In Vitro Evaluation of Osteoblast-Like Cell Adhesion and Proliferation on Titanium Oxide Film Formed by Sand-Blasted Titanium Anode Treatment Process

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (33) ◽  
pp. 37-45
Author(s):  
Yi Lin ◽  
Pei-Huan Hsieh
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 553-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao HU ◽  
Cheng-lin CHU ◽  
Li-hong YIN ◽  
Yao-pu PU ◽  
Yin-sheng DONG ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 342-343 ◽  
pp. 545-548
Author(s):  
Li Ping Wang ◽  
Bang Cheng Yang ◽  
Ji Yong Chen ◽  
Xing Dong Zhang

The bioactivities of titanium oxide film on titanium surface received from different chemical treatment methods were studied in SBF in vitro and mechanically and histologically investigated in vivo. Three groups of titanium specimens were prepared: untreated titanium(S), acid-alkali treated titanium (H), and acid-alkali and heat-treated titanium(X). The oxide film of X surface resulted in more apatite formation and significantly higher strength of the interface between the samples and bone than those of the other titanium groups. The surface of the acid-alkali treated titanium and that further treated by heat treatment had higher bioactivity and stronger bone-bonding ability.


Author(s):  
An Sha Zhao ◽  
Ping Yang ◽  
Yong Xiang Leng ◽  
Jun Ying Chen ◽  
Jin Wang ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 330-332 ◽  
pp. 729-732
Author(s):  
An Sha Zhao ◽  
Ping Yang ◽  
Yong Xiang Leng ◽  
Jun Ying Chen ◽  
Jin Wang ◽  
...  

Ti-O film is a kind of potential biomaterial may be applied in medical devices. But the mechanism of its good biocompatility is not so clear. This study revealed that when Titanium oxide contact with macrophage and plasma, the activation, adhesion and secretion of inflammatory molecule MCP-1 of macrophage is lower than reference material. Ti-O film also show minor contact activation to plasma. So reducing the host reaction including contact activation and inflammation may be the important reason for the good biocompatibility of Ti-O film.


Materials ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Yu Li ◽  
Hua-Wen Liu ◽  
Tai-Hong Chen ◽  
Chun-Hao Chang ◽  
Yi-Shan Lu ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e266-e269 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Yoon Lee ◽  
Madoka Takai ◽  
Hyun-Min Kim ◽  
Kazuhiko Ishihara

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Turco ◽  
Davide Porrelli ◽  
Eleonora Marsich ◽  
Federica Vecchies ◽  
Teresa Lombardi ◽  
...  

Background: Bone substitutes, either from human (autografts and allografts) or animal (xenografts) sources, suffer from inherent drawbacks including limited availability or potential infectivity to name a few. In the last decade, synthetic biomaterials have emerged as a valid alternative for biomedical applications in the field of orthopedic and maxillofacial surgery. In particular, phosphate-based bone substitution materials have exhibited a high biocompatibility due to their chemical similitude with natural hydroxyapatite. Besides the nature of the biomaterial, its porous and interconnected architecture is essential for a correct osseointegration. This performance could be predicted with an extensive characterization of the biomaterial in vitro. Methods: In this study, we compared the biological, chemical, and structural features of four different commercially available bone substitutes derived from an animal or a synthetic source. To this end, µ-CT and SEM were used to describe the biomaterials structure. Both FTIR and EDS analyses were carried out to provide a chemical characterization. The results obtained by these techniques were correlated with cell adhesion and proliferation of the osteosarcoma MG-63 human cell line cultured in vitro. Results: The findings reported in this paper indicate a significant influence of both the nature and the structure of the biomaterials in cell adhesion and proliferation, which ultimately could affect the clinical performance of the biomaterials. Conclusions: The four commercially available bone substitutes investigated in this work significantly differed in terms of structural features, which ultimately influenced in vitro cell proliferation and may so affect the clinical performance of the biomaterials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document