scholarly journals Metabolic cost of generating muscular force in human walking: insights from load-carrying and speed experiments

2003 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 172-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Griffin ◽  
Thomas J. Roberts ◽  
Rodger Kram
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Stance Phase ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Direct Proportion ◽  
Muscular Force ◽  
Active Muscle ◽  
Cost Coefficient ◽  
Load Carrying ◽  
Leg Muscle ◽  
The Cost

We sought to understand how leg muscle function determines the metabolic cost of walking. We first indirectly assessed the metabolic cost of swinging the legs and then examined the cost of generating muscular force during the stance phase. Four men and four women walked at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 m/s carrying loads equal to 0, 10, 20, and 30% body mass positioned symmetrically about the waist. The net metabolic rate increased in nearly direct proportion to the external mechanical power during moderate-speed (0.5–1.5 m/s) load carrying, suggesting that the cost of swinging the legs is relatively small. The active muscle volume required to generate force on the ground and the rate of generating this force accounted for >85% of the increase in net metabolic rate across moderate speeds and most loading conditions. Although these factors explained less of the increase in metabolic rate between 1.5 and 2.0 m/s (∼50%), the cost of generating force per unit volume of active muscle [i.e., the cost coefficient ( k)] was similar across all conditions [ k = 0.11 ± 0.03 (SD) J/cm3]. These data indicate that, regardless of the work muscles do, the metabolic cost of walking can be largely explained by the cost of generating muscular force during the stance phase.

Carrying Loads. The Cost of Generating Muscular Force

Physiology ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 153-155
Author(s):  
CR Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
African Women ◽  
Muscular Force ◽  
Load Carrying ◽  
The Cost

African women can carry loads of 20% of their body mass on their heads without measurable metabolic cost. In contrast, trained or untrained humans and animals increase their metabolism by 20% when they carry loads of this magnitude. Two possible mechanisms are proposed for the women's economic means of load carrying, based on considerations of the cost of generating muscular force during locomotion.

scholarly journals Energetics of terrestrial locomotion of the platypus Ornithorhynchus anatinus

2001 ◽  
Vol 204 (4) ◽  
pp. 797-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.E. Fish ◽  
P.B. Frappell ◽  
R.V. Baudinette ◽  
P.M. MacFarlane
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Standard Metabolic Rate ◽  
Cost Of Transport ◽  
Terrestrial Locomotion ◽  
Terrestrial Mammals ◽  
Video Recordings ◽  
Ornithorhynchus Anatinus ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Limb Structure

The platypus Ornithorhynchus anatinus Shaw displays specializations in its limb structure for swimming that could negatively affect its terrestrial locomotion. Platypuses walked on a treadmill at speeds of 0.19-1.08 m × s(−1). Video recordings were used for gait analysis, and the metabolic rate of terrestrial locomotion was studied by measuring oxygen consumption. Platypuses used walking gaits (duty factor >0.50) with a sprawled stance. To limit any potential interference from the extensive webbing on the forefeet, platypuses walk on their knuckles. Metabolic rate increased linearly over a 2.4-fold range with increasing walking speed in a manner similar to that of terrestrial mammals, but was low as a result of the relatively low standard metabolic rate of this monotreme. The dimensionless cost of transport decreased with increasing speed to a minimum of 0.79. Compared with the cost of transport for swimming, the metabolic cost for terrestrial locomotion was 2.1 times greater. This difference suggests that the platypus may pay a price in terrestrial locomotion by being more aquatically adapted than other semi-aquatic or terrestrial mammals.

scholarly journals Mechanical Work Accounts for Most of the Energetic Cost in Human Running

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
RC Riddick ◽  
AD Kuo
Keyword(s):  
Lower Cost ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Energetic Cost ◽  
Active Muscle ◽  
Muscle Work ◽  
Direct Measurements ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Tissue Deformations ◽  
Human Running ◽  
Series Elastic

AbstractThe metabolic cost of human running is challenging to explain, in part because direct measurements of muscles are limited in availability. Active muscle work costs substantial energy, but series elastic tissues such as tendon may also perform work while muscles contract isometrically at a lower cost. While it is unclear to what extent muscle vs. series elastic work occurs, there are indirect data that can help resolve their relative contributions to the cost of running. We therefore developed a simple cost estimate for muscle work in humans running (N = 8) at moderate speeds based on measured joint energetics. We found that even if 50% of the work observed at the joints is performed passively, active muscle work still accounts for 76% of the net energetic cost. Up to 24% of this cost due is required to compensate for dissipation from soft tissue deformations. The cost of active work may be further adjusted based on assumptions of multi-articular energy transfer and passive elasticity, but even the most conservative assumptions yield active work costs of at least 60%. Passive elasticity can greatly reduce the active work of running, but muscle work still explains most of the overall energetic cost.

