Robustness of Word and Character N-gram Combinations in Detecting Deceptive and Truthful Opinions

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Al Hafiz Akbar Maulana Siagian ◽  
Masayoshi Aritsugi
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Vitaly Kuznetsov ◽  
Hank Liao ◽  
Mehryar Mohri ◽  
Michael Riley ◽  
Brian Roark

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant P. Strimel ◽  
Ariya Rastrow ◽  
Gautam Tiwari ◽  
Adrien Piérard ◽  
Jon Webb

2019 ◽  
Vol 1193 ◽  
pp. 012032
Author(s):  
D Purwantoro ◽  
H Akbar ◽  
A Hidayati ◽  
Sfenrianto
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Hamed Zargari ◽  
Morteza Zahedi ◽  
Marziea Rahimi

Words are one of the most essential elements of expressing sentiments in context although they are not the only ones. Also, syntactic relationships between words, morphology, punctuation, and linguistic phenomena are influential. Merely considering the concept of words as isolated phenomena causes a lot of mistakes in sentiment analysis systems. So far, a large amount of research has been conducted on generating sentiment dictionaries containing only sentiment words. A number of these dictionaries have addressed the role of combinations of sentiment words, negators, and intensifiers, while almost none of them considered the heterogeneous effect of the occurrence of multiple linguistic phenomena in sentiment compounds. Regarding the weaknesses of the existing sentiment dictionaries, in addressing the heterogeneous effect of the occurrence of multiple intensifiers, this research presents a sentiment dictionary based on the analysis of sentiment compounds including sentiment words, negators, and intensifiers by considering the multiple intensifiers relative to the sentiment word and assigning a location-based coefficient to the intensifier, which increases the covered sentiment phrase in the dictionary, and enhanced efficiency of proposed dictionary-based sentiment analysis methods up to 7% compared to the latest methods.


Author(s):  
Suyanto Suyanto ◽  
Andi Sunyoto ◽  
Rezza Nafi Ismail ◽  
Ema Rachmawati ◽  
Warih Maharani
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 103048
Author(s):  
Nidal Nasser ◽  
Lutful Karim ◽  
Ahmed El Ouadrhiri ◽  
Asmaa Ali ◽  
Nargis Khan
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Oihana Coustie ◽  
Josiane Mothe ◽  
Olivier Teste ◽  
Xavier Baril
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 192-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamza Aldabbas ◽  
Abdullah Bajahzar ◽  
Meshrif Alruily ◽  
Ali Adil Qureshi ◽  
Rana M. Amir Latif ◽  
...  

Abstract To maintain the competitive edge and evaluating the needs of the quality app is in the mobile application market. The user’s feedback on these applications plays an essential role in the mobile application development industry. The rapid growth of web technology gave people an opportunity to interact and express their review, rate and share their feedback about applications. In this paper we have scrapped 506259 of user reviews and applications rate from Google Play Store from 14 different categories. The statistical information was measured in the results using different of common machine learning algorithms such as the Logistic Regression, Random Forest Classifier, and Multinomial Naïve Bayes. Different parameters including the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were used to evaluate Bigram, Trigram, and N-gram, and the statistical result of these algorithms was compared. The analysis of each algorithm, one by one, is performed, and the result has been evaluated. It is concluded that logistic regression is the best algorithm for review analysis of the Google Play Store applications. The results have been checked scientifically, and it is found that the accuracy of the logistic regression algorithm for analyzing different reviews based on three classes, i.e., positive, negative, and neutral.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document