Motion Adaptation in Area MT

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 3469-3476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. A. Van Wezel ◽  
Kenneth H. Britten
Keyword(s):  
Opposite Direction ◽  
Human Motion ◽  
Neural Responses ◽  
Motion Adaptation ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Subsequent Test ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Perceptual Shift ◽  
Static Pattern

In many sensory systems, exposure to a prolonged stimulus causes adaptation, which tends to reduce neural responses to subsequent stimuli. Such effects are usually stimulus-specific, making adaptation a powerful probe into information processing. We used dynamic random dot kinematograms to test the magnitude and selectivity of adaptation effects in the middle temporal area (MT) and to compare them to effects on human motion discrimination. After 3 s of adaptation to a random dot pattern moving in the preferred direction, MT neuronal responses to subsequent test patterns were reduced by 26% on average compared with adaptation to a static pattern. This reduction in response magnitude was largely independent of what test stimulus was presented. However, adaptation in the opposite direction changed responses less often and very inconsistently. Therefore motion adaptation systematically and profoundly affects the neurons in MT representing the adapted direction, but much less those representing the opposite direction. In human psychophysical experiments, such adapting stimuli affected direction discrimination, biasing choices away from the adaptation direction. The magnitude of this perceptual shift was consistent with the magnitude of the changes seen in area MT, if one assumes that a motion comparison step occurs after MT.

Neural responses to visual texture patterns in middle temporal area of the macaque monkey

1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 164-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Olavarria ◽  
E. A. DeYoe ◽  
J. J. Knierim ◽  
J. M. Fox ◽  
D. C. van Essen
Keyword(s):  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Neural Responses ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Middle Temporal ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Orientation Contrast ◽  
Background Texture ◽  
Moving Texture

1. We studied how neurons in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of anesthetized macaque monkeys responded to textured and nontextured visual stimuli. Stimuli contained a central rectangular ,figure- that was either uniform in luminance or consisted of an array of oriented line segments. The figure moved at constant velocity in one of four orthogonal directions. The region surrounding the figure was either uniform in luminance or contained a texture array (whose elements were identical or orthogonal in orientation to those of the figure), and it either was stationary or moved along with the figure. 2. A textured figure moving across a stationary textured background (,texture bar- stimulus) often elicited vigorous neural responses, but, on average, the responses to texture bars were significantly smaller than to solid (uniform luminance) bars. 3. Many cells showed direction selectivity that was similar for both texture bars and solid bars. However, on average, the direction selectivity measured when texture bars were used was significantly smaller than that for solid bars, and many cells lost significant direction selectivity altogether. The reduction in direction selectivity for texture bars generally reflected a combination of decreased responsiveness in the preferred direction and increased responsiveness in the null (opposite to preferred) direction. 4. Responses to a texture bar in the absence of a texture background (,texture bar alone-) were very similar to the responses to solid bars both in the magnitude of response and in the degree of direction selectivity. Conversely, adding a static texture surround to a moving solid bar reduced direction selectivity on average without a reduction in response magnitude. These results indicate that the static surround is largely responsible for the differences in direction selectivity for texture bars versus solid bars. 5. In the majority of MT cells studied, responses to a moving texture bar were largely independent of whether the elements in the bar were of the same orientation as the background elements or of the orthogonal orientation. Thus, for the class of stimuli we used, orientation contrast does not markedly affect the responses of MT neurons to moving texture patterns. 6. The optimum figure length and the shapes of the length tuning curves determined with the use of solid bars and texture bars differed significantly in most of the cells examined. Thus neurons in MT are not simply selective for a particular figure shape independent of whatever cues are used to delineate the figure.

Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 902-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. Colby ◽  
J. R. Duhamel ◽  
M. E. Goldberg
Keyword(s):  
Visual Motion ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Intraparietal Sulcus ◽  
Stimulus Motion ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Response Properties ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
The Face ◽  
Ventral Intraparietal Area

1. The middle temporal area (MT) projects to the intraparietal sulcus in the macaque monkey. We describe here a discrete area in the depths of the intraparietal sulcus containing neurons with response properties similar to those reported for area MT. We call this area the physiologically defined ventral intraparietal area, or VIP. In the present study we recorded from single neurons in VIP of alert monkeys and studied their visual and oculomotor response properties. 2. Area VIP has a high degree of selectivity for the direction of a moving stimulus. In our sample 72/88 (80%) neurons responded at least twice as well to a stimulus moving in the preferred direction compared with a stimulus moving in the null direction. The average response to stimuli moving in the preferred direction was 9.5 times as strong as the response to stimuli moving in the opposite direction, as compared with 10.9 times as strong for neurons in area MT. 3. Many neurons were also selective for speed of stimulus motion. Quantitative data from 25 neurons indicated that the distribution of preferred speeds ranged from 10 to 320 degrees/s. The degree of speed tuning was on average twice as broad as that reported for area MT. 4. Some neurons (22/41) were selective for the distance at which a stimulus was presented, preferring a stimulus of equivalent visual angle and luminance presented near (within 20 cm) or very near (within 5 cm) the face. These neurons maintained their preference for near stimuli when tested monocularly, suggesting that visual cues other than disparity can support this response. These neurons typically could not be driven by small spots presented on the tangent screen (at 57 cm). 5. Some VIP neurons responded best to a stimulus moving toward the animal. The absolute direction of visual motion was not as important for these cells as the trajectory of the stimulus: the best stimulus was one moving toward a particular point on the face from any direction. 6. VIP neurons were not active in relation to saccadic eye movements. Some neurons (10/17) were active during smooth pursuit of a small target. 7. The predominance of direction and speed selectivity in area VIP suggests that it, like other visual areas in the dorsal stream, may be involved in the analysis of visual motion.

scholarly journals Impact of visual motion adaptation on neural responses to objects and its dependence on the temporal characteristics of optic flow

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 1825-1834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei Liang ◽  
Roland Kern ◽  
Rafael Kurtz ◽  
Martin Egelhaaf
Keyword(s):  
Optic Flow ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Induced Response ◽  
Neural Responses ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Motion Adaptation ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Pure Rotation ◽  
Normal Behavior ◽  
Natural Dynamics

It is still unclear how sensory systems efficiently encode signals with statistics as experienced by animals in the real world and what role adaptation plays during normal behavior. Therefore, we studied the performance of visual motion-sensitive neurons of blowflies, the horizontal system neurons, with optic flow that was reconstructed from the head trajectories of semi-free-flying flies. To test how motion adaptation is affected by optic flow dynamics, we manipulated the seminatural optic flow by targeted modifications of the flight trajectories and assessed to what extent neuronal responses to an object located close to the flight trajectory depend on adaptation dynamics. For all types of adapting optic flow object-induced response increments were stronger in the adapted compared with the nonadapted state. Adaptation with optic flow characterized by the typical alternation between translational and rotational segments produced this effect but also adaptation with optic flow that lacked these distinguishing features and even pure rotation at a constant angular velocity. The enhancement of object-induced response increments had a direction-selective component because preferred-direction rotation and natural optic flow were more efficient adaptors than null-direction rotation. These results indicate that natural dynamics of optic flow is not a basic requirement to adapt neurons in a specific, presumably functionally beneficial way. Our findings are discussed in the light of adaptation mechanisms proposed on the basis of experiments previously done with conventional experimenter-defined stimuli.

