Increases in maximal accumulated oxygen deficit after high-intensity interval training are not gender dependent

2002 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 1795-1801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare L. Weber ◽  
Donald A. Schneider

Gender differences in maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD) were examined before and after 4 and 8 wk of high-intensity interval training. Untrained men ( n = 7) and women ( n = 7) cycled at 120% of pretraining peak oxygen uptake (V˙o 2 peak) to exhaustion (MAOD test) pre-, mid-, and posttraining. A posttraining timed test was also completed at the MAOD test power output, but this test was stopped at the time to exhaustion achieved during the pretraining MAOD test. The 14.3 ± 5.2% increase in MAOD observed in men after 4 wk of training was not different from the 14.0 ± 3.0% increase seen in women ( P > 0.05). MAOD increased by a further 6.6 ± 1.9% in men, and this change was not different from the additional 5.1 ± 2.3% increase observed in women after the final 4 wk of training. V˙o 2 peak measured during incremental cycling increased significantly ( P < 0.01) in male but not in female subjects after 8 wk of training. Moreover, the accumulated oxygen (AO2) uptake was higher in men during the posttraining timed test compared with the pretraining MAOD test ( P < 0.01). In contrast, the AO2uptake was unchanged from pre- to posttraining in female subjects. The increase in MAOD with training was not different between men and women, suggesting an enhanced ability to produce ATP anaerobically in both groups. However, the increase inV˙o 2 peak and AO2 uptake obtained in male subjects after training indicates improved oxidative metabolism in men but not in women. We conclude that there are basic gender differences that may predispose men and women to specific metabolic adaptations after a period of intense interval training.

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 721
Author(s):  
Jenna B. Gillen ◽  
Lauren E. Skelly ◽  
Rachel B. Tan ◽  
Brian Martin ◽  
Michael E. Percival ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 803-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Vera ◽  
Raimundo Jiménez ◽  
Beatríz Redondo ◽  
David Cárdenas ◽  
Bryon R McKay ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 1117-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Metcalfe ◽  
Nicolas Tardif ◽  
Dylan Thompson ◽  
Niels B.J. Vollaard

Previously it has been reported that reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training (REHIT; total training time of 3 × 10 min per week) improves maximal aerobic capacity in both sedentary men and women, but improves insulin sensitivity in men only. The aim of the present study was to determine whether there is a true sex difference in response to REHIT, or that these findings can be explained by the large interindividual variability in response inherent to all exercise training. Thirty-five sedentary participants (18 women; mean ± SD age for men and women, respectively: age, 33 ± 9 and 36 ± 9 years; body mass index, 25.1 ± 2.1 and 24.1 ± 3.5 kg·m−2; maximal aerobic capacity, 38.6 ± 8.3 and 31.6 ± 4.6 mL·kg−1·min−1) completed a 6-week REHIT programme consisting of eighteen 10-min unloaded cycling sessions with 1 (first session) or 2 (all other sessions) “all-out” 10–20-s sprints against a resistance of 5% of body mass. Maximal aerobic capacity and oral glucose tolerance test-derived insulin sensitivity were determined before and after training. REHIT was associated with an increase in maximal aerobic capacity (2.54 ± 0.65 vs. 2.78 ± 0.68 L·min−1, main effect of time: p < 0.01), a trend toward reduced plasma insulin area-under-the-curve (AUC; 6.7 ± 4.8 vs. 6.1 ± 4.0 IU·min−1·mL−1, p = 0.096), but no significant change in plasma glucose AUC or the Cederholm index of insulin sensitivity. Substantial interindividual variability in response to REHIT was observed for all variables, but there was no significant effect of sex. In conclusion, REHIT improves the key health marker of aerobic capacity within a minimal total training time-commitment. There is large interindividual variability in responses to REHIT, but sex differences in the responses are not apparent.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-21
Author(s):  
D Fernandes da Silva ◽  
C Segabinazi Peserico ◽  
F Andrade Machado

Introduction: The adherence on endurance running events is increasing exponentially around the World in both previously untrained men and women, thus the incorporation of more appropriate and individualized training approaches are required. It is not known if male and female untrained runners differ in the responses to endurance running training on performancerelated variables. Objective: We aimed to compare performance-related responses to an endurance running training program between untrained men and women. Material and method: Sixteen participants (8 men and 8 women) were paired in the baseline by age, body mass index, and percentage in which time to complete 5 km (t5km) represented from the average of best 50 runners t5km in the greatest regional race for each gender. They completed an 11-week training protocol alternating high-intensity interval training and moderateintensity continuous running, three times per week, in a running track. In the week 1 and 11 of the protocol (baseline and post-training weeks), peak running velocity at treadmill (Vpeak), time limit (tlim) at 100% Vpeak, t5km, and the index rMSSD of heart rate variability (HRV) were measured for cardiac autonomic function. Baseline gender-differences were accounted in the analysis. Results: Male and female significantly improved Vpeak (9.4 ± 1.7% and 7.2 ± 1.7%, respectively) and t5km (-13.0 ± 1.8% for both), and no gender-related differences for the adaptations in these two variables were observed. The tlim at 100% Vpeak and rMSSD did not change across the training period in both groups. Percentage of change for men was “moderately” higher than for women for rMSSD (33.4 ± 40.7% vs. 13.9 ± 21.4%), although statistically non-significant. Conclusion: Men and women responses to training were similar with regards to their running performance and cardiac autonomic function. With regards to practical application, Vpeak and its tlim can be applied in exercise settings for the prescription of moderate- to high-intensity running training with similar benefits regardless of the biological gender


Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 743-P
Author(s):  
ANGELA S. LEE ◽  
KIMBERLEY L. WAY ◽  
NATHAN A. JOHNSON ◽  
STEPHEN M. TWIGG

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 553-P
Author(s):  
GIDON J. BÖNHOF ◽  
ALEXANDER STROM ◽  
MARIA APOSTOLOPOULOU ◽  
DOMINIK PESTA ◽  
MICHAEL RODEN ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document