Patient Exposure to Ionizing Radiation in Dental Radiography

Radiology ◽  
1957 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman A. Baily
1979 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gurcan G. Yulek ◽  
Emine Soydan ◽  
Zuhal Ugur

Author(s):  
Luke Cascarini ◽  
Clare Schilling ◽  
Ben Gurney ◽  
Peter Brennan

Guidelines for dental radiology 40 Dental radiography 42 Panoramic radiography 46 Facial and skull radiography 48 Ultrasonography 50 CT and cone beam CT 52 MRI and nuclear imaging 56 Sialography 57 • Although the radiation doses are generally quite low, the same rules apply as with other radiology and are controlled by IRMER (Ionizing Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations (2000))....


1971 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stewart C. Bushong ◽  
Jess C. Galbreath ◽  
Robert Garris ◽  
Earl Merritt

2017 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-339
Author(s):  
Céline Cozic ◽  
Fabien Audran ◽  
Christophe Blanchard ◽  
Christophe David ◽  
Vincent Andre ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-17
Author(s):  
Farah Masood ◽  
Patrick K. Hardman

Abstract Using projection geometry, algebraic formulas, and different beam indicating devices (BIDs), the surface area and volume of tissue exposed for a hypothetical patient was determined. Combinations of 4 BID lengths and shapes were used: 4-inch (10.2 cm.) pointed plastic, 8-inch (20.3 cm.) round plastic, 14-inch (35.6 cm.) round aluminum, and 14-inch (35.6 cm.) rectangular aluminum. As each subject BID was progressively lengthened and collimated, the area and volume of tissue exposed was reduced. The calculated area and volume of exposed tissue for the 14-inch rectangular aluminum open-ended lead-lined BID was 16.6 cm.2 and 327.7 cm.3, respectively. This represented 9% of the area and 8% of the volume of tissue exposed using the 4-inch round pointed plastic BID or a 91% (area) and 92% (volume) reduction in patient exposure. Citation Hardman PK, Masood F. The Effects of BID Length and Shape on the Surface Area and Volume of Tissue Exposed During Dental Radiography. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005 February;(6)1:010-017.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-11
Author(s):  
T Prasanth Dhanapal ◽  
Noble Joy Manayanipuram ◽  
Anuja Anna Cherian

ABSTRACT Endodontists belong to the category of specialist dentists who depend much on dental radiography. Starting from the stage of disease diagnosis, radiography is of much importance in different stages of endodontic therapy, and further on radiographic evaluation is a tool for assessment of endodontic treatment. There is a heavy dependency on dental radiography in some form or other in the speciality of endodontics. As is the case with any ionizing radiation, radiation hazard is a phenomenon that matters a lot to this group of dental professionals. There needs to be a change in our attitude toward radiation safety measures, as many of our professional colleagues are seen much not to be bothered about the cumulative outcomes of radiation hazard, which can create havoc in our professional and personal lives. This article outlines the potential hazards that can happen by routine radiographic utilization in endodontic setup and tries to highlight the measures that need to be taken to mitigate the negative effects. How to cite this article Manayanipuram NJ, Dhanapal P, George L, Charlie KM, Cherian AA. Radiation Safety: Endodontic Perspective. Cons Dent Endod J 2017;2(1):8-11.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document