Response to Motion in Extrastriate Area MSTl: Center-Surround Interactions

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 282-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Eifuku ◽  
Robert H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Opposite Direction ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Stimulus Presentation ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Field Center ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Receptive Field Center

Eifuku, Satoshi and Robert H. Wurtz. Response to motion in extrastriate area MSTl: center-surround interactions. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 282–296, 1998. The medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey extrastriate visual cortex can be divided into a dorsal medial (MSTd) and a lateral ventral (MSTl) region. The functions of the two regions may not be identical: MSTd may process optic flow information that results from the movement of the observer, whereas MSTl may be related more closely to processing visual motion related specifically to the motion of objects. If MSTl were related to such object motion, one would expect to see mechanisms for the segregation of objects from their surround. We investigated one of these mechanisms in MSTl neurons: the effect of stimuli falling in the region surrounding the receptive field center on the response to stimuli falling in the field center. We found the effects of the surround stimulation to be modulatory with little response to the surround stimulus itself but a clear effect on the response to the stimulus falling on the receptive field center. The response to motion in the center in the direction preferred for the neuron usually increased when the surround motion was in the opposite direction to that in the center and decreased when surround motion was in the same direction as that in the center. Fifty-seven percent of the neurons showed a ratio of response for center motion with a surround moving in the opposite direction to that in the center for center motion alone that was >1. The response to motion in the center also increased when the surround stimulus was stationary, and this increase was sometimes larger than that with a moving surround. Nearly 70% of the neurons showed a ratio of response to center motion with a stationary surround to center motion alone that was >1. This is in contrast to the minimal effect of stationary surrounds in middle temporal area neurons. When the stimulus presentation was reversed so that the stimulus in the center was stationary and the surround moved, some MSTl neurons responded when the direction of motion in the surround was in the direction opposite to the preferred direction of motion in the center of the receptive field. Stimulation of the surround thus had a profound effect on the response of MSTl neurons, and this pronounced effect of the surround is consistent with a role in the segmentation of objects using motion.

Processing of kinetically defined boundaries in the cortical motion area MT of the macaque monkey

1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 1258-1270 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. L. Marcar ◽  
D. K. Xiao ◽  
S. E. Raiguel ◽  
H. Maes ◽  
G. A. Orban
Keyword(s):  
Motion Vector ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Preferred Orientation ◽  
Coherent Motion ◽  
Directional Sensitivity ◽  
Motion Vectors ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Kinetic Boundary

1. Electrophysiological recordings of 68 cells in the middle temporal area MT were made in paralyzed and anesthetized macaque monkeys. 2. Testing with our kinetic boundary stimuli always occurred under optimized conditions. To this end, the preferred direction, speed, stimulus position, and stimulus size of each cell were determined by quantitative tests. 3. The orientation selectivity to stationary luminance contrast edges served as a reference by which a response to kinetic boundaries could be compared. We found cells in area MT to be less selective to the orientation of luminance contrast stimuli than to the direction of motion. We confirmed the presence of neurons with preferred orientation aligned with their preferred direction. 4. The responses to kinetic edges defined by motion vectors moving in opposite directions, kinetic gratings with motion vectors in opposite directions, kinetic edges containing coherent motion and a stationary complementary field or coherent motion and a complementary field containing visual dynamic noise were compared. Kinetic boundaries were generated so that the motion vectors moved either parallel or orthogonal to the orientation of the discontinuity. For a cell to be considered as responding to the orientation of a kinetic boundary, it had to exhibit the same preferred orientation when the local motion vectors changed from parallel to orthogonal to the orientation of the kinetic boundary. 5. All cells in area MT changed their preferred orientation by 90 degrees when the coherent motion vectors changed from moving parallel to moving orthogonal to the boundary. This was the case independent of the types of kinetic boundary tested. We concluded that cells in area MT appear to respond to the motion vector over their classical receptive field (CRF) only and were unable to code the orientation of the kinetic boundary. 6. In those cells exhibiting an antagonistic surround, we examined the ability of the cell to code the position of a kinetic boundary. None of the cells tested signaled the position of a kinetic boundary. The side preference of the stimulus of the cells changed from left to right as the motion vectors in the stimulus reversed. This indicates that the cells were only selective for the motion vectors present over their CRF. 7. We found that the directional sensitivity of cells in area MT remained unaltered by the presence of additional motion vectors within the CRF. This suggests that cells in area MT extract a specific motion vector from a spatial configuration of vectors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Constraints on the Source of Short-Term Motion Adaptation in Macaque Area MT. II. Tuning of Neural Circuit Mechanisms

