Processing of Nociceptive Mechanical and Thermal Information in Central Amygdala Neurons With Knee-Joint Input

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Neugebauer ◽  
Weidong Li
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Central Nucleus ◽  
Response Functions ◽  
Central Amygdala ◽  
Deep Tissue ◽  
Stimulus Response ◽  
Noxious Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Pain has a strong emotional dimension, and the amygdala plays a key role in emotionality. The processing of nociceptive mechanical and thermal information was studied in individual neurons of the central nucleus of the amygdala, the target of the spino-parabrachio-amygdaloid pain pathway and a major output nucleus of the amygdala. This study is the first to characterize nociceptive amygdala neurons with input from deep tissue, particularly the knee joint. In 46 anesthetized rats, extracellular single-unit recordings were made from 119 central amygdala neurons that were activated orthodromically by electrical stimulation in the lateral pontine parabrachial area and were tested for receptive fields in the knee joints. Responses to brief mechanical stimulation of joints, muscles, and skin and to cutaneous thermal stimuli were recorded. Receptive-field sizes and thresholds were mapped and stimulus-response functions constructed. Neurons in the central nucleus of the amygdala with excitatory input from the knee joint ( n = 62) typically had large symmetrical receptive fields in both hindlimbs or in all four extremities and responded exclusively or preferentially to noxious mechanical stimulation of deep tissue ( n = 58). Noxious mechanical stimulation of the skin excited 30 of these neurons; noxious heat activated 21 neurons. Stimulus-response data were best fitted by a sigmoid nonlinear regression model rather than by a monotonically increasing linear function. Another 15 neurons were inhibited by noxious mechanical stimulation of the knee joint and other deep tissue. Fifteen neurons had no receptive field in the knee but responded to noxious stimulation of other body areas; 27 nonresponsive neurons were not activated by natural somesthetic stimulation. Our data suggest that excitation is the predominant effect of brief painful stimulation of somatic tissue on the population of central amygdala neurons with knee joint input. Their large symmetrical receptive fields and sigmoid rather than monotonically increasing linear stimulus-response functions suggest a role of nociceptive central amygdala neurons in other than sensory-discriminative aspects of pain.

Evidence for a central component in the sensitization of spinal neurons with joint input during development of acute arthritis in cat's knee

1990 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 299-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Neugebauer ◽  
H. G. Schaible
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Cord ◽  
Mechanical Stimuli ◽  
Spinal Neurons ◽  
Deep Tissue ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. In the spinalized cat, nociceptive spinal neurons with knee input show enhanced responses to mechanical stimulation of that joint once an inflammation has developed in the knee. Enhanced responses may result from increased afferent inflow as well as from modifications of the nociceptive processing within the spinal cord. To examine the significance of these components, we tested in 30 chloralose-anesthetized, spinalized cats whether, during development of arthritis, changes of responsiveness in spinal neurons are restricted to stimulation of the inflamed joint or whether responsiveness in these neurons is altered in general. While continuously recording from a neuron, we injected kaolin and carrageenan into one knee and tested the responses to mechanical stimuli applied to the joint and to regions adjacent to and remote from the knee during the developing arthritis. In addition, in six cats we monitored the neurons' responses to electrical stimulation of the sural nerves and the rostral lumbar spinal cord. 2. Of 32 neurons in laminae VI, VII, and VIII of the lumbar spinal cord, 15 ascending and eight nonascending cells were driven by mechanical stimulation of one or both knee joint(s). Nine of these were nociceptive specific (NS), responding exclusively or predominantly to noxious compression of the knee and other deep tissue, and 12 were wide-dynamic-range (WDR) cells with graded responses to gentle and noxious stimuli applied to the knee joint(s), deep tissue, and skin. Two neurons with high ongoing discharges had some excitatory joint input but showed marked inhibition by most stimuli used (INH neurons). The majority of the neurons had receptive fields on both legs. Nine of the 32 neurons had no input from the knee(s). 3. All 23 neurons with joint input became sensitive or more responsive to movements and gentle compression of the inflamed knee once the inflammation had developed. In general, these neurons also showed enhanced responses to compression of the adjacent muscles in thigh and lower leg. In 20 neurons, response properties were even altered for stimuli applied to regions remote from the inflamed joint, including the contralateral leg in 18 cases. We found expansion of initially restricted receptive fields (mainly in NS cells), enhancement of preexisting responses, and/or lowering of threshold to mechanical stimuli applied to these regions; few neurons developed inhibitory reactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mechanical sensitivity of group III and IV afferents from posterior articular nerve in normal and inflamed cat knee

