Central Representation of Dynamics When Manipulating Handheld Objects

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 893-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore E. Milner ◽  
David W. Franklin ◽  
Hiroshi Imamizu ◽  
Mitsuo Kawato
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Internal Model ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Small Region ◽  
Unstable State ◽  
Moment Control ◽  
Central Representation ◽  
The Stability ◽  
The Moment

To explore the neural mechanisms related to representation of the manipulation dynamics of objects, we performed whole-brain fMRI while subjects balanced an object in stable and highly unstable states and while they balanced a rigid object and a flexible object in the same unstable state, in all cases without vision. In this way, we varied the extent to which an internal model of the manipulation dynamics was required in the moment-to-moment control of the object's orientation. We hypothesized that activity in primary motor cortex would reflect the amount of muscle activation under each condition. In contrast, we hypothesized that cerebellar activity would be more strongly related to the stability and complexity of the manipulation dynamics because the cerebellum has been implicated in internal model-based control. As hypothesized, the dynamics-related activation of the cerebellum was quite different from that of the primary motor cortex. Changes in cerebellar activity were much greater than would have been predicted from differences in muscle activation when the stability and complexity of the manipulation dynamics were contrasted. On the other hand, the activity of the primary motor cortex more closely resembled the mean motor output necessary to execute the task. We also discovered a small region near the anterior edge of the ipsilateral (right) inferior parietal lobule where activity was modulated with the complexity of the manipulation dynamics. We suggest that this is related to imagining the location and motion of an object with complex manipulation dynamics.

Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex improves selective muscle activation in the ipsilateral arm

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 2937-2942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alana B. McCambridge ◽  
Lynley V. Bradnam ◽  
Cathy M. Stinear ◽  
Winston D. Byblow
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Selectivity Ratio ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Antagonist Muscles ◽  
Stimulation Of

Proximal upper limb muscles are represented bilaterally in primary motor cortex. Goal-directed upper limb movement requires precise control of proximal and distal agonist and antagonist muscles. Failure to suppress antagonist muscles can lead to abnormal movement patterns, such as those commonly experienced in the proximal upper limb after stroke. We examined whether noninvasive brain stimulation of primary motor cortex could be used to improve selective control of the ipsilateral proximal upper limb. Thirteen healthy participants performed isometric left elbow flexion by contracting biceps brachii (BB; agonist) and left forearm pronation (BB antagonist) before and after 20 min of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS) or sham tDCS of left M1. During the tasks, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in left BB were acquired using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of right M1 150–270 ms before muscle contraction. As expected, left BB MEPs were facilitated before flexion and suppressed before pronation. After c-tDCS, left BB MEP amplitudes were reduced compared with sham stimulation, before pronation but not flexion, indicating that c-tDCS enhanced selective muscle activation of the ipsilateral BB in a task-specific manner. The potential for c-tDCS to improve BB antagonist control correlated with BB MEP amplitude for pronation relative to flexion, expressed as a selectivity ratio. This is the first demonstration that selective muscle activation in the proximal upper limb can be improved after c-tDCS of ipsilateral M1 and that the benefits of c-tDCS for selective muscle activation may be most effective in cases where activation strategies are already suboptimal. These findings may have relevance for the use of tDCS in rehabilitation after stroke.

scholarly journals Primary motor cortex neurons classified in a postural task predict muscle activation patterns in a reaching task

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 2021-2032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan A. Heming ◽  
Timothy P. Lillicrap ◽  
Mohsen Omrani ◽  
Troy M. Herter ◽  
J. Andrew Pruszynski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Network Connectivity ◽  
Spatiotemporal Patterns ◽  
Neural Population ◽  
Activation Patterns ◽  
Reaching Task ◽  
Muscle Activation Patterns ◽  
Muscle Groups

Primary motor cortex (M1) activity correlates with many motor variables, making it difficult to demonstrate how it participates in motor control. We developed a two-stage process to separate the process of classifying the motor field of M1 neurons from the process of predicting the spatiotemporal patterns of its motor field during reaching. We tested our approach with a neural network model that controlled a two-joint arm to show the statistical relationship between network connectivity and neural activity across different motor tasks. In rhesus monkeys, M1 neurons classified by this method showed preferred reaching directions similar to their associated muscle groups. Importantly, the neural population signals predicted the spatiotemporal dynamics of their associated muscle groups, although a subgroup of atypical neurons reversed their directional preference, suggesting a selective role in antagonist control. These results highlight that M1 provides important details on the spatiotemporal patterns of muscle activity during motor skills such as reaching.

