Software validation and verification - a state of the art report(Panel Discussion)

1978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry A. Straeter ◽  
Carlo Broglio ◽  
Marilyn Fujii ◽  
Leon Stucki ◽  
Sabina Saib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
State Of The Art ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Software Validation ◽  
Validation And Verification

The State of the Art in Real-Time Range Mapping — A Panel Discussion

1990 ◽  
pp. 341-346
Author(s):  
Joseph Wilder ◽  
J.K. Aggarwal ◽  
P. Besl ◽  
T. Kanade ◽  
A. Slotwinski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
The State ◽  
Time Range

Professional Education in Performing Arts Medicine

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 139-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph A Manchester
Keyword(s):  
Professional Education ◽  
Performing Arts ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
The Body ◽  
Performing Arts Medicine ◽  
Performing Artists ◽  
Body Of Knowledge ◽  
Broad Variety ◽  
Huge Challenge

As the body of knowledge that comprises the field of performing arts medicine has grown, it has simultaneously become more important and more difficult for everyone who is concerned about the health of performing artists to stay current with the state of the art. In this regard, performing arts medicine is no different from any other field, but we have a huge challenge as we try to meet the educational needs of the broad variety of professionals who treat, teach, manage and do research on musicians, dancers, and other performing artists. A panel discussion on this subject was part of the 2010 Aspen Symposium on the Healthcare of Performing Artists. ... I will try to summarize where our efforts to educate performing arts medicine professionals stand today and what our options are for the future.

Summary of Panel Discussion “Substrate Issues for Wide Bandgap Semiconductors”

1994 ◽  
Vol 339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max N. Yoder ◽  
Peter K. Bachmann
Keyword(s):  
State Of The Art ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Wide Bandgap ◽  
The State ◽  
Wide Bandgap Semiconductors ◽  
Bandgap Semiconductors

The state-of-the-art in each of the major materials (Diamond, SiC and III-nitrides) was discussed with the advantages, disadvantages, and requirements of each enumerated.

Management of common voice problems: Committee report

2002 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M. Zeitels ◽  
Roy R. Casiano ◽  
Glendon M. Gardner ◽  
Norman D. Hogikyan ◽  
James A. Koufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
State Of The Art ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Position Statement ◽  
Committee Report ◽  
The Past ◽  
Reinke’S Edema ◽  
Science Investigations ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Management Issues

OBJECTIVE: This report provides the reader with a state-of-the-art update on a number of common voice problems that require phonosurgical intervention. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: This multiauthor review is not a position statement of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (AAOHNS) and may reflect institutional preference and/or bias. It arose from a panel discussion at the AAOHNS meeting in 2000. RESULTS: We provide a review of the genesis and management of papillomatosis, dysplastic glottal epithelium, arytenoid granulomas, Reinke's edema, and vocal-fold paralysis. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: In the past decade, there has been a dramatic expansion of knowledge regarding a variety of voice disorders and associated treatment. There has been a convergence of basic science investigations in anatomy, physiology, and pathology with clinical trials of treatment, both surgical and nonsurgical. This information should provide the reader with current insight into critical management issues of the aforementioned disorders.

Panel Discussion Cognitive Engineering: Will They Know Our Name When We Are 40?

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-261
Author(s):  
Cindy Dominguez ◽  
Michael F. Rayo ◽  
Steve Dorton ◽  
Dane A. Morey ◽  
Neelam Naikar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Daily Basis ◽  
Systems Development ◽  
Vantage Point ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Cognitive Engineering ◽  
High Stakes ◽  
The Many

This panel discussion will examine the societal awareness of cognitive engineering today. Cognitive engineering celebrated its 30th anniversary in 2018 at the HFES annual meeting. Still, some would say that cognitive engineering is not as well-known as it should be, and that it is applied in an ad hoc manner in the many high-stakes, high-risk technology modernization efforts where it would be useful. As technology advances proliferate for sharp end of the spear decision makers, we are at risk of catastrophic results if CE remains in the shadows; these results are arguably emerging on a daily basis. Each panelist will describe, from their vantage point, CE’s state of the art today, thoughts on barriers to acceptance and application, and how they envision we act towards a future in 2028 in which cognitive engineers engage systematically in complex systems’ development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document