Independent metabolic costs of supporting body weight and accelerating body mass during walking

2005 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 579-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alena Grabowski ◽  
Claire T. Farley ◽  
Rodger Kram
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Added Mass ◽  
Normal Walking ◽  
Reduced Gravity ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Support Body Weight

The metabolic cost of walking is determined by many mechanical tasks, but the individual contribution of each task remains unclear. We hypothesized that the force generated to support body weight and the work performed to redirect and accelerate body mass each individually incur a significant metabolic cost during normal walking. To test our hypothesis, we measured changes in metabolic rate in response to combinations of simulated reduced gravity and added loading. We found that reducing body weight by simulating reduced gravity modestly decreased net metabolic rate. By calculating the metabolic cost per Newton of reduced body weight, we deduced that generating force to support body weight comprises ∼28% of the metabolic cost of normal walking. Similar to previous loading studies, we found that adding both weight and mass increased net metabolic rate in more than direct proportion to load. However, when we added mass alone by using a combination of simulated reduced gravity and added load, net metabolic rate increased about one-half as much as when we added both weight and mass. By calculating the cost per kilogram of added mass, we deduced that the work performed on the center of mass comprises ∼45% of the metabolic cost of normal walking. Our findings support the hypothesis that force and work each incur a significant metabolic cost. Specifically, the cost of performing work to redirect and accelerate the center of mass is almost twice as great as the cost of generating force to support body weight.

Inexpensive load carrying by rhinoceros beetles

1996 ◽  
Vol 199 (3) ◽  
pp. 609-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Kram
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Added Mass ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Direct Proportion ◽  
Total Load ◽  
Load Carrying ◽  
Cost Of Locomotion ◽  
Conventional Models ◽  
Energy Cost Of Locomotion

These experiments determined the magnitude of loads that rhinoceros beetles (Scarabaeidae) can carry and also the metabolic energy required for carrying loads. I hypothesized that, like many other animals, these beetles would have metabolic rates in direct proportion to the total load (body mass plus added mass). Eight beetles (Xylorctes thestalus) walked at 1 cm s-1 on a motorized treadmill enclosed in a respirometer. The beetles could sustain this speed with loads of more than 30 times their body mass. In addition to being strong, these beetles carry loads with remarkable economy. The metabolic cost of moving a gram of additional load was more than five times cheaper than that of moving a gram of body mass. This phenomenon cannot be explained by conventional models that link the biomechanics and metabolic energy cost of locomotion.

scholarly journals The metabolic cost of changing walking speeds is significant, implies lower optimal speeds for shorter distances, and increases daily energy estimates

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 20150486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidhi Seethapathi ◽  
Manoj Srinivasan
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Laboratory Frame ◽  
Constant Speed ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Energy Estimates ◽  
Walking Speeds ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Speed Fluctuations ◽  
Energy Cost Of Walking

Humans do not generally walk at constant speed, except perhaps on a treadmill. Normal walking involves starting, stopping and changing speeds, in addition to roughly steady locomotion. Here, we measure the metabolic energy cost of walking when changing speed. Subjects (healthy adults) walked with oscillating speeds on a constant-speed treadmill, alternating between walking slower and faster than the treadmill belt, moving back and forth in the laboratory frame. The metabolic rate for oscillating-speed walking was significantly higher than that for constant-speed walking (6–20% cost increase for ±0.13–0.27 m s −1 speed fluctuations). The metabolic rate increase was correlated with two models: a model based on kinetic energy fluctuations and an inverted pendulum walking model, optimized for oscillating-speed constraints. The cost of changing speeds may have behavioural implications: we predicted that the energy-optimal walking speed is lower for shorter distances. We measured preferred human walking speeds for different walking distances and found people preferred lower walking speeds for shorter distances as predicted. Further, analysing published daily walking-bout distributions, we estimate that the cost of changing speeds is 4–8% of daily walking energy budget.

The metabolic cost of swimming in marine homeotherms.