Task-related changes in intracortical inhibition assessed with paired- and triple-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (5) ◽  
pp. 1470-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
George M. Opie ◽  
Michael C. Ridding ◽  
John G. Semmler
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Index Finger ◽  
Precision Grip ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Presynaptic Mechanisms ◽  
First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle

Recent research has demonstrated a task-related modulation of postsynaptic intracortical inhibition within primary motor cortex for tasks requiring isolated (abduction) or synergistic (precision grip) muscle activation. The current study sought to investigate task-related changes in pre- and postsynaptic intracortical inhibition in motor cortex. In 13 young adults (22.5 ± 3.5 yr), paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to measure short (SICI)- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) (i.e., postsynaptic motor cortex inhibition) in first dorsal interosseous muscle, and triple-pulse TMS was used to investigate changes in SICI-LICI interactions (i.e., presynaptic motor cortex inhibition). These measurements were obtained at rest and during muscle activation involving isolated abduction of the index finger and during a precision grip using the index finger and thumb. SICI was reduced during abduction and precision grip compared with rest, with greater reductions during precision grip. The modulation of LICI during muscle activation depended on the interstimulus interval (ISI; 100 and 150 ms) but was not different between abduction and precision grip. For triple-pulse TMS, SICI was reduced in the presence of LICI at both ISIs in resting muscle (reflecting presynaptic motor cortex inhibition) but was only modulated at the 150-ms ISI during index finger abduction. Results suggest that synergistic contractions are accompanied by greater reductions in postsynaptic motor cortex inhibition than isolated contractions, but the contribution of presynaptic mechanisms to this disinhibition is limited. Furthermore, timing-dependent variations in LICI provide additional evidence that measurements using different ISIs may not represent activation of the same cortical process.

scholarly journals Different contributions of primary motor cortex, reticular formation, and spinal cord to fractionated muscle activation

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boubker Zaaimi ◽  
Lauren R. Dean ◽  
Stuart N. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Reticular Formation ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cervical Spinal Cord ◽  
Motor Output ◽  
Natural Activity ◽  
Limb Muscles

Coordinated movement requires patterned activation of muscles. In this study, we examined differences in selective activation of primate upper limb muscles by cortical and subcortical regions. Five macaque monkeys were trained to perform a reach and grasp task, and electromyogram (EMG) was recorded from 10 to 24 muscles while weak single-pulse stimuli were delivered through microelectrodes inserted in the motor cortex (M1), reticular formation (RF), or cervical spinal cord (SC). Stimulus intensity was adjusted to a level just above threshold. Stimulus-evoked effects were assessed from averages of rectified EMG. M1, RF, and SC activated 1.5 ± 0.9, 1.9 ± 0.8, and 2.5 ± 1.6 muscles per site (means ± SD); only M1 and SC differed significantly. In between recording sessions, natural muscle activity in the home cage was recorded using a miniature data logger. A novel analysis assessed how well natural activity could be reconstructed by stimulus-evoked responses. This provided two measures: normalized vector length L, reflecting how closely aligned natural and stimulus-evoked activity were, and normalized residual R, measuring the fraction of natural activity not reachable using stimulus-evoked patterns. Average values for M1, RF, and SC were L = 119.1 ± 9.6, 105.9 ± 6.2, and 109.3 ± 8.4% and R = 50.3 ± 4.9, 56.4 ± 3.5, and 51.5 ± 4.8%, respectively. RF was significantly different from M1 and SC on both measurements. RF is thus able to generate an approximation to the motor output with less activation than required by M1 and SC, but M1 and SC are more precise in reaching the exact activation pattern required. Cortical, brainstem, and spinal centers likely play distinct roles, as they cooperate to generate voluntary movements. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Brainstem reticular formation, primary motor cortex, and cervical spinal cord intermediate zone can all activate primate upper limb muscles. However, brainstem output is more efficient but less precise in producing natural patterns of motor output than motor cortex or spinal cord. We suggest that gross muscle synergies from the reticular formation are sculpted and refined by motor cortex and spinal circuits to reach the finely fractionated output characteristic of dexterous primate upper limb movements.

scholarly journals Microstimulation of dorsal premotor and primary motor cortex delays the volitional commitment to an action choice

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 927-935
Author(s):  
David Thura ◽  
Paul Cisek
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Neural Activity ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Premotor Cortex ◽  
Neural Substrates ◽  
Daily Basis ◽  
Decision Task ◽  
Movement Initiation ◽  
Deliberation Process ◽  
The Moment

Humans and other animals are faced with decisions about actions on a daily basis. These typically include a period of deliberation that ends with the commitment to a choice, which then leads to the overt expression of that choice through action. Previous studies with monkeys have demonstrated that neural activity in sensorimotor areas correlates with the deliberation process and reflects the moment of commitment before movement initiation, but the causal roles of these regions are challenging to establish. Here, we tested whether dorsal premotor (PMd) and primary motor cortex (M1) are causally involved in the volitional commitment to a reaching choice. We found that brief subthreshold microstimulation in PMd or M1 delayed commitment to an action but not the initiation of the action itself. Importantly, microstimulation only had a significant effect when it was delivered close to and before commitment time. These results are consistent with the proposal that PMd and M1 participate in the commitment process, which occurs when a critical firing rate difference is reached between cells voting for the selected option and those voting for the competing one. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The neural substrates of decisions between actions are typically investigated by correlating neural activity and subjects’ decision behavior, but this does not establish causality. In a reaching decision task, we demonstrate that subthreshold microstimulation of the monkey dorsal premotor cortex or primary motor cortex delays the deliberation duration if applied shortly before choice commitment. This result suggests a causal role of the sensorimotor cortex in the determination of decisions between actions.

