Skeletal muscle adaptations in response to voluntary wheel running in myosin heavy chain null mice

2002 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 313-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. C. Harrison ◽  
M. L. Bell ◽  
D. L. Allen ◽  
W. C. Byrnes ◽  
L. A. Leinwand

10.1152/ japplphysiol.00832.2001.—To examine the effects of gene inactivation on the plasticity of skeletal muscle, mice null for a specific myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform were subjected to a voluntary wheel-running paradigm. Despite reduced running performance compared with nontransgenic C57BL/6 mice (NTG), both MHC IIb and MHC IId/x null animals exhibited increased muscle fiber size and muscle oxidative capacity with wheel running. In the MHC IIb null animals, there was no significant change in the percentage of muscle fibers expressing a particular MHC isoform with voluntary wheel running at any time point. In MHC IId/x null mice, wheel running produced a significant increase in the percentage of fibers expressing MHC IIa and MHC I and a significant decrease in the percentage of fibers expressing MHC IIb. Muscle pathology was not affected by wheel running for either MHC null strain. In summary, despite their phenotypes, MHC null mice do engage in voluntary wheel running. Although this wheel-running activity is lessened compared with NTG, there is evidence of distinct patterns of muscle adaptation in both null strains.

2018 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 923-929
Author(s):  
T. Seward ◽  
B. D. Harfmann ◽  
K. A. Esser ◽  
E. A. Schroder

Voluntary wheel cage assessment of mouse activity is commonly employed in exercise and behavioral research. Currently, no standardization for wheel cages exists resulting in an inability to compare results among data from different laboratories. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the distance run or average speed data differ depending on the use of two commonly used commercially available wheel cage systems. Two different wheel cages with structurally similar but functionally different wheels (electromechanical switch vs. magnetic switch) were compared side-by-side to measure wheel running data differences. Other variables, including enrichment and cage location, were also tested to assess potential impacts on the running wheel data. We found that cages with the electromechanical switch had greater inherent wheel resistance and consistently led to greater running distance per day and higher average running speed. Mice rapidly, within 1–2 days, adapted their running behavior to the type of experimental switch used, suggesting these running differences are more behavioral than due to intrinsic musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, or metabolic limits. The presence of enrichment or location of the cage had no detectable impact on voluntary wheel running. These results demonstrate that mice run differing amounts depending on the type of cage and switch mechanism used and thus investigators need to report wheel cage type/wheel resistance and use caution when interpreting distance/speed run across studies. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The results of this study highlight that mice will run different distances per day and average speed based on the inherent resistance present in the switch mechanism used to record data. Rapid changes in running behavior for the same mouse in the different cages demonstrate that a strong behavioral factor contributes to classic exercise outcomes in mice. Caution needs to be taken when interpreting mouse voluntary wheel running activity to include potential behavioral input and physiological parameters.


Evolution ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 646-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore J. Morgan ◽  
Theodore Garland ◽  
Patrick A. Carter

2017 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 346-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan A. Whitehead ◽  
Nicholas L. Lam ◽  
Melody S. Sun ◽  
Joshua Sanchez ◽  
Shahani Noor ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 440
Author(s):  
Jon-Philippe K. Hyatt ◽  
Lindsay Caprio ◽  
Elisa J. Bienenstock ◽  
Jung A. Kim ◽  
Gary E. McCall

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter van Lunteren ◽  
Marnix A. Groenewold ◽  
Gabor Pozsgai ◽  
Joseph Sarvary

AbstractRunning wheels are frequently used to improve the welfare of captive animals, increase environmental enrichment, and, by doing so, reduce stereotypic behaviors. It is, however, still debated whether or not wheel running itself is a stereotypy. New evidence emerged when Meijer and Robbers (2014, Proc. Royal Soc. B) reported voluntary wheel running of wild animals in the Netherlands. Since stereotypic behaviors are exclusively attributed to captive animals, the occurrence of wheel running in the wild suggests that this behavior is non-stereotypic. Our study explores that same line of investigation, examining whether wild animals will voluntarily use running wheels in a natural area in Paraguay in comparison to the urban and semi-urban settings in the Netherlands. Of the 1857 small mammal visits we recorded, only two occasions showed evidence of what could be considered as wheel running behavior; over hundredfold fewer than previously reported. The potential reasons for the observed difference in wheel running activity, such as different species pool or seasonality, are discussed. The difference, however, is likely to be due to the much lower probability of Neotropical mammals in a remote natural site encountering man-made objects and experiencing urbanization-related behavioral patterns. Additionally, in the light of our findings, we review the definition of wheel running as a stereotypic behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document