Accuracy of Saccades to Remembered Targets as a Function of Body Orientation in Space

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 521-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua T. Vogelstein ◽  
Lawrence H. Snyder ◽  
Dora E. Angelaki
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Body Axis ◽  
Body Orientation ◽  
Upright Orientation ◽  
The Asymmetry

A vertical asymmetry in memory-guided saccadic eye movements has been previously demonstrated in humans and in rhesus monkeys. In the upright orientation, saccades generally land several degrees above the target. The origin of this asymmetry has remained unknown. In this study, we investigated whether the asymmetry in memory saccades is dependent on body orientation in space. Thus animals performed memory saccades in four different body orientations: upright, left-side-down (LSD), right-side-down (RSD), and supine. Data in all three rhesus monkeys confirm previous observations regarding a significant upward vertical asymmetry. Saccade errors made from LSD and RSD postures were partitioned into components made along the axis of gravity and along the vertical body axis. Up/down asymmetry persisted only in body coordinates but not in gravity coordinates. However, this asymmetry was generally reduced in tilted positions. Therefore the upward bias seen in memory saccades is egocentric although orientation in space might play a modulatory role.

Effects of cerebellar lesions on saccadic eye movements

1976 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1246-1256 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Ritchie
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Macaca Mulatta ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Motor Systems ◽  
Antagonist Muscle ◽  
Restoring Forces ◽  
System 2 ◽  
Cerebellar Lesions ◽  
Cerebellar Symptoms

1. Areas of cerebellar cortex related to saccadic eye movements were ablated in three Macaca mulatta monkeys trained to fixate visual targets. There followed a postoperative dysmetria of saccadic eye movements which appeared to be the result of an impairment specifically within the saccadic system. 2. Convergent evidence from two experimental paradigms indicated that the saccadic deficit was a function of the position of the eye in the orbit and did not involve retinal error processing. 3. The pattern of this position-dependent dysmetria suggests that the eye was no longer fully compensating for the elastic restoring forces imposed by the orbital medium and antagonist muscle(s). 4. The similarity of these data to saccadic eye movements of human cerebellar patients and arm movements of rhesus monkeys with cerebellar lesions indicates that the inability to compensate for the differential loads placed on motor systems by the mechanics of those systems may explain several cerebellar symptoms.

Top-Down Control of Saccades as Part of a Generalized Model of Proactive Inhibitory Control

2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 2578-2580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bénédicte Ballanger
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Inhibitory Control ◽  
Neuronal Activity ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Proactive Inhibition ◽  
Recurrent Network ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Eye Field

Lo and colleagues have recently described a recurrent network model of inhibitory control of saccadic eye movements based on neurophysiological observations in the frontal eye field (FEF) and superior colliculus (SC) of rhesus monkeys. This model emphasizes the proactive, inhibition-based, tonic neuronal activity that prevents the eye from moving in a countermanding paradigm. In this review I discuss the model with respect to existing literature that the authors did not mention, suggesting that proactive inhibitory control extends far beyond saccadic control and provides an interesting framework to interpret several attentional and movement disorders in humans.

scholarly journals Saccadic Behavior during the Response to Pure Vergence Stimuli I: General Properties

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
John Semmlow ◽  
Yung-Fu Chen ◽  
Tara L. Alvarez ◽  
Claude Pedrono
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
The Other ◽  
General Properties ◽  
Dominant Eye ◽  
Vergence Movement ◽  
The Asymmetry ◽  
Almost All

If two targets are carefully aligned so that they fall along the cyclopean axis, the required eye movement will be symmetrical with the two eyes turning equally inward or outward. When such “pure vergence stimuli” are used only a “pure vergence movement” is required, yet almost all responses include saccadic eye movements, a rapid tandem movement of the eyes. When saccades occur, they must either produce an error in the desired symmetrical response or correct an error from an asymmetrical vergence response. A series of eye movement responses to pure convergence stimuli (4.0 deg step stimuli) were measured in 12 subjects and the occurrence, timing and amplitude of saccades was measured. Early saccades (within 400 msec of the stimulus onset) appeared in 80% to 100% of the responses. In most subjects, the first saccade increased the asymmetry of the response, taking the eyes away from the midline position. In three subjects, these asymmetry-inducing saccades brought one eye, the preferred or dominant eye, close to the target, but in the other subjects these asymmetry-inducing saccades were probably due to the distraction caused by the transient diplopic image generated by a pure vergence stimulus. While many of these asymmetry-inducing saccades showed saccade-like enhancements of vergence, they were, with the exception of two subjects, primarily divergent and did not facilitate the ongoing convergence movement. All subjects had some responses where the first saccade improved response symmetry, correcting an asymmetry brought about by unequal vergence movements in the two eyes. In five subjects, large symmetry-inducing saccades corrected an asymmetrical vergence response, bringing the eyes back to the midline (to within a few tenths of a degree).

The effect of task set on fixational saccadic eye movements

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Spotorno ◽  
Guillaume S. Masson ◽  
Anna Montagnini
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Task Set

Extent of compensation for variations in monkey saccadic eye movements

2000 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Quaia ◽  
Martin Paré ◽  
Robert H. Wurtz ◽  
Lance M. Optican
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements

scholarly journals A Fast and Effective System for Analysis of Optokinetic Waveforms with a Low-Cost Eye Tracking Device

Healthcare ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Chong-Bin Tsai ◽  
Wei-Yu Hung ◽  
Wei-Yen Hsu
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Tracking ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Slow Phase ◽  
Eye Tracker ◽  
Effective System ◽  
Tracking Device ◽  
Traditional Approaches

Optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) is an involuntary eye movement induced by motion of a large proportion of the visual field. It consists of a “slow phase (SP)” with eye movements in the same direction as the movement of the pattern and a “fast phase (FP)” with saccadic eye movements in the opposite direction. Study of OKN can reveal valuable information in ophthalmology, neurology and psychology. However, the current commercially available high-resolution and research-grade eye tracker is usually expensive. Methods & Results: We developed a novel fast and effective system combined with a low-cost eye tracking device to accurately quantitatively measure OKN eye movement. Conclusions: The experimental results indicate that the proposed method achieves fast and promising results in comparisons with several traditional approaches.

scholarly journals Vision as oculomotor reward: cognitive contributions to the dynamic control of saccadic eye movements

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Wolf ◽  
Markus Lappe
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual System ◽  
Dynamic Control ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Saccade Target ◽  
Cognitive Mechanisms ◽  
Foveal Vision ◽  
Subsequent Behavior ◽  
High Level

AbstractHumans and other primates are equipped with a foveated visual system. As a consequence, we reorient our fovea to objects and targets in the visual field that are conspicuous or that we consider relevant or worth looking at. These reorientations are achieved by means of saccadic eye movements. Where we saccade to depends on various low-level factors such as a targets’ luminance but also crucially on high-level factors like the expected reward or a targets’ relevance for perception and subsequent behavior. Here, we review recent findings how the control of saccadic eye movements is influenced by higher-level cognitive processes. We first describe the pathways by which cognitive contributions can influence the neural oculomotor circuit. Second, we summarize what saccade parameters reveal about cognitive mechanisms, particularly saccade latencies, saccade kinematics and changes in saccade gain. Finally, we review findings on what renders a saccade target valuable, as reflected in oculomotor behavior. We emphasize that foveal vision of the target after the saccade can constitute an internal reward for the visual system and that this is reflected in oculomotor dynamics that serve to quickly and accurately provide detailed foveal vision of relevant targets in the visual field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document