1986 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Grigg ◽  
H. G. Schaible ◽  
R. F. Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Sciatic Nerve ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Conduction Velocity ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Mechanical Sensitivity ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Stimulation Of

Recordings were performed from sciatic nerve or dorsal root filaments in 28 cats to study single group III (conduction velocity 2.5-20 m/s) and group IV (conduction velocity less than 2.5 m/s) units supplying the knee joint via the posterior articular nerve (PAN). In seven of these cats the knee joint had been inflamed artificially. Recordings from sciatic nerve filaments revealed responses to local mechanical stimulation of the joint in only 3 of 41 group IV units and in 12 of 18 group III units from the normal joint. In the inflamed joint 14 of 36 group IV units and 24 of 36 group III units were excited with local mechanical stimulation. In recordings from dorsal root filaments (normal joint) 4 of 11 group IV units and 7 of 13 group III units were activated by stimulating the joint locally. In the normal joint four group IV units (recorded from dorsal root filaments) responded only to rotations against the resistance of the tissue, whereas the majority of the fibers did not respond even to forceful movements. Group III units with local mechanosensitivity in the normal joint reacted strongly or weakly to movements in the working range of the joint or only to movements against resistance of the tissue. In the inflamed joint, group IV fibers (recorded in sciatic nerve filaments) with detectable receptive fields responded strongly to gentle movements or only to movements against resistance of tissue. Some did not react to movements. Group III units reacted strongly or weakly to gentle movements or only to movements against resistance of the tissue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Responses of neurons in VPL and VPL-VL region of the cat to algesic stimulation of muscle and tendon

1983 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 649-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. D. Kniffki ◽  
K. Mizumura
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Transitional Zone ◽  
The Other ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Nociceptive Information ◽  
Noxious Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The responses evoked by electrical stimulation of cutaneous and muscle nerves, by noxious and innocuous mechanical stimulation of muscle, tendon, and cutaneous tissues, and by intra-arterial (ia) injection of algesic substances (potassium, bradykinin) into arteries supplying the gastrocnemius-soleus muscle (GS) were studied in single neurons located in the ventroposterolateral nucleus (VPL) and in the transitional zone between VPL and the ventrolateral nucleus (VL) of cats lightly anesthetized with thiopenthal. Such chemical stimulation of the muscles has been shown to activate muscular groups III and IV axons specifically (43, 44) and presumably is nociceptive in character (14, 17, 31). 2. One hundred eight neurons were tested. Eighty-three of the units responded only to various types of cutaneous stimulation of the hindlimb. The other 25 responded to algesic stimulation of muscle and/or tendon. Of these latter 25, 7 had no apparent cutaneous receptive field although 4 of them responded to electrical stimulation of the common peroneal and/or sural nerve. Thus, only three neurons responded exclusively to algesic chemical and noxious mechanical stimulation of the muscle. Of the other 18 neurons, 14 had cutaneous receptive fields restricted to the hindlimb and often responded to non-noxious repetitive light stroking and to noxious pinching with a high-frequency discharge. Four cells (two of which had cutaneous input only from low-threshold mechanoreceptors) had complex and large receptive fields extending to more than one limb. 3. Potassium was a more potent muscle receptor stimulant than bradykinin, the latter only weakly exciting 3 neurons of 24 tested with both substances. The responses to potassium were rapid (approximately 4.0 s in latency) and tended to be greater (have higher response rates) for the units that responded to cutaneous as well as muscle/tendon stimulation. 4. Most neurons that responded to noxious deep stimulation had a threshold for the GS nerve volley in the group III fiber range. The few neurons with thresholds slightly below the group III range did not respond to activation of group I or II muscle spindle afferents by intra-arterial application of succinylcholine or by stretching the muscle. 5. Neurons with responses to any of the muscle, tendon, or cutaneous nociceptive stimuli were located at the ventral and dorsal periphery of VPL and in the VPL-VL transitional zone. 6. These results strongly suggest that there exist regions within the lateral diencephalon of cats that are capable of processing nociceptive information and that these regions are located at the periphery of VPL.

