Young Investigator Perspectives. Teaching and the postdoctoral experience: impact on transition to faculty positions

2014 ◽  
Vol 306 (9) ◽  
pp. G739-G740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Uno ◽  
Kristen L. W. Walton
Keyword(s):  
Career Paths ◽  
Academic Skills ◽  
Formal Training ◽  
Science Careers ◽  
Institutional Research ◽  
Young Investigator ◽  
Postdoctoral Training ◽  
Faculty Positions ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Career Development Award

This editorial continues with our Young Investigator Perspectives series. Drs. Uno and Walton are young investigators who hold faculty positions. They completed a K12 postdoctoral program through the IRACDA (Institutional Research and Career Development Award) program sponsored through the NIGMS institute at NIH. IRACDA programs exist at multiple institutions in the USA to combine postdoctoral training with formal training in academic skills and teaching at partner institutions. I thank Drs. Walton and Uno for a thoughtful perspective on how this experience shaped their career goals to combine teaching and research and inspire undergraduates to science careers. Given the current national dialog on broadening career paths and outcomes for PhD scientists, this is a timely perspective. — P. Kay Lund

Scientometrics as a Limiting Factor of Economic Researches: the Evidence From the USA

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (3) ◽  
pp. 61-77
Author(s):  
Ivan Tenyakov
Keyword(s):  
Career Paths ◽  
The United States ◽  
Economic Research ◽  
Scientometric Indicator ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Economic Journals ◽  
Funding Agencies ◽  
The Usa ◽  
New Ideas ◽  
Modern Economic

The article reveals the deterrent eff ect of the scientometric factor on the development of economic research based on the analysis of publication activity in American economic journals. The author systematizes the main trends in the development of modern economic research. It is shown that publications in the top fi ve journals in the United States infl uence the direction of research in the economy, career paths and the reputation of young researchers, decisions of funding agencies, as well as the ratings of departments and universities. Diff erences in citation rates between the top fi ve journals and other top-level journals are noted. It is shown that the orientation to publications in the top “fi ve” as the main scientometric indicator stimulates careerism and restrains the development of new ideas. Possible ways of overcoming the existing institutional trap are considered.

The American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Foundation Grants Program: A 25-Year Report and a Look Toward the Future

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1616-1621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer C. King ◽  
Theodore S. Lawrence ◽  
Sharon B. Murphy ◽  
Nancy E. Davidson ◽  
Robert J. Mayer
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Research ◽  
Clinical Oncology ◽  
Career Paths ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Young Investigator ◽  
Clinical Cancer Research ◽  
25Th Anniversary ◽  
Start Up ◽  
American Society ◽  
The Impact

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Grants Program began in 1984 with a single $16,000 grant to a young investigator for start-up research funding. In 2009, the Grants Program, now administered by The ASCO Cancer Foundation, awarded more than $6.5 million to 70 different investigators. This article, celebrating the 25th anniversary of this initiative, describes the history and evolution of the Grants Program, attempts to measure the impact of the program on clinical cancer research through an analysis of the career paths of past recipients, and addresses challenges that the program will face as it enters its second 25 years.

scholarly journals Professional Practices, Beliefs, and Incomes of Postdoctoral Trainees: The AACN, NAN, SCN 2020 Practice and ‘Salary Survey’

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry J Sweet ◽  
Kristen M Klipfel ◽  
Nathaniel W Nelson ◽  
Paul J Moberg
Keyword(s):  
Professional Practice ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
American Psychological Association ◽  
Clinical Experiences ◽  
Clinical Neuropsychology ◽  
American Psychological ◽  
Postdoctoral Training ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Salary Survey ◽  
Training Background

