Hydrofluoric Acid Etching of Silicon Dioxide Sacrificial Layers: II . Modeling

1994 ◽  
Vol 141 (1) ◽  
pp. 270-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Monk ◽  
David S. Soane ◽  
Roger T. Howe
Keyword(s):  
Silicon Dioxide ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Sacrificial Layers

scholarly journals Rolled-Up Nanotech: Illumination-Controlled Hydrofluoric Acid Etching of AlAs Sacrificial Layers

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 1463-1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruxandra M. Costescu ◽  
Christoph Deneke ◽  
Dominic J. Thurmer ◽  
Oliver G. Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Sacrificial Layers

scholarly journals Four chemical methods of porcelain conditioning and their influence over bond strength and surface integrity

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Paulo Fragomeni Stella ◽  
Andrea Becker Oliveira ◽  
Lincoln Issamu Nojima ◽  
Mariana Marquezan
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Integrity ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Surface Conditioning ◽  
Phosphoric Acid Etching

OBJECTIVE: To assess four different chemical surface conditioning methods for ceramic material before bracket bonding, and their impact on shear bond strength and surface integrity at debonding.METHODS: Four experimental groups (n = 13) were set up according to the ceramic conditioning method: G1 = 37% phosphoric acid etching followed by silane application; G2 = 37% liquid phosphoric acid etching, no rinsing, followed by silane application; G3 = 10% hydrofluoric acid etching alone; and G4 = 10% hydrofluoric acid etching followed by silane application. After surface conditioning, metal brackets were bonded to porcelain by means of the Transbond XP system (3M Unitek). Samples were submitted to shear bond strength tests in a universal testing machine and the surfaces were later assessed with a microscope under 8 X magnification. ANOVA/Tukey tests were performed to establish the difference between groups (α= 5%).RESULTS: The highest shear bond strength values were found in groups G3 and G4 (22.01 ± 2.15 MPa and 22.83 ± 3.32 Mpa, respectively), followed by G1 (16.42 ± 3.61 MPa) and G2 (9.29 ± 1.95 MPa). As regards surface evaluation after bracket debonding, the use of liquid phosphoric acid followed by silane application (G2) produced the least damage to porcelain. When hydrofluoric acid and silane were applied, the risk of ceramic fracture increased.CONCLUSIONS: Acceptable levels of bond strength for clinical use were reached by all methods tested; however, liquid phosphoric acid etching followed by silane application (G2) resulted in the least damage to the ceramic surface.

scholarly journals Acid Etching as Surface Treatment Method for Luting of Glass-Ceramic Restorations, part 1: Acids, Application Protocol and Etching Effectiveness

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 568-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilija Barjaktarova-Valjakova ◽  
Anita Grozdanov ◽  
Ljuben Guguvcevski ◽  
Vesna Korunoska-Stevkovska ◽  
Biljana Kapusevska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Glass Ceramic ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Etching Time ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Adhesive Luting ◽  
Ceramic Restorations ◽  
Etching Effect

AIM: The purpose of this review is to represent acids that can be used as surface etchant before adhesive luting of ceramic restorations, placement of orthodontic brackets or repair of chipped porcelain restorations. Chemical reactions, application protocol, and etching effect are presented as well.STUDY SELECTION: Available scientific articles published in PubMed and Scopus literature databases, scientific reports and manufacturers' instructions and product information from internet websites, written in English, using following search terms: “acid etching, ceramic surface treatment, hydrofluoric acid, acidulated phosphate fluoride, ammonium hydrogen bifluoride”, have been reviewed.RESULTS: There are several acids with fluoride ion in their composition that can be used as ceramic surface etchants. The etching effect depends on the acid type and its concentration, etching time, as well as ceramic type. The most effective etching pattern is achieved when using hydrofluoric acid; the numerous micropores and channels of different sizes, honeycomb-like appearance, extruded crystals or scattered irregular ceramic particles, depending on the ceramic type, have been detected on the etched surfaces.CONCLUSION: Acid etching of the bonding surface of glass - ceramic restorations is considered as the most effective treatment method that provides a reliable bond with composite cement. Selective removing of the glassy matrix of silicate ceramics results in a micromorphological three-dimensional porous surface that allows micromechanical interlocking of the luting composite.

Enlargement of diatom frustules pores by hydrofluoric acid etching at room temperature

2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (17) ◽  
pp. 5665-5671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deyuan Zhang ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
Wenqiang Zhang ◽  
Junfeng Pan ◽  
Jun Cai
Keyword(s):  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Acid Etching

scholarly journals Silane Heat Treatment Could Eliminate the Hydrofluoric Acid Etching of Lithium Disilicate Overlays: A Four-Year Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Spartak Spasov Yanakiev ◽  
Mirela Borislavova Marinova-Takorova
Keyword(s):  
Heat Treatment ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Preparation Technique ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Dental Adhesive ◽  
Ceramic Bond

A four-year follow-up of a novel silane heat treatment method for bonding lithium disilicate overlays to tooth structures without hydrofluoric acid etching of the ceramic surface is presented in this case report. Silane heat treatment modifies the silane layer and thus enhances resin ceramic bond strength without hydrofluoric acid etching. The standard ceramic preparation technique prior to bonding silicate ceramics to tooth structure is hydrofluoric acid etching and applying a silane coupling agent, followed by dental adhesive. In this case, the micromechanical roughening of the ceramic surface was performed by air abrasion with Al2O3. Silane heat treatment with constant 120°C airflow, applied for 60 sec, followed by dental adhesive application enhanced the resin-ceramic bond strength. After a four-year follow-up, the restorations’ clinical appearance could be defined as excellent/very good according to the FDI clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. This clinical result supports many in vitro studies regarding the resin-ceramic bond strength and durability obtained through postsilanization heat treatment.

scholarly journals Effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of a resin-based cement to porcelain

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 290-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Paulo Nagayassu ◽  
Luciana Keiko Shintome ◽  
Eduardo Shigueyuki Uemura ◽  
José Eduardo Junho de Araújo
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
And Control

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of a resin-based cement to porcelain. Sixty pairs of 50% aluminous porcelain discs were fabricated. In each pair, one disc measured 6 mm in diameter X 3 mm thickness (A) and the other measured 3 mm in diameter X 3mm thickness (B). The specimens were randomly assigned to 6 groups (n=10 pairs of discs), according to the surface treatment: etching with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 2 or 4min (G1 and G2); 50-µm particle aluminum oxide sandblasting for 5 s (G3); sandblasting followed by etching for 2 or 4min (G4 and G5) and control - no treatment (G6). A silane agent was applied to the treated surface of both discs of each pair. Bistite II DC dual-cure resin cement was applied and the B discs were bonded to their respective A discs. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37ºC for 24 h and were tested in shear strength at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. Means in MPa were: G1: 14.21 ± 4.68; G2: 8.92 ± 3.02; G3: 10.04 ± 2.37; G4: 12.74 ± 5.15; G5: 10.99 ± 3.35; G6: 6.09 ± 1.84. Data were compared by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. Bond strength recorded after 2-min acid etching was significantly higher than 4-min etching (p<0.05) and control (p<0.05), but did not differ significantlyfrom sandblasting alone (p>0.05) or followed by etching for 2 or 4 min (p>0.05). Within the limitations of an in vitro study, it may be concluded that 2-min hydrofluoric acid etching produced a favorable micromechanical retention that enhanced resin cement bond strength to porcelain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document