Physiological characterization of spinohypothalamic tract neurons in the lumbar enlargement of rats

1991 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 261-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Burstein ◽  
R. J. Dado ◽  
K. D. Cliffer ◽  
G. J. Giesler
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Gray Matter ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Optic Tract ◽  
Antidromic Activation ◽  
Noxious Stimuli ◽  
Noxious Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Ninety-six neurons in the lumbar enlargement of urethananesthetized rats were antidromically activated from the contralateral hypothalamus. The antidromic stimulating electrode was moved systematically within the hypothalamus until antidromic activation could be produced with currents of less than or equal to 50 microA (18.6 +/- 10.8 microA; mean +/- SD). The points at which antidromic activation thresholds were lowest were found in several regions of the hypothalamus but were concentrated in the optic tract and the supraoptic decussation. 2. The recording locations of 79 spinohypothalamic tract (SHT) neurons were marked and recovered. Twenty-nine were located in the superficial dorsal horn (SDH), 42 in the deep dorsal horn (DDH), 4 in the intermediate zone, and 2 in the gray matter surrounding the central canal. Two additional marks were located in the dorsal lateral funiculus (DLF). 3. The responses of 46 SHT neurons were examined during innocuous and noxious mechanical stimulation of their receptive fields. Forty-eight percent of recorded SHT neurons responded to both innocuous and noxious stimuli (wide dynamic range, WDR) and 39% responded only to noxious stimuli (high threshold, HT). Therefore 87% of SHT neurons responded preferentially or exclusively to noxious mechanical stimulation. Nine percent of SHT neurons responded exclusively to innocuous manipulation of joints and muscles. Four percent of SHT neurons responded only to innocuous tactile stimul (low threshold, LT). WDR, HT, and LT neurons were recorded widely throughout the dorsal horn; no relationship was found between the locations of recording sites in the dorsal horn and the response types of the neurons. SHT neurons that responded to stimulation of muscle, tendon, or joint were recorded deep in the gray matter. 4. The effects of heating the receptive fields were determined for 25 SHT neurons. Fourteen (56%) responded to thermal stimuli. Six (43%) of the responsive neurons responded at low frequencies to innocuous warming (38-41 degrees C) but more vigorously to noxious (greater than or equal to 45 degrees C) heating. The other eight responded only to noxious heat. Eighteen percent (3/17) of tested SHT neurons were activated by noxious cooling of their receptive fields. 5. Cutaneous receptive fields of most recorded SHT neurons were small, typically involving areas as small as two or three toes on the ipsilateral hindlimb; the largest receptive fields covered the entire paw. These findings indicate that relatively precise information about the location of innocuous and noxious stimuli is conveyed directly to the hypothalamus by SHT neurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Convergence of heterotopic nociceptive information onto neurons of caudal medullary reticular formation in monkey (Macaca fascicularis)

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 1118-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Villanueva ◽  
K. D. Cliffer ◽  
L. S. Sorkin ◽  
D. Le Bars ◽  
W. D. Willis
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Reticular Formation ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Background Activity ◽  
The Body ◽  
Thermal Stimulation ◽  
Medullary Reticular Formation ◽  
Nociceptive Information ◽  
Noxious Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Recordings were made in anesthetized monkeys from neurons in the medullary reticular formation (MRF) caudal to the obex. Responses of 19 MRF neurons to mechanical, thermal, and/or electrical stimulation were examined. MRF neurons exhibited convergence of nociceptive cutaneous inputs from widespread areas of the body and face. 2. MRF neurons exhibited low levels of background activity. Background activity increased after periods of intense cutaneous mechanical or thermal stimulation. Nearly all MRF neurons tested failed to respond to heterosensory stimuli (flashes, whistle sounds), and none responded to joint movements. 3. MRF neurons were excited by and encoded the intensity of noxious mechanical stimulation. Responses to stimuli on contralateral limbs were greater than those to stimuli on ipsilateral limbs. Responses were greater to stimuli on the forelimbs than to stimuli on the hindlimbs. 4. MRF neurons responded to noxious thermal stimulation (51 degrees C) of widespread areas of the body. Mean responses from stimulation at different locations were generally parallel to those for noxious mechanical stimulation. Responses increased with intensity of noxious thermal stimulation (45-50 degrees C). 5. MRF neurons responded with one or two peaks of activation to percutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the limbs, the face, or the tail. The differences in latency of responses to stimulating two locations along the tail suggested that activity was elicited by activation of peripheral fibers with a mean conduction velocity in the A delta range. Stimulation of the contralateral hindlimb elicited greater responses, with lower thresholds and shorter latencies, than did stimulation of the ipsilateral hindlimb. 6. Electrophysiological properties of monkey MRF neurons resembled those of neurons in the medullary subnucleus reticularis dorsalis (SRD) in the rat. Neurons in the caudal medullary reticular formation could play a role in processing nociceptive information. Convergence of nociceptive cutaneous input from widespread areas of the body suggests that MRF neurons may contribute to autonomic, affective, attentional, and/or sensory-motor processes related to pain.

