scholarly journals Shear stress induces Gαq/11 activation independently of G protein-coupled receptor activation in endothelial cells

2017 ◽  
Vol 312 (4) ◽  
pp. C428-C437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel G. dela Paz ◽  
Benoît Melchior ◽  
John A. Frangos
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Fluid Shear Stress ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Proximity Ligation Assay ◽  
Human Coronary Artery ◽  
Gpcr Activation ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Mechanochemical signal transduction occurs when mechanical forces, such as fluid shear stress, are converted into biochemical responses within the cell. The molecular mechanisms by which endothelial cells (ECs) sense/transduce shear stress into biological signals, including the nature of the mechanosensor, are still unclear. G proteins and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been postulated independently to mediate mechanotransduction. In this study, we used in situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) to investigate the role of a specific GPCR/Gαq/11 pair in EC shear stress-induced mechanotransduction. We demonstrated that sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) stimulation causes a rapid dissociation at 0.5 min of Gαq/11 from its receptor S1P3, followed by an increased association within 2 min of GPCR kinase-2 (GRK2) and β-arrestin-1/2 with S1P3 in human coronary artery ECs, which are consistent with GPCR/Gαq/11 activation and receptor desensitization/internalization. The G protein activator AlF4 resulted in increased dissociation of Gαq/11 from S1P3, but no increase in association between S1P3 and either GRK2 or β-arrestin-1/2. The G protein inhibitor guanosine 5′-(β-thio) diphosphate (GDP-β-S) and the S1P3 antagonist VPC23019 both prevented S1P-induced activation. Shear stress also caused the rapid activation within 7 s of S1P3/Gαq/11. There were no increased associations between S1P3 and GRK2 or S1P3 and β-arrestin-1/2 until 5 min. GDP-β-S, but not VPC23019, prevented dissociation of Gαq/11 from S1P3 in response to shear stress. Shear stress did not induce rapid dephosphorylation of β-arrestin-1 or rapid internalization of S1P3, indicating no GPCR activation. These findings suggest that Gαq/11 participates in the sensing/transducing of shear stress independently of GPCR activation in ECs.

scholarly journals An Efficient Strategy to Estimate Thermodynamics and Kinetics of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Activation Using Metadynamics and Maximum Caliber

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derya Meral ◽  
Davide Provasi ◽  
Marta Filizola
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Adaptive Sampling ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Conformational Space ◽  
Kinetic Properties ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptor ◽  
Efficient Strategy ◽  
Gpcr Activation ◽  
Kinetic Rates ◽  
G Protein Coupled

ABSTRACTComputational strategies aimed at unveiling the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) activation require extensive molecular dynamics simulations of the receptor embedded in an explicit lipid-water environment. A possible method for efficiently sampling the conformational space of such a complex system is metadynamics (MetaD) with path collective variables (CV). Here, we applied well-tempered MetaD with path CVs to one of the few GPCRs for which both inactive and fully active experimental structures are available, the μ-opioid receptor (MOR), and assessed the ability of this enhanced sampling method to estimate thermodynamic properties of receptor activation in line with those obtained by more computationally expensive adaptive sampling protocols. While n-body information theory (nBIT) analysis of these simulations confirmed that MetaD can efficiently characterize ligand-induced allosteric communication across the receptor, standard MetaD cannot be used directly to derive kinetic rates because transitions are accelerated by a bias potential. Applying the principle of Maximum Caliber (MaxCal) to the free-energy landscape of morphine-bound MOR reconstructed from MetaD, we obtained Markov State Models (MSMs) that yield kinetic rates of MOR activation in agreement with those obtained by adaptive sampling. Taken together, these results suggest that the MetaD-MaxCal combination creates an efficient strategy for estimating thermodynamic and kinetic properties of GPCR activation at an affordable computational cost.

Molecular mechanisms of GABAB receptor activation: new insights from the mechanism of action of CGP7930, a positive allosteric modulator

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 871-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Binet ◽  
C. Goudet ◽  
C. Brajon ◽  
L. Le Corre ◽  
F. Acher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Gabab Receptor ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
New Strategies

The GABAB (γ-aminobutyric acid-B) receptor is composed of two subunits, GABAB1 and GABAB2. Both subunits share structural homology with other class-III G-protein-coupled receptors. They contain two main domains, a heptahelical domain typical of all G-protein-coupled receptors and a large ECD (extracellular domain). It has not been demonstrated whether the association of these two subunits is always required for function. However, GABAB2 plays a major role in coupling with G-proteins, and GABAB1 has been shown to bind GABA. To date, only ligands interacting with GABAB1-ECD have been identified. In the present study, we explored the mechanism of action of CGP7930, a compound described as a positive allosteric regulator of the GABAB receptor. We have shown that it can weakly activate the wild-type GABAB receptor, but also the GABAB2 expressed alone, thus being the first described agonist of GABAB2. CGP7930 retains its weak agonist activity on a GABAB2 subunit deleted of its ECD. Thus the heptahelical domain of GABAB2 behaves similar to a rhodopsin-like receptor. These results open new strategies for studying the mechanism of activation of GABAB receptor and examine any possible role of GABAB2.