1997 ◽  
Vol 200 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
A T Hind ◽  
W S Gurney
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Hydrodynamic Drag ◽  
Cost Of Transport ◽  
Sea Lions ◽  
Minke Whales ◽  
Free And Forced Convection ◽  
Phocid Seals ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Cost

This paper describes a model of the metabolic cost of swimming in pinnipeds and its application to other marine homeotherms. The model takes account of both hydrodynamic and thermal processes. The thermal component incorporates both free and forced convection and takes account of the effect of hair on free convection. Using data from the literature to evaluate all but two of the parameters, we apply the model to metabolic rate data on phocid seals, otariids (sea lions), penguins and minke whales. We show that the model is able to reproduce two unusual features of the data; namely, a very rapid increase in metabolic rate at low velocities and an overall rise in metabolic rate with velocity which is slower than the rise in hydrodynamic drag force. The work shows the metabolic costs of propulsion and thermoregulation in a swimming homeotherm to be interlinked and suggests differing costs of propulsion for different modes of swimming. This is potentially of ecological significance since the swimming speed that minimises the cost of transport for an animal will change with changes in water temperature.

Metabolic energy and muscular activity required for leg swing in running

2005 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 2126-2131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse R. Modica ◽  
Rodger Kram
Keyword(s):  
Stance Phase ◽  
Muscular Activity ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Rectus Femoris ◽  
Swing Phase ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Medial Gastrocnemius ◽  
Running Speed ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
The Cost

The metabolic cost of leg swing in running is highly controversial. We investigated the cost of initiating and propagating leg swing at a moderate running speed and some of the muscular actions involved. We constructed an external swing assist (ESA) device that applied small anterior pulling forces to each foot during the first part of the swing phase. Subjects ran on a treadmill at 3.0 m/s normally and with ESA forces up to 4% body weight. With the greatest ESA force, net metabolic rate was 20.5% less than during normal running. Thus we infer that the metabolic cost of initiating and propagating leg swing comprises ∼20% of the net cost of normal running. Even with the greatest ESA, mean electromyograph (mEMG) of the medial gastrocnemius and soleus muscles during later portions of stance phase did not change significantly compared with normal running, indicating that these muscles are not responsible for the initiation of leg swing. However, with ESA, rectus femoris mEMG during the early portions of swing phase was as much as 74% less than during normal running, confirming that it is responsible for the propagation of leg swing.

scholarly journals Energy cost and muscular activity required for propulsion during walking

2003 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 1766-1772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinger S. Gottschall ◽  
Rodger Kram
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Muscular Activity ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Medial Gastrocnemius ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Horizontal Force ◽  
Normal Walking ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Muscle Actions

We reasoned that with an optimal aiding horizontal force, the reduction in metabolic rate would reflect the cost of generating propulsive forces during normal walking. Furthermore, the reductions in ankle extensor electromyographic (EMG) activity would indicate the propulsive muscle actions. We applied horizontal forces at the waist, ranging from 15% body weight aiding to 15% body weight impeding, while subjects walked at 1.25 m/s. With an aiding horizontal force of 10% body weight, 1) the net metabolic cost of walking decreased to a minimum of 53% of normal walking, 2) the mean EMG of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) during the propulsive phase decreased to 59% of the normal walking magnitude, and yet 3) the mean EMG of the soleus (Sol) did not decrease significantly. Our data indicate that generating horizontal propulsive forces constitutes nearly half of the metabolic cost of normal walking. Additionally, it appears that the MG plays an important role in forward propulsion, whereas the Sol does not.

scholarly journals Metabolic cost of generating horizontal forces during human running

1999 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 1657-1662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Hui Chang ◽  
Rodger Kram
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Vertical Force ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Support Body Weight ◽  
Human Running

Previous studies have suggested that generating vertical force on the ground to support body weight (BWt) is the major determinant of the metabolic cost of running. Because horizontal forces exerted on the ground are often an order of magnitude smaller than vertical forces, some have reasoned that they have negligible cost. Using applied horizontal forces (AHF; negative is impeding, positive is aiding) equal to −6, −3, 0, +3, +6, +9, +12, and +15% of BWt, we estimated the cost of generating horizontal forces while subjects were running at 3.3 m/s. We measured rates of oxygen consumption (V˙o 2) for eight subjects. We then used a force-measuring treadmill to measure ground reaction forces from another eight subjects. With an AHF of −6% BWt,V˙o 2 increased 30% compared with normal running, presumably because of the extra work involved. With an AHF of +15% BWt, the subjects exerted ∼70% less propulsive impulse and exhibited a 33% reduction inV˙o 2. Our data suggest that generating horizontal propulsive forces constitutes more than one-third of the total metabolic cost of normal running.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document