Towards Building an Automated Fact-Checking System

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damian Jimenez
Keyword(s):  
Fact Checking

FACT-CHECKING. FROM TERM AND CONCEPT TO WORD USAGE

2020 ◽  
pp. 72-78
Author(s):  
Maxim S. Kronev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
New Media ◽  
Information And Communication Technologies ◽  
Communication Technologies ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Word Usage ◽  
Information And Communication ◽  
Source Studies ◽  
Fact Checking ◽  
The Russian Language ◽  
Dictionary Definitions

With modern realities in the development of new media and the information and communication technologies (ICT), the skills of checking information for the reliability of sources – fact-checking (or fact-check) is extremely important. The article briefly considers the term fact-checking and gives the definitions and also related concepts. The author’s understanding of approaches to and tools of the fact-checking in the context of the concept “Source Studies 2.0” is offered. English dictionary definitions are analyzed and translated into Russian, an overview of the Russian-language interpretations is given, as well as links to key publications on the topic.

The Chicago Guide to Fact-Checking by Brooke Borel

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-143
Author(s):  
Steven E. Gump
Keyword(s):  
Fact Checking

scholarly journals Uncertainty about the risks associated with microplastics among lay and topic-experienced respondents

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina J. Thiele ◽  
Malcolm D. Hudson
Keyword(s):  
Risk Perception ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Environmental Issue ◽  
Contaminants Of Emerging Concern ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Present Part ◽  
Fact Checking ◽  
Level Of Concern ◽  
People’S Perceptions

AbstractMicroplastics are contaminants of emerging concern but there is currently a lack of evidence on actual risks relating to them, despite claims in media and scientific articles. Research on people’s perceptions on microplastics is in its infancy. Here we present part of a larger survey about people’s perceptions of issues with microplastics. Our analysis of 1681 responses across the globe to an online questionnaire demonstrates a certain level of uncertainty, not only in lay people but also respondents who study/work on the topic of plastics and microplastics as a pollutant. This uncertainty ranges from level of concern about microplastics as an environmental issue to existing evidence for effects. Further, there is some discrepancy between risk perception and state of the research. Some of this may be driven by scientific work with some serious limitations in reporting and methods. This highlights the need for fact-checking of circulating information about microplastics, but also for addressing the discordance between ecotoxicological risk and how risk is framed within the scientific community.

scholarly journals Trust and distrust in online fact-checking services

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petter Bae Brandtzaeg ◽  
Asbjørn Følstad
Keyword(s):  
Fact Checking
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document