scholarly journals G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Taste Physiology and Pharmacology

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raise Ahmad ◽  
Julie E. Dalziel
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Taste Receptor ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Type I ◽  
Taste Receptors ◽  
Agonist Binding ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest receptor family in mammals and are responsible for the regulation of most physiological functions. Besides mediating the sensory modalities of olfaction and vision, GPCRs also transduce signals for three basic taste qualities of sweet, umami (savory taste), and bitter, as well as the flavor sensation kokumi. Taste GPCRs reside in specialised taste receptor cells (TRCs) within taste buds. Type I taste GPCRs (TAS1R) form heterodimeric complexes that function as sweet (TAS1R2/TAS1R3) or umami (TAS1R1/TAS1R3) taste receptors, whereas Type II are monomeric bitter taste receptors or kokumi/calcium-sensing receptors. Sweet, umami and kokumi receptors share structural similarities in containing multiple agonist binding sites with pronounced selectivity while most bitter receptors contain a single binding site that is broadly tuned to a diverse array of bitter ligands in a non-selective manner. Tastant binding to the receptor activates downstream secondary messenger pathways leading to depolarization and increased intracellular calcium in TRCs, that in turn innervate the gustatory cortex in the brain. Despite recent advances in our understanding of the relationship between agonist binding and the conformational changes required for receptor activation, several major challenges and questions remain in taste GPCR biology that are discussed in the present review. In recent years, intensive integrative approaches combining heterologous expression, mutagenesis and homology modeling have together provided insight regarding agonist binding site locations and molecular mechanisms of orthosteric and allosteric modulation. In addition, studies based on transgenic mice, utilizing either global or conditional knock out strategies have provided insights to taste receptor signal transduction mechanisms and their roles in physiology. However, the need for more functional studies in a physiological context is apparent and would be enhanced by a crystallized structure of taste receptors for a more complete picture of their pharmacological mechanisms.

scholarly journals Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 regulates the directional migration of lymphatic endothelial cells in response to fluid shear stress

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (125) ◽  
pp. 20160823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay N. Surya ◽  
Eleftheria Michalaki ◽  
Eva Y. Huang ◽  
Gerald G. Fuller ◽  
Alexander R. Dunn
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Fluid Shear Stress ◽  
Lymphatic Vessels ◽  
Upstream Migration ◽  
Lymphatic Endothelial Cells ◽  
Sphingosine 1 Phosphate ◽  
G Protein Coupled

The endothelial cells that line blood and lymphatic vessels undergo complex, collective migration and rearrangement processes during embryonic development, and are known to be exquisitely responsive to fluid flow. At present, the molecular mechanisms by which endothelial cells sense fluid flow remain incompletely understood. Here, we report that both the G-protein-coupled receptor sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) and its ligand sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) are required for collective upstream migration of human lymphatic microvascular endothelial cells in an in vitro setting. These findings are consistent with a model in which signalling via S1P and S1PR1 are integral components in the response of lymphatic endothelial cells to the stimulus provided by fluid flow.

Structural and functional aspects of G protein-coupled receptor oligomerization

1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence E Hébert ◽  
Michel Bouvier
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transduction ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Drug Binding ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Surface Receptors ◽  
Receptor Oligomerization ◽  
Gpcr Activation ◽  
Molecular Events ◽  
G Protein Coupled

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the single largest family of cell surface receptors involved in signal transduction. It is estimated that several hundred distinct members of this receptor family in humans direct responses to a wide variety of chemical transmitters, including biogenic amines, amino acids, peptides, lipids, nucleosides, and large polypeptides. These transmembrane receptors are key controllers of such diverse physiological processes as neurotransmission, cellular metabolism, secretion, cellular differentiation, and growth as well as inflammatory and immune responses. GPCRs therefore represent major targets for the development of new drug candidates with potential application in all clinical fields. Many currently used therapeutics act by either activating (agonists) or blocking (antagonists) GPCRs. Studies over the past two decades have provided a wealth of information on the biochemical events underlying cellular signalling by GPCRs. However, our understanding of the molecular interactions between ligands and the receptor protein and, particularly, of the structural correlates of receptor activation or inhibition by agonists and inverse agonists, respectively, is still rudimentary. Most of the work in this area has focused on mapping regions of the receptor responsible for drug binding affinity. Although binding of ligand molecules to specific receptors represents the first event in the action of drugs, the efficacy with which this binding is translated into a physiological response remains the only determinant of therapeutic utility. In the last few years, increasing evidence suggested that receptor oligomerization and in particular dimerization may play an important role in the molecular events leading to GPCR activation. In this paper, we review the biochemical and functional evidence supporting this notion.Key words: G proteins, receptors, dimerization, signal transduction, adrenergic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document