acid. The majority (n = 251) were treated with high-frequency (10–20 Hz) rTMS of the lDLPFC for an average of 17 treatment sessions with a figure-of-8 coil with a MagVenture system aiming for 110% resting motor threshold, and smaller groups of patients were being treated with other protocols including intermittent theta-burst stimulation and bilateral prefrontal and medial prefrontal protocols. For group comparisons, we used analysis of variance with the between-subjects factor group or Chi-Square Test of Independence depending on the scales of measurement. For post-hoc tests, we used least significant difference (LSD). For differences in treatment effects between groups, we used an ANOVA with the between-subjects factor group (groups: no mood stabilizer, Li, LTG, VPA, Li + LTG) the within-subjects factor treatment (pre vs. post treatment with rTMS) and also Chi-Square Tests of independence for response and remission. Results Overall, patients showed an amelioration of symptoms with no significant differences for the main effect of group and for the interaction effect treatment by group. Based on direct comparisons between the single groups taking mood stabilizers against the group taking no mood stabilizers, we see a superior effect of lamotrigine, valproic acid and combination of lithium and lamotrigine for the response and remission rates. Motor threshold was significantly and markedly higher for patients taking valproic acid. Conclusion Being treated with lithium, lamotrigine and valproic acid had no relevant influence on rTMS treatment outcome. The results suggest there is no reason for clinicians to withhold or withdraw these types of medication from patients who are about to undergo a course of rTMS. Prospective controlled work on the subject is encouraged.

The effects of 30 Hz, 50 Hz AND 100 Hz continuous theta burst stimulation via transcranial magnetic stimulation on the electrophysiological parameters in healthy individuals

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 41-49
Author(s):  
Zeynep Ozdemir ◽  
Erkan Acar ◽  
Aysun Soysal
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Individual Variability ◽  
Theta Burst Stimulation ◽  
Burst Stimulation ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Theta Burst ◽  
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a non-invasive procedure that uses robust magnetic fields to create an electrical current in the cerebral cortex. Dual stimulation consists of administering subthre­shold conditioning stimulation (CS), then suprathreshold test stimulation (TS). When the interstimulus interval (ISI) is 1-6 msec, the motor evoked potential (MEP) decreases in amplitude; this decrease is termed “short interval intracortical inhibition” (SICI); when the ISI is 7-30 msec, an increase in MEP amplitude occurs, termed “short interval intracortical facilitation” (SICF). Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), often applied at a frequency of 50 Hz, has been shown to decrease cortical excitability. The primary objective is to determine which duration of cTBS achieves better inhibition or excitation. The secondary objective is to compare 50 Hz cTBS to 30 Hz and 100 Hz cTBS. The resting motor threshold (rMT), MEP, SICI, and SICF were studied in 30 healthy volunteers. CS and TS were administered at 80%-120% and 70%-140% of rMT at 2 and 3-millisecond (msec) intervals for SICI, and 10- and 12-msec intervals for SICF. Ten individuals in each group received 30, 50, or 100 Hz, followed by administration of rMT, MT-MEP, SICI, SICF immediately and at 30 minutes. Greater inhibition was achieved with 3 msec than 2 msec in SICI, whereas better facilitation occurred at 12 msec than 10 msec in SICF. At 30 Hz, cTBS augmented inhibition and suppressed facilitation, while 50 Hz yielded less inhibition and greater inter-individual variability. At 100 Hz, cTBS provided slight facilitation in MEP amplitudes with less interindividual variability. SICI and SICF did not differ significantly between 50 Hz and 100 Hz cTBS. Our results suggest that performing SICI and SICF for 3 and 12 msec, respectively, and CS and TS at 80%-120% of rMT, demonstrate safer inhibition and facilitation. Recently, TBS has been used in the treatment of various neurological diseases, and we recommend preferentially 30 Hz over 50 Hz cTBS for better inhibition with greater safety and less inter-individual variability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document