scholarly journals Relationship Between Jaw Stiffness and Kinematic Variability in Speech

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 2329-2340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas M. Shiller ◽  
Rafael Laboissière ◽  
David J. Ostry

Humans produce speech by controlling a complex biomechanical apparatus to achieve desired speech sounds. We show here that kinematic variability in speech may be influenced by patterns of jaw stiffness. A robotic device was used to deliver mechanical perturbations to the jaw to quantify its stiffness in the mid-sagittal plane. Measured jaw stiffness was anisotropic. Stiffness was greatest along a protrusion-retraction axis and least in the direction of jaw raising and lowering. Consistent with the idea that speech movements reflect directional asymmetries in jaw stiffness, kinematic variability during speech production was found to be high in directions in which stiffness is low and vice versa. In addition, for higher jaw elevations, stiffness was greater and kinematic variability was less. The observed patterns of kinematic variability were not specific to speech—similar patterns appeared in speech and nonspeech movements. The empirical patterns of stiffness were replicated by using a physiologically based model of the jaw. The simulation studies support the idea that the pattern of jaw stiffness is affected by musculo-skeletal geometry and muscle-force-generating abilities with jaw geometry being the primary determinant of the orientation of the stiffness ellipse.

1989 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Medinsky ◽  
J. A. Bond ◽  
S. Hunsberger ◽  
W. C. Griffith

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1550-1558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Z. Ferl ◽  
Vania Kenanova ◽  
Anna M. Wu ◽  
Joseph J. DiStefano

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 701-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Peduzzi de Castro ◽  
Daniel Cury Ribeiro ◽  
Felipe de Camargo Forte ◽  
Joelly Mahnic de Toledo ◽  
Roberto Costa Krug ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to compare shoulder muscle force and moment production during external rotation performed in the transverse and sagittal planes. An optimization model was used for estimating shoulder muscle force production of infraspinatus, teres minor, supraspinatus, anterior deltoid, middle deltoid and posterior deltoid muscles. The model uses as input data the external rotation moment, muscle moment arm magnitude, muscle physiologic cross-sectional area and muscle specific tension. The external rotation moment data were gathered from eight subjects in transverse and six subjects in sagittal plane using an isokinetic dynamometer. In the sagittal plane, all studied muscles presented larger estimated force in comparison with the transverse plane. The infraspinatus, teres minor, supraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscles presented larger moment in sagittal when compared with transverse plane. When prescribing shoulder rehabilitation exercises, therapists should bear in mind the described changes in muscle force production.


1994 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.E. Dallas ◽  
S. Muralidhara ◽  
X.M. Chen ◽  
R. Ramanathan ◽  
P. Varkonyi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document