Review of Interventional Musculoskeletal US Techniques

Radiographics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1684-1685
Author(s):  
Junzi Shi ◽  
Jacob C. Mandell ◽  
Christopher J. Burke ◽  
Ronald S. Adler ◽  
Luis S. Beltran
Keyword(s):  
Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 2692-2698
Author(s):  
Béatrice Soucy ◽  
Dien Hung Luong ◽  
Johan Michaud ◽  
Mathieu Boudier-Revéret ◽  
Stéphane Sobczak

Abstract Background Blockade of the pudendal nerve (PN) using ultrasound (US) guidance has been described at the levels of the ischial spine and Alcock’s canal. However, no study has been conducted to compare anatomical accuracy between different approaches in targeting the PN. Objective To investigate the accuracy of US-guided injection of the PN at the ischial spine and Alcock’s canal levels. This study also compared the accuracy of the infiltrations by three sonographers with different levels of experience. Subjects Eight Thiel-embalmed cadavers (16 hemipelvises). Methods Three physiatrists trained in musculoskeletal US imaging with 12 years, five years, and one year of experience performed the injections. Each injected a 0.1-mL bolus of colored dye in both hemipelvises of each cadaver at the ischial spine and Alcock’s canal levels under US guidance. Each cadaver received three injections per hemipelvis. The accuracy of the injection was determined following hemipelvis dissection by an anatomist. Results The injections were accurate 33 times out of the total 42 attempts, resulting in 78% accuracy. Sixteen out of 21 injections at the ischial spine level were on target (76% accuracy), while the approach at Alcock’s canal level yielded 17 successful injections (81% accuracy). The difference between the approaches was not statistically significant. There was also no significant difference in accuracy between the operators. Conclusions US-guided injection of the PN can be performed accurately at both the ischial spine and Alcock’s canal levels. The difference between the approaches was not statistically significant.


Hand Surgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (03) ◽  
pp. 177-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. K. K. Chan ◽  
R. M. Choa ◽  
D. Chung ◽  
G. Sleat ◽  
R. Warwick ◽  
...  

A retrospective analysis of 227 patients undergoing ultrasonography (US) of the hand/wrist over a three-year period in a district general hospital trust was performed. The usefulness in each case was assessed by two independent reviewers using a qualitative rating system, as (A) Useful: determines management, (B) Useful: contributory, (C) Not useful: not misleading, or (D) Not useful: misleading/potentially harmful. US was useful in 74.8% of cases but misleading/potentially harmful in 13.1%. Misleading rates exceeding 10% in sub-categories including tendinopathy, carpal tunnel syndrome, foreign body and lumps, where US findings may influence the decision to operate or not, are particularly worrying. There were a number of cases where US led to unnecessary operations or suggested operating on the wrong structures, and also cases where US findings wrongly suggested that surgery was unnecessary. Various recommendations aimed to improve the usefulness of US in the Hand and Wrist, including mandatory/formal musculoskeletal US training, are made.


RadioGraphics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junzi Shi ◽  
Jacob C. Mandell ◽  
Christopher J. Burke ◽  
Ronald S. Adler ◽  
Luis S. Beltran
Keyword(s):  

RadioGraphics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lana H. Gimber ◽  
David M. Melville ◽  
Andrea S. Klauser ◽  
Russell S. Witte ◽  
Hina Arif-Tiwari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document