Abstract Objective Within a portion of the 2020 professional practice and “salary survey,” to update key information regarding neuropsychology postdoctoral trainees. Methods Postdoctoral trainees were contacted via a variety of membership listings, including the listserv used by the program directors of the Association of Postdoctoral Programs in Clinical Neuropsychology (APPCN). Invitations sent in multiple waves to members of numerous neuropsychological organizations via e-messages and physical postcards included the request that postdoctoral trainees participate. The survey website was opened on January 17, 2020 and closed on April 2, 2020, during which time a total of 178 postdoctoral trainees in the USA and 3 in Canada participated. Results Response rate was estimated to be 56.4%, which adequately represents the target sample. The modal postdoctoral trainee is a woman whose internship was American Psychological Association (APA)-accredited and whose postdoctoral training is in an APPCN program that adheres to Houston Conference training guidelines. Extensive clinical experiences in neuropsychology in the form of externship practica and during internship were reported by the majority of trainees prior to postdoctoral training. There are few differences between APPCN and non-APPCN trainees and reported training experiences. Job satisfaction is high. Salaries appear to have increased substantially in recent years. There is universal interest in pursuing board certification. Support for the empirical foundations justifying assessment of response validity is high. Conclusions Surveys of postdoctoral trainees continue to provide valuable perspectives regarding training background, clinical experiences, practice beliefs, and incomes of individuals who will soon launch their careers in clinical neuropsychology.

Identifying Grant Funding: Mentored Career Development and Transition Awards

Hematology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin T. McDonagh
Keyword(s):  
Career Development ◽  
Clinical Investigation ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Faculty Position ◽  
Postdoctoral Training ◽  
Protected Time ◽  
Salary Support ◽  
Career Development Award

Abstract NIH Career Development Awards are designed to provide outstanding, clinically trained professionals with salary support and protected time to pursue a course of intensive, mentored research experience necessary to achieve full scientific independence. The ideal candidate for a career development award is a health scientist nearing the completion of postdoctoral training or in the early years of a faculty position. The K series of NIH awards provide several options for mentored training that are appropriate for investigators interested in laboratory or clinical investigation in the biologic and medical sciences.

scholarly journals Academic Careers in Pediatric Pharmacy: Part 2—Academic Advancement

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-193
Author(s):  
Allison B. Blackmer ◽  
Anita Siu ◽  
Angela Thornton ◽  
Peter N. Johnson ◽  
Kristen R. Nichols ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Career Paths ◽  
Academic Career ◽  
Junior Faculty ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Academic Careers ◽  
Academic Evaluation ◽  
Academic Advancement ◽  
Faculty Positions ◽  
Key Aspects ◽  
Answer Format

An increasing number of pediatric clinical pharmacists are pursuing careers in academia. Once in an academic position, questions, challenges and benefits related to the processes of academic evaluation and advancement unique to pediatric academia often arise. This is the second article in a 2-part series that attempts to demystify pediatric faculty positions and address gaps in the literature regarding careers in pediatric-focused academic positions. The purpose of this article is to review key aspects pertaining to academic evaluation and the preparation for and process of academic advancement/promotion. A question and answer format is used to discuss common questions related to these processes and tips for success are provided. This article is primarily intended to be used as a helpful guide for junior faculty members as well as mid-level individuals seeking advancement; however, it will also benefit students, trainees, and practicing pharmacists seeking increased knowledge of pediatric academic career paths.

scholarly journals Career Paths and Prospects in Academic Data Science: Report of the Moore-Sloan Data Science Environments Survey

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Stuart Geiger ◽  
Charlotte Cabasse ◽  
Chihoko Y. Cullens ◽  
Laura Norén ◽  
Brittany Fiore-Gartland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Universities ◽  
Career Paths ◽  
Data Science ◽  
Science Careers ◽  
Roles And Responsibilities ◽  
Academic Fields

This report is based on a 2016 survey of members and affiliates of three institutes of data science at major U.S. research universities, focusing on career paths for data scientists within academia. After considering how our respondents define data science, we identify various activities, priorities, resources, and concerns around data science in academia, especially with respect to data science careers. We end by providing recommendations about how universities can better support an emerging set of roles and responsibilities around data and computation within and across academic fields.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document