Functional Connectivity Between Secondary and Primary Motor Areas Underlying Hand–Foot Coordination

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 414-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winston D. Byblow ◽  
James P. Coxon ◽  
Cathy M. Stinear ◽  
Melanie K. Fleming ◽  
Garry Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Connectivity ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Premotor Cortex ◽  
Hand Movement ◽  
Physiological Basis ◽  
Activation Conditions ◽  
Motor Representations ◽  
Motor Areas

Coincident hand and foot movements are more reliably performed in the same direction than in opposite directions. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess motor cortex function, we examined the physiological basis of these movements across three novel experiments. Experiment 1 demonstrated that upper limb corticomotor excitability changed in a way that facilitated isodirectional movements of the hand and foot, during phasic and isometric muscle activation conditions. Experiment 2 demonstrated that motor cortex inhibition was modified with active, but not passive, foot movement in a manner that facilitated hand movement in the direction of foot movement. Together, these findings demonstrate that the coupling between motor representations within motor cortex is activity dependent. Because there are no known connections between hand and foot areas within primary motor cortex, experiment 3 used a dual-coil paired-pulse TMS protocol to examine functional connectivity between secondary and primary motor areas during active ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. Dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) and supplementary motor area (SMA) conditioning, but not ventral premotor cortex (PMv) conditioning, produced distinct phases of task-dependent modulation of excitability of forearm representations within primary motor cortex (M1). Networks involving PMd–M1 facilitate isodirectional movements of hand and foot, whereas networks involving SMA–M1 facilitate corticomotor pathways nonspecifically, which may help to stabilize posture during interlimb coordination. These results may have implications for targeted neurorehabilitation after stroke.

scholarly journals The primary motor cortex prospectively computes the spinal reflex

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Umeda ◽  
Tadashi Isa ◽  
Yukio Nishimura
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Linear Models ◽  
Movement Control ◽  
Spinal Reflex ◽  
Afferent Activity ◽  
Precise Movement ◽  
Behaving Monkeys

AbstractThe spinal reflex transforms sensory signals to generate muscle activity. However, it is unknown how the motor cortex (MCx) takes the spinal reflex into account when performing voluntary limb movements. We simultaneously recorded the activity of the MCx, afferent neurons, and forelimb muscles in behaving monkeys. We decomposed muscle activity into subcomponents explained by the MCx or afferent activity using linear models. Long preceding activity in the MCx, which is responsible for subsequent afferent activity, had the same spatiotemporal contribution to muscle activity as afferent activity, indicating that the MCx drives muscle activity not only by direct descending activation but also by trans-afferent descending activation. Therefore, the MCx implements internal models that prospectively estimate muscle activation via the spinal reflex for precise movement control.

Reduced Muscle Selectivity During Individuated Finger Movements in Humans After Damage to the Motor Cortex or Corticospinal Tract

2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 1722-1733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine E. Lang ◽  
Marc H. Schieber
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Corticospinal Tract ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Descending Pathways ◽  
Finger Movements ◽  
Abductor Pollicis Brevis ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Pure Motor

We investigated how damage to the motor cortex or corticospinal tract affects the selective activation of finger muscles in humans. We hypothesized that damage relatively restricted to the motor cortex or corticospinal tract would result in unselective muscle activations during an individuated finger movement task. People with pure motor hemiparesis attributed to ischemic cerebrovascular accident were tested. Pure motor hemiparetic and control subjects were studied making flexion/extension and then abduction/adduction finger movements. During the abduction/adduction movements, we recorded muscle activity from 3 intrinsic finger muscles: the abductor pollicis brevis, the first dorsal interosseus, and the abductor digit quinti. Each of these muscles acts as an agonist for only one of the abduction/adduction movements and might therefore be expected to be active in a highly selective manner. Motor cortex or corticospinal tract damage in people with pure motor hemiparesis reduced the selectivity of finger muscle activation during individuated abduction/adduction finger movements, resulting in reduced independence of these movements. Abduction/adduction movements showed a nonsignificant trend toward being less independent than flexion/extension movements in the affected hands of hemiparetic subjects. These changes in the selectivity of muscle activation and the consequent decrease in individuation of movement were correlated with decreased hand function. Our findings imply that, in humans, spared cerebral motor areas and descending pathways that remain might activate finger muscles, but cannot fully compensate for the highly selective control provided by the primary motor cortex and the crossed corticospinal system.

scholarly journals Motor Training Increases the Stability of Activation Patterns in the Primary Motor Cortex

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e53555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Huang ◽  
Zonglei Zhen ◽  
Yiying Song ◽  
Qi Zhu ◽  
Song Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Training ◽  
Activation Patterns ◽  
The Stability
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document