Unmyelinated nociceptors of rat paraspinal tissues

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 1752-1762 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. M. Bove ◽  
A. R. Light
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Intact Animal ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Clinical Importance ◽  
Mechanical Stimuli ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathies ◽  
Deep Tissue ◽  
Surrounding Connective Tissue ◽  
Thermal Stimuli ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. We made recordings from rat dorsal root filaments to study unmyelinated afferent units (conduction velocity < or = 1.5 m/s) associated with deep paraspinal tissues of the dorsal sacrum and proximal tail. Data from 57 unmyelinated units were analyzed in 47 experiments. Receptive fields were identified in intact animals and then surgically isolated using microdissection. Units were characterized using mechanical, noxious chemical, and thermal stimuli. 2. These recordings revealed innervation of the nerve sheaths and surrounding connective tissue, muscles, tendons, and tissue apposed to the undersurface of the skin. No units were found with receptive fields directly on joint capsular tissue. The receptive fields of the units were often multiple and located in more than one tissue; 31 of 57 units showed convergence from different tissues. 3. The units with receptive fields on neurovascular bundles shared sensitivities with other deep tissue units described in this and other reports. These units may have clinical importance in pain due to peripheral neuropathies. 4. The units initially responded to strong mechanical stimulation of the intact animal and often to noxious stretch of the tail. Once surgically isolated, an individual unit's threshold to mechanical stimuli appeared lower. 5. Capsaicin (0.001%-0.1%) elicited responses in 81% (17 of 21) of the units tested. Bradykinin (20 micrograms/ml) elicited responses in 45% (10 of 22) of the units tested. Noxious cold (4-10 degrees C) and hot (55 degrees C) stimulation elicited discharges from 33% (5 of 15) and 25% (5 of 20) of the units tested, respectively. 6. The unmyelinated units had similar mechanical, chemical, and thermal sensitivities. These similarities and the observed convergence only allowed separation of units by the tissue in which the ending was found, and did not allow further classification. 7. The prevalence of background discharge suggested that many units were sensitized during the experiments. 8. The sensitivities of these paraspinal units were similar to those reported for other tissues. Because of the anatomic similarity of the paraspinal tissues of the proximal tail and the lumbar spine, the conclusions of the present study can be related to the lumbar spine. These afferent units are thought to participate in nociception from the deep paraspinal tissues.

A comparative study of the changes in receptive-field properties of multireceptive and nocireceptive rat dorsal horn neurons following noxious mechanical stimulation

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 854-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Laird ◽  
F. Cervero
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Mechanical Stimulus ◽  
Mechanical Stimuli ◽  
Dorsal Horn Neurons ◽  
Mechanical Threshold ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Low Threshold ◽  
Noxious Mechanical Stimulation

1. Single-unit electrical activity has been recorded from 42 dorsal horn neurons in the sacral segments of the rat's spinal cord. The sample consisted of 20 multireceptive (class 2) cells with both A- and C-fiber inputs and 22 nocireceptive (class 3) cells. All neurons had cutaneous receptive fields (RFs) on the tail. 2. The RF sizes of the cells and their response thresholds to mechanical stimulation of the skin were determined before and after each of a series of 2-min noxious mechanical stimuli. Up to five such stimuli were delivered at intervals ranging from 10 to 60 min. In most cases, only one cell per animal was tested. 3. The majority of neurons were tested in barbiturate-anesthetized animals. However, to test whether or not this anesthetic influenced the results obtained, experiments were also performed in halothane-anesthetized and decerebrate-spinal preparations. The results from these experiments are considered separately. 4. All of the neurons responded vigorously to the first noxious pinch stimulus and all but one to the rest of the stimuli in the series. The responses of the neurons varied from stimulus to stimulus, but there were no detectable trends in the two groups of cells. 5. The RFs of the class 2 cells showed large increases (624.3 +/- 175.8 mm2, mean +/- SE) after the application of the pinch stimuli. The RFs of the class 3 neurons, which were initially smaller than those of the class 2 cells, either did not increase in size or showed very small increases after the pinch stimuli (38.3 +/- 11.95 mm2, mean +/- SE). 6. Some cells in both groups (6/10 class 2 cells and 7/16 class 3 cells) showed a decrease in mechanical threshold as a result of the noxious mechanical stimulus, but none of the class 3 cells' thresholds dropped below 20 mN into the low-threshold range. 7. The results obtained in the halothane-anesthetized and decerebrate-spinal animals were very similar to those seen in the barbiturate-anesthetized experiments, with the exception that in the decerebrate-spinal animals, the RFs of the class 2 cells were initially larger and showed only small increases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document