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 370-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Priebe ◽  
Stephen G. Lisberger
Keyword(s):  
Time Course ◽  
Neural Circuit ◽  
Extrastriate Cortex ◽  
Target Velocity ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Motion Adaptation ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Mt Neurons ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Direction Tuning

Neurons in area MT, a motion-sensitive area of extrastriate cortex, respond to a step of target velocity with a transient-sustained firing pattern. The transition from a high initial firing rate to a lower sustained rate occurs over a time course of 20–80 ms and is considered a form of short-term adaptation. In the present paper, we compared the tuning of the adaptation to the neuron's tuning to direction and speed. The tuning of adaptation was measured with a condition/test paradigm in which a testing motion of the preferred direction and speed of the neuron under study was preceded by a conditioning motion: the direction and speed of the conditioning motion were varied systematically. The response to the test motion depended strongly on the direction of the conditioning motion. It was suppressed in almost all neurons by conditioning motion in the same direction and could be either suppressed or enhanced by conditioning motion in the opposite direction. Even in neurons that showed suppression for target motion in the nonpreferred direction, the adaptation and response direction tuning were the same. The speed tuning of adaptation was linked much less tightly to the speed tuning of the response of the neuron under study. For just more than 50% of neurons, the preferred speed of adaptation was more than 1 log unit different from the preferred response speed. Many neurons responded best when slow motions were followed by faster motions (acceleration) or vice versa (deceleration), suggesting that MT neurons may encode information about the change of target velocity over time. Finally, adaptation by conditioning motions of different directions, but not different speeds, altered the latency of the response to the test motion. The adaptation of latency recovered with shorter intervals between the conditioning and test motions than did the adaptation of response size, suggesting that latency and amplitude adaptation are mediated by separate mechanisms. Taken together with the companion paper, our data suggest that short-term motion adaptation in MT is a consequence of the neural circuit in MT and is not mediated by either input-specific mechanisms or intrinsic mechanisms related to the spiking of individual neurons. The circuit responsible for adaptation is tuned for both speed and direction and has the same direction tuning as the circuit responsible for the initial response of MT neurons.

scholarly journals Altered Sensitivity to Motion of Area MT Neurons Following Long-Term V1 Lesions

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 451-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen A Hagan ◽  
Tristan A Chaplin ◽  
Krystel R Huxlin ◽  
Marcello G P Rosa ◽  
Leo L Lui
Keyword(s):  
Neural Responses ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Motion Sensitivity ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Mt Neurons ◽  
Residual Motion ◽  
Altered Sensitivity

Abstract Primates with primary visual cortex (V1) damage often retain residual motion sensitivity, which is hypothesized to be mediated by middle temporal area (MT). MT neurons continue to respond to stimuli shortly after V1 lesions; however, experimental and clinical studies of lesion-induced plasticity have shown that lesion effects can take several months to stabilize. It is unknown what physiological changes occur in MT and whether neural responses persist long after V1 damage. We recorded neuronal responses in MT to moving dot patterns in adult marmoset monkeys 6–12 months after unilateral V1 lesions. In contrast to results obtained shortly after V1 lesions, we found that fewer MT neurons were direction selective, including neurons expected to still receive projections from remaining parts of V1. The firing rates of most cells increased with increases in motion strength, regardless of stimulus direction. Furthermore, firing rates were higher and more variable than in control MT cells. To test whether these observations could be mechanistically explained by underlying changes in neural circuitry, we created a network model of MT. We found that a local imbalance of inhibition and excitation explained the observed firing rate changes. These results provide the first insights into functional implications of long-term plasticity in MT following V1 lesions.

scholarly journals Dynamic population codes of multiplexed stimulus features in primate area MT

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Goddard ◽  
Samuel G. Solomon ◽  
Thomas A. Carlson
Keyword(s):  
Population Level ◽  
Similarity Analysis ◽  
Population Response ◽  
Classification Analysis ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Middle Temporal ◽  
Feature Representations ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Stimulus Features

The middle-temporal area (MT) of primate visual cortex is critical in the analysis of visual motion. Single-unit studies suggest that the response dynamics of neurons within area MT depend on stimulus features, but how these dynamics emerge at the population level, and how feature representations interact, is not clear. Here, we used multivariate classification analysis to study how stimulus features are represented in the spiking activity of populations of neurons in area MT of marmoset monkey. Using representational similarity analysis we distinguished the emerging representations of moving grating and dot field stimuli. We show that representations of stimulus orientation, spatial frequency, and speed are evident near the onset of the population response, while the representation of stimulus direction is slower to emerge and sustained throughout the stimulus-evoked response. We further found a spatiotemporal asymmetry in the emergence of direction representations. Representations for high spatial frequencies and low temporal frequencies are initially orientation dependent, while those for high temporal frequencies and low spatial frequencies are more sensitive to motion direction. Our analyses reveal a complex interplay of feature representations in area MT population response that may explain the stimulus-dependent dynamics of motion vision. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Simultaneous multielectrode recordings can measure population-level codes that previously were only inferred from single-electrode recordings. However, many multielectrode recordings are analyzed using univariate single-electrode analysis approaches, which fail to fully utilize the population-level information. Here, we overcome these limitations by applying multivariate pattern classification analysis and representational similarity analysis to large-scale recordings from middle-temporal area (MT) in marmoset monkeys. Our analyses reveal a dynamic interplay of feature representations in area MT population response.

Receptive-field properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area (MT) of owl monkeys

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 488-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Felleman ◽  
J. H. Kaas
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
Visual Area ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Stimulus Movement ◽  
Middle Temporal ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Direction Of Movement ◽  
Owl Monkeys ◽  
Visual Area Mt

Response properties of single neurons in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of anesthetized owl monkeys were determined and quantified for flashed and moving bars of light under computer control for position, orientation, direction of movement, and speed. Receptive-field sizes, ranging from 4 to 25 degrees in width, were considerably larger than receptive fields with corresponding eccentricities in the striate cortex. Neurons were highly binocular with most cells equally or nearly equally activated by either eye. Neurons varied in selectivity for axis and direction of moving bars. Some neurons demonstrated little or no selectivity, others were bidirectional on a single axis, while the largest group was highly selective for direction with little or no response to bar movement opposite to the preferred direction. Over 70% of neurons were classified as highly selective and 90% showed some preference for direction and/or axis of stimulus movement. Neurons typically responded to bar movement only over a restricted range of velocities. The majority of neurons responded best to a particular velocity within the 5-60 degrees/s range, with marked attenuation of the response for velocities greater or less than the preferred. Some neurons failed to show significant response attenuation even at the lowest tested velocity, while other neurons preferred velocities of 100 degrees/s or more and failed to attenuate to the highest velocities. Response magnitude varied with stimulus dimensions. Increasing the length of the moving bar typically increased the magnitude of the response slightly until the stimulus exceeded the receptive-field borders. Other neurons responded less to increases in bar length within the excitatory receptive field. Neurons preferred narrow bars less than 1 degree in width, and marked reductions in responses characteristically occurred with wider stimuli. Moving patterns of randomly placed small dots were often as effective as or more effective than single bars in activating neurons. Selectivity for direction of movement remained for the dot pattern. for the dot pattern. Poststimulus time (PST) histograms of responses to bars flashed at a series of 21 different positions across the receptive field, in the "response-plane" format, indicated a spatially and temporally homogeneous receptive-field structure for nearly all neurons. Cells characteristically showed transient excitation at both stimulus onset and offset for all effective stimulus locations. Some cells responded mainly at bright stimulus onset or offset.

Chromatic sensitivity of neurones in area MT of the anaesthetised macaque monkey compared to human motion perception

2005 ◽  
Vol 167 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Riečanský ◽  
Alexander Thiele ◽  
Claudia Distler ◽  
Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Human Motion ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Chromatic Sensitivity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document