Summary Statistics and Material Categorization in the Visual Periphery

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Benjamin Balas ◽  
Catherine Conlin ◽  
Dylan Shipman
Keyword(s):  
Summary Statistics ◽  
Visual Periphery

scholarly journals Inflation versus filling-in: why we feel we see more than we actually do in peripheral vision

2018 ◽  
Vol 373 (1755) ◽  
pp. 20170345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Odegaard ◽  
Min Yu Chang ◽  
Hakwan Lau ◽  
Sing-Hang Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Vision ◽  
Perceptual Content ◽  
False Alarms ◽  
Summary Statistics ◽  
Theme Issue ◽  
Visual Periphery ◽  
Cognitive Access ◽  
Subjective Level ◽  
Perceptual Phenomenon

Do we perceive fine details in the visual periphery? Here, we propose that phenomenology in the visual periphery can be characterized by an inflated sense of perceptual capacity, as observers overestimate the quality of their perceptual inputs. Distinct from the well-known perceptual phenomenon of ‘filling-in’ where perceptual content is generated or completed endogenously, inflation can be characterized by incorrect introspection at the subjective level. The perceptual content itself may be absent or weak (i.e. not necessarily filled-in), and yet such content is mistakenly regarded by the system as rich. Behaviourally, this can be reflected by metacognitive deficits in the degree to which confidence judgements track task accuracy, and decisional biases for observers to think particular items are present, even when they are not. In two experiments using paradigms that exploit unique attributes of peripheral vision (crowding and summary statistics), we provide evidence that both types of deficits are present in peripheral vision, as observers' reports are marked by overconfidence in discrimination judgements and high numbers of false alarms in detection judgements. We discuss potential mechanisms that may be the cause of inflation and propose future experiments to further explore this unique sensory phenomenon. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access’.

scholarly journals Inflation versus filling-in: why we feel we see more than we actually do in peripheral vision

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Odegaard ◽  
Min Yu Chang ◽  
Hakwan Lau ◽  
Sing-Hang Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Vision ◽  
Perceptual Content ◽  
False Alarms ◽  
Summary Statistics ◽  
Confidence Judgments ◽  
Visual Periphery ◽  
Subjective Level ◽  
Perceptual Capacity ◽  
Perceptual Phenomenon

AbstractDo we perceive fine details in the visual periphery? Here, we propose that phenomenology in the visual periphery can be characterized by an inflated sense of perceptual capacity, as observers overestimate the quality of their perceptual inputs. Distinct from the well-known perceptual phenomenon of “filling-in” where perceptual content is generated or completed endogenously, inflation can be characterized by incorrect introspection at the subjective level. The perceptual content itself may be absent or weak (i.e., not necessarily filled-in), and yet such content is mistakenly regarded by the system as rich. Behaviorally, this can be reflected by metacognitive deficits in the degree to which confidence judgments track task accuracy, and decisional biases for observers to think particular items are present, even when they are not. In two experiments using paradigms which exploit unique attributes of peripheral vision (crowding and summary statistics), we provide evidence that both types of deficits are present in peripheral vision, as observers’ reports are marked by overconfidence in discrimination judgments and high numbers of false alarms in detection judgments. We discuss potential mechanisms which may be the cause of inflation and propose future experiments to further explore this unique sensory phenomenon.

Summary Statistics Computed Across Time are Restricted to a 600-msec Window

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mouna Attarha ◽  
Shaun P. Vecera ◽  
Cathleen M. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Summary Statistics

FORMULAS FOR COMBINING SUMMARY STATISTICS

2001 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 1130
Author(s):  
RICHARD A. CHARTER
Keyword(s):  
Summary Statistics

Contrasting Broad- and Clinically- defined Polygenic Indicators of Depression and Depression-related Phenotypes in Adults and Children

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. McGeary ◽  
Chelsie Benca-Bachman ◽  
Victoria Risner ◽  
Christopher G Beevers ◽  
Brandon Gibb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Cognitive Reappraisal ◽  
Twin Studies ◽  
European Ancestry ◽  
Summary Statistics ◽  
Depression Severity ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Polygenic Scores ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
The Uk

Twin studies indicate that 30-40% of the disease liability for depression can be attributed to genetic differences. Here, we assess the explanatory ability of polygenic scores (PGS) based on broad- (PGSBD) and clinical- (PGSMDD) depression summary statistics from the UK Biobank using independent cohorts of adults (N=210; 100% European Ancestry) and children (N=728; 70% European Ancestry) who have been extensively phenotyped for depression and related neurocognitive phenotypes. PGS associations with depression severity and diagnosis were generally modest, and larger in adults than children. Polygenic prediction of depression-related phenotypes was mixed and varied by PGS. Higher PGSBD, in adults, was associated with a higher likelihood of having suicidal ideation, increased brooding and anhedonia, and lower levels of cognitive reappraisal; PGSMDD was positively associated with brooding and negatively related to cognitive reappraisal. Overall, PGS based on both broad and clinical depression phenotypes have modest utility in adult and child samples of depression.

scholarly journals Hidden by bias: how standard psychophysical procedures conceal crucial aspects of peripheral visual appearance

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fazilet Zeynep Yildirim ◽  
Daniel R. Coates ◽  
Bilge Sayim
Keyword(s):  
Visual Perception ◽  
Line Pair ◽  
Crucial Aspect ◽  
Time And Space ◽  
Contextual Modulation ◽  
Visual Appearance ◽  
Single Time ◽  
Visual Periphery ◽  
Contextual Stimuli ◽  
Biased Perception

AbstractThe perception of a target depends on other stimuli surrounding it in time and space. This contextual modulation is ubiquitous in visual perception, and is usually quantified by measuring performance on sets of highly similar stimuli. Implicit or explicit comparisons among the stimuli may, however, inadvertently bias responses and conceal strong variability of target appearance. Here, we investigated the influence of contextual stimuli on the perception of a repeating pattern (a line triplet), presented in the visual periphery. In the neutral condition, the triplet was presented a single time to capture its minimally biased perception. In the similar and dissimilar conditions, it was presented within stimulus sets composed of lines similar to the triplet, and distinct shapes, respectively. The majority of observers reported perceiving a line pair in the neutral and dissimilar conditions, revealing ‘redundancy masking’, the reduction of the perceived number of repeating items. In the similar condition, by contrast, the number of lines was overestimated. Our results show that the similar context did not reveal redundancy masking which was only observed in the neutral and dissimilar context. We suggest that the influence of contextual stimuli has inadvertently concealed this crucial aspect of